Antinaturalists defend the inherent and absolute moral permissibility of abortion, body modification, divorce, contraception, sex reassignment surgery, and other means by which they believe human beings can assume control of their own bodies and their own environments.[5] Antinaturalism stands in contrast to some radical environmentalist movements, which state that nature itself is sacred and should be preserved for its own sake; instead it advances the idea that all human acts are natural and that ecological preservation is important inasmuch as it is necessary for the well-being of sentient beings, not because of some inherently sacred attribute of nature as a whole.[7] Yves Bonnardel argues that naturalist ideology "goes hand in hand with and legitimises speciesist oppression of non-human sentient beings",[8] and that using natural law to justify the reintroduction of predatory animals to control populations of other animals is a form of speciesism.[9]
^Olivier, David (9 April 1999). "Contribution au débat à la maison de l'écologie" [Contribution to the debate at the House of Ecology]. Les Cahiers antispécistes (in French). Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 14 August 2020.
Haber, Stéphane (2006). Critique de l'antinaturalisme. Études sur Foucault, Butler, Habermas ["Critique of Antinaturalism. Studies on Foucault, Butler, Habermas"]. France University Press (1, 2).