This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
The sorting of subcategories in this category is inconsistent. What should be done with it?
Two sorting types are used in here at present:
Alphabetically by sport (e.g. Category:IFAF World Championship is sorted under "A" for "American football", instead of under "I" for "IFAF")
Alphabetically by subcategory base name (e.g. Category:ICC World Twenty20 is sorted under "I" for "ICC" instead of "C" for "Cricket").
Additionally, someone has been adding sortkeys to some subcats (e.g. "+Cue sports" to Category:Cue sports world championships) to create a separate list above the A–Z listing, by sport.
I would (i) leave the special ones at the top, (ii) use the sport name only if it appears within the category name, and otherwise (iii) use the category name rather than the sport name, but ignoring the word "World". – FayenaticLondon23:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But these are not "any 'list of ...' and other pages that should appear after the key article and before the main alphabetical listings"; they're subcategories in an array of subcategories, and numerous other entries in that array are also comparable things (world championships in various sports). That the approach is "sometimes used to bring particular subcategories to the start" of such an array doesn't mean that it should/must be done robotically. No case has actually be made for a need to do so here, and it simply has the effect of singling out a handful of sports for no apparent reason. We don't need a "World cup competitions" category and series of article, because the entire notion is an artificial clumping together of unrelated things by coincidence of similar naming; see WP:SHAREDNAME. Many top competitions in sports do not have "world cup" in their titles, and not everything with "world cup" in the name of it is actually a comparable world championship (several have been failed commercial attempts to create such an event). What we do already have is this Category:World championships which is for top-level competitions in sports, regardless what their name is (e.g. Category:Capcom Cup and Category:ICC World Twenty20, and Category:Kabaddi World Cup are all in there, along with Category:World Chess Championships and various other "world championship"-named stuff. Finally, WP:SMALLCAT militates against the idea of having a bunch of new subcategories under this that don't have much if any potential for growth. We might need a few, e.g. for American/gridiron football, but not for every sport for which we happen to have an article or two.
1) "these are not any list?" Read the cited WP:SORTKEY again. The same technique is sometimes used to bring particular subcategories to the start of the list. So, the using of "+" or "*" sortkey for subcategories sorted by sport (to split them from subcategories by competition now) is appropriate solution. 2) it's a not duplicative topics. In many sports, World Cup (with many stages in a season), and world championship (usually a single event) are different. 95.133.219.133 (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Completely counterfactual. The terms are synonymous. Many sports have world championships that consist of many stages in a season, they just don't all put "cup" in the name. The cup is the trophy, nothing more. Not all trophies are in the shape of a cup. — SMcCandlish☏¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 18:10, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not wrong. The fact that some sports have both a world cup and another world-level tournament (often called a world championship) doesn't mean anything. They're still the same sort of thing. Some sports even have multiple events called world championships (put on by different organizations). The fact remains that the overall nature of the events cannot be distiguished by the name, and varies not only from sport to sport by from event to event within many sports. There is no one-to-one relationship between all world cups, or between all world championships. They are all in the same class, however: world-level professional tournaments for top-ranking players/teams. — SMcCandlish☏¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ< 03:22, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]