View text source at Wikipedia
Submission declined on 21 January 2025 by Aqurs1 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 20 January 2025 by Qcne (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 12 days ago. |
Wildscreen ARK (https://wildscreenark.org/) is a new nature education platform run by the conservation charity
Predecessor(s) | ARKive |
---|---|
Created by | Wildscreen |
URL | https://wildscreenark.org/ |
Launched | February 2024 |
Wildscreen.[1][2]. Launched in February 2024, it aims to connect and engage teenagers with nature and the natural world, utilizing nature video and photo content alongside educational resources[3][4]. The project's initial phase has concentrated on UK wildlife, with plans to expand to global species in subsequent phases[5].
During the first year of the project, a local Youth Film and Photography Competition was launched for young people from the West of England region, in collaboration with the West of England Combined Authority.[6][7]
Wildscreen ARK is the newest version of ARKive.[8], a project created by Christopher Parsons, a founding member of the BBC Natural History Unit and the Wildscreen charity[9]. ARKive was a huge, free, multimedia project documenting the lives of 16,000+ endangered species with over 100,000 videos, photos and authenticated fact files. Used by over a million people around the world each month, it was with regret that ARKive was retired in 2019.[8]