View text source at Wikipedia
Hup | |
---|---|
Hupdë | |
Pronunciation | [húpʔɨ̌d] |
Native to | Brazil |
Ethnicity | Hupd'ëh, Yohup |
Native speakers | 1,700 (2006–2007)[1] |
Naduhup
| |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | Either:jup – Hupyab – Yuhup |
Glottolog | hupy1235 |
ELP | Hupda |
Yuhup[2] | |
The Hup language (also called Hupdë,[3] Hupdá, Hupdé, Hupdá Makú, Jupdá, Makú, Makú-Hupdá, Makú De, Hupda, and Jupde) is one of the four Naduhup languages. It is spoken by the Hupda indigenous Amazonian peoples who live on the border between Colombia and the Brazilian state of Amazonas. There are approximately 1500 speakers of the Hup language. As of 2005, according to the linguist Epps, Hup is not seriously endangered – although the actual number of speakers is few, all Hupda children learn Hup as their first language.
Although their territory was the target of forced transferrals throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, due to their isolation, the Naduhup were among the least affected, since they were protected by the geography of their land. They were also the target of several Catholic missions, though those ultimately failed, as the Naduhup refused to send their children to Catholic education centres.[4]
Contact with the Tucanoan people, also known as the River Indians, who live along the rivers rather than in the forests, has significantly impacted the Naduhup, both culturally and linguistically. Since before European contact, the Naduhup and Tukanoan peoples have engaged in trade, the Naduhup providing labour and hunted meats and the Tucanoan providing agricultural goods. However, the Naduhup are viewed as inferior by the Tucanoan, because of their linguistic and lifestyle differences. Because of this inequality, most Naduhup people can understand and/or speak a Tucanoan, while it is the opposite vice versa – very few, if any Tucanoan people speak Hup.[5]
Relatively few linguistic materials of Hup are available, due to the isolation of the Hupda. Incomplete vocabulary lists and dictionaries were established in 1955 (Giacone) and 1993 (Erickson and Erickson). The most complete descriptive grammar of Hup, A Grammar of Hup, was written by Patience Epps in 2005, was updated in 2008, and outlines Hup phonology, parts of speech, morphology, aspect, tense, modality, among many other features.
Hup is one of four languages in the Naduhup (Makú) family. Though Makú is the term most commonly used to refer to this language family, there is controversy over its usage, since it is also an ethnic slur, translating to “without language”, used by the Tukanoan towards the Naduhup. There has not been a consensus on a replacement term, although Epps proposed “Naduhup”, which combines the names of the four members of the language family - Nadëb, Dâw, Hup, and Yuhup.[6] Of the four members of the language family, Hup is most closely related to Yuhup, followed by Dâw, and then lastly by Nadëb. Hup and Yuhup are nearly mutually intelligible, sharing more than 90% of their basic vocabularies.[6]
There are nineteen contrasting consonants in Hup, with the twentieth /p’/ occurring in the morpheme-initial position in only one word of only some Hup dialects. /j/, /g/, and /ç/ only appear in morpheme-final position, while all other consonants may appear in morpheme initial, medial, and final position. Hup has glottalized consonants of both stops and approximants which can be seen in the chart below.[7] This language also has nasal allophones of the voiced stops.[7]
Bilabial | Denti- alveolar |
Palatal | Velar | Glottal | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plosive | voiceless | p | t | c ⟨ch⟩ | k | ʔ |
voiced | b | d | ɟ ⟨y⟩ | g ⟨k⟩ | ||
glottalized | bˀ (pʼ) | dˀ | ɟˀ ⟨yʼ⟩ | gˀ ⟨kʼ⟩ | ||
Fricative | ç ⟨ch⟩ | h | ||||
Glide | plain | w | j ⟨y⟩ | |||
ejective | wʼ | jʼ ⟨yʼ⟩ |
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 40.
Hup contains a large segmental phonemic inventory, in comparison to the Tukanoan languages that neighbour it geographically. Hup vowels are composed of nine contrasting sounds, with no occurring diphthongs:[8]
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | i | ɨ | u |
Mid | e | ə | o |
Open | æ | a | ɔ |
However, these nine sounds occur only in non-nasal contexts. In nasal morphemes, there are only six distinct vowels:
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | ĩ | ɨ̃ | ũ |
Open | æ̃ | ã | ɔ̃ |
Adapted from Epps (2005)[9]
According to Epps (2005), this indicates that the contrast between mid-vowels and high/low vowels are neutralised in nasal contexts. Nasalisation is morphemic at the syllable level and targets all segments – generally, every syllable is either fully nasal or fully oral.[9]
Hup tonality functions in what is called a word-accent system – there is a word-level tone contrast system; the contrast is restricted to one syllable per word, which is predictable and also exhibits other features of stressed syllables (greater intensity, longer duration, and higher pitch). There are two tones: rising and high, which only appear in nouns and adjectives.
Hup Tones | |||
---|---|---|---|
Rising | /cǎʔ/ [cǎʔ] "clump of roots" | ||
High | /cáʔ/ [cáʔ] "box, nest" |
Nouns and verbs are open class, while adjectives are closed class. Nouns usually appear as arguments of clauses and can appear bare in the clause, while verbs must be inflected in some way. Hup is highly agglutinative and concatenative, with a high rate of synthesis and low rate of phonological fusion of morphemes. Therefore, its morphemes are easily segmented. Roots typically undergo compounding, while formatives are affixed or cliticised.[10]
Subject | Object | Oblique | Possessive | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Downriver Hup dialects | Umari Norte dialect | ||||
1sg | ʔɑ̃h́ | ʔɑ́n | ʔɑ̃h́-ɑ̃t́ | nɨ̌ | nɨ̌h |
2sg | ʔɑ́m | ʔɑ́m-ɑ́n | ʔɑ́m-ɑ́t | ʔɑ́mɨ̌h | ʔɑ́m-nɨ̌h |
3sg | tɨ́h | tɨ́h-ɑ́n | tɨ́h-ɨ́t | tɨnɨ̌h | tɨh-nɨ̌h |
1pl | ʔɨ́n | ʔɨ́n-ɑ́n | ʔɨ́n-ɨ́t | ʔɨnɨ̌h | ʔɨn-nɨ̌h |
2pl | nɨ́ŋ | nɨ́ŋ-ɑ́n | nɨ́ŋ-ɨ́t | nɨŋɨ̌h | nɨŋ-nɨ̌h |
3pl | hɨ́d | hɨ́d-ɑ́n
hɨɾan (TD) |
hɨ́d-ɨ́t
[hɨɾɨt] (TD) |
hɨdnɨ̌h
hɨdɨ̌h [hɨɾɨh] (TD) yɨʔd’ə̌h-nɨ̌h |
hɨd-nɨ̌h |
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 138
Inflection | Demonstratives[11]
(forms and meanings) |
Interrogative | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
uninflected | nu- / nɨ-
Proximal |
n'i-
Distal |
yu- / yɨ-
Intangible |
cã-
'other' |
hɨ̃
Interrogative |
Some nouns of Hup are semi-verbal, namely those which have to do with the passage of time, as well as periods of time, which are “inherently progressive and impermanent.”[12]
“Passage of time” words:
“Periods of time” words:
While these words belong to the noun class (they typically appear as arguments of a clause, and aspectual inflection is not required), they have verb-like qualities, such as occurrence in verbal compounds (which is normally restricted to only verbs):
mɔ̌h
inambu
tɨh
3sg
yæ̃ʔ-wɑd-hi-wɑ́g-ɑ́h
roast-eat-FACT-day-DECL
"He cooked and ate inambu until daybreak."
The enclitic =wəd, derived from the word for “old man” wəhə́d, can be inserted as a respect marker when referring to spiritual beings or other humans. The feminine form of this is =wa.
yunícu=wəd-ǎn
Junilson=RESP-OBJ
ʔãh
1sg
ʔɨ́d-ɨh
speak-DECL
"I spoke to respected Junilson."
This marker is usually used to refer to someone older or of higher status, though it can also be used to indicate someone to be feared, especially when used to refer to dangerous spirits.[13]
yúp
that.ITG
tɨ̃hɨ̃́y=wəd
snake=RESP
nɨ̌h
POSS
tóg-óh!
daughter-DECL
"It was the old/respected Snake’s daughter! (from the Rainbow Spirit and the Snake of the Hollow-Star story)."
The usage of =wəd is also not necessarily respectful. The enclitic can also be affixed to children's names as a sign of affection, comparable to doing the same in English with the titles “Mister” or “Miss”.[14]
Negation is complex in Hup, as three separate strategies can be used to express negation in the language. The most common form of indicating negation is through the negator suffix [-nɨ́h] on verbal or adjectival predicates.[5] Secondly, predicative particle [pã̌] can be used with noun phrases to express negation; similarly, and lastly, the article [ʔǎp] expresses negation against an entity within a clause or the against entire clause itself.[5]
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 726[5]
maŋgǎ
margarita
hɨ́d-ǎn
3PL-OBJ
təw-nɨ́h
scold-NEG
‘Margarita didn't yell at them.’ (Verbal negation in main clauses, Epps (2005), p. 726)
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 738[6]
[tiyɨʔ
man
pǒg]
big
pã̌
NEG:EX
‘There is no big man.’ (Existential negative, Epps (2005), p. 738)
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 742[6]
nutæ̌n-æ̃́y
today-DYNM
ʔɨd
story
ʔǎp
NEG:ID
‘(It's) not a story of today.’ (Identity negative, Epps (2005), p. 742)
Negative responses to questions or refusals to offers in Hup require one of the strategies above; there is no general lexeme/morpheme for 'no' in Hup.[5]
The most frequent and grammatically simplest word order in Hup is Subject (Agent), Object, Verb (SOV). Epps notes that the agent, the actor/argument of a transitive sentence, precedes the object and verb in the syntactic structure of Hup.[6]
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 168[8]
tiyǐʔ
man
cadakǎʔ-ǎn
chicken-OBJ
pɨhɨtyúm
corn
nɔ́ʔ-ɔ̃́y
give-DYNM
‘The man gives corn to the chicken.’ (Nominal subject AOV order, Epps (2005), p. 168)
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 180[5]
nùp
this
hɔ̴̴̌p-ǎn
fish-OBJ
ʔɨn
1PL
wæd-té-h
eat-FUT-DECL
‘We'll eat this fish.’ (Pronominal subject AOV order, Epps (2005), p. 180)
The verb-final construction of clauses in Hup, as seen above, is best characterized as AOV (agent, object, verb).
Hup is nominative-accusative. All subjects are unmarked, while the object and other noun cases are suffixed. Which suffix is used can depend on number, animacy, type of noun, and grammatical function, as shown in the table below. Case marking extends also to the noun phrase and relative clause, and the suffixes attach to the final constituent of the phrase.
Grammatical function | Nouns | Nouns marked for number | Pronouns, demonstratives |
---|---|---|---|
S, A | -ø | -ø | -ø |
O (Direct object) | Human: -ɑ̌n, Animal: -ɑ̌n (optional), Inanimate: -ø | -ɑ̌n (Plural: -n’ɑ̌n) | -ɑ̌n |
O (beneficiary, recipient of ditransitive verbs) | -ɑ̌n | -ɑ̌n (Plural: -n’ɑ̌n) | -ɑ̌n |
Directional oblique | -an | ||
Oblique | -V́t | -V́t | -V́t |
Adapted from Epps (2005), p. 143
tɨh=tæ̃h ʔín-ɑ̌n=mɑh
3sg=child,mother-OBJ=REP
tɨh
3sg
mǽh-ǽh
hit-DECL
"He beat his wife, it’s said." (Direct Object, Epps (2005), p. 144) Unknown glossing abbreviation(s) (help);
nǽm
louse
ʔɑ́m-ɑ̌n
2sg-OBJ
ʔɑ̃h
1sg
key-nɨ̌ŋ
see-COOP
"I’ll look for lice for you." (“You” as a beneficiary, Epps (2005), p. 145)
hɔ̃p=n'ɑn
fish=PL.OBJ
tɨh
3sg
w'ób-óh
place-DECL
"She placed the fish (on the smoking platform)." (Plural object, Epps (2005), p. 153)
yɑ́g-ɑn
hammock-DIR
g'ɑ̃ʔ-ʔɑ́y
suspend-VENT.IMP
hɑ́m
go.IMP
"Go lie in the hammock!" (Directional Oblique, Epps (2005), p. 156)
tiyǐʔ(-ɑ̌n)
man(-OBJ)
(tɨh=)pǒg-ɑ̌n
(3sg=)big-OBJ
túk-úy=mɑh
want-DYNM=REP
"She wants the big man, it’s said." (Suffixes assigned to last word of noun phrase, Epps (2005), p. 155) Unknown glossing abbreviation(s) (help);
Though the object case and directional oblique markers are almost identical phonologically, the only difference being the stress, directional oblique is mainly used to indicate direction, and sometimes, location, in which it coincides with oblique case.
Modification is a semantic operation and syntactic construction by which referents in a language can be modified. There are three types of modifier constructions, each of which are present in Hup: subcategorizing modification, selecting modification, and situating modification.
Subcategorizing modification includes property concept modification. In Hup, property concept modification is constructed using a juxtaposition strategy (zero strategy). As noted by Epps, adjectives (property concepts in a modifying relationship with a referent) follow the nouns they modify, which is in contrast to other types of noun phrases containing a modifier like numerals, demonstratives, and compounded nouns, which precede the noun.[5]
tɨh wɔn-hám-ay-áh té tod pǒg g'et-pó-ow-ít=mah
3SG follow-go-INCH-DECL until hollow.tree big stand-EMPH1-FLR-OBL=REP
‘She went after (the spirit), to where a big hollow tree stood, they say.' (Property concept modification 'big hollow tree', juxtaposition strategy, Epps (2005), p. 326)
Selecting modification includes numeral concept modification. In Hup, numeral modification is constructed using a juxtaposition strategy (zero strategy). Epps notes that numerals can occur both as nominal modifiers and as nominal heads in a noun phrase, and that as modifiers, they typically precede the noun using a juxtaposition strategy.[5]
ʔɨn
1PL
wɨd-ham-bɨ́-ay-áh...
arrive-go-HAB-INCH-DECL
j'ák
buriti
b'ɔk
swamp
kə́d-ə́h,
pass-DECL
koʔap
two
b'ɔ̌k
swamp
‘We arrived as we always do... we passed the buriti-swamps, two swamps’ (Numeral modification 'two swamps', juxtaposition strategy, Epps (2005), p. 314)
In Hup, object modification is constructed using a relational or flag strategy. An adposition marks a modifying relationship between an object concept and referent. According to Epps, expression of possession in Hup--a type of object modification relationship--involves the conjunction of two nouns and the postpositional particle [nɨ̌h], which indicates inalienable possession.[13]
pedú
Pedro
nɨ̌h
POSS
cug'æ̌t
book
‘Pedro's book’ (Object modification 'Pedro's book', alienable possession, relational strategy (flag/adposition), Epps (2005), pp. 225-226)
Situating modification includes deictic modification. In Hup, deictic modification, including the modifying relationship of demonstratives with a referent, is constructed using a juxtaposition strategy (zero strategy). In Hup, deictic modifiers and demonstratives precede the referent noun in a noun phrase.
núp təg ʔán péʔ-éy=hɔ̃
this tooth 1SG.OBJ hurt-DYNM=NONVIS
‘This tooth hurts (lit. 'hurts me')’ (Deictic modification, juxtaposition strategy, Epps (2005), pp. 292)
The plurality marker for nouns is =d'əh and follows an animacy hierarchy: humans, animals, and inanimates. For humans, plural marking is obligatory, though exception is made for a non-specific referent.[15]
tiyǐʔ=d'əh-əwə́c
man=PL-FLR-EXCL2
ʔəg-nɑ́ʔ-ɑ́y
drink-lose.senses-DYNM
"Only the men got drunk!" (Epps (2005), p. 165) Unknown glossing abbreviation(s) (help);
hup
person
də̌b
many
hɨd
3pl
bɨ́ʔ-ɨ́h
work-DECL
"Lots of people worked." (Epps (2005), p. 166)
However, the marker is present for groups of people, which are considered conceptually plural.[16]
nutæ̌n-ɑy
today-INCH
teghɔ̃́=d'əh
Non-Indian=PL
nɨ̌h
POSS
yɑ́g-ɑy
hammock-INCH
nutæ̌n-ǽp
today-DEP
"Nowadays we use the hammocks of the Non-Indians, these days." (Epps (2005), p. 165)
Animals are generally also marked for plurality, but differ in that the marker is not obligatory for groups of animals. As with humans, non-specific referents are also not marked.[17]
núp
this
nutæ̌n
today
yɑʔɑ́m=d'əh
jaguar=PL
hɨd
3pl
wæd-nɨ́h-ɑy-ɑ́h
eat-NEG-INCH-DECL
"So today jaguars don’t eat (people)." (Epps (2005), p. 168)
hɔ̃̌p(*=d'əh)
fish(*=PL)
ʔɑ̃́h
1sg
kək-d'oʔ-nɨ́h
pull-take-NEG
"I didn't catch any fish." (Epps (2005), p. 168)
hɔ̃̌p=d'əh
fish=PL
pɑ̃̌
NEG:EX
"The (specific) fish are not here." (Epps (2005), p. 168)
Inanimate objects are not marked for plurality and rely on numerals to indicate such. Plural inanimate entities are regarded with low importance, due to usually having low conceptual salience, and therefore are also almost always unmarked for number in discourse as well.[18]
dadɑ́nya
orange
tɨ́h-ɑ̌n
3sg-OBJ
ʔɑ̃h nɔ́ʔ-b'ɑy-ɑ́h
give-AGAIN-DECL
"I gave her the oranges (that I’d brought)." (Epps (2005), p. 169) Unknown glossing abbreviation(s) (help);
Numerals in Hup are fairly etymologically unambiguous, which is very rare cross-linguistically. For the cardinal numerals 1-5, the forms likely derive from grammaticalized phrases, referring to the quantity of various salient phenomena for Hup people, with some variation between dialects. These dialectal variants will be labeled further as TD (Tat Deh), B (Barreira), UN (Umari Norte), and NF (Nova Fundação).The quantifier morpheme (-ʔǎp) is already integrated into the numerals '2' and '3' and may be used for the numerals 4+, but is not mandatory. For the cardinal numerals 6-20, there is much more variation, and their forms have not been lexicalized to the extent of numerals 1-5. Furthermore, through lexical borrowing, "virtually all speakers prefer Portuguese numerals for 6+," and for numerals 20+, Portuguese forms are exclusively used.[19]
Numeral | Likely Etymology | |
---|---|---|
1 | ʔayǔp (TD, B)
ʔǽp (UN) |
compare with demonstrative 'yúp' - 'that' (intangible) |
2 | koʔǎp (B)
kaʔǎp (TD, UN) kəwěg-ʔǎp (NF?) |
'eye-quantity' |
3 | mɔ́twaʔǎp (B)
mɔ́ɾaʔǎp (TD) mɔ́t-wɨg-ʔǎp (NF?) bab' pẵ (UN) |
'rubber.tree-seed-quantity'
'sibling NEG:EX' (UN) |
4 | hi-bab'-nǐ (TD, B)
bab'-nǐ (TD, UN) |
'(FACT)-have_sibling/accompany.NMZ' |
5 | ʔayup dapṹh (TD, B)
ʔædapṹh (TD) nap'ṹh (variant B) ʔæp d'apṹh (UN) |
'one hand' |
Abbreviation | Meaning |
---|---|
AGAIN | repetitive aspect / topic-shift |
COOP | cooperative |
DECL | declarative |
DEP | dependent marker, topic marker |
DIR | directional oblique |
DYNM | dynamic |
EXCL | exclusive |
EXCL2 | exclusive (dialectical variant) |
FACT | factitive |
FLR | following marker |
IMP | imperative |
INCH | inchoative |
ITG | intangible |
NEG | negative (verbal) |
NEG:EX | negative existence |
NMZ | nominalizer |
OBJ | object |
PL | plural/collective |
POSS | possessive |
REP | reportive evidential |
RESP | respect marker |
VENT | ventive |
EMPH1 | emphatic (1st person) |
REP | repetitive aspect |
NONVIS | nonvisual experiential |