Talk:Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days

A news item involving Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 October 2019.

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Military This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance). Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Iraq Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Biography / Middle East / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military biography task force Middle Eastern military history task force Post-Cold War task force Death Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are: Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. Remedy instructions and exemptions Enforcement procedures: Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard. Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned. With respect to any reverting restrictions: Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion. Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism. Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: November 15 to 21, 2015 (18th) October 27 to November 2, 2019 (1st)

A UPE sockfarm closely associated with Michael Patrick Mulroy has substantially edited this article and other related articles. This sockfarm main interest was promoting Mulroy (often with reliable sources but undue weight) and his colleages, as well as introducing refspam to articles written by them and other members of Lobo Institute. Some edits may be due, and I'm unfamiliar with the topic. Could someone review the following edits and clean up if necessary?

• Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: 1, 2, 3, 4
• Death of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: 1, 2, 3

Thank you! MarioGom (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi (cropped).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a statement at the end of the first paragraph of this article that reads: "Some journalists have alleged that al-Baghdadi was Jewish and affiliated with Mossad." Four sources are listed for this statement. However, while some of the sources reference the allegation that Al-Baghdadi was a Mossad agent, none of the sources support or even mention the allegation that he was Jewish. In light of this, what should be done with this statement? RoughEndofthePineapple (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC) (RoughEndofthePineapple, 12:52PM, 11/18/2022)[reply]

• Remove. Sourcing is inadequate for such an extraordinary claim. If retained, it should not be in the lead. (Summoned by bot) Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 19:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove from the lead unless higher-quality sources are provided. Definitely remove the statement that he was Jewish (which none of the other sources say); the statement that he worked for the Mossad, while technically reported in the cited sources, is treated as a conspiracy theory in the higher-quality ones, while I don't think the Daily Trust or the Janta Ka Reporter are high-quality enough to treat it as leadworthy. It might be worth covering as a claim made by Iran in the body, but it is probably not leadworthy and should be more clearly attributed; we should also directly cover the sources calling it a conspiracy theory or saying it is false. --Aquillion (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove [article] from Haaretz mentions the claim which has been perpetuated by senior members of the Iranian government, whose views in recent time have widely been considered to be fringe and unsubstantiated. I might be in favour of adding a line somewhere in the article (but not in the introductory paragraph) stating "members of the Iranian government have alleged that al-Baghdadi was Jewish and a member of Mossad, however, such claims have remained unsubstantiated". I should also note that if you look at User:Atiqul Islam Sakib recent contributions, they have been involved in several edit wars where they have tried to push unsourced conspiracy theory narratives. SBA19 (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove – The sentence: "Some journalists have alleged that al-Baghdadi was Jewish and affiliated with Mossad.[16][17][18][19]" should be removed from the lead, since it gives undue weight to a false rumour. Also, for clarity in regards to the sources:

Source 16 is a reprint of an article from Infowars which is an unreliable source. The article only states that he is a Mossad agent and does not state that he is Jewish. This unreliable source should be removed.

Source 17 is an article by Haaretz which only states that Iran claims that the Islamic State group is a creation of Mossad. The article does not mention anything about al-Baghadadi being Jewish.

Source 18 is an article which claims based on a UN report that Israel is supporting Islamic State. If you go to the UN document, it does not support this claim. This unreliable source should be removed.

Source 19 is an article by Politifact which disproves the rumor that Islamic State was created by Israel/Mossad. This source can be kept to disprove the rumor that al-Baghdadi is a Mossad agent.

If the sentence is added to the body of the article, it needs to be made clear, as stated in the Politfact article, that this is a false rumour, which countries like Iran, have been promoting for propaganda purposes with no evidence. --Guest2625 (talk) 09:43, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Remove Unless there's some WP:RS to support this claim it should be removed. Nemov (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Remove Not only is this an unverified claim, it's a refuted conspiracy theory (p.226) pushed by Iran and websites like Veterans Today (pg.86-87). Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 03:02, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I am reading the article history correctly, this was removed once and then re-added; the edit summary says that the edit restoring it was adding sources, but it did not. Leaping straight to an RFC with no discussion seems premature - obviously it should be left out without sources, but we should try and get a sense of what's up first. @Atiqul Islam Sakib:, who restored the text - did you intend to restore it without adding sources? Do you have any sources? --Aquillion (talk) 20:14, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did discuss this issue with the user who put in this information-but on their account talk page, so apologies if that was the wrong forum. While I admit I did not start off in the most diplomatic way and assumed anti-semitism, I tried to re-engage in a more constructive way afterward. The latest reply I sent him was to ask him to remove the part of the statement at issue that states that 'sources state that Abu-Bakr Al-Baghdadi was Jewish', because none of the sources state that or even reference that idea. He has not responded since.

I suppose it would be good to let him present his side, but if there is no explanation forthcoming, is there a way to ensure that whatever is done with the statement at issue, (remaining as is, moved down the page, put in as a footnote, language edited, or removed) it isn't subject to constant future changes/ edit wars? RoughEndofthePineapple (talk) 05:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm going to go ahead and remove the RfC template from this discussion: the content at-issue appears to have already been removed, there's a strong consensus against it so far in this discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:51, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]