View text source at Wikipedia
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: LT910001 (talk · contribs) 21:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
I will take this review. I am sorry for how long you've had to wait. I've reviewed 60+ other articles, including some long and complex ones, and will review this article against the 6 good article criteria. I'll read over this article and have a think, then start the review in 2-3 days. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Whilst I commend the editors who have put some effort into improving this article, it is not suitable for GA status. My concerns include:
I have rated this article "Start class" and encourage the nominator to edit it further, but it needs a fair amount of work before it is suitable for "good article" status. Yours, --Tom (LT) (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2016 (UTC)