Talk:Enid Mumford

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Systems: Systems psychology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Systems psychology. This article has been marked as needing an infobox. Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. It is requested that an image(s) be included in this article to improve its quality.

I observe that much of the text of this article is identical to the biography on Mumford's own website. This is probably acceptable - it appears to be authoritative without being overly egotistical. In any case, I hope her website will be maintained after her death.--RichardVeryard 08:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Various sources describe Mumford as a companion of the Institute of Personnel Development. I assume this is a reference to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, which has been the name of this organization since 2000, and I have changed the article accordingly.--RichardVeryard 08:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why this has just now been tagged with living person biography when she is (sadly) no longer with us. --RichardVeryard 00:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't there be any reference to the ETHICS method she developed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.170.224.236 (talk) 13:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC). Yes. I think that there should be. I came here looking for some details about ETHICS details are here.[reply]

online book- http://www.enid.u-net.com/C1book1.htm

I too hope her website will be maintained after her death. I guess that there will be a google cashe of it though even if it gets taken down, or the domain doesn't get renewed.--Alexhough (talk) 15:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I can't add my contribution since I can't edit the wiki page. Up952310 (talk) 00:13, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I have further information I would like to contribute to this wikipedia page regarding one of Enid Mumfords book 'Designing Secretaries: Participative Design of a Word Processing System'. UP900750 (talk) 06:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Mumford, E. (2006). Researching people problems: Some advice to a student. Inf. Syst. J., 16, 383–389. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00223.x

Up934633 (talk) 11:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]