Talk:Fruit Ninja: Puss in Boots

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Reptile (Mortal Kombat) (1 participant)
Pet Simulator (7 participants)
Dvorak (game) (1 participant)
Bad Toys 3D (1 participant)
Purple Lamp (0 participants)
Clue (information) (6 participants; relisted)
B1t (2 participants; relisted)
Satandisk (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Merger proposed

This was a shortly avaliable app, and it was poorly notable. This should probably be merged into Fruit Ninja as it is poorly notable, it has issues, and it was a short-lived app. MrCoolGuy159 (talk) 23:59, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per WP:NTEMP, notability isn't temporary. I have found lots of reliable sources that discuss the game: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11], [12]. Passes WP:GNG easily. Will try to improve the article soon. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I think you’re confusing “poor quality” with “notability”. It appears to be a garbage game. But that doesn’t change the fact that reliable sources covered it in significant detail. Sergecross73 msg me 19:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The overall page quality is not a factor for deletion. As from what Jovanmilic posted, it's clearly been covered extensively by reliable sources, so I fail to see how it isn't notable (in fact, you seem to confuse "notability" with "quality", per Sergecross' response). Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 21:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]