Talk:Music of Red Dead Redemption 2

	Music of Red Dead Redemption 2 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Music of Red Dead Redemption 2 is part of the Red Dead Redemption 2 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result February 29, 2020 Good article nominee Listed June 4, 2020 Good topic candidate Promoted
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 10, 2019. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that players are only likely to hear around one-third of all the music created for Red Dead Redemption 2 in a standard playthrough?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Reptile (Mortal Kombat) (1 participant) Pet Simulator (7 participants) Dvorak (game) (1 participant) Bad Toys 3D (1 participant) Purple Lamp (0 participants) Clue (information) (6 participants; relisted) B1t (2 participants; relisted) Satandisk (5 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Evil Empire (company) (discussion) Console game (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates Kim Kitsuragi (nom) Ethan Winters (nom) Fallout: New Vegas (nom) The Legend of Dragoon (nom) Rockstar North (nom) Good article nominations Project Zero 2: Wii Edition (start) Pokémon Stadium (nom) Tom Clancy's The Division 2 (start) Berzerk (video game) (start) Cry of Fear (nom) The King of Fighters '97 (nom) F1 24 (start) Façade (video game) (start) Prey (2017 video game) (start) Transfer Pak (start) Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (start) Lost Sphear (start) Pocket Monsters Stadium (start) Oatchi (start) Necromorph (start) Pokémon Fossil Museum (nom) Luis Sera (start) Tala (Darkwatch) (start) Ayane (Dead or Alive) (start) Hanna Barbera's Turbo Toons (start) Roblox (start) Tetris (start) DYK nominations David Szymanski Backyard Football (video game) Reviews and reassessments Appy Awards List of major Super Smash Bros. Ultimate tournaments Dynasty Warriors 4 (nom) Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga (nom) The Operative: No One Lives Forever (nom) Chrono Trigger (nom) Crash Bandicoot (character) (nom) Articles that need... assessment (3) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (5) infoboxes (8) cover art (268) screenshots (9,084) photos (70) translation from japan (185) creation merging

This review is transcluded from Talk:Music of Red Dead Redemption 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CR4ZE (talk · contribs) 15:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm taking on the main article, it makes sense that I'd continue with a review of this sub-article as well. I'll get comments to you on this after I'm finished there. CR4ZE (t • c) 15:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, CR4ZE! Are you still able to take this one on? – Rhain ☔ 23:33, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This might be time to get a second opinion since the original nominator has not edited since December. GamerPro64 17:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take over from here on out. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:14, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Here are my thoughts.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I think it looks good to me. It's a pass. Good work. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 06:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]