GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Dcdiehardfan (talk · contribs) 01:31, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: ClaudineChionh (talk · contribs) 02:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
I aim to start this review in the next 12–36 hours. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This felt like an easy pass. Well done! ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:19, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- No likely issues raised by Copyvio Detector.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Episode poster (non-free) is appropriately tagged.
- Photo of Hanoi – CC-BY-2.0.
- Video of Zemo dancing – link to official Marvel YouTube version.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Photo of Hanoi – I wonder if it would be better to display this in the Design section as that's where the Hanoi train track is mentioned (instead of in Writing), but not a deal-breaker.
- Video of Zemo dancing – good illustration of new aspects of the character introduced in this episode (though I wish Marvel also released the 30-second version on YouTube and not that other website).
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Source spot check
[edit]Six random numbers: 29, 57, 21, 42, 53, 43.
- [29]
[Dillon] said the alley set was the "biggest sleight of hand that we pulled on the whole show". He enjoyed the experience, but said it was the most technically difficult part of shooting the series.
Verified - [57] Entertainment Weekly reviews Verified
- [21]
Filming for the series officially began in November 2019
Verified - [42] VFX team Verified
- [53] Blu-ray release Verified
- [43] Verified
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.