Talk:The Post-American World

	The Post-American World has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 16, 2009 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 3, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the book The Post-American World was criticized for not delivering on what the title promised: an examination of a world not dominated by America?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This book has recently been previewed in the New York Times. Any cites? Bearian (talk) 20:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While there is mention of the preface to the paperback edition, there is no discussion of it. In fact, the preface implicitly though not explicitly contradicts a lot of the main content. This is because the preface was written after the financial events of 2008 and beyond, which were not predicted in the main text.Kdammers (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I wrote most of the article, but I have only read the hardcover version of this book. What does the new preface say? maclean (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article needs a grammar check, especially in the part that disucsses Nepal.Kdammers (talk) 00:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I have consolidated the Nepal portion. maclean (talk) 21:18, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maclean and I are discussing our recent edits to this article on my talk page. Feel free to join in; we can always move the discussion here if appropriate. Failng that, I'll leave a permalink on this page. Cheers, CWC 09:34, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the removal of this review [1], I propose we use Hari's review as published in The Progressive. A third opinion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 141#Johann Hari indicates the review can be used. Therefore, I propose adding the following text: In a review published in The Progressive, Johann Hari called Zakaria's assertions Thatcherist referring to the belief that there is no alternative to globalization and free market capitalism.^[1] Hari cited examples where policies such as what Zakaria advocated led to disasters, like the 1999 collapse of Argentinian economy, and financial deregulation resulting in the financial crisis of 2007–2010, which had begun just after the book was published. —maclean (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Post-American World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090219084734/http://www.fareedzakaria.com:80/interviews/playboy_interview.pdf to http://www.fareedzakaria.com/interviews/playboy_interview.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]