Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom

Trisha Stafford-Odom has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 31, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

College basketball

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College basketballWikipedia:WikiProject College basketballTemplate:WikiProject College basketballcollege basketball
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Basketball: Women's

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball
	This article is supported by the Women's basketball task force.

Women's sport: Basketball / WNBA

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's basketball task force.
	This article is supported by the WNBA task force.

A fact from Trisha Stafford-Odom appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that basketball coach Trisha Stafford-Odom left the Eagles to join the Eagles?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Trisha Stafford-Odom.

Wikipedia

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that basketball coach Trisha Stafford-Odom left the Eagles to join the Eagles?

Sources: [1][2]

ALT1: ... that women's basketball player Trisha Stafford-Odom was once compared to Charles Barkley for her play as a "scorer, rebounder and part-time enforcer"?

Source: [3]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/John Moore (basketball)

Created by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 5 past nominations.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:26, 26 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

WikiOriginal-9, the article is detailed, well-written, and well-sourced. The use of eagles as a pun in the hook makes it interesting, and both sources support the claim. Earwig shows that it is copyvio free. QPQ done. Good to go! —Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 15:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 01:38, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: WikiOriginal-9 (talk · contribs) 12:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 21:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will complete an initial review within the next few days. -Riley1012 (talk) 21:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written
No notes on the prose, good job.

Add "and coach" to the end of the first sentence.
- Done. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2. Verifiable
Passes Earwig's. Spot check- 5, 6, 10, 12, 14, 17, 20, 24, 30, 33, 41, and 46 are all fine.

Could you add |via=[[Newspapers.com]] to the references retrieved from Newspapers.com?
- Done. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Are the LinkedIn citations necessary given both times it's used there is an independent source along with it?
- Nice catch. Removed. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3. Broad

I'm assuming there's nothing else to add since being released from NC Central?
- No new developmemts yet. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
The article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
No images to evaluate, unfortunately.

@WikiOriginal-9: Okay, that's it. This is a well-written article. Let me know when you've gone through the review. -Riley1012 (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012: Addressed everything. Thanks for the review. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response, everything looks good to go now! -Riley1012 (talk) 01:37, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.