Template talk:Asteroid-stub

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting

• tr:Şablon:Asteroit-taslak --Fcn (talk) 09:39, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add an interwiki link to sv:Mall:Asteroidstub; i.e., expand

}}<noinclude>
[[Category:Astronomy stub templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
</noinclude>

to

}}<noinclude>
[[Category:Astronomy stub templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]

[[sv:Mall:Asteroidstub]]
</noinclude>

JoergenB (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I note that there seems to be a similar request on top of this page, for adding an iw link tr:Şablon:Asteroit-taslak. This could be done at the same time (or the page could be unlocked; vide infra). JoergenB (talk)

Done for both ILLs: sv:Mall:Asteroidstub tr:Şablon:Asteroit-taslak --Redrose64 (talk) 22:21, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! JoergenB (talk) 14:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This template was protected here, with the motivation Heavily used template. (There was as far as I can see no preceeding edit warring or other problematic edit pattern.) I don't know how "heavily used" the template was when it was protected in 2008, but now there are less than 150 links to it.

My conclusion is, that there does not seem to be a better reason for protecting this template than other astronomy stub templates. JoergenB (talk) 17:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You need to file a request at WP:RFPP. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:22, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]