This template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
in the ancestry sction, why is Enlish shown as North Europe and Scotland is shown as West? I would have called them either both North or both West — Preceding unsigned comment added by DC94 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
To move Hong Kong Canadians and Taiwanese Canadians from East Asia to Southeast Asia, and Tibetan Canadians from East Asia to Central Asia, owing to their geographical locations, political NPOV policies of Wikipedia – and, the fact that these Canadians or their parents or grandparents may or may not be Chinese by ethnicity or ancestry, may have left the locations of their ancestral origins before they became Chinese, or may or may not identify themselves as or associate themselves with Chinese. For some Hong Kong-born Canadians in particular, their background my be related to Indochina, the Indian subcontinent, or the Dutch East Indies, and so on. 219.76.24.202 (talk) 12:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not done. The header is "East and Southeast Asia", so Hong Kong and Taiwan are in their proper category. Tibet is modernly considered East Asia as well. But really, all these groups are lumped together as "ethnic Chinese", Han or minority. I don't really see a problem with NPOV at all. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 01:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
::::Some of these people aren't even (ethnic) Chinese minority, e.g., Punjabs, Khmers, and Macanese.[6][7] (And on the "minority" label: not everyone who belongs to any of those 56 or 55 designated groups are Chinese by default. Those groups include Kazakhs, Koreans, Mongols, Russians, Tajiks, Tatars, Uzbeks, Was, Vietnamese, to name a few.)219.76.24.202 (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2021 (UTC) IP hopping sock. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/14.0.180.170/Archive.[reply]