This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix
Put new discussions at the bottom of the page. A better question would be "Why does Emokid have to be annoying and keep changing it back?" This is a more streamlined template; the characters, plus Heartless and Nobodies, can be accessed from the character list article. '(Feeling chatty? ) (Edits!)04:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it keeps being removed because it's already a part of the Kingdom Hearts (series) article. It would basically amount to having two links in the template that go to the same page. Though I do see a reason to list it because it was a separate game. Let's see what others think. (Guyinblack25talk21:48, 26 September 2007 (UTC))[reply]
I think the name should be spelt Coded in the template since it is a word alone (it's not written Kingdom Hearts coded here but Coded/coded). Notice how the words Characters, Music, Universe are also spelt with a capital letter. Kariteh (talk) 08:38, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because those aren't parts of titles, they're just parts of article names. "coded" is part of the game's name and spelt with a lowercase there, I see no reason as to why the fact that "Characters" has a capital C should have any bearing on "coded" - rst20xx (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
True, but the "coded" is still part of the trademark. Though the article name uses a lowercase, the prose uses "Coded" when it is used by itself and starting a new sentence. The MoS (trademarks) guideline was the rationale for that too. I'd say this is a similar example and should follow the same convention for consistency's sake. That's how I interpret the guideline anyway, but we can get some outside feedback for something more definitive. (Guyinblack25talk20:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC))[reply]
I know that this format is similar to that of the Final Fantasy series template, but it just seems more appropriate. Also, I feel that if a game features a secret ending that promotes another game and/or is featured within that video, then that game should be a "main game" while the other games bridge gaps between them, regardless of when they were released. Immblueversion (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm... Interesting format. But I think right now it's presumptuous to call Birth by Sleep a main game, and as an extension, any of them a main game. The previous format was not perfect, but I think it was more objective in listing the first three games in a chronological release order, and the unreleased games in an alphabetical order. I'm in favor of reverting to the previous format for now. Maybe new information will come to light that will warrant a change after the games are released. (Guyinblack25talk22:04, 2 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Okay, we can rework the format. It's just that KH, KHII, and BBS seem to be much more major compared to the other games not in terms of the importance in plot, but rather the scale of the games themselves. Immblueversion (talk) 22:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think that was more a product of the systems they're developed for. I'd say KH Re:CoM was of similar scale to KH and KHII, but they first were limited by the GBA's hardware for the original CoM. Plus, with the games still unreleased, we can't really say what the scale of the three will be like. (Guyinblack25talk22:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]
Re:Chain of Memories, Keyblade, and Worlds do not have separate articles. Templates are meant to navigate articles in specific topic. Redirects and sub-sections should be avoided.
The media list should be in the "Others" section.
Maybe link the top title like this (Kingdom Hearts series) instead to reduce confusion between the first game and the series.
358/2 Days, Chain of Memories, Birth by Sleep, and coded should not be in the "Other games" list. They are part of the main series. --Sdoo493 (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. All of the games have a clear place in the chronology, and all of them are essential to understanding the entire story. There's no point to dividing them up like this; they should be in one list sorted chronologically either by release date or by place in the story. ~e.o.t.d~ (蜻蛉の目•話す•貢献) 23:32, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]