Hmmm, there's nothing interesting here; except my dedication of linking real religions and denying funny mythologies.
Believers are supposed to be following their holy books; however, I see that most don't. I continually point out to the verses that they ignore, or don't understand, to prove that these religions really are connected--forming one message from the Creator. There's absolutely NO reason for the hate, as it's all human-made cultural misunderstanding.
Anyways, my research isn't strictly based on belief, as I always prove my points with reliable sources.
I list these not as a boast about where I've been, but to suggest that I have fairly broad experience of the world and that this helps with my editing.
Bare URLs used as article references (citations) are subject to link rot. The usability of a bare URL depends entirely on the target WWW site retaining its chosen site structure, which it is under no obligation to do.
A full citation, in contrast, gives the author, title, publisher, publication, and date of the work. So, if the web site address changes, the additional information may assist in finding the new location. If the source is no longer available on the internet, then the additional information may assist in tracking down the source if it is in printed form, microfiche archives, article/paper collections, published as books, and the like. Fully dressed citations may be filled in manually, or there are semi-automated tools online, such as: reFILL (can be installed as a Toolbox link or as a Bookmarklet), or Yadkard. For Google Books, try the: Wikipedia Citation Tool for Google Books.