Hello and welcome to my user page.
-
(In a nature-documentary style:) "And this is where we will often find the "Jenhawk" Wikipedian, known for monstrously large topics... with the small bird as the favored Swedish collaborator Gråbergs Gråa Sång" -
Capybara: Where has my favorite Swedish collaborator disappeared to? I can't see him. I need to ask him an important question: now that I am the "cattle tyrant", can I just order everyone to agree with me? -
Gråbergs Gråa Sång offers this humble bird to be included on my mock coat of arms (along with my crocodile) and my very real motto "Illegitimi non carborundum" (don't let the bastards grind you down).
_on_Capybara.jpg)
.jpg)
"Mainstream" scholarship is defined by critical method and what is verifiable historically. It's a method. It is not a point-of-view, or a philosophy, or a religious belief. It does not require belief other than a belief in the method itself.
- My Essay On Neutrality
I fully support the very high priority Wikipedia and my fellow editors place on neutrality. It's really quite an amazing thing when you stop and think about it - millions of people setting aside personal beliefs and opinions to uphold a standard that goes against natural tendencies.
For better — and for worse — we are all influenced by our culture, race, nationality, gender, and ethics. We are all historically situated. The good news is, that does not have to prevent neutrality and objectivity.
Take Olympic judges for example. They must overcome their national biases to be decent judges, and part of that is the presence of the other judges from whom they want the same thing. As historian Thomas L. Haskell explains, "even a polemicist, deeply and fixedly committed" can cultivate neutrality insofar as they are willing to enter into even a little empathy and treat others as they would like to be treated.
This is not naive; it is fully practical and doable.
- I. Be wary of overconfidence.
- "The more certain you are about an opinion, the more likely you are to employ confirmation bias... Sometimes the best time to expose yourself to opposing views is when you are most certain you already have all the information you need". [1]
- "When you find evidence that contradicts your opinion, don’t assume you must either reject the evidence or abandon your opinion. Instead, consider modifying aspects of your original theory."
- II. Confront all data
- Test Yourself by looking for contrary evidence.
- Leave behind the way we might prefer things to be and deal with the way things are.
- Pure detachment is not possible, but, as economist Robert Solow says, “Just because a perfectly aseptic environment is impossible doesn’t mean one should conduct surgery in a sewer.”
- III. Use Wikipedia's just and reasonable Method.
- Vet your sources.
- Learn how to recognize if an author neglects facts, fails to acknowledge opposing arguments, or dismisses contradictory studies. Their bias doesn't excuse yours.
- IV. Use the same standard for all
- Seek Consensus; Submit your work to the unsympathetic. Listen. Peer reviews are worth their weight in gold.
- V. No Personal attacks
- Don't make them, don't let others get away with them. Contact an admin when needed. This is our online home, and we must all maintain it.
- However, we must also be willing to listen to criticism and carefully consider it. We don't have to automatically agree - or disagree - but we should at least check it out.
- Admitting error doesn't actually cost anything. All of us are more than any one mistake.
- VI. Enjoy being here. This is a wonderful opportunity. A thousand blessings on Jimmy Wales!
- Cheers to all my fellow Wikipedian's! and Happy editing! Jenhawk777 (talk) 21:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
And here's a couple of FUNNY You-tube videos for those with a sense of humor:
[4] 
and [5]
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
.jpg){kind=small}
Contributions:
[edit]Augustine of Hippo (section on Coercion)
The Bible and humor My first DYK? article!
Bible and violence - the very first article I ever worked on here on Wikipedia - needs work now
Biblical criticism (my first GA article) 
Byzantine Empire (Religion section)
Christianization of the Roman Empire as diffusion of innovation
GAR of Devil in Christianity
My first creation (rather than addition) - Early Christian Women and Pagan Opinion: The Power of the Hysterical Woman
created Evolutionary theodicy
Fall of the Western Roman Empire
Historiography of the Christianization of the Roman Empire
[9] History of Christian thought on persecution and tolerance
Persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire
Persecution of Christians in the post–Cold War era
[11] Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire
Christianity in civilization Role of Christianity in civilization
Religious policies of Constantine the Great
Religious responses to the problem of evil
- As a reviewer:
Reviewed: Tourbillion Bulgaria; My first GA review of someone else's article succeeded!
So did my second: Indonesian Christian Student Movement! [13]
Reviewed W. Sterling Cary a really well done article and passed it. Jenhawk777 (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Reviewed John 3:16 failed
Reviewed Papyrus 45 passed
Reviewed Devil in Christianity passed
Reviewed Christianity: failed
Reviewed Michael Miller: failed
Peer review of Megan Phelps-Roper that subsequently went GA
Works in progress:
[edit]Beginning: Christianity as the Roman state religion
Of interest:
[edit]need to create: New (Neo) evangelicalism
need to create: Primitive Christianity
need to create: volitional epistemology and moral ecology
need to create: Wayne Meeks; Charity in early Christianity; The Confession of St. Patrick;
need an article on the Christian enlightenment during the early modern period.
need to create an article on Moore's book. Lots of articles available on it.
Add to Louis the Pious impact on church becoming less entangled with state
- Frances Young
- Early Christianity
- The Bible and slavery
- State (polity)
- EPG model
- First Great Awakening
- Ulrich von Hutten
- State church of the Roman Empire
- Christianity and colonialism
- Second Congo War
- do this one first: Being and Nothingness
- Peace and Truce of God - multiple issues
- Albigensian crusade
- Christian values is seriously bad - start class
- Edict of Thessalonica has since been worked on by someone else; it looks better now
- Christianity in the 8th century
- Christianity in the Roman Empire
- Christianity in late antiquity
- Christianization of Europe
- Persecution of pagans under Theodosius I - outdated scholarship
- Wild animal suffering
- Predation problem
- Crisis of the Third Century
- Damascius
Add to this one under Legacy: Apostles in the New Testament
Christianity in the 4th century
Christianity in late antiquity
From Gog:
[14] Ethics in religion
[15] History of Christianity
covenant Covenant
Nativity Nativity
Judaizers Judaizers
Talk:Theodicy Theodicy
[16] civil religion
[17] atonement in Christianity Leviticus 18
total rewrite has been suggested for Insider movement
added Toleration
[18] Christianity and violence, my first bog of quicksand, doesn't look too bad.
Circumcellions imbalance
Covenant (historical) needs citations
Compadres
[edit]these are wonderful editors and people! I am so glad to have worked with them
Just Another Cringy Username editor capable of deleting what isn't necessary; helped on History of Christianity
Aza24 helps with music/arts
Wham2001 also corrects citations - man I love these guys, and I mean that literally!
ActivelyDisinterested willing to help with correcting citations! YAY!
[19]Ermenrich
[20]Buidhe
[[21]]
(
Buttinsky)
Josh Milburn semi-retired
Generalissima did the GA of history of Christianity
User talk:Werter1995 sources on H. of C.
User talk:Borsoka Middle Ages - lots of drama
User talk:AirshipJungleman29 Middle Ages
User talk:Seltaeb Eht Middle Ages
Help:
[edit]To link to a section or subsection in another page, append a # and the section name to the page name: displayed text For linking in the same page, omit the page name and use a # and the section name: displayed text Page name § Section name
Ellipses require the placement of a "non-breaking space" before them: it's written with a & then nbsp and a semicolon
[22] Avoiding common mistakes: first, know what they are.
Wikipedia:Writing better articles
Wikipedia:Simplified Manual of Style
Help:Table how to set up a table
The great and wonderful Teahouse! [23]
[24] how to check images for copyright
[25]] how to use multiple images
[26] passing image review
[27] alternative text for images
[28] idea lab
[29] rudeness
[30]countering bias
[31]MOS block quotes
[32] how to do diffs
[33] Wikitext
[34] ANI
To include a pdf in a reference:
- Include URL link to article, pre-print, or abstract.
{{cite journal |last=Aries |first=Myriam B. C. |last2=Newsham |first2=Guy R. |last-author-amp=yes |date=2008 |title=Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review |url=http://archive.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/obj/irc/doc/pubs/nrcc49212/nrcc49212.pdf |journal=Energy Policy |volume=36 |issue=6 |pages=1858–1866 |doi=10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021 |access-date=October 18, 2013}}
Displays as:
Aries, Myriam B. C. & Newsham, Guy R. (2008). "Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review" (PDF). Energy Policy. 36 (6): 1858–1866. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
- Displays as:
Aries, Myriam B. C. & Newsham, Guy R. (2008). "Effect of daylight saving time on lighting energy use: a literature review" (PDF). Energy Policy. 36 (6): 1858–1866. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.021. Retrieved October 18, 2013.
- If the linked document is PDF, but the extension is not .pdf or .PDF, you may add the parameter |format=PDF, which displays " (PDF)" after the link.
- On a Talk page, when including references, place Talkref between double curly brackets at the end just before signing
- Redirect: create the new page and add:
#REDIRECT [[Article name]]
as the sole text on the old article
- [35] splitting: remember to add an edit summary when copying content, have thought about which categories and external links you will need to add and what the new lead will look like, then just type the name of the new article somewhere, This is my new article name (like in your sandbox, or in to the search engine), and click on it, and you will see “you may create this page”, click on that, and create the page. Then copy your content in to there making sure the edit summary says, “copied from” the old article name with a live wikilink. You will need to have two different windows open in your browser ... the one you are copying from and the new article you are copying to. Try not to save the new article until you have added a proper lead sentence and categories so the new page patrollers won’t have you :). And don’t forget to add the references section. You can worry about deleting content from the old article after you have the new article working, but again, when you delete the content from the old article, be sure to say in edit summary, “content moved to” with a live link to the new article. Basically, you are just creating a new article and the only thing that is really crucial is that you follow WP:CWW by indicating in edit summary where you got the content. Then, don’t forget to tag the new article talk page with the Wikiproject tags that are on the old article. Heartfelt thanx to SandyGeorgia for interpreting WP instructions!
use: (two curly brackets) Copied|from= |from_oldid=|to= |to_diff= (two curly brackets)
Tools
[edit]My library The library!! Whoo hoo!
[37] Archive
[38] open library
[39] free newspaper library
[40] Bible translator
[41] Resource request Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request
List of citation templates: Help:Citation Style 1
Template for use in articles undergoing major edits: double curly brackets front and back around 'under construction' will tag an article about major work being done; or
[43] under construction
Wikipedia:Prosesize for # of words
Wikipedia:Moving_a_page#How_to_move_a_page
Wikipedia:Personal user awards
Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests
Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Assessment
Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace
[44] referencing
[45] citation bot
[46]] copyright tags for images
[47]] check for copy violations
[48]] how to nowrap
for Bible quotes go to wikisource at s:Bible; type in like this: [[s:Bible (King James)/Psalms#Psalm 23|Psalms:23]]
Citation Tool for Google Books
Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Archive_199#People_we_quote_and_paraphrase Manual of style archive
[50] GA criteria
[51] FA criteria
[52] Welcoming committee
[[53]] hyphenator for isbn's
Template:Hatnote templates for finding templates
[54] Hirtle chart/copyright info for images
[55] By country copyright for images
Quoted from the Five pillars: (Don't forget this!)
[edit]"We strive for articles that document and explain major points of view, giving due weight with respect to their prominence in an impartial tone. We avoid advocacy and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is on living persons. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong". (Harvard, Oxford, etc., Vetus Testamentum, and the Journal of Biblical Literature, etc. preferred on Bible articles.)
Invaluable resources for researchers:
| Name: Wikiquote Description: collection of quotations Website: www Launched: July 10, 2003 Alexa rank: 3,733 (Global, July 2017[update])[1] |
|
Name: Wikisource Description: digital library Website: www Launched: November 24, 2003 Alexa rank: 4,362 (Global, July 2017[update])[2] | |||
|
Name: Wikimedia Commons Description: repository of images, sounds, videos, and general media Website: commons Launched: September 7, 2004 |
|
Name: Wikispecies Description: taxonomic catalogue of species Website: species Launched: September 14, 2004 |
|
Name: Wikinews Description: online newspaper Website: www Launched: November 8, 2004 Alexa rank: 60,341 (Global, July 2017[update])[3] |
|
Name: Wikiversity Description: collection of tutorials and courses, while also serving as a hosting point to coordinate research Website: www Launched: August 15, 2006 Alexa rank: 14,505 (Global, July 2017[update])[4] |
|
Name: Wikidata Description: knowledge base Website: www Launched: October 30, 2012 |
Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library
- TO WELCOME NEW PEOPLE USE THIS:
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Please take a moment to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is and is not. Wikipedia is not just another news, forum, blog/webhost, promotional/advertising/directory, or social networking site. It is a place for serious, collaborative, scholarly assembly of knowledge about notable subjects into a high-quality encyclopedia, with verifiable references to independent, reliable sources. Many people come here with other expectations and have a difficult time as a result.
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by adding a space and four tildes to the end of the last line of your post, like this:
This is the last line of the post. ~~~~
The tildes will be automatically converted to a signature that contains your linked username and a timestamp to help keep conversations organized. I will sign mine accordingly with hopes you will remember me and will feel free to ask me any questions you have--or just say hi!
Where to find new users
[edit]Here are some ways to find new users:
- Check your watchlist – welcome the users who are working on the things you yourself are interested in. The new users are the ones with a red talk page link.
- Check Wikipedia's account creation log – this is especially useful with a quick link to their talk page, as well as an "at-a-glance" sign to tell if they've probably been welcomed already: their talk page isn't red linked!
- Special:ActiveUsers a list of users who had some kind of activity within the last 30 days.
- New users can frequently be found seeking help at the Wikipedia:Teahouse and Wikipedia:Help desk.
- You will no doubt come across new users as you work on Wikipedia. You may spot them in the edit histories of pages or on talk pages. If a user's signature or username is in red, that indicates that he or she doesn't have a user page set up yet. That means they are very likely (but not always) a new user. Check their talk page to see if they've already been greeted (though there's no harm in greeting a new user again; you can always say "hi", and offer your assistance).
- Check the recent changes. If there is a new user, it will say as an edit summary: (New user account). These users will also be on the account creation log. You can then click on the red linked talk page and then greet them. This is also helpful if you are looking for newbies, vandalism, etc.
- Snuggle displays users who have registered within the past month. The list can be sorted in date order. It provides an overview of messages on their talk page, and quick access to their talk page and list of contributions.
- ^ "Wikiquote.org Site Info". Alexa Internet. Retrieved 2017-07-08.
- ^ "Wikisource.org Site Info". Alexa Internet. Retrieved 2017-07-08.
- ^ "Wikinews.org Site Info". Alexa Internet. Retrieved 2017-07-08.
- ^ "Wikiversity.org Site Info". Alexa Internet. Retrieved 2017-07-08.