User talk:Alex Bakharev

This user may have left Wikipedia. Alex Bakharev has not edited Wikipedia since August 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Alex is away on vacation and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Thanks for uploading File:Konchalovsky Alex Tolstoy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maxim Vinaver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Brussels.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please carry out a proper review before moving articles out of draft. This one has basic grammatical errors as well as several unreferenced paragraphs. Thanks. Deb (talk) 07:31, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, please help the new user to improve the article Alex Bakharev (talk) 23:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Future of the Russian Navy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pacific Fleet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm asking your advice on the dispute with Volunteer Marek. Please note that while I'm not a newcomer, I'm relatively inexperienced about conflict resolution on en.wiki.
Recently I had this conversation with User:Boud. The topic is withdrawing my ANI complaint and opening an AE request. At ANI you invited us to find a compromise. While I think that that is both desirable and possible with regard to the contents of the article on war crimes, I doubt we can compromise on civility. But the point is: as a relatively inexperienced editor, I might have misunderstood the standards of civility and tendentiousness that this community deems acceptable. If that is the case, I'd rather stop it here, don't waste my and other people's time, and possibly move to less controversial topic areas leaving the floor to others who have the stomach for this. If, on the other side, I haven't made a blatant mistake on civility and tendentiousness, and Volunteer Marek's behaviours are contrary to our guidelines and policies, or at least they are in a "grey area" where reasonable people could disagree on their appropriateness, then I'd be happy to bring the case to AE.
I'm not particularly keen on writing another complaint and I'm aware that this could easily backfire, but it might be worth it: exposing the way they behave and asking AE to uphold our policies might be the right thing to do, as I think that their contribution is quite harmful in that topic area. If in the process I get topic banned or blocked, that would be unpleasant, but not too hard to deal with: I have other projects and interests.
So the question for you is: AE or not AE? Your advice is very much appreciated. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, I might be too thick-skinned myself but I would have let the issue die if I were in your shoes. Find a compromise on the article and forget about some impolite discussion in between. I know User:Volunteer Marek for many years, occasionally the contacts were frustrating but overall he is a good guy. Anyway it is your choice. We have a policy WP:FORUMSHOP that discourages going with someone's grievances to another forum if the decision of the first one is unsatisfactory. We have a dozen of different forums with intersecting authority and if somebody would go to all of them he or she would eventually get their foe block. I do not see any quick exit out of it. I guess if WP:AN/I decision would not help the problem in a week you can try another forum WP:AE. On the other hand discouragement is not forbidding I guess you can drop a notice to WP:AE maybe with a link to WP:AN/I and ask if they think the issue is covered by WP:ARBEE - the arcom decision that sets simplified blocking policy for the tendentious editing in the area of Eastern European and Balkan issues. This is your choice Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:32, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you for the explanation and advice. I thought about it and decided to follow your suggestion: I will not pursue the matter further. In fact, I agree that WP:FORUMSHOP clearly applies to a case as this one. Out of inexperience I might have made a wrong decision about the best venue for addressing my quarrel, but VM cannot be burden with my procedural mistakes, and that would also be unfair to the editors who commented at AN/I. I should have followed Boud's advise immediately and asked to transfer the case at AE. However, I think that that mistake of mine will not prevent me from opening an AE request in case of future behaviours by VM that I deem disruptive or uncivil. If and when I will raise a case at AE, I will share a link to the discussion at AN/I, and I will hope that that doesn't fall under WP:FORMUSHOP. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 11:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you Alex Bakharev (talk) 03:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riga Governorate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ezel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You recently blocked 103.225.23.94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), so could you also please block 182.239.120.42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? Both of those IPs geolocate to Hong Kong and make the same edits (compare Special:Diff/1099326161 and Special:Diff/1099336074). Kleinpecan (talk) 07:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Done Alex Bakharev (talk) 07:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Alex Bakharev, please can you creat with your bot the section New articles in the portal of Algeria? cordially. Boumediene15 (talk) 14:11, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yea a'll do it! Aarist Fire (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is a reference? I started A draft and I want to add some references but I do not know what a reference is. Somebody please help. :( Aarist Fire (talk) 14:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Alex Bakharev

I would like to create a page that shows recent articles created under the portal of Algeria. I have already found this page, User:AlexNewArtBot/AlgeriaSearchResult, but it does not work. Do you know how to fix this problem?

Thank you very much. Riad Salih (talk) 01:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NoBackLink has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:09, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Alex Bakharev

Could you please help me create new articles related to Algeria? I'm struggling with it and I created one by copying from Morocco and changing the name User:AlexNewArtBot/Algeria.

Thank you and regards Riad Salih (talk) 21:26, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian and Soviet polar explorers has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sahil Gupta is 17 years old Sahil8901 (talk) 07:28, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uh auto.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uh luna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uh nikuda.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images that survived replaceability discussions has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 00:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mirsky Book Cover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Improper use of non-free content. The image is used only on an article about the subject of the book, not the book itself, and there is no "critical commentary of the work" to speak of.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revolution Saga (talk) 07:35, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]