User talk:Arbeiten8

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Expend4bles have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. InfiniteNexus (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Unplugged (smartphone), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 00:12, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Butlerblog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Language of Jesus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noting specifically what you added, I don't disagree with the premise of what you added, but it is entirely unsourced and as such, it is original research. Don't add statements of that magnitude without a cited source. ButlerBlog (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Jesus" is the anglicized Greek version of the Hebrew name "Joshua." It is explained in the main Jesus article. You can consult Wiktionary. --Arbeiten8 (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter. It needs to be cited. Read WP:WHYCITE. It likewise doesn't matter what is in other articles. Wikipedia cannot be used to source itself (WP:NOTSOURCE). If you don't understand, ask. This is a primary content guideline so understanding how/when to cite material is important. ButlerBlog (talk) 21:25, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did I stop you from contributing and improving the article? Arbeiten8 (talk) 21:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Godsy and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect God of the New Testament, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 11 § God of the New Testament.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Godsy}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Godsy ^(TALK_CONT) 05:29, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect God of the Old Testament has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12 § God of the Old Testament until a consensus is reached. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to List of infant monarchs. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 07:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you answered an edit request to remove the old name of the subject of the article. Per MOS:NB, if the subject is known by their old name professionally prior to the name change, as is the case in this article, the name should be listed in the article as a former name. You changing it without any discussion goes against the letter of the guideline and such change should be made through consensus on the talk page first. I reverted the edit and would just caution making any such change again without discussing in and achieving consensus for the change first. cyberdog958^Talk 03:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. Steele wasn't notable at all until this documentary came out. In fact, we didn't have an article on her until the documentary premiered. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, multiple of the references used in the article refer to the subject by their former name, so the former name should be listed or else it wouldn't even make any sense to the uninformed reader. If anything of their career is mentioned to prior the name change, and if any reference refer to the subject with their former name, it should be kept in the article once per the guideline. cyberdog958^Talk 03:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The references are made with male names for Vivian Wilson (publicly done by her father, New York Post, and many others), Rachel Levine, and others. Don't harm people emotionally. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is inappropriate to resort to personal attacks. Reach consensus on the talk page before making the change on a contentious topic and there should be no problem. cyberdog958^Talk 03:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be patient? Can you stop badgering me with your constant retorts on my talk page? Please wait to see if others will chime in on the relevant talk page.Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Me responding to your statements on your talk page do not constitute badgering me with my constant retorts. cyberdog958^Talk 03:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just 1 question. Can you wait like me? This will allow others to comment. Arbeiten8 (talk) 03:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And again, if consensus is reached to remove the name on the talk page, that is one thing. But the change should not be made unilaterally without discussion. cyberdog958^Talk 03:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB may not be used as a reference

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Crovetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Unplugged (smartphone), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username MPGuy2824, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Elbrus Kutrashev, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Markus Potzel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Does not currently appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CoconutOctopus talk 11:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Stone Jesus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 31 § Stone Jesus until a consensus is reached. Dr vulpes (Talk) 06:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Several junk sources, but no reliable independent secondary sources discussing Cardone in any depth.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grant Cardone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:58, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Jimmy Sharmahd. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

nick isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:50, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The subject's YouTube uses the nickname. I added it in the external links section. Arbeiten8 (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ahoo Daryaei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Looks like a case of BLP1E lets wait to create article.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Accesscrawl (talk) 01:39, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Albert Einstein, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 11:46, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you reply to my comment on the article's talk page. Arbeiten8 (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Reza Rasayi. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add a mention of this person to the target page, with a good reference.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to work on this. You can delete it. Arbeiten8 (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Informational defect. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

try to integrate this phrase into the target article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Arbeiten8 (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 12:37, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A boilerplate shouldn't be a substitute to offend and dehumanize people. I provided reliable sources on the talk page. I did it for the record. Arbeiten8 (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Unplugged".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:00, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please see WP:NPOVTITLE regarding your recent move of Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act. I have reverted your move; if you want to change the title, I would strongly suggest starting a requested move discussion. :Jay8g [V•T•E] 05:21, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can discuss on the article's talk page. Arbeiten8 (talk) 05:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protecting Women's Private Spaces Act until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Partofthemachine (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - speaking as a nonbinary trans person I appreciate your passion for respectful trans representation, but speaking as a long-time Wikipedian your edits are leaning into WP:ADVOCACY territory. Please familiarize yourself more with Wikipedia policies to avoid conflicts here. Thanks. Funcrunch (talk) 16:42, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is nice to know that you are a trans editor. On the one hand, I value you, while on the other hand, I feel that hand-wringing and you blazing past non-queer voices to please the crowd isn't my style. Everything has its pros and cons. I don't ask you to be like-minded. However, it isn't necessary for you to echo and entrench WP rules even more that aren't ideal for minorities and may need reform. Your style is akin to Kamala Harris not really understanding and dodging the Kamala is for they/them ads on which Trump side spent over $200 million. At a minimum, Kamala could have said that the ad was transphobic and Democrats don't believe in punching down vulnerable minorities and scapegoating anyone. Her over-cautious and dance to the tune of her opponents served her poorly. Arbeiten8 (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why you're bringing up the recent election. I am not affiliated with any political party, and have not voted for a major party presidential candidate since 1992. I didn't vote for a presidential candidate at all in 2020 or 2024. Regardless, I have no interest in crowd-pleasing; my interest is in maintaining the value of this encyclopedia. Funcrunch (talk) 17:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Democrat. I realize that my frustration is no reason for me to disengage. The person in the White House has broad powers and gives directions to lower-level officials. I don't dictate what you should do politically. That is your freedom; however, the passage of the Equality Act or representation like Rachel Levine as an Agency Executive has an impact on the queer community. I skimmed through your article published which I construe as learned helplessness in the political realm.

As far as your editing goes, it isn't neutral from my standpoint. If I were you and purporting to support trans equality, I wouldn't have removed the name of the golfer as you did. By excluding facts such as an important name, the audience gets the wrong impression that trans women are routinely winning gold, silver, and bronze medals across professional sports. You don't have to be LGBT to be able to have facts on the table as Jen Psaki does so adeptly. Arbeiten8 (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because it read like your opinion of the situation rather than an accurate summation of the cited source. Regardless, as you can see from my userpage, I routinely create and edit the biographies of trans and other marginalized people and associated topics. I feel that my record stands for itself, but of course you're free to disagree. Funcrunch (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just went to the section of your userpage to find that you created the Raquel Willis and Chase Strangio articles. I stand corrected. You are doing amazing work. Feel free to revert or modify my future edits when you like. Arbeiten8 (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I appreciate it. Funcrunch (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, editor, I noticed you recently participated in a discussion of a requested move for the article Brian Thompson (businessman). There is a new discussion open at Talk:Brian Thompson (businessman) § Killing of Brian Thompson, and I'd like to invite you to participate. Thank you. BarntToust 19:10, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Luke Elaine Burke. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nancy_Mace, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hi there, I am not going to disagree with any of the points you made regarding the politician. I am however, going to disagree with the way you handled speaking to the other individual who is simply trying to do the right thing and follow the rules of Wikipedia. If you read their messages on the talk page they clearly agree with your views on this person, and hence your close-mindedness and passive agressivness on this subject is not needed. I encourage you to be read more on the rules on Wikipedia, as the site has to (as sad as it may be) stay objective and use credible sources. Wishing you the best, and please reach out if you have any questions or disagree with me in any way. I would love to have a constructive argument! L.E. Rainer 15:40, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to join the discussion at Talk:Nancy Mace - Wikipedia Arbeiten8 (talk) 21:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 22:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC) ApteryxRainWing🐉 | Roar with me!!! | My contributions 22:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will roar against your arguments there. Arbeiten8 (talk) 22:57, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are topic-banned for three months from editing anything related to transgender people, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for tendentious editing.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:47, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Logan Brown (pregnant man) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Brown (pregnant man) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Valereee (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the notification, Arbeiten8, it's automatic. Unfortunately you shouldn't comment about this anywhere. Valereee (talk) 16:58, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Someone objected to your move on WP:RMTR here. I reverted your move per their objection under WP:RMUM. If you are still interested in completing the move, you are free to start an RM discussion on the talk page to gain consensus. Thanks! cyberdog958^Talk 01:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok Arbeiten8 (talk) 02:04, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Crusade against the Colonna family. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:32, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arbeiten8,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Piège de cristal for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Piège de cristal to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Arbeiten8

I edit here too, under the username Cremastra and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Pullani, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 11 § Pullani.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cremastra}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cremastra (u — c) 13:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 assassination of Sharia judges in Iran, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:46, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arbeiten8. Thank you for your work on Society of Fighting Clergy. Another editor, Utopes, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

No mention of "Fighting Clergy" at the target article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Utopes}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Utopes: I think it translates to the same target page. However, if I am mistaken, feel free to delete it. Arbeiten8 (talk) 08:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Toadspike [Talk] 08:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is the page you are referring to? Arbeiten8 (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Charlotte Burrows, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:24, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Golikom. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Robert F. Kennedy Jr, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Golikom (talk) 08:51, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The David Kennedy story is well-chronicled David Kennedy: A life tormented by grief and drugs - UPI Archives Arbeiten8 (talk) 08:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Michelle King (Commissioner of Social Security). You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 04:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am learning about the public domain template on this platform. Arbeiten8 (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Michelle King (Commissioner of Social Security) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner/?ftag=YHF4eb9d17. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:54, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - The article is not deleted but that does not mean there is not a problem. Copying text, even if it is public domain, must be attributed to make it clear it has been copied. I have provided the attribution, but you shoudl read the warning above about copying public domain sources and ensure oyu provide attribution in the future. -- Whpq (talk) 04:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing unique that would be copyrightable about the listing of a person's degrees. For example, "Jane has an MPA from such and such with a concentration A from College X + BA in P with concentration with X&Y." Arbeiten8 (talk) 09:39, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The material was not just a listing of degrees and academic achievements. It copied the structure and text of the material as well. There is no copyright on facts, but there can be copyright on the expression of those facts. -- Whpq (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De-Trumpification. Please note that, on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of the arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. If your comments concerned a deletion discussion, please consider reading Wikipedia's deletion policy for a brief overview of the deletion process. If you are involved in a disagreement between editors, you may wish to consider reading Wikipedia's dispute resolution policy to learn more about how to resolve it. We hope that you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! ZyphorianNexus ^Talk 04:04, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Saeed Iravani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Saeed Iravani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Golikom (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]