User talk:Atulsnischal/archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Atulsnischal. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

What were the edits at Wildlife Conservation and List of conservation topics supposed to mean? Especially the "tittys" and "pooopy"? Femto 13:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

You need to give sources to show his notability. It's up to you to explain why he is notable, not for me to find out. jimfbleak 09:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Only keep the google books link. Keeping the other links allows other users that POV push to delete the book itself from the article under false claims of Hindutva. Please do read WP:RS and WP:V, and use those policies to get your point across. I support you fully on that page, and many other pages, but learn to use wikipedia policy and there wont be a conflict.Bakaman 16:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Atulsnischal. I keep reverting your long "see also" list on the Hari Singh article, for reasons I have made clear on the talk page. Please stop re-adding this list: all it does is duplicate links that are already in the article, and it also seems to be POV. If you believe there is a point to this list, please put your point on the Hari Singh discussion page, and let's talk about it. Many thanks, TinaSparkle 20:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Dude theres no need for the long list. I am well aware abdullah is an oppressor of Kashmiri Hindus. You may wish to get in contact with Aupmanyav (talk · contribs) and Saiva suj (talk · contribs), they are Kashmiri Pandits as well.Bakaman 03:35, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

The list is poorly formatted. Abdullah has absolutely no relation to aksai chin, rajput, karakoram tract, monarch, maharaja, etc. I'd suggest you find links which actually relate to him like (National Conference, History of Jammu and Kashmir, Hari Singh). The page looks ugly with 20 links. You only need 4-5 links. Its obvious you have a pro-India predilection, that's fine (I do as well) but the point isnt to put an list on every Kashmir article, its to write them in such a way that the facts verify the truth of the matter (that Kashmir is being oppressed by Pak and China and Karan Singh is the rightful ruler of Kashmir).Bakaman 03:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

why did you change rajput page?

Mani —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.225.171.205 (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC).

Hi, I didnt change the "Rajput" page, I am also annoyed how come it changes all the time.

Sincerely

Atulsnischal 21:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism — a collaborative effort to improve articles about Hinduism Discussion board — a page for centralised Hinduism-related discussion Notice board — contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements Hindu Wikipedians — Wikipedians who have identified themselves as Hindus Portal — a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories Workgroups — projects with a more specific scopes For more links, go to the project's navigation template.

--D-Boy 01:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of topics on the land and the people of “Jammu and Kashmir”, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:List of topics on the land and the people of “Jammu and Kashmir”. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Incman|वार्ता 17:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

This is the List of topics on the land and the people of “Jammu and Kashmir”

Atulsnischal 09:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

This is the comprehensive List of topics which deal with "the People”, “the Culture & Heritage” and “the Land” of Jammu and Kashmir:

This List is a comprehensive list of articles on Wikipedia which deal with "the People”, “the Culture & Heritage” and “the land” of Jammu and Kashmir and it is definitely not like the Kashmir (disambiguation) Page. This list should remain on Wikipedia for people to be able to easily access all articles on different aspects of the people, culture and the area of Jammu and Kashmir.

Atulsnischal 23:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi Atulsnischal, Good work with the Reintroduction of asiatic lion in Kuno-Palpur, but I think it is not necessary to have a separate article for that. As the same text is also contained in Asiatic Lion and Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary, I think that Asiatic Lion Reintroduction Project should be deleted. Moreover I think the block "Asiatic Lion Reintroduction Project" should be deleted either in Asiatic lion or in Kuno Wildlife sanctuary. I think it is not good to have the same contents twice ore more. What do you think about that? Gruß, --Altaileopard 14:32, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Leopard

I just made a basic tempelate of the information for the three pages hoping they will evolve into three seperate paragraphs in time with a basic introduction on two pages and the Asiatic Lion Reintroduction Project can have the project in more detail as it is a very important and costly project that has got caught in state politics. Year by year new achievements can be added to the project page (with time in dacades to come and relevent news links etc). Thanks Atulsnischal

I just noticed the same problem. They were identical articles. Even within the article there was far too much repetition. There is no need to include links in the see also section if they are in the article. David D. (Talk) 21:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I noted that the articles you have been working on have far too many external links. There should be a minimal number of "important sites". If there are articles etc. relevant to the article then they can be referenced in the text as notes. A sea of external links is practically useless since the important ones are diluted. David D. (Talk) 21:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi David the Extra "External Links" in the Wildlife articles I have been working on and the Extra External links you have been removing

Hi David

First of all let me thanks you for helping with the wildlife articles I have been working on

Asiatic Lion, Kuno Wildlife Sanctuary, Asiatic Lion Reintroduction Project, etc.

I know you have been removing all the external links I had added in all these and other articles, but you see I am not an experienced writer on Wikipedia, all the external links that I added are actually what I read before writing of editing the article,

• Hence they should have been included in the "References" section that I didnt make, and I didnt add a "Further Reading" section, wher all the links should have been added.

If you now see the inbreeding section in Asitic Lions, references have been correctly added as an inset within the article, like you were also suggesting, ..... you might want to see how that section was written after pressing edit, also see what appears after pressing edit on "Cited References", if done prperly the "Wikipedia software" automatically tabulates references under the "Cited References" heading, please see when you get time.

All external links will have to be added in "References" section and under "Further reding" sections which were missing, my mistake.... I have been not getting much time to comtribute on wikipedia.

Thanks again

Atulsnischal 06:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Atulsnischal, sounds like you are getting the right idea. I'll help out with formatting as I see these come up on my watchlist. David D. (Talk) 04:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)