User talk:Augmented Seventh/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Augmented Seventh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Augmented Seventh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper) Things to do Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on People's Liberation Army Support Base in Djibouti. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MacAddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 12:16, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

I can see you are a new editor, but you have already been warned by User:Macaddct1984 about Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Unfortunately, at Acre (state), you are again edit warring, this time to restore unsourced content which another editor has removed because it is unsourced--and according to them--contentious and untrue. Please take a moment to read WP:BURDEN, which is a cornerstone policy on Wikipedia. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:28, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

You continue to violate wp:burden. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khaneh_Shahr_Hall&diff=prev&oldid=1195511799 As you have been warned now a number of times above.

Yet you continue doing exactly what you were warned for. By a number of editors now.

WP:BURDEN is clear. This has now been explained to you a number of times. Your arguments that what you are controversially disagreeing with is "not controversial," and that it is not OR (this is precisely what OR is), are unavailing. And now you have increased your violations of wp:burden, after your warnings, with a slew of violations below.

04:26, 14 January 2024 diff hist +460‎ Sneeze ‎ Undid revision 1195511910 by 2A00:23C5:2685:8601:818D:719F:D49C:DBDA (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

04:23, 14 January 2024 diff hist +3,160‎ Glynis Johns ‎ Undid revision 1195513247 by 2600:1700:561E:A000:4AF:5E9D:90F7:2470 (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

04:14, 14 January 2024 diff hist +968‎ Khaneh Shahr Hall ‎ Undid revision 1195490537 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

04:13, 14 January 2024 diff hist +924‎ Shapur cave ‎ Undid revision 1195491252 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:16, 14 January 2024 diff hist +392‎ Shahshahan mausoleum ‎ Undid revision 1195487587 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:16, 14 January 2024 diff hist +487‎ Shahshahan mausoleum ‎ restored cited Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:05, 14 January 2024 diff hist +808‎ Sultan Amir Ahmad Bathhouse ‎ not original research, not controversial Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:03, 14 January 2024 diff hist +740‎ Nobar Bathhouse ‎ Undid revision 1195476643 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) current Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:02, 14 January 2024 diff hist +388‎ Jabalieh ‎ not original research, not controversial Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

02:01, 14 January 2024 diff hist +399‎ Arg-e Bam ‎ →‎History: restoring wanton deletion of non controversial content, Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

01:54, 14 January 2024 diff hist +879‎ Shazdeh Garden ‎ restoring non controversial Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

01:53, 14 January 2024 diff hist +1,627‎ Meymand, Kerman ‎ Undid unclear revision 1195489507 by 2603:7000:2101:AA00:AD0F:225B:FE43:9FE7 (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit

2603:7000:2101:AA00:900A:D8A2:DD0B:116C (talk) 06:57, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

thanks for taking the time to correct me on my reverting your tendentious edits.

I'm here to learn about these things; you seem to know a lot about how to carefully remove well written and uncontentious content around one specific topic of which you seem quite invested.

good on you for the primer, and for pointing, unintentionally, where the worst soft vandalism is occurring.

have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 15:45, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

You appear not to have taken the above warnings by multiple editors -- three different editors in the past three weeks -- to heart. And understood wp:burden. The test for inclusion is not whether as you incorrectly believe whether the text is "well written." It is whether it is supported by reliable sources. If removed for lack of reliable sources, it is obviously a point of contention as to whether it should be included. And to restore it, you must provide inline RS refs. You have repeatedly flouted the rule. I would appreciate you abandoning that approach, and think it to your benefit to do so, as continued editing against wp rules can result in blocks. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:3875:8D93:E6B4:D38 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

you seem to have a great sense of humor, and I'm glad you're playing along helping me create an online encyclopedia.

your adherence to protocol as regards policy, when it suits your poorly thought out edits, is admirable.

your concern about my tenure is misplaced; i remain the oldest active editor, and created large sections of the physics articles before wiki even came online.

be best, little soldier, Augmented Seventh (talk) 00:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I expressed no concern about your tenure; I believe you are confusing my edits with those of User:Magnolia677. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:64F9:FE25:4DEC:9B39 (talk) 06:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

that's super hot, thanks for mentioning your continued interest. Augmented Seventh (talk) 10:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Martin Luther King Sr.: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. To apply these warnings, you can use Twinkle or RedWarn, or you can do it manually. Thanks! Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 19:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to instruct regarding tools and procedures.

thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 06:50, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

thank you kindly for the editing pointers.

much appreciation, Augmented Seventh (talk) 07:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Capital High School (Boise, Idaho), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You added an alumnus without linking to her article, and you provided a non functioning URL as a source. Meters (talk) 01:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

got it thank you. Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, please make sure that when you undo or revert edits on a page that you consistently leave warning messages on the user's talk page. Twinkle can help you with this. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

i don't use that feature, thank you.

thanks for helping keep my encyclopedia accurate,

s Augmented Seventh (talk) 15:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:WARNVAND, you really need to warn users. If they don't see an explanation of what they've done wrong, then they will often continue with the problematic behaviour. They might also be scared away from making future constructive edits.

As said above, Twinkle makes warnings extremely easy (just a couple clicks!), and it makes reverting faster as well. Thriftycat ^{Talk • Contribs} 15:58, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

i don't use those tools when i edit, and i don't interact in that way with editors.

thanks for the heads up on the new tech. Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

You have reverted my edits without an edit summary nor a good reason. Please reinstate them or I will not hesitate to WP:ANI you. You have 24 hours from now to make the changes. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

vulgarity was the reason, but upon closet inspection and reading over the citations, there was copius changed sourced information without new proper attribution.

if you would like to source properly and re-submit those for addition, that would be fantastic.

i think i left a message on your page, upon seeing the vulgarity, expressing my reasoning.

have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

All information was appropriately referenced, the nonsense offered above as reasons are not acceptable. The 24 hour timeline remains the same. Then we shall see what the denizens of the WP "blood sports" page makes of it, and your edit history. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 05:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

ok, fellow editor.

not sure what you're up to, but if seems quite important to you. we're just keeping things accurate and appropriate.

you inserted a random vulgarity, we reverted it.

we have explained, in written response, the reasoning.

thank you for helping up create an online encyclopedia, Augmented Seventh (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

You can knock off the "we", this matter is all about you alone. You would be well-advised to start preparing your case. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 05:34, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

You have one minor point, the term Relationshits crept in due to error "Relationships" and "its". However, you could have simply amended that word, rather than reverting 11 edits - there was no good reason to do that. The clock continues to tick. You will have the wonderful opportunity to explaining to your superiors how the common English word "mishit" is a vulgarity. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 14.2.205.177 (talk) 06:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

don't do that, my tp my rules, so bug off 63.115.31.130 (talk) 14:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Augmented Seventh. I pinged you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saintstephen000 regarding my reversal of your previous account's vanishing. Since this bit of my message there is a warning, I'm copying it here just so there's no question of whether you saw it:

I am not going to block either of your accounts right now, but please make sure to comply with WP:VALIDALT. I'd strongly recommend sticking to one account, either the old one or the new one; if you do need an alt account for any reason, I would strongly recommend disclosing it publicly or, if necessary for privacy reasons, to ArbCom. And logged-out editing, when you have a perfectly good account, is best avoided entirely, because at a certain point a checkuser may well find that you are doing so to evade scrutiny. Furthermore, please note that a future retirement or vanishing while under AN/I scrutiny or similar may be looked at much less sympathetically by administrators.

Happy editing, and please let me know if you have any questions. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe) 15:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

thank you for the information. everything you surmised was correct.

i have had different log-ons over the decades, mostly due to life changes and the resultant editing breaks.

i had vanished the prior account simply to fresh start and to examine the procedure and how it would affect my efforts towards keeping an online encyclopedia accurate (no easy task!)

originally, i had assumed that old sign in names would be subjected to an internal churn, i can see now that is not the case.

thank you again for instruction, Augmented Seventh (talk) 18:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

 You have been consistently failing to warn users. You have forgotten to do so many times today after reverting their vandalism or mistakes. If you don't want notify users of your reverts to their changes, then stop reverting their changes. jayhawker6 (talk) 00:10, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

i do not have the ability to communicate directly with editors regarding uncontroversial reversions.

i understand that is recommended protocol.

i will look into your suggestions.

thank you for the heads up, Augmented Seventh (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

@Augmented Seventh,

Please remember to warn users about their mistakes. Try Twinkle or Redwarn as they make reverting and warning users easy to do. If you do not want to use these tools, read Wikipedia:WARNING for list of user warnings to add to user pages. Thank you! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

thanks for the heads up. i occasionally leave conversational notes on user pages, words of encouragement and such.

thanks again, Augmented Seventh (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isabella Rositano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planking. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I don't know if you know this but there are templates for responding to unconstructive edits. "your recent edit added nonsense to the article. it has been removed." while accurate, it isn't particularly informative or helpful to the user you are warning. I would suggest reading the tail end of this page Wikipedia:Disruptive editing and using a template like Template:Uw-disruptive1 in the future. And for obvious vandalism (I looked at the edits, they looked like vandalism to me) refer to Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol and Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings. Thanks! ZombiUwU ^{(💬 ~♥~ 📝)} 08:46, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

those templates sure are a time saver.

the language they use preclude my adoption, i have watched the verbiage change over the decades and disagree with their content.

i don't participate in light threatening and stern warning, and the like. mostly i just encourage better behavior.

thanks for the heads up and instruction, Augmented Seventh (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

I don't think you needed to post the same message to this user across both accounts, given that there is potential WP:COI sockpuppetry going on here. I am going to refrain from reporting it to SPI for now, but I have watchlisted the page because of these issues. JeffSpaceman (talk) 16:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

thanks for the heads up. Augmented Seventh (talk) 21:09, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Kindly use the restore version option instead of reverting every single unsourced edit made by other editors on a single article. Saves you time and preserves the history log for a longer time. Thank you Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:14, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 203.189.116.236 (talk) 02:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

you're still making unconstructive edits by removing the word Roman from links to the Roman Catholic Church, and you're claiming by fiat that the word is unnecessary.

i strongly disagree.

thanks for helping me keep it accurate, Augmented Seventh (talk) 02:19, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

I would like to talk to you about your unwarranted, constant reversion to my edits in multiple articles. The usage of the term "Roman Catholic" to describe the entire denomination is inaccurate considering that the Eastern Catholic Churches (which are NOT Roman Catholic) exist within the Catholic Church. You are also reverting my link simplifications returning them to the absurd long form of [[Catholic Church|Roman Catholic Church]] when simply writing [[Catholic Church]] would suffice. The main article for that church itself is named simply as the Catholic Church. That alone is enough precedent to justify simplyfying the terminology regarding that church across Wikipedia. You are also reverting links named [[Catholic Church in Country X]] to [[Roman Catholicism in Country X]] despite the former being more accurate and it being the ACTUAL name of the article in the links. For instance, the Ethiopian Catholic Church is not synonymous with Catholic Church in Ethiopia since the Ethiopian Catholic Church is an Eastern Catholic Church and is only subset of the Catholic Church in Ethiopia which also includes members of the Latin (Roman) Church in Ethiopia. In the instance of the article about Jakarta Cathedral, you reverted my edit back to the jarring and repetitive version which reads "Jakarta Cathedral (Indonesian: Gereja Katedral Jakarta, Dutch: Kathedraal van Jakarta) is a Roman Catholic cathedral in Jakarta, Indonesia, which is also the seat of the Roman Catholic archbishop of Jakarta" when it could be better written as "Jakarta Cathedral (Indonesian: Gereja Katedral Jakarta, Dutch: Kathedraal van Jakarta) is a Catholic cathedral in Jakarta, Indonesia, which is also the seat of the Archbishop of Jakarta" 203.189.116.236 (talk) 03:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Greeley Central High School, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

In this edit, you changed the header from "Incidents" to "School shooting". While it was a shooting on the school property, the term school shooting seems an incorrect connotation. It wasn't in the school building, at a school-related event on the property, or during school hours. And though our article says the victim was a teacher, the ref doesn't support that fact, let alone that she was a teacher at this particular school. The previous wording seems less loaded, in keeping with the lack of relationship of the event to the school proper. Any thoughts about changing it back? DMacks (talk) 04:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

good catch. I'll do so promptly. Augmented Seventh (talk) 04:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! DMacks (talk) 04:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with wp:redlinks. Furthermore, correcting the inappropriate use of cite journal vs cite news is not "unproductive". Finally, if you're going to accuse me of making grammatical mistakes, please do point them out. I can't see how I introduced any grammatical mistakes.

I see that you have been to ANI before for inappropriate reverts. I hope that we can resolve this amicably instead of going there again. 142.157.236.100 (talk)` 142.157.236.100 (talk) 04:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

your misspelled words, added unsourced content to a biographical article, readded after it was challenged, and put a non notable link into another person's articles.

it's reverted, again Augmented Seventh (talk) 04:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

I have opened a discussion on the talk page and you are cordially invited to participate. 142.157.236.100 (talk) 04:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

ok, thank you. Augmented Seventh (talk) 06:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Pedi people. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 17:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me with the editing and more grammatical correction, Seventh! :) 75.113.159.27 (talk) 07:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Can I have your guys' opinion and vote? If Freedom Caucus was a hypothetical European political party? would it belong to Identity and Democracy Party or European Conservatives and Reformists? If so, why do you think it would belong to the party. I am willing to hear your opinion and explanation why. 97.97.98.76 (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I don't know if you caught it by now but these two accounts seem to be related to eachother and go around removing/distorting content from the same articles:

User:Wikiedutor20041006

User:Softmedtoric

We might need to keep a close eye on the articles they edit. Cheers! 2600:100C:B003:D302:5D0B:8301:A14A:50C9 (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I've reverted a few edits by Softmedtoric for original research and unexplained content removal. It looks as if there's some POV trying to be pushed. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Note identical content removal by Softmedtoric & Wikiedutor:

• Original removal by Wikiedutor
• later removed by Softmed

I've left a message on Softmedtoric's talk page asking about any connection they have. Hopefully this is productive. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 05:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Can you explain this? How is that article an attack page? -- Whpq (talk) 19:41, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

going over the months long edit war, i noticed the recent removal of speedy deletion tags by editors involved with rapidly inserting and deleting content best left to the talk page.

i readded, but apparently incorrectly.

thanks for the heads up,

Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:46, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

That is not an adequate explanation. How is it an attack page? Furthermore, there was no edit war or removal of speedy deletion tags. Those speedy deletion requests were addressed by me. -- Whpq (talk) 19:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

looking back over the edits on my phone, i may have gotten two articles confused. i was looking at an article with rhetorical air qoutes, disparaging unsourced comments about the scientist's work, and a month long back and forth containing blanking and odd grammar.

thanks for pointing it out. i surely missed something. obviously not what I tagged it as.

thanks again, Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

i think i might have been here:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jayant_B._Udgaonkar Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Okay, that makes more sense, although there should not be any speedy tagging for that article. Please take more care in the future. -- Whpq (talk) 20:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

noted. Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Luke, Maryland: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Including many other. I may have warned them for you; just for the future! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

thank you kindly for the pointers.

it's always nice to know people are on task.

have an excellent day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 01:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:O._J._Simpson#How_should_we_treat_Simpson's_“culpability”_in_the_murders;_neutral_or_adamant? 92.17.198.220 (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

wrongful death is the final disposition of the case.

thanks for helping keep the encyclopedia accurate. Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mike_Gilbert

I have starting a discussion as to whether Mike Gilbert is notable enough 92.17.198.220 (talk) 17:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

I have put a suggestion of an FAQ on the Simpson talk page 92.17.198.220 (talk) 19:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi,

I've noticed your fight against vandalism (which is great!) and recommend Twinkle. Twinkle is a Javascript application that makes it easier to revert vandalism and warn users. I use it all the time.

Of course, you are not "forced" to, but I'm just recommending the tool as it makes reverting easy.

Sincerely,

Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 18:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

I've hesitated adopting newer script tools for many a year; my recent crusade, with the multiple attendant self created errors, pushes me towards following my well-wishers counsel.

thanks for the heads up, Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mike_Gilbert

I have started a discussion as to whether Mike Gilbert is notable enough. I don’t know if you had noticed it earlier so I put a new subject to get notice. 17:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC) 92.17.198.220 (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi I have removed your edit warning on Kate Armstrong (artist). First, you did not provide any proof of COI on the talk page. If you give a warning, be sure to describe why you are putting this warning here. On reading your talk page, it seems as if there is a history of unproven warnings. LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 17:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

thanks for the heads up. Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

thanks for your contributions! :) xRozuRozu (t • c) 05:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

Please take a look at edits before you revert them. The one you reverted was de-duping a citation that had been repeated five times, and others were doubled. The only part of the edit worth a discussion was the quote removal, which you could have edited constructively or discussed on the talk page. This kind of hasty reverting can be considered disruptive editing. 71.187.156.92 (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to instruct me regarding generally accepted editing protocol regarding reverting spurious and tendentious additions to the encyclopedia.

rest assured, i read nearly all of the edits, and the sources, and the edit history, for all of my gentle corrections.

i do, however, on occasion make mistakes.

thanks again, and have a Wikipedia day. Augmented Seventh (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

I have reverted you edits at Nepo baby because you needlessly removed images which were valid in illustrating the article subject. If you disagree with this, please start a discussion at Talk:Nepo baby. Adam Black ^{talk • contribs} 20:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

i think I'll defer. my disagreement with the inclusion of selective representative images of living persons for the purpose of illuminating an article addressing a slur; my opinion is neither strong enough nor sufficiently well-informed for the task of defending the change. thanks for staying on top of things, Augmented Seventh (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jameson Wang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 12.75.41.81 (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

howdy lil partner,

no idea what git yer dander up like that, but i ain't been battling no where no how with any vandal or pov pusher. been laying low here in the the foothills of the headlands.

if you could kindly point me toward this skirmish, i could likely settle up rightly quick.

thanks in advance, and have yourself a Wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 04:17, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

You reverted my edit while a conversation was open on the talk page. Can you explain where in the book of mormon a province named Deseret is mentioned? If not, can you explain why you added information about a later proposed state (with its own article) to an article about the usage of the word IN the book of mormon? 12.75.41.81 (talk) 04:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

oh, them there edits bout the ol cjclds. i reckon i be noticed a largish chunk of properly sourced, cited, and relevant content being removed all willy nilly, and i reverted to its previous form.

i was plum unaware of the tendentious and strident tone of the editor removing the content, otherwise i might of headed over to them talky talk pages, and explained to the kids why i reverted the edit, why it didn't rise to exit warring, and why it's best to mind the dragon in the doorway.

have yourself a wikipedia day, fellow editor, Augmented Seventh (talk) 04:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

I agree with you here, but the editor keeps on whitewashing, reverting you, and editing against consensus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Angelo_Taylor&diff=prev&oldid=1227899365 2603:7000:2101:AA00:5C03:FD09:465C:DA45 (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

How can these be considered "Grasping re Notability"?:

1) Anita Baldwin was an heiress to one of the pioneering "robber barons" of early Californian-Lucky Baldwin (Lucky Baldwin - Wikipedia). When she died in 1939 she left her $20 million to estate to various charities. Santa Anita horseracing track is named after her, and the following California landmarks are named after her family: Baldwin Hills, Baldwin Park, Baldwin Ranch in Seal Beach

2) Charles "Kip" Theriot was the great grandson of the founder of one of the oldest surviving newspapers in the Western United State, the San Francisco Chronicle, Charles de Young (Charles de Young - Wikipedia). In his own right, he served on the Boards or was Director of 10 different community, charity, or philanthropic organizations (of three major California companies, and 10 charitable, philanthropic, or community organizations (Charles Thieriot Obituary (1947 - 2021) - San Francisco, CA - San Francisco Chronicle (legacy.com) 2603:8000:713F:79F:9971:8D2C:BD0E:6249 (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

howdy,

being related to someone who has established notability, isn't in itself notable.

the accomplishments you list perhaps belong in a Wikipedia page regarding the non-notable person in question, at which time we could have another look.

you seem to be quite passionate about this addition, and you seemingly possess significant knowledge of the people discussed.

editing your own information is discouraged, and the children of notable people are not notable by family ties.

you could read this covered exhaustively, or ask over at the Wikipedia Treehouse, where you will find pointers on editing biographical articles.

thanks for helping with the encyclopaedia,

regardless, editing ones own Wikipedia page is discouraged. Augmented Seventh (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherwood, Oregon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

howdy fellow editor,

It looks like you have a real experience when it comes to edit wars.

Please remember the rule : "If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors".

If not, we will have to ask for some help, but keep in mind erasing other editors contents without talk or reasons is vandalism.

Also, you have not been respecting the WP "Three revert rule" recently. That is a serious reason to block your profile, please keep that in mind, thanks.

Raoul mishima (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

thank you for the advice. this admittedly is a topic of which i have no prior knowledge, or even have a passing interest.

i was reverting trolls, socs, and pov edits, and started following along with this mess, as a learning tool.

have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 20:53, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

As it says on the tin. NatPo opinion pieces are non notable 2605:B100:1130:ACA7:D79:21D0:86FD:8A6C (talk) 14:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

howdy there,

this section needs balance, and this sourced paragraph you are attempting to remove supplies it

and please, fellow editor, contain your disparagement.

thanks in advance, Augmented Seventh (talk) 14:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

The criticism section needs more balance? Your ability to comprehend english is lacking. May I suggest http://hi.wikipedia.org 2605:B100:1130:ACA7:D79:21D0:86FD:8A6C (talk) 14:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Opinion pieces from a notoriously biased publication defending their founder against satire do not meet the definition of "balance" in Western english parlance. What is your native language? 2605:B100:1130:ACA7:D79:21D0:86FD:8A6C (talk) 14:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Also 100% unclear how such content rises to the level of "notable". This is not a comedian mock-murdering an effigy of the president on national television, and in fact seems to have been a literary device subsequently heavily used by NatPo. So, it's totally irrelevant. Also there is nothing controversial about hating Black, a convicted felon, in mainstream Canadian society. Curious to hear your thoughts. 2605:B100:1130:ACA7:D79:21D0:86FD:8A6C (talk) 14:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to keep the encyclopedia accurate.

your suggestions and complaints are noted.

have a wikipedia day, Augmented Seventh (talk) 14:55, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which I get flagged by Raoul mishima Kelvintjy (talk) 07:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

WP:HOUNDING is a form of harassment and following IP users you believe to have a shared purpose or to be one person or not to cast WP:ASPERSIONS is harassment with personal attacks. Please read WP:IPHUMAN and reconsider your conduct. It's not constructive. Thank you! If you wish to edit an article, then do so and talk about the content on the talk pages. It's not a forum for your musings about IP editors. 2600:8801:3983:E800:E443:7D09:DFB4:DCD8 (talk) 05:48, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

IP editors are human too, yes. I'm an IP editor too and I'm not in fact a bot! But it's easier to talk to us as human beings when we don't use a new IP address from a new provider and presumably through some new proxy, for every edit. Is there a reason you're doing that?? 76.6.213.65 (talk) 10:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

thank you for taking the time to instruct regarding what you feel to be correct editing.

in this particular instance, you're incorrect, but i appreciate the strident and baffling attempt at article ownership, as the campaign to create a preferred version of this article was instructive.

I'll go back and check the multiple tendentious edits, and see where your specific ip range fit into the mess.

thanks again for the gentle correction, Augmented Seventh (talk) 14:33, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I've reported the IP hopper here, in case you didn't see my reply to you on one of the umpteen hopped-IP pages.

signed, a non-hopping IP editor 76.6.213.65 (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Congrats on 100,000 edit! Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:41, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, 10,000 Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 15:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

a kind thank you,

s The Hell You Say! (request an appointment) 04:47, 26 July 2024 (UTC)