User talk:Cagliost/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Cagliost. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

A tag has been placed on Michael Burgess requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jons63 22:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Mike Caveney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 20:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Balliol rhyme, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The article Dalvey has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fakecharities.org requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 12:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. andy (talk) 12:15, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello Cagliost! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Robert Sledge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Anthony Browne (UK politics) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Mark Applebaum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:20, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• In a way, it is an insult to Wikipedia to post half a sentence and think we will accept it. If you are not prepared to write a proper article, leave it to someone else. If you need time, work in User:Cagliost/sandbox until it is ready. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• What a dick. cagliost (talk) 08:37, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Ilya Chashnik requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 08:26, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

I have nominated Ilya Chashnik, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilya Chashnik. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Max Viwe | Wanna chat with me? 09:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

The article Bruce Caldwell (economic historian) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kim Il-sung, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Norman Cocker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 22:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating Mary Buckland! Andrew Gray (talk) 11:27, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Have you considered suggesting this article for the Did you know section of the main page? It meets the criteria - as long as you do the submission within the next five days. If you'd like to do it, read the above link and how to post a new nomination. I've done this a few times, so if you have any questions feel free to ask (I'll watch your page for a while). RockMagnetist (talk) 15:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

On 29 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mary Buckland, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Mary Buckland, a scientific illustrator, took a year-long geological tour as a honeymoon with her husband William Buckland? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Buckland. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Andrew Gray (talk) 22:38, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Anthony J. Evans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. reddogsix (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Your "scooping" of the Mary Buckland article was mentioned in Nature. Cheers, Gobōnobō ^{+ c} 08:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Throne and altar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. §FreeRangeFrog 18:02, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello Cagliost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of people known as Sage for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Makro (talk) 00:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Absurd (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 04:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello Cagliost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charles Vince for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 19:43, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Phil Mattingly requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 11:22, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello Cagliost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Prayer Book Society (England) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:27, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Missed call, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

You can't just copy text from newspapers and paste it into Wikipedia. You have to rewrite it in your own words, and you can't just change one or two words. I have stubbed Quentin Crewe to remove the copyright violations. In the future, you should use inline citations, such as <ref>...</ref>, to support text that you add, especially in a biography (biographies of living people have stricter requirements). In order to cite the same source multiple times, you can use named references, like <ref name=nyt>...</ref>. Then, when you need to use the reference again, you can cite it with <ref name=nyt/>. Remember that you must use your own words when you write an article. If you wish to use direct quotations, you can use <quote></quote> or quotation marks: Jane Journalist of The New York Times called the book "a triumphant return to form". If you choose to paraphrase someone else's words, you must give attribution: According to Jane Journalist of The New York Times, the book was a return to form for the author. After each of these statements, you would need to include a citation, of course. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

I've already warned you once about this. Do not add back your original text. Not only is it plagiarism, it is a copyright violation. You have changed a few words per sentence from the original NYT and Independent articles, and that is not enough. If you continue to add copyrighted text, you can be blocked. All you need to do is follow the instructions that I've stated above. In order to avoid plagiarism issues, give attribution. In order to avoid copyright issues, use your own phrasing. Don't just substitute a few words here and there in their sentences. You should also cite your sources properly; uncited information can be challenged and removed. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The article Battle of Al Waki Market has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable skirmish, no assertion of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough, but its always a good idea to include some claim of notability before you put up an article.TheLongTone (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Lise de la Salle. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

I wanted to extend a special invitation to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Quotations#How_to_cite_examples_of_an_idea.2Fargument, since this discussion was prompted by your use of the over-quote tag. 165.189.37.11 (talk) 21:28, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Found it. cagliost (talk) 07:54, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of places named after places, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 10:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Back in 2004 , when you had just joined WP, you started a number of minimal stubs of people; I wonder if you would consider going back to those that have not been worked on since, and filling them in a little? DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

The article Jack Farthing has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Benboy00 (talk) 16:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Many of your recent edits, including this edit to Matt Ridley [1], are marked as minor edits, although most of them do not meet the criteria at WP:MINOR. In particular "A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute". Regards, Jonathan A Jones (talk) 09:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I accept the rebuke re Matt Ridley, sorry. (I think that at least 13 out of the last 15 of my edits marked as minor were correctly marked. In any case I will endeavour to use the feature correctly in future.) cagliost (talk) 10:39, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. To be clear I don't think any of your edits were particularly controversial; I just have a very low threshold for "could never". Jonathan A Jones (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the List of most common surnames in North America page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

The article Luciano Pellicani has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cahk (talk) 16:09, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost. Pathological Altruism, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 04:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

• Hi, can you improve the article Pathological Altruism little bit? You can add just 2-3 more lines in that article. I have nominated it for DYK and it may feature on main page. I request you to add 2-3 lines. Please.--Human3015^TALK  11:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

On 19 November 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pathological Altruism, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barbara Oakley's book Pathological Altruism explores negative aspects of altruism and empathy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pathological Altruism. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about vandal warning but you should have left an edit summary explaining the deletion of such a large amount of text from the Eric Dillon, 19th Viscount Dillon article. So much mischief these days on Wikipedia. Yours, Quis separabit? 18:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

You're right, I should have -- you did the right thing. cagliost (talk) 10:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello Cagliost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Charles Vince for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Prof. Mc (talk) 20:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of unusual football matches is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual football matches until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KJ ^Discuss? 19:08, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for starting this page and for your comments at this discussion but you have not yet placed a bold-faced !vote. I recommend that you enter a Keep, Delete or Merge as these tend to have more weight than more general comments. Andrew D. (talk) 19:34, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

The article Jiffy Packaging Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article makes no clear assertion that the topic is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 18:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for creating The Henry Smith Charity, Cagliost!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added some extra citations and categories, and linked the talk page to WikiProject Organizations. Hope that's all OK!

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi Cagliost. People are commentating on your move request. It appears you didn't see the recent discussion on the talkpage. No worries, you can simply remove the requested move template (perhaps with a comment that it was placed in error), and that will close the matter. Regards SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 22:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'm UNSC Luke 1021. Cagliost, thanks for creating Newport Street Gallery!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You can obviously write very well and this is obviously a famous topic. Please follow the guidelines I have presented. Take care!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. UNSC Luke 1021 (talk) 19:16, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, please can you comment on the article talk page to explain your "undue weight" and source reliability concerns. cagliost (talk) 09:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

You left a spurious comment on my talk page indicating "Thank you for some of your contributions so far, however, some other of your contributions do not meet Wikipedia's guidelines. It is good to discuss an article on its Talk page, with the aim of improving the article, but not to discuss the subject more generally.". Clearly, not providing any indication or example of what the offending contribution was seems a little odd - would you care to give some examples to see if there is a general trend? ASavantDude (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

1. [2]
2. [3]
3. [4]

cagliost (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Pass (2016 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵɜat bʉɭagɑ!!! (Talk | Contributions) 09:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 06:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

The article Six Carpenters' Case has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced, very short, this content could be added to another article instead

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seraphim System ^(talk) 18:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The article Readiris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of places named after places is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of places named after places until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 06:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bloomberg London. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have been politely asked before to use sources when you add content to Wikipedia. Continuing to add content without sources is disruptive and can result in you being blocked. Feel free to ask questions if you don't understand how sources are supposed to be used on Wikipedia. - MrX 14:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for creating William Gage (judge). I've added two sources, but there are still some unsourced claims that need to be referenced to reliable sources. For future reference, please also add relevant categories to any article you create. Bennv3771 (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on J. C. W. Brook requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sheldybett (talk) 11:57, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect FAPI. Since you had some involvement with the FAPI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:44, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

The article Froy Gutierrez has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:16, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Paul Sauer, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 23:49, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Cagliost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Oliver Bonas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Mdriscoll03 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Doyne Dawson should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doyne Dawson.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Mdriscoll03}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mdriscoll03 (talk) 17:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost

Thank you for creating Nathan Laube.

User:Citrivescence, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The page is very short so please add as much well-cited information as you can.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Citrivescence (talk) 04:46, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Rory Sutherland (advertising) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:43, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Rory Sutherland (advertising) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 15:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost

Thank you for creating Duncan Bell (historian).

User:DGG, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

you might want to add some more of the bio from his university web site.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DGG}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DGG ( talk ) 22:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

The article Jonny Buchardt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minor character actor. Fails WP:NACTOR, and there doesn't appear to be enough to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oliver Bonas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Cagliost, I just thought it's better to discuss here :-) Like I wrote, I totally can see your point. But I hope you understand my point too? Since it is my life it is very important for me that my decision is reasoned correctly, especially an important one like this one. And "he doesn't want to be associated with" is just not it, there are important parts missing. I also changed my name right after High School, but this process took time and I'm not sure if it was exactly 19 or a bit later. Best! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Libuda84 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm sympathetic to your situation and desire for privacy. Claims on Wikipedia have to be sourced, and secondary sources are preferred to primary sources. So ideally claims about your intentions should be in a newspaper article rather than your personal website. For example, you added a claim about your American ancestry. It would be nice if there was some explanation of this on your personal website, but even better if it was explained in a third-party source. cagliost (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your quick reply, Cagliost, and for your understanding. I also saw your post on my talk section now and answered it. The thing with intentions on print articles is a bit tricky here since I usually try to avoid to talk with newspapers about my family. Because I don't want to sell books with these headlines and private topics, but with the stories I write itself. This is why I wrote the text on my homepage to make my decision clear without selling books with it. So I understand that a third party source is better, but it can't be more true than my homepage text. Libuda84 (talk) 14:27, 18 February 2021 (UTC) P.S. Thank you for your edits. If there is anything unclear with my page in the future you can always write into my talk section. Best wishes! Libuda84 (talk) 14:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I've reverted your move of this page for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, the current title is in line with WP:NCSHIPS, second, potentially controversial moves should be discussed first. In this case, if you had asked at the article talk page, I (or others) would have let you know about the naming conventions. Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Jenyire2 18:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Variable-pitch propeller (marine) into Variable-pitch propeller (aeronautics). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.

The article Aircraft performance has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a dictionary definition and not an encyclopedic article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

I have objected and left a message on the article talk page. cagliost (talk) 16:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Young Royals (Netflix). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Young Royals (TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Young Royals (TV series). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Babar Suhail (talk) 16:01, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I have undone your move and other edit there, as license is always the correct spelling for both the verb and noun in American English, in which the article is written. Your edits therefore violated Wikipedia's guideline on English varieties. Graham87 15:55, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Dutton (author), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Flynn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

79.21.97.65 aka the Brescia LTA is a Long-term abuser who is banned from Wikipedia and whose edits should be removed immediately. See User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA for a partial list. Do you happen to know him? Adakiko (talk) 19:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello Adakiko. I do not know this user or users.

You say the user is banned from Wikipedia but I don't see them mentioned on the official Wikipedia:LTA page yet. Instead you provide a link to someone's user page, which says a LTA report is still under construction.

The edit in question does not appear abusive. cagliost (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

I also note 79.21.97.65 and 79.21.61.218 do not appear on the User:Beyond My Ken/Brescia LTA list. cagliost (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Please format/indent/thread your talk WP:THREAD - I indented yours above.

Editors in the Brescia area have been making wp:disruptive edits and wp:personal attacks on Dutton as well as similar articles and have been blocked numerous times. I would suggest that you review page history. IPs do change and there are numerous IPs in the Brescia area. The fact 79.21.97.65 is not on the list would likely be the rule and not the exception. I would suggest you discuss this with Beyond My Ken (talk · contribs) Adakiko (talk) 21:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know about the Brescia editor. I agree with you reverting their edits to the article, which weren't constructive. However the edit on talk page is, I believe, constructive, and not abusing anyone. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this user is not in fact banned from Wikipedia. If you think an IP ban or some other ban is justified, please pursue it. Regards, cagliost (talk) 21:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Peter Linehan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 11:37, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Trinity Six, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 10:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hilaire du Berrier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Welch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

IMHO, an edit summary of "Moved references to articles" is barely explanatory. Is there a WP:MoS policy about your preferred style of referencing? Paul W (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Apologies, I was misremembering Wikipedia:Disambiguation#References, which doesn't apply. Nonetheless I think the same logic applies, and I think it is better to avoid cluttering the page with many references of tangential relevancy. I think it would be better to have a short list of particularly notable/relevant alumni (e.g. Eric Liddell), with a reference about them being the most notable/relevant, and put the rest on either a separate article or just rely on the category. Eton College doesn't list all alumni on the main article. cagliost (talk) 16:17, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Clarityfiend (talk) 01:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konditor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mansion House.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I have reverted your addition of birth dates to the Lead section of the Richard and Maurice McDonald article, because they were not accompanied by citations of reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources. I understand that you're a veteran editor, and that it's possible you added it because you saw those dates in the article's Infobox, but I thought I'd point out that information was also uncited, as another editor added it without citations two days before you did. I've noticed it's somewhat common for editors to add material to one part of an article for this reason, which is why I'd request/suggest, from one veteran editor to another, that we double-check the portion of the article that contains the initial info before adding it to another one. Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost,

Thank you for creating The Light of Day (Eric Ambler novel).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet notability for Books.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 04:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost,

Thank you for creating The Night-Comers.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet notability for Books

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 04:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost,

Thank you for creating The Schirmer Inheritance.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet notability for Books

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 04:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost,

Thank you for creating Send No More Roses.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The link to Kirkus Reviews "The Siege of the Villa Lipp" appears to have nothing to do with this title, "Send No More Roses". Supply references relevant to this text, and satisfy WP:NBOOK

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Cagliost,

Thank you for creating The Levanter.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references to meet notability for Books

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)