View text source at Wikipedia
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Callmemirela. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
What's wrong with saying "Kids" in the episode descriptions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.55.157 (talk) 22:15, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
"Kids" isn't slang at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.55.157 (talk) 00:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I see you are interested in the article on the talk page. After removing tons of useless information only one reference turned out and good and the page remains a stub. I though I'd let you know and am seeing if you think it should be deleted or merged with Scythian religion. With regards Psychotic Spartan 123 12:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
There has been a conflict over the use of the infobox image in the Jamie Dornan page, I'm hoping that a vote to choose a preferred image would settle the dispute. I am therefore writing to those editors who have ever edited Jamie Dornan page to voice their opinion in the Jamie Dornan Talk page so we can reach a consensus. I would welcome your opinion. Hzh (talk) 13:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
Thank you for defending me at WP:ANI against User:WordSeventeen. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC) |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:47, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Appreciate your support at AN/I. Thanks! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Weegeerunner (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the new article and for the encouraging comment! TowardsTheLight (talk) 23:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello to you. Well, I do have 9 categories there. However, I am still new to adding relevant categories to a new article. As you probably have seen the 2015 in sports article is way too large. Anyway, thank you for your input in this matter. I will see what other categories to add there. Rockies77 (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I accidently reverted your edit. Sorry!!Catty319 (talk) 23:19, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks for reverting an edit on my talk page. An editor put an item about an international cup (?) on my talk page and it is very unclear why this was done. Many thanks again-RFD (talk) 22:56, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
It's in many places, and it plays a role not just in best practices, but also in our policies and guidelines. To begin with, you can find its foundation in two of our policies: WP:CIV (participate in a respectful and considerate way, and avoid directing offensive language at others; discussion of other editors should be limited to polite discourse about their actions; avoid belittling a fellow editor) and WP:NPA (comment on content, not on the contributor). Finally, you can find these policies applied in the behavioral guidelines, such as those governing discussions in project space, such as Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, which stipulates how to avoid attacking other editors in the headings of discussions (see WP:TALKNEW): don't be critical in headings, don't address other users in a heading, and never use headings to attack other users. I should note, that in practice, there is an exception for addressing other users in a heading, but that only applies to admin noticeboards about editorial conduct disputes. On the other hand, on a regular article talk page, we generally avoid talking about other users in the heading, preferring to focus only on content. I realize that this can get confusing. Viriditas (talk) 22:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Why do you say TO averaged 1.81M and 0.9? That article was posted back in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.212.129 (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
But that article is from May 2014, way before the season even began. Its not confusing, It's just completely wrong, and not a valid source. It should be TBA until Deadline or TVbytheNumbers posts an article about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisLoudMorningxThisQuietNight (talk • contribs) 18:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
HI I PROVIDED A SOURCE ON THE CHARACTER. AND THAT MEANS I PERSONALLY ATTACKED YOU??? YOU NEED HELP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:1C80:221C:88F4:4633:8DB4:DE01 (talk) 05:26, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Callmemirela. As a reminder, WP:3RR applies to you as well. Please note that reverting material that you feel violates WP:NPOV is not an exception to WP:EDITWAR or the 3RR rule. I suggest ceasing immediately and discussing the edit on the talk page or requesting a third opinion. Continuing to revert will result in a block. Tiptoety talk 05:36, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello! Callmemirela,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:02, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)Hello C. I notice that you are archiving threads like this one on the same day that they are closed. There are some problems with that. First and foremost, due to the nature of how time is kept on Earth, there are editors who will not have had a chance to read the threads. For example most of the thread that I linked to took place while I was asleep. Even if it has been closed there is informative value to editors by reading a closed thread. Next, threads have been known to be reopened. Next, the bot archiving still works and it is only in special cases (like an extraordinarily long thread) that it is helpful to manually archive a thread. Don't get me wrong I know that you are trying to be helpful but these are things that you need to consider as you proceed. Thanks for your time. MarnetteD|Talk 15:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —Darkwind (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Callmemirela (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I admit to my wrongdoings, quite frankly. I know that edit warring wasn't the place and I should have reported them earlier rather than dealing with a block (something I had been trying to avoid for two years). I do apologize for my actions and I seriously promise to avoid edit warring and violating 3rr again. After 1 revert, I let other users handle it. Thank you for considering my unblock, Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 21:48, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Accept reason:
Sounds fine to me - - unblocking based on time served. I feel a block was particularly inappropriate as it prevents you from explaining to the IP why they should not repeatedly add unverifiable content, and it stops you from requesting page protection. I would personally have semi-protected the article for 12 hours, not blocked. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your closure here [1] if you really aren't sure if the situation is resolved, as a non-admin you really shouldn't be closing it.--211.215.156.184 (talk) 08:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Callmemirela (or should I call you Mirela?). Anyway, just to let you know, someone's repeatedly vandalized the article on the movie 50 First Dates, changing names, pronouns etc. You know this already, because you reverted this person's first "edit". Afterwards, he undid your reversion. Just now, I re-reverted the page to your version. Perhaps, if this person keeps it up, it would by a good idea to put the article under lock and key, yes? 80.61.230.65 (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC) (Sorry, didn't take the time to log in. I'm Ieneach fan 'e Esk, from the Frisian Wikipedia.)
Hi again C. I wanted to let you know that 67.184.255.230 (talk · contribs) has already been blocked. I know that those 3rr reports take some work (whew) so you can leave it or remove it as you wish. Enjoy the week ahead. MarnetteD|Talk 18:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi you took off the Chicago Med picture on the page, and didn't replace it with a new one. Why are you always deleting and not editing properly? the page needs a picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:245:0:101F:2D7A:3A06:9B0D:4056 (talk) 17:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Seriously, I agree with the comment above, why did you remove the shows picture and not replace it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Watchme420 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
The tv show has been renewed for a second season. Caden cool 19:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)