User talk:Chris gonzalez

Chris 18:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Hi, Chris. It's probably not a good idea to include your email address on your User pages, since spammers read these pages and use your email address to send spam. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me a heads up about that.

Favorite quote: "Shoot for the stars. Even if you miss you will land among the stars." Les Brown <- I live by this

Unless you are an admin (have had the admin bit turned on after approval by a consensus of the other editors), you cannot delete a page. What you can do, is to flag it for an admin's attention by putting {{db-author}} at the top of the page. This will alert admins that the author of the page requests that it be deleted. User:Zoe|(talk) 16:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can sign your posts on Talk and discussion pages by using four tildes - ~~~~. User:Zoe|(talk) 20:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. If you have any more questions, don't hesitate to ask. If I'm not available, you can put {{helpme}} on your Talk page, and some other kind person may come by to ask what help you are looking for. User:Zoe|(talk) 18:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 13:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To tell you the truth, i do not remember what i exactly wrote on your page, "AP World History," although i admit to editing it with non-factual information. If you would plz leave a note on my page to tell me how to use the sandbox, that would be wonderful. User:Chris gonzalez

Actually what you (or someone using your username) did was a little more than just adding non-factual information. It was vandalism. Here is an example: [1]. But no harm done. If you want to experiment in the sandbox, click on the link and then you can edit it like any other page, only it is reset periodically, so there's no trouble for you. TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 01:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey don't worry about it anymore. :) Lots of newcomers do it but not many accept, like you did, that they were wrong. Cheers. - TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 05:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have awarded a barnstar on your user page. Vikrant Phadkay 15:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This barnstar is for those who learn from their mistakes rather than misunderstanding other users to be disruptive. Vikrant Phadkay 14:29, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I love myselfChris 13:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the smile. ^_^ -WarthogDemon 20:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

template:History of Manchuria is suffering from extensive revert warring, and discussion is heading nowhere. A RfC was filed, but was only able to get one outside commentor[2]. Please provide a third opinion on whether template:History of Manchuria should be titled History of Manchuria[3] or History of Northeast China[4][5] to facilitate dispute resolution. Thank you. 08:47, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)