User talk:Efficacious

Hi Efficacious. Just to let you know, the reasons you cited for deletion may well be valid reasons, but they are excluded from deletion of the "speedy" variety. See WP:NOTCSD. Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul. Thought that looked too easy. I missed the *Non*-criteria in WP:NOTCSD. :) Efficacious (talk) 23:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Efficacious, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ching_Hai. Thank you. Halo, Please make sure you read the guidelines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons before you make any changes to the page. Thanks Ldp linux (talk) 20:23, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response at User_talk:Ldp_linux. Efficacious (talk) 22:20, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Ching Hai, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hi Efficacious, I highly admire the work that you are involved in expanding our community-based Wikipedia. But I strongly urge you to take caution in relying solely on the poorly sourced article that lack original research before making any changes. And please do keep in mind that we are writing about a living person who is truly dedicated to the cause of the humanity! Thanks! Ldp linux (talk) 05:45, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well there's really no answer to that gibberish. Efficacious (talk) 05:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've noticed your contributions to the Supreme Master Ching Hai page. Thanks for correcting my inaccuracies, it's hard to be 100% accurate and unbiased sometimes haha. Anyways, I was just wondering... Are you affiliated with Ching Hai in any way? I'm just curious a little because I've noticed your uncannily large amount of contributions to the article. Happypatatoes (talk) 04:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, just got interested based on media hype and the previously significant bias and inaccuracies in the article. Efficacious (talk) 06:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Efficacious: two of your edits to Invention of the telephone needed to be reverted due to inaccuracies. In one of your edits, you wrote:

"The modern telephone is the culmination of work done by many individuals. Alexander Graham Bell was the first to successfully patent the telephone, an "apparatus for transmitting vocal or other sounds telegraphically"."

Kindly note that a patent caveat is not a patent application. The statement that Bell was the 'first to patent the telephone' is indeed correct and completely factual, as there can only be one 'first' in a patent process. Additionally, there are no other known inventors who 'unsuccessfully' tried to patent the telephone –i.e. they filed a patent application for a telephone that was rejected by a patent office prior to Bell's application in February 1976. Adding the word 'successfully' to the article will thus distort the paragraph and leave it open to misinterpretation.

In the other reverted edit, you mentioned a myth long promoted by Antonio Meucci supporters, that he lacked the funds to renew his patent caveat. That falsehood was previously removed from the Meucci article for several reasons. Meucci supporters can't claim poverty when testimony clearly shows that Meucci was funded with $20 by his backers to obtain a patent, but he instead chose to spend only $10 of it for a patent caveat instead of spending $15 for a full patent application (not the $250 claimed by numerous supporters). During the period from when Meucci filed his teletrofono patent caveat, up to when Bell received his telephone patent, Meucci also filed four more patent applications plus one additional patent caveat application ––its hard for his supporters to claim he couldn't spend $15 on that patent application when he actually spent at a minimum $150 on other patents. For more information on this, see the talk section: Antonio Meucci –Expense of the patent as a reason for not obtaining it. Best: HarryZilber (talk) 15:20, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edit shouldn't be considered vandalism since it was sourced: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3baqyANDM3A

71.22.151.202 (talk) 04:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They weren't referenced and there was mini vandalism in the addition; now corrected. Efficacious (talk) 07:19, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there and happy new year to you. I understand you wanted to further discuss the changes for Ching Hai page, specifically the section on western press. can you please elaborate what aspect of the change caused you to view it as notable and relevant, but it however caused you to revert it, preferring to discuss it on your talk page. thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.114.174 (talk) 22:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, at least two editors have now disagreed with your recent edit at Thor (Marvel Comics). In order to prevent an edit war, I am formally asking you to bring your disagreement to the talk page for discussion. --Tenebrae (talk) 01:11, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 11:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]