View text source at Wikipedia
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Exemplo347. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hi Exemplo347, may I know why you deleted the things I edited on HappyFresh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anisahdpt (talk • contribs) 10:38, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi, a suspected sockpuppet IP user is going around removing sourced content. Examples: Nam Joo-hyuk, Ryu Jun-yeol. I do not want to engage in a edit war, so please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2404:E800:E610:1D5:E817:CD4A:A8F8:65E (talk) 13:34, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
I'm disappointed that you acted before I'd had a chance to respond. I DO own all of those images. I personally know the person in those pictures, I took the pictures of him, and I created the memes for the ones that have been memed. The fact that a couple of the images were turned into memes doesn't change at all the fact that they were all relevant to the pages on which I posted them and, with the captions I added, enhanced the pages on which they were posted. The one illustrated cyber humiliation, which is an important facet of erotic humiliation that was not amply addressed on that page. The second illustrated the lifestyle of a "sissy maid" on a feminization page that talks about sissy maids but didn't connect the dress-up aspect of the lifestyle to public outings, which are an important part of it, until I added my photo. And the third was an actual example of a picture that can be found on the People Of Walmart website and is illustrative of the pictures visitors to that site will find. I don't want to get into a spat because I'm new to all of this Wikipedia editing stuff, but I'm going to trust now that you know I do in fact own the copyrights to these and many other pictures of this guy that you won't interfere with my adding them to pages so long as they are actually relevant to the topic of the pages. Is that a fair assumption?
Dom Vadar (talk) 01:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Prince011 (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)I am here by to discuss about my page Babangida Kabiru Ruma which was tagged by deletion, i have made several edition on the page kindly take a look or perhaps give me a tips on which article should be on wikipedia. thanks you Prince011 (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For your repeated detection and rapid tagging of G10 attack pages. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC) |
I was not trying to be malicious in anyway. Originally my user name was PaeDae Entertainment but then i changed it to Brenon of PaeDae Entertainment because it violated the terms of a username. Then i changed it to Ty Bricksdale because apparently it still violated. That's why i have multiple accounts. I was in no way trying to violate any rules. I didn't know how to change the user name so i just made a new account. I'm sorry for any inconvenience i caused. If you can make the edits i made visible it will be greatly appreciated. Have a great day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ty Bricksdale (talk • contribs) 02:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I don't understand why you are trying to delete this article. You've stated they don't meet notability standards but they are GRAMMY NOMINATED in 3 categories and have produced multiple top-10 singles across the United States, Australia, the UK, New Zealand, Italy and more. This is not gaining notability through "working with a famous person", this is publishing with recognised musical artists and in many cases Grammy award winning artists. By your logic EVERY SINGLE MUSIC PRODUCER with an article on wiki would need to have their page deleted. What is your issue with this page? (Haydon.h. (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2017 (UTC))
OK, my apologies, i did not mean to misuse the talk page. Can you help me with the article though? What types of sources do i need to insert to prevent it from being deleted? (Haydon.h. (talk) 00:24, 5 February 2017 (UTC))
I see that you've been involved in cleaning up after RaySingh, so I just wanted to let you know I've just added his name to this SPI for a long-time sockpuppeteer. I've suspected it was the same person, and the hijacking of Muslim Educational Trust was yet another similarity to how previous socks have behaved. Anyway, we'll see what the SPI finds out. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 16:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Please stop spamming my page with unnecessary content. Direct questions could have been asked. Also I am improving comments so they are being replied to not disrupting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danny578 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello!
You don't need to @ a user when you're on their talk page. They'll get notified automatically!
...That's it. Just FYI.
MereTechnicality (talk) 02:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Exemplo347 reported by User:Dharmadhyaksha (Result: ). Thank you. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Read it! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Two conversations at ANI, two edit-conflicts with Floquenbeam closing topics! Here's what I wrote for you: :I would have probably relisted it with a note. But if you had closed it the way you did, I wouldn't have (and won't) used my admin status to re-open, preferring instead to point to WP:DRV. --NeilN talk to me 04:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
You rolled back my changes to the Mutual Fund page because it appeared to be promotional. I guess it was linking to two specific companies that offer classifications of mutual funds. The classifications are ubiquitous, but also proprietary, so I felt it necessary to link to the companies wiki pages. There is nothing promotional about this and I believe the changes should be replaced. Note I also made some changes to address the fact that the article was too US-centric. Rozwat (talk) 02:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
ARodak (talk) 18:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Hey @Exemplo347. Thank you for reaching out with the message about the new edits to the Cabela's wiki page. I am new to wikipedia editing so please bare with me on this, but how would one go about adding valuable information to a page without it breaking conflict of interest. Was just hoping to put up some information about their locations. Let me know! Thanks.
ARodak (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)I have read the conflict of interest. thank you for bringing that to my attention. I am an employee, however I am not looking to advertise. Just want to put current and valuable information on the page. Much of it is outdated. Sorry if putting that graph back up was a mistake, I've just seen it used on other pages and figured it was acceptable after removing the address/phone number like you had mentioned. Like I mentioned, I am still new to this. What would be your suggestions moving forward? Thanks again for working with me on this one.
ARodak (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)That works for me. If I go in and suggest some edits, can I reach back out to you through here to verify them for approval?
Hi Exemplo347,
It looks like you deleted my page shoe´ups. Could you send me the text that i had written on the page ?
Regards,
OrnJoh — Preceding unsigned comment added by OrnJoh (talk • contribs) 12:26, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
I appreciate your closure, but to be clear, I was actually referring to the entire thread, now rendered moot by the RfC, of which only two sub-sections are currently closed. It's really a minor point, but since convention allows for closed threads to sit idle on ANI for at least a day to allow for global participation, its a fairly consequential housekeeping matter for lengthy threads. TimothyJosephWood 14:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Iranians = wrong
pls see it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aryanic_languages&redirect=no and :
can u add Aryanic to article with this source : http://cura.free.fr/xv/14boutet.html - One of its two stars, much like our own Sun, is on the white spectrum while the other is of a yellow-red tinge. Did not Enmerkar, the Sumerian king of Uruk have gifts of silver and gold to offer the Aryan overlord of Chariots? It is therefore possible that these two stars were not as close then as they are now. If one looks closer at the Sumerian legends, one finds many overlapping details with those of the Aryanic peoples. The wild-man of the Gilgamesh cycle for example, bears much resemblance with those found in Scandinavian, Celtic and Vedic myths. This takes us to the imagery found in astrology as well as in I.E. mythology. [16] The Rig Veda, selected, translated and annotated by Wendy Doniger O'Flaherty, 1.160 Vs 1-5, p. 203. « Text
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Please do not add COI templates to articles, as you did at The Russian Bride, when no COI has been declared. If the text is neutral, it doesn't belong there at all. If it isn't, edit the text. Lyrda (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Why are you so sure this is a vandal? Looking at the article the only reference has nothing to do with a "Tom Parker". Please reconsider your actions or explain them. BethNaught (talk) 18:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
hi, see it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan : "Aryan" (/ˈɛəriən, ˈɛərjən, ˈær-/)[1] is a term meaning "noble" which was used as a self-designation by Indian and Iranian or Indo-Iranian people. click on Indo-Iranian people .... go to Indo-Iranians. your criteria for speedy deletion is not neccesary and correct. pls delete it. is it very clear , but i will not keep on but you like to delet a correct link.
thanks . no problem, i dont like keep on argument, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talk • contribs) 19:27, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
for add infobox and add map, i dont know how act?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Minorities_in_Turkey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Callofworld (talk • contribs) 13:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thanks, can u add infobox to this article : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Iranians&oldid=766647898
I deleted it as A7 rather than hoax, as I didn't consider it 'blatant' (i.e. stand up and spit in your face obvious). However, you might find my post on User talk:BrianKleinman interesting... Peridon (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
My page Pink Floyd Records contains no advertising, propaganda or "sandboxing" of any kind. Please stop undoing my page. I apologize for any inconvenience i might have caused. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crimson1216 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week for your work with new editors. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}
Thanks again for your efforts! Lepricavark (talk) 05:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Please be careful while choosing criteria for speedy deletion. Vergenoegd Primary School did not fall under G10 and therefore, the tag was removed. sami talk 12:30, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Thank you for your steadfast defense of wiki policy and the wiki itself in a recent AfD. Your arguments against a barrage of continual unwiki positions was something to admire! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 13:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi Exemplo347,
Thank you for your tips on my talk page. I have added few more lines to the Direct ferries page today https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Ferries. I hope it's according to the Wikipedia guidelines. I assure you no one else uses this login.
Thanks, Speedy09 (talk) 10:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Since the discussion closed on keeping/removing the topic above, I ask you here. What did you mean by: don't completely destroy the formatting of the discussion in future? As said before, I'm from the Netherlands and my English is O.K. at best, so if there is anything I did wrong, I'm willing to know. Kind regards: Oxygene7-13 (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for the welcome message, Exemplo. I just tried to reply to you, although I'm not sure if I did it well. Did you get my reply? Torrenegra (talk) 02:22, 1 March 2017 (UTC) |
- Please delete the page "UserRobinBirk" which you have flagged for deletion. It was created by accident. - Do not delete the page Edna Blanchard. She is a legit artist, past president of the legit Artists of Minnesota, and exhibitor at legit museums. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinbirk (talk • contribs) 23:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Once again, please delete the page "UserRobinBirk" which you have flagged for deletion. It was created by accident. - robinbirk (signed!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinbirk (talk • contribs) 00:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
I moved Utilisateur:Arizona1909 to User:Arizona1909 and removed the csd as it seemed a misplaced userpage to me. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 11:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Exemplo347,
thank you for your tips on my talk page. I am also grateful that you offered to "ask me or another editor to proofread it." I would be happy for comments on the article on the Metacognitive training, particularly which areas you might find biased. Regarding Trichotillomania: I do not understand, however, why my changes have been deleted. Decoupling was examined in two RCTs which were published in two good journals following peer-review, so I think the information is worth sharing. Decoupling is available at no cost so there are no commercial interests involved.
Very kind regards, research_hh Research hh (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed on my talk page that I have been sent a message from you explaining that I had a conflict of interest on one of the articles I edited. I want to know what that article was, so I could demonstrate better wiki edits in the future. I would also like to know, because I don't think I have a conflict of interest with articles I have edited recently. The only substantial edits I have done is on the article Yandere Dev. I do not have any contact, nor have any business relationship with his company. I am only a fan of his work. Is this conflict of interest? Let me know, because I am a new user on wikipedia and do not know all of the rules. Thanks!
Jamesjpk (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesjpk (talk • contribs) 00:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I have used part of your header of the talk page in mine. Is that okay? I can remove it if you want me too. I made slight edits to the talk page header to better fit my talk page. Let me know!
Always open to feedback, Jamesjpk (talk) 01:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
Thank you for helping me get started on wikipedia! You gave me well-needed constructive feedback and helped me learn more about this platform. Thanks :D. Jamesjpk (talk) 01:54, 11 March 2017 (UTC) |
I thought that you deserved something a bit extra for all of the amazing work you've done for the project.
I've nominated you for a gift from the Wikimedia Foundation! |
<3 Jamesjpk (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Sorry - I inadvertently pasted the Gavin Selerie draft twice. However the main draft was indeed revised in an attempt to meet your requirements. However I will now consult Teahouse
Gerarddenerval (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Kharen Hill is a legitimate Canadian/Us Celebrity photographerand artist.RhyH (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Exemplo247,
This is in response to: User_talk:OldWaysTea#March_2017
I understand why you requested I change my username. I was OldWaysTea (which I personally sell tea under). I am now TeaFriend. I have no interest in promoting my business on Wikipedia. I just want to make sure all information is factual and correct.
What I don't understand is why my edits to Guobiao Standards and Wuyi Tea were reversed. You said something about external links, but I only added links to existing wiki articles that seemed relevant to the pages.
Could you help me understand what I need to do to help contribute? I have spent a lot of time in Wuyishan, China and believe I can do a good job finding references and information to better fill out these articles.
TeaFriend (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Now that you have have deleted what ever you see is wrong with the article, is there anything else I can do to get the warning type sign at the top, removed? Thanks! Al — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allotnap (talk • contribs) 01:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Is being a big fan a connection? Is the source material sub par? I just wanted to get it right. there are a lot of uninformed articles out there. Yes I have read the WP:COI. Thank you for pointing it out. Is there anything else about the article that needs help? Please advise. Allotnap (talk) 02:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
New to this and will get better. Thank you for all your help! Allotnap (talk) 02:12, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Not sure why you have scheduled Jozeff for deletion, there are plenty of notable links on there. There are hundreds of other artist pages/biographies we used for reference when creating the wikipedia page Jozeff, yet they are not removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:40E:9600:A8BB:ECF4:4AB3:C8E8 (talk) 12:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Apolagies Exemplo347.
The last post regarding 'Jozeff' was myself. Can you suggest any changes that would reverse the page deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danieljames9090 (talk • contribs) 12:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black English. Since you had some involvement with the Black English redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 14:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Please allow me to delete the Rotair wiki page. As you are a contributor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jake505k (talk • contribs) 23:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Exemplo347,
No COI to declare. Being a resident of Mt Roskill, Auckland. I am just really inspired by the young Shail Kaushal, born overseas but grew up in Mt Roskill and is now on the Auckland's local government representing my area. He has doorknocked my place number of times. Also the first Indian-born to be ever elected by the people in Auckland, New Zealand, and one of the youngest. My next contributions would be on page Puketapapa Local Board, and local MP Michael Wood.
Thanks,
Hi-I wanted to check why the page was deleted when I've cited several independent sources verifying all the information that I have listed about Monsterindia.com. There are other job sites like Naukri.com with wiki pages written in a similar fashion on wikipedia - could you let me know why they aren't considered promotional content? Please see links below - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naukri.com Thanks Sonal nerurkar (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)sonal nerurkar
Hi-how can I access the page to upload it in Article Creation wizard? Will I have to recreate it? It would help if you can make it available for me. Thanks Sonal nerurkar (talk) 22:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)sonal
Hi, Exemplo! I'm responding to your request for page protection of this article. I did not impose protection because I temporarily blocked the current problem editor, and the previous one is indefinitely blocked. But it is clear that the article is being attacked by sockpuppets and there are likely to be more. I have filed a sockpuppet investigation request at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alexisdaoud. If you have an ongoing interest in that article, you might want to take note of it. Because if they do identify a sockmaster, then when new users show up at that article doing the same thing, you can report them to WP:SPI (or for that matter to me) and get them dealt with quickly. --MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Sir, This is with regard to the following MESSAGE " Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Pentecostal Mission, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Exemplo347" received from your side.
It has come to my notice that there is a section in the The Pentecostal Mission Article called Criticisms and controversies.It contains unsubstantiated information and allegations without any basis. So when I remove this, you reinstate it back. I have already given my explanation that it is just allegations with no proof.
I want to know who posted this information in the first place and what proof was given of these Criticisms and controversies. Please produce your information to substantiate these Criticisms and controversies in The Pentecostal Mission Article or PLEASE REMOVE IT IMMEDIATELY. STOP PUTTING WRONG INFORMATION. ANY PERSON CAN MAKE UP CONTROVERSIES. I HOPE WIKIPEDIA WILL MOVE TO A HIGHER STANDARD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasmath72 (talk • contribs) 04:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
HI Exemplo347 Can I know the reason for why you are applying to delete the page ZEBRONICS. I don't think it has any errors nor looks like a advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keschristo (talk • contribs) 11:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
HI Exemplo347,
I feel G11 is not applicable kindly read it carefully before applying.
Exemplo347 no it is not applicable. Anybody can edit the pages in Wikipedia. Many people editing a same article can't be considered as spammers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kesavanchristo (talk • contribs) 11:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@Exemplo347,
Yeah already reported about your activies under edit warring and also for spamming activities also appealed to delete the user. Hope it will work. Let see
There is no sign of spamming i feel @exemplo347 is ment to do edit warring like he always does. kindly do check it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kesavanchristo (talk • contribs) 12:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Give WP:ORCP a whirl and see how it goes - I think you'll be pleasantly surprised as for blocking Australia, what have they ever done for us eh -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Re weird appellations: a particularly tiresome troll used to call me "kidneyless". I should have saved a diff, because I can't find it now - it is probably the strangest thing I've been called, though. :-o --bonadea contributions talk 14:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello - I see that you edited my draft of the [N. Converse] wikipedia page. I think you said that linking to csmonitor.com was a copyright infringement, but I work for CSM and we have rights to the article. Does that mean I can still reference? I'm just about to add the COI bit. Also, I'm not sure if you took out some sections of the articles, but I was wondering why they can't be used. Much appreciated! Csmonitorwiki (talk) 15:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your reply @Exemplo347:. The article does contain facts about Gordon Converse's life (e.g. he was named Newspaper-Magazine Photographer of the Year in 1959) - would I be able to cite those? I'm working on submitting a release of copyright, but may run into impediments with legal counsel at CSM, so I thought that in the meantime I might be able to include these facts. Thanks!
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, to the best of my knowledge, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Material Sciences Corporation do not warranted a NAC. Both the sides were evenly poised and per WP:NACD:-Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to admins.
And taking a decision based (solely/mainly) based on Cunard's sources(which was the last opinion) somehow gave me the impression that the closer exercised a super-vote.Anyway, what d'ya think?Do not take this as a request to reopen the disc. or otherwise.Cheers!Winged Blades Godric 10:33, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This is actually still a questionable close, especially as a non-admin, because I was actually going to comment and analyze since the one other comment, also analyzed them. Re-opening this would benefit for everyone to see the sources. Especially because the sources actually violate WP:What Wikipedia is not, given the offered sources actually contain pricing and costs info (WP: Wikipedia is not a sales catalogue). Such sources would not improve the article. SwisterTwister talk 15:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)