User talk:FlyJet777

Hi FlyJet777! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FlyJet777 I am creating new articles on Ladakh mountain peaks and other geographical landmarks. Would you like to team up? RPSkokie (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle

The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter

Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged. On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue. Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion. The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7. The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed. The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125. The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members New Members KingAviationKid (Joined on 17 December) PatrickChiao (Joined on 22 December) Wp9097 (Joined on 16 December) Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921. Closed Discussions Featured Article assessment Jim Lovell (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Good Article assessment HAL Tejas (discussion) – Closed as not promoted on 30 December 2021 William Hodgson (RAF officer) (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 26 December 2021 Supermarine Sea King (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 22 December 2021 Raymond Hesselyn (discussion) – Closed as promoted on 4 December 2021 Deletion Timeline of Berlin Brandenburg Airport's construction (discussion) – Closed as delete and redirect on 30 December 2021 Evergreen International Airlines Flight 17 (discussion) – Closed as keep on 25 December 2021 Requested moves Akbarpur (Ambedkar Nagar) Airstrip → Akbarpur Airstrip (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 1983 Avensa Douglas DC-9 crash → Avensa Flight 007 (discussion) – Closed as moved on 30 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 035 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 035 (discussion) – Withdrawn on 28 December 2021	Article Statistics This data reflects values from DMY. Aviation pages by quality Quality Total FA 142 FL 15 A 56 GA 505 B 4,573 C 11,878 Start 15,082 Stub 18,754 List 2,539 Category 11,638 Disambig 653 File 2,713 Portal 629 Project 89 Redirect 1,518 Template 2,489 NA 66 Assessed 73,339 Unassessed 1 Total 73,340 WikiWork factors (?) ω = 252,102 Ω = 4.91
New/Ongoing Discussions Featured Article review D. B. Cooper (discussion) – Since 14 December 2021 A-class Article assessment Granville Gee Bee Model A (discussion) – Since 21 April 2020 List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War (discussion) – Since 22 February 2010 Good Article assessment Romanian Air Corps (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Jean Batten (discussion) – Since 2 October 2021 Merger proposals List of astronauts by name → List of astronauts by year of selection (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of cosmonauts → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 List of space travelers by name → List of space travelers by nationality (discussion) – Since 10 August 2021 Holidays Czech Airlines → Czech Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 June 2021 Bendix Aviation → Bendix Corporation (discussion) – Since 30 May 2021 Airport Movement Area Safety System → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 29 May 2021 ASDE-X → Airport Surface Surveillance Capability (discussion) – Since 28 May 2021 Splitting proposals Family Airlines (discussion) – Since 23 November 2021 2021 Kabul airport attack (discussion) – Since 24 September 2021 List of military aircraft of the United States (discussion) – Since 16 August 2021 Braniff International Airways (discussion) – Since 8 September 2019 Deletion List of maiden voyages (discussion) – Since 29 December 2021 Requested moves Hot-air balloon → Hot air balloon (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 108 → Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela Flight 109 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 150 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 150 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 206 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 206 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 708 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 708 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 Garuda Indonesia Flight 892 → Garuda Indonesian Airways Flight 892 (discussion) – Since 28 December 2021 TWA Flight 800 → TWA Flight 800 (1996) (discussion) – Since 27 December 2021 Dynamic Airways Flight 405 → Dynamic International Airways Flight 405 (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 CommutAir Flight 4281 → CommutAir Flight 4821 (discussion) – Since 25 December 2021 Thai Airways → Thai Airways International (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Thai Airways fleet → Thai Airways International fleet (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 List of Thai Airways destinations → List of Thai Airways International destinations (discussion) – Since 13 December 2021 Did you know Ravish Malhotra (discussion) – Since 30 December 2021 Alexander Tahy (discussion) – Since 26 December 2021 Veronica Volkersz (discussion) – Since 6 December 2021 Rudolf Szepessy-Sokoll (discussion) – Since 3 December 2021 On The Main Page Did you know... ... that the aerobatic demonstration aircraft used by SoloTürk is also used in military operations of the Turkish Air Force? (24 December)
Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list. Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi im just here to leave you note that has been discussed and agreed that we do not separate airlines with different subsidies for example like Wizzair, Wizzair UK, Wizzair Malta, Wizzair Abu Dhabi or Eurowings and their subsidies except Eurowings Discover or Easyjet and their subsidies or British Airways and their subsidies, etc. The list goes on. All these subsidies have just different AOC but using the same website with the same rules. That's why we do not list it separately. As you stated your example Air India and Air India Express are two different brands indeed using different rules and different websites etc. in that case those are listed separately. Thank you for your understanding. Wishing you lovely day/evening. Wappy2008 (talk) 20:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this note. Please mention the discussion/archived discussion of the same here for better understanding. FlyJet777 (talk) 20:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here you find all 19 archives of Airport project: ^[1] its good to scroll through all of it so your eyes catch several articles that might be very useful for your future edits. Wappy2008 (talk) 22:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the particular discussion link. It's not feasible to look at each and every discussion starting from the year 2004. FlyJet777 (talk) 05:10, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to scroll through it as it has been a while ago and i don't know which archive it is but i will check if i find it will straight attach it to you Wappy2008 (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been quite a while now since you wrote that. Therefore, I request you to attach the archived discussion at the earliest. You may mention some aviation users who may be aware of the discussion. Do it at the earliest. FlyJet777 (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's been almost a month and you still haven't responded even after my reminder. I now suggest to you that either you mention the archived discussion here or all of your edits will be reverted immediately citing vandalism to Wikipedia. As I had mentioned earlier, you may mention other aviation users to support your point. You have a day to respond. FlyJet777 (talk) 12:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i suggest you go through the archive and properly check before you go against Wikipedia rules. as well would like to make aware that you don't accuse people of being vandal. this will be your second warning message and it's just because you are too lazy to scroll through the archive Wappy2008 (talk) 03:27, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are suggesting that it is other users responsibility to clear your point? If you are confident about your claim, then prove it. That is the sole reason I stopped editing the pages as I was expecting the discussion link. First you say there's been a discussion and consensus and then when I ask about it, you fail to provide it. Also, your reason of merging the subsidiaries because of them "having the same website" rather seems invalid because if it had been the case, then AirAsia's subsidiaries (Indonesia AirAsia, Thai AirAsia, etc.) would be shown as merged into AirAsia as the website is common. But, they are listed differently on Wikipedia.

Further, I had given you a month's time to respond with the archived discussion link. I had also allowed you to mention other aviation users who were part of the said discussion. Did you respond? No. I had also given you a reminder but you still didn't respond. You are unable to prove your point and it is you who is engaged in an edit war. FlyJet777 (talk) 05:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As i would mention before if you have so much concern about the topic and as clearly you do and are only one. This was done for a years now where we didn't separate AOC and subsidies which were agreed before. why would you separate subsidies when you go to the airport What is written is just AirArabia not subsidies. separating them is just useless and if you are not happy about creating a related topic and discussion on the Airport project page would be useful for you. I didnt reply because for some reason i didn't receive notification about your reply no because id dint want to or tried to avoid it Wappy2008 (talk) 13:19, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Surely. Why wouldn't I be concerned? It is a serious issue we are discussing here. Subsidiaries have never been listed under the parent company on Wikipedia. For example: Alliance Air was Air India's subsidiary till January 2022. During those times, there websites were the same. But Alliance Air's routes were never mentioned under Air India. They were and are still listed differently.

"When you go to the airport what is written is just AirArabia not subsidiaries", what kind of statement is that? Example: AirAsia India flights (IATA: I5 ; ICAO: IAD) were and are never shown under the IATA code AK (which belongs to its parent company AirAsia), the flights are always listed as I5XXX. Thai AirAsia X, AirAsia X, Indonesia AirAsia, all are AirAsia's subsidiaries and have the same website but are always shown differently because they are different airlines - this is the key here: DIFFERENT AIRLINES which have different codes. Where is the logic in your statement?

And if there's already been a discussion (as you say) then why should I post a new discussion? All I am asking you is to provide the discussion link. I will be happy to be proven wrong, but atleast provide the link. And do you seriously think I am going to scroll through the archives from 2004 till present? Not happening. FlyJet777 (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jan olieslagers @Reywas92 Need some help here. FlyJet777 (talk) 19:37, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but you are one who has concern here, therefore you should create discussion to get other involved so your problem is resolved (you shouldn't ask different users to get involved on your talk page neither, there is special discussion board on it) but as i mentioned before i have attached you archive to have a read and scroll through it so you avoid further conflicts like this but you refusing to do so. Airasia should be lined as Airasia only and no other distinguish involved as it is just a different country / AOC / subsidy but airlines remain the same company. AS well you have to understand that Wikipedia is not a Travel guide and in use is common name. and here we get again to another article from archive which if you wont be lazy to read you would understand what exactly i am writing and talking about here. As if you want to be good editor is not just about editing is about to read Wikipedia articles to go along with it. Wappy2008 (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Airasia should be lined as Airasia only" Do you understand that different airlines should always be listed differently otherwise it creates confusion? A flight which is being operated by I5 should not be under AK. It creates confusion as to which airline is actually operating the flight (I5 or AK). This is the reason they are listed differently. This has nothing to do with WP:COMMONNAME.

I also noticed that you mentioned of WP:AIRPORTS in your edit summary on Abu Dhabi International Airport. I read the entire Airlines and destinations section of that page thrice but could found no statement which justifies your edit on merging subsidiaries. I also read WP:AIRLINES but as usual, there was no mention of any rule that stated "subsidiary airlines should be merged".

I am happy to put up a new discussion on this topic. FlyJet777 (talk) 04:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me that the only confusion is you are creating for yourself by not reading the archive. you are still mixing names with flight/IATA numbers. all flights are by AirASia. If you buy a flight with Airasia I5 and another connecting flight is AK. what you use as a common name i fly with AirAsia no matter what IATA each flight uses. Thats if you would read WP:COMMONNAME you would understand. as you mentioned flights operate by (I5 or AK) which is another topic in the archive that we do not list operated by (you would have known that if you would read archive). Wappy2008 (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The matter is under discussion in WP:AIRPORTS. We shall further discuss this matter there. FlyJet777 (talk) 18:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note above mixing common names with IATA and ICAO which has nothing to do with how you state / style airline names on articles. Not to mention that you fully admitted above that you refuse to educate yourself on aviation articles in archives and cooperate with other users. Not a very good way of responding. I have read all 16 archives so im able to understand what is allowed and what is not. It's just for your own better so you don't get into conflicts like this. if you would spare that month of waiting and read it even before we wont have to go through this at all right now. Hope this makes it more understandable for you. Thank you and have a good day Wappy2008 (talk) 23:27, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer @Sunnya343 Want you both to have a look at this. FlyJet777 (talk) 05:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Proposed infrastructure in Odisha indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Telangana Legislative Assembly election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khanapur Assembly constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you make edits, please could you check them. We all make mistakes. This particularly applies when using templates, because they can have unobvious features. In this edit to the article on Prayagraj division you added a template call: {{Prayagraj-geo-stub}}. It does not exist. Please fix it. If you have been adding it in other places, please fix it there too.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Prayagraj division geography stubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Prayagraj-geo-stub indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Male actors from Prayagraj indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Started Talk:Amitabh_Bachchan#Names_of_places for comments on this. Ravensfire (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please stop manually moving categories from "X in Allahabad" to "X in Prayagraj"? The proper process is to list them at WP:CFDS, citing WP:C2D, not copy-and-paste and haphazardly change articles around. Thanks. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also please don't cut-and-paste move templates - use the page move function instead. I've cleaned up after most of this already. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:12, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FlyJet777,

Also, do not empty out categories so they are tagged for speedy deletion, this is called "emptying out of process". All of your edits doing this can be reverted. If you believe a category should be deleted, renamed or merged, propose it at Categories for Discussion.Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:46, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you seem to have taken over K. Annamalai, and turned it into a different person altogether. Please don't do that. If you want to write about someone by the same name, create a new article for them. (I have restored the article to its earlier content.)

As part of doing that, you appear to have also made a copypaste move to recreate the original article at K. Annamalai (AIADMK politician). Please don't do that, either. Copypaste/cutpaste moves lose the article's edit history, which must be retained for legal reasons.

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on K. Annamalai (BJP politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annamalai k. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. iMahesh (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rani Kamalapati (Habibganj)–Rewa Vande Bharat Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rewa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 16th Madhya Pradesh Assembly, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rajpur Assembly constituency, Banda Assembly constituency and Devsar Assembly constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @FlyJet777. Regarding your edit at 18th Uttar Pradesh Assembly, whenever there is a death/ disqualification or resignation by MLA, do not remove the name of outgoing MLA since they are historically a part of that assembly until their death disqualification or resignation. In that case, add a new line under that constituency and mark it as 'Vacant' like I have done here. Dhruv edits (talk) 07:30, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason why we need to mention that the ASI produced a 839-page report, etc. Also see WP:NOTNEWS - we do not aim to give a blow-by-blow account. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TrangaBellam We need to mention about the report because it is a serious current issue pertaining to Gyanvapi. Important current events are always mentioned in Wikipedia, or they aren't? The content that I have added about the ASI survey is to expand the litigation section with respect to what is happening currently, of which the ASI report is a very significant part. Line-by-line details of the report have not been mentioned. Not mentioning the findings also undermines WP:NPOV, as in that case the article seems to describe the current issue from a the point of view of the Muslim-side. I have added the views of both Hindu and Muslim sides with regards to the report with proper citation. Further suggestions are welcome. Have a good day! FlyJet777 (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the report and your summarization is horrible — entirely driven by the media-frenzy — missing out on far-intriguing aspects.

For example, you wrote about how the ASI report mentioned that the western wall of the mosque was part of the destroyed temple; did you spot that long before ASI arrived, our article, written almost in entirety by me, already said, [..] the southern wall — along with its cusped arches, exterior moldings and toranas — was turned into the qibla wall [..]? TrangaBellam (talk) 20:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More than the number (32), what matters is that they appear to be votive inscriptions. These are the interesting bits from the persepctive of art history.

efforts were made to erase the symbols on the temple pillars - yes, that is the result of aniconic impulses of Islam; not something sinister as is made out to be. We see the same in Qutb Shah Complex and many other places across South and South East Asia. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long story short, as a cursory glance at our article impresses upon an average reader, no RS doubts that there did not exist the Vishveshwar at the place of the current mosque. (vide, there has been little engagement with these claims in historical scholarship; Desai interprets Nomani's arguments as a strategic "rewriting of history" arising out of the Hindu-hegemonic nature of discourse in postcolonial Benaras.) So, using the ASI report to drive home that point is very weird and misplaced. Their survey has far interesting bits which I will add in a day or two. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:48, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why mentioning the ASI report is weird? I have the report too and there have been several other findings as well that were not added to the article. Only those findings that hold significant importance were added. If your article mentions that the southern wall was turned into qibla, what's wrong in mentioning about the figurines of Shiva, Vishnu, etc that are there since there existed the now-demolished Adi Vishveshwar Temple? You may add that to provide more details to the article, not paragraphs about them, but one-liners. FlyJet777 (talk) 21:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that mentioning the ASI report is weird; rather that your use of the report — to highlight a point that is already well-made in existing scholarship (and the article) — is weird. It is not that I have not used the report — see the part about the mosque being built in the 20th regnal year of Aurangzeb, the chambered design, etc. So that said, if your sole point of contention is the recovery of figurines, I am willing to add a line about that. TrangaBellam (talk) 07:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I didn't say that mentioning the ASI report is weird; rather that your use of the report — "to highlight a point that is already well-made in existing scholarship". Okay so you are saying that since the point about the western walls was already made then we did not have to rewrite it citing the ASI report. Understandable.

Then you could have removed just that line about the western wall. There was no need to remove the other points (about the figurines, the reaction of AIMPLB and Varanasi district court allowing Hindus to worship). The "permission for worship" part is a significant turn for the mosque's present and future. And it was properly cited as well, and it was definitely not driven by "media-frenzy" as you say it. I added them to present them as a chain of events (again, as one-liners and not entire paras) w.r.t the current litigation. FlyJet777 (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see why AIMPLB's reaction - on an ASI survey - is DUE given Desai's comments, which I had quoted above. Btw, did the ASI survey attempt a reconstruction of the original temple plan? I glanced through the report and did not find anything but that would have been interesting. TrangaBellam (talk) 19:48, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not sinister? destroying idols and erasing symobols which are religiously and emotionaly important to others is ok beacuse its the relgion's impulse and should be accepted because its "common"? makes it non sinister? ok fine. for one moment we can accept that.but building a mosque over others worship place is also non sinister? you need a morality check. we understand you have a soft spot for islamic invaders but removing sourced information from different different pages whenever it dosent suit you own prespective or narrative has become your standard lately.fine do as you wish.justify whatever you can in your brain and then present information which makes you sleep better at night.selective biased editors. 2409:40E3:19:572B:10D5:6F36:ACF9:5FA0 (talk) 01:00, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hooghly Lok Sabha constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hooghly.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can't add alliance with as you did at 2019 Kerala and Tamil Nadu general election as per as [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure] but can use Infobox legislative election লাল সেলাম কমরেড (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 elections in India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hamirpur Assembly constituency.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@FlyJet777 Please make difference between CPI(M) and BAP in Rajasthan Lok Sabha 2024 map. XYZ 250706 (talk) 06:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @FlyJet777. Please always add a reference for Candidate list under 'Candidates' section when you are adding candidates for an Indian election. I have added the reference for your recent edit at 2024 Haryana Legislative Assembly election. See here. Add the reference like this in the future. Thanks. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Could you please provide me the source of the map "2019 Gujarat Lok Sabha Election Assembly Wise Lead Map" please. @FlyJet777 AshuTri912 (talk) 04:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The data was published by Chief Electoral Officer, Gujarat. Here it is (https://ceo.gujarat.gov.in/Home/ElectionResult)

Regards FlyJet777 (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in 2024 Jharkhand Legislative Assembly election. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Sam Sailor 14:14, 28 October 2024 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

@FlyJet777

Can you help by sharing how you create seat sharing map? Ritwik Mahata^t@lk 15:06, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You can create those maps using Inkscape software. :) FlyJet777 (talk) 07:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ritwik Mahata^t@lk 12:00, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sir, I just wanted to inform you that Editor Ritwik Mahata had made a complaint against me last day about the Party and alliances. And I had no chance to revert his edits. I wanted to inform that Ritwik Mahata is again requesting the Adminstrator Daniel Case to add the candidates of JANMAT again in the box ^[1] Please look into this. Ankur0745 (talk) 19:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ankur! I read the entire conversation and I think that since Ritwik has made a new request to add candidates of Janmat/JLKM, it is in the best if the matter is left to the administrator to handle. We have already had a discussion on adding candidates in the talk page & the consensus was negative. So, I think it is best to wait for now & let Daniel look up the matter. Regards! FlyJet777 (talk) 19:28, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to add your Vote and Comment in the discussion related to whether the article 'Karimganj' to be renamed and moved to 'Sribhumi (town)' or not, here is the given link, Karimganj Talk page

You can also add your Vote and Comment in the similar discussion related to the 'Karimganj district' to whether the article to be renamed and moved to 'Sribhumi district' or not, here is the given link, Karimganj district talk page

Hi FlyJet777. Thank you for your work on 2025 Haldwani Municipal Corporation election. Another editor, Numbermaniac, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The templates for the Hindi references should contain the "|language=" parameter to specify their language. In the article, you can also expand on the format of the election, the candidates, any major news stories relating to this election, and so on.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Numbermaniac}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– numbermaniac 11:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]