User talk:Jeyradan

Welcome!

Hello, Jeyradan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!

I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Our goal is to facilitate collaboration on medicine-related articles, and everyone is welcome to join (regardless of medical qualifications!). Here are some suggested activities:

• Read our Manual of Style for medical articles
• Join in editing our collaboration of the week (the current one is Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
• Discuss with other members in the doctor's mess
• Have a look at some related WikiProjects
• Have a look at the collaboration dashboard

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, or feel free to ask me on my talk page.

Again, welcome!  --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:41, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Asperger syndrome, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Eubulides (talk) 16:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to follow up: the points you added are plausible, but we need reliable sources for every claim made in that article. Please see WP:MEDRS for a summary of how reliable sources work in medical articles. Thanks. Eubulides (talk) 16:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, those are some really cool images of dinosaur skulls you've just uploaded! I was looking at this[MegaraptorClaw.JPG] image, and noticed that it seems to be a picture of a picture, and not a direct picture of the claw. So if that's the case, you might not have copyright of the picture and won't be able to release it into the public domain, unless you of course took the original picture, or got permission from the original author to release it into the public domain. Just wanted to point that out, as someone else might notice it too and nominate the image for deletion. Anyway, I hope to see more of your dinosaur images in the future! FunkMonk (talk) 20:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out - looks like I uploaded the wrong image. I'll take it down and look for the correct one.

- Jeyradan (talk)

Ok, will be cool to have a free image of such a rare fossil! I just nominated the image for deletion on Commons, since you already replaced it. FunkMonk (talk) 22:15, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks awfully! It may take a while to find the other image, but I'll get a hold of it.

- Jeyradan (talk)

I have also noticed your fine dinosaur uploads, Jeyradan. Thanks so much for your contributions. We greatly appreciate your efforts. :) Firsfron of Ronchester 07:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, welcome to the Wikiproject! If you have any questions or suggestions please feel free to drop me a note on my talkpage. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 04:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JFW | T@lk 09:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JFW | T@lk 15:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JFW | T@lk 11:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi please review the page Atorvastatin, i added it to peer view, and am asking for advise Maen. K. A. (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please reply to my message on my Talk Page.

Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!)

-- Addbot (talk) 00:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maen. K. A. (talk) 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to extremely low editing in the project within the past six months, you have been removed from the list of available editors at Wikipedia:Peer review/volunteers. This is done to ensure those seeking volunteers are only directed to active editors who can respond relatively quickly to requests. If you decide to return to editing Wikipedia, feel free to readd your name to this list. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JFW | T@lk 16:54, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see from your updated info in the MCB member list that you've started a PhD. Good luck and congrats on your graduation! Tim Vickers (talk) 18:31, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much! I hope to be able to become a better (and more frequent) contributor on here now that I'll actually be gaining - and creating - some real knowledge.

- Jeyradan (talk)

Hi. I noticed your interest in oncology. Perhaps you can help me with the above BLP. See [1]. Even referring this to another, more appropriate, editor would be greatly appreciated. Yakushima (talk) 14:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that there is a new freely accessible medical resource, MedMerits (to which I'm a medical advisor) on neurologic disorders. A discussion on ELs to MedMerits and medical ELs in general is currently in progress ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world"). Presto54 (talk) 18:33, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Get free access to research! Research tools and services Resource Exchange Reference Desk Discover open access Free Resource Guides Book Sources Journal Sources Bibliographies Free newspaper sources Online archives Find Your Local Library tips Find Your Source tips How to find sources Citation tools guide Outreach The Wikipedia Library Bookshelf (meta) Universities and Libraries Archivists Publishers Wikipedia Loves Libraries Wikidata source metadata Get involved Get free access to sources Read the Books & Bytes newsletter Help disambiguate authors of scholarly papers Be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar Teach Library Interns Become a Coordinator Learn about TWL ...Support Open Access...

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HEY HO, LET'S GO!!! Punk rockers—As you know, the Ramones are undeniably the first punk rock band, so it is vital to this genre that we collaborate to improve their scope! So far, I have worked on the band's first three albums, and it would be awesome if all the punks on Wiki would aid in expanding/cleaning the Ramones articles. You can see my progress here. Please fellow fans, do this for the old-school punk. CrowzRSA 17:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]