View text source at Wikipedia
|
Definitely looks like a good start. I'll look over it some more tonight. Thanks for your kind words, I just try to help out wherever I can. I'll see if I can flesh it out with some more sources...or else the haters will come out and try to delete it because Chris Reeve has never been a character on Family Guy or the Simpsons. Any interest in helping out with a Michael Walker or Bob Terzuola article?--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
I made a disambig page, here. Just edit below what I put on there, that should work.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 14:56, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jumpcoach, I've made some edits improving the flow of the Chris Reeve article, but I think what it really needs is citations. User:Mike Searson said you have them? --Mistsrider (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Please weigh in on this discussion to keep our project open:Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cutlery. Thanks--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
This is up for deletion, let your thoughts be known whether we need to keep it, delete it, etc:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_knife_discussion_forums. Thanks.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:10, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Medford_knife_And_tool
Hello, I established the top link (no relation to the previous page presented on the subject), the editor is supposed to approve my article claims there is no interest in this field. Can you intervene and explained as it has an interest in knives.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eytankey (talk • contribs) 17:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Professional Soldier. Since you had some involvement with the Professional Soldier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. RekishiEJ (talk) 03:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Jumpcoach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)