User talk:Lapablo

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page. Please add a new thread to the bottom of the page if you wish to leave me a new message. If you're following up on a previous message, keep your comment in that same place: If you leave me a message here, I will reply here and {{Mention}} you here or leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page, unless you indicate that you are watching my page or no talkback message is necessary. If you are responding to a message I left on your talk page, please reply there so the discussion stays in one place. Please {{Mention}} me in the message there or leave a {{Talkback}} template here so I know about the message, unless I indicate that no talkback is necessary in my message. If you are commenting here on a message or warning I left there, don't be surprised if I move the discussion back to your talk page. This page is set for automatic archiving every 7 days. I will remove talkback messages as acknowledgment that I have read the related reply, and I reserve the right to summarily remove any uncivil comments. Thank you, and happy editing!

@Lapablo: Yes, this is correct. My friend is part of that company, but he is not paying me. I am an English teacher working here. We teachers have not had much work lately, due to COVID-19 (though schools have opened back up), so he wanted to give me a project because I am interested in Wikipedia. I have tried my best to be as plain and unbiased as possible. It is much more detailed than other software companies I looked at (For example, in Russia). Every criteria should have been met. Now please stop having me diverse personal information, I am very uncomfortable doing it. So please re-up it.

@Lapablo: If there is anything that is an issue, please share it with me and I shall comply.

The article Halima Dangote has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

The article Akparavuni has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Created by blocked paid editor. Notability under either WP:GNG or WP:NGEO is not sustained by offered sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:56, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stadium Goods has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A store with two locations. Lots of PR type stuff, but does not appear to meet either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by now blocked editor.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:46, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you take another look at Draft:Jordan Cohen, since he now meets our N standard for basketball? Thanks. --2604:2000:E010:1100:8900:C784:6A03:68D3 (talk) 08:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lapablo is unlikely to return to editing here in the foreseeable future. Please improve the draft if you have not done so already and submit it when ready, preferably explaining the change in circumstances that you believe makes it now suitable for inclusion to Wikipedia, on its talk page, and some other reviewer should get to it in due time. You may seek any assistance you might require at the Teahouse or the AFC help desk. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I had already improved it and left a note on the issue. Thanks. --184.153.21.19 (talk) 06:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Agroplon Głuszyna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relies on score announcements, change of personnel (both of which are WP:ROUTINE coverage) and social media post for sourcing. Searches online returned entry on sport websites and game results announcements. Lacks significant coverage to pass WP:ORG or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]