User talk:Laplandian

Hello, Laplandian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Shuki 21:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Laplandian. I noticed your move of Arbayter Fraynd to Arbeter Fraynd, i.e. correct Yiddish, but wrong transcription of the title. I have written why I put it there in the first place in the talk page there - maybe you could have a look and see what you think. BobFromBrockley 12:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting in the time on this. I also noticed the excellent work you did on the Anarchism and Judaism page and at the info shop wikipedia on Jewish anarchism. Keep it up! BobFromBrockley 10:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Laplandian - Have you seen this merger proposal? You might like to comment at talk page of Jewish anarchism. BobFromBrockley 12:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Yuri Mamin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Judaism's view of Jesus were excellent, providing a wealth of information. However, the current crop of senior administrators are adamant about wanting external published sources, especially ones that are internet accessible, rather than your own obvious scholarship. If you go back and add external references, I for one would support the additions as helping make it a quality article.--DeknMike (talk) 04:40, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Judaism's view of Jesus. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:33, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did cite a reasonable number of reliable sources which indicate that the opinions I mentioned are neither original research nor novel synthesis. I could add more reliable sources. In the contrary, this censoring looks like pushing a biased personal opinion. I dispute the neutrality of this article. Laplandian (talk) 04:46, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You drew a large number of conclusions based on your own analysis of various primary sources, many of which did not even mention Jesus, much less Judaism's view of him. What you must do instead is reproduce the theories and arguments of reliable secondary sources about Judaism's view of Jesus, which is the topic of the article in question. Please click on the links provided in the previous sentence, and also review WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My section on positive views on Jesus explained the views of two mainstream rabbis, Jacob Emden and Elijah Benamozegh. Their views are well known and often cited by Jewish supporters of religious pluralism. There is nothing new or original about it. This article includes a theoretical discussion about Jewish monotheism, Trinity, etc. which doesn't mention Jesus either. By your logic, either my additions are relevant or the whole theological section of this article should be deleted. Meanwhile, I did provide exact references to mainstream Hasidic and Kabbalistic sources, as well as academic research on the topic. Laplandian (talk) 05:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Let's continue this discussion on the article's Talk: page, where it belongs. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what you say in your recent contribution to the ENIAC talk page, but you might like to look back at the earlier comments on the talk page for 'Template:Early computer characteristics'. --TedColes (talk) 12:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yiddish grammar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Negative (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Laplandian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Laplandian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Birobidzhaner Shtern 01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:46, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Birobidzhaner Shtern, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]