User talk:Lkomdis

Hello, Lkomdis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 02:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trapped Magic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable short film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 11:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 15:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have not edited in four years only to return to instigate action against another editor. Please use your primary account or disclose how you heard about these stubs if you're going to request an unblock. Star Mississippi 15:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lkomdis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Star Mississippi I acknowledged that I have been on a break from all digital things for four years, but does this mean I should not report Masscreation case?. I don't have any personal issues with anyone and I respect others' contributions, but the way he was defending whole case from the beginning that was alarming and suspicious, I reported the incident to bring the matter in lite. Again just after my block he used it to defend/save a cryptocurrency enthusiast Waqar Zaka here !. I believe we shouldn't encourage COI culture.

Now I don't have any issues with Saqib regarding Masscreation incident because as he has accepted in discussion that he was not aware about policy, and that makes sense to me, other than that I have not broken any rules, I firmly believe in Wikipedia policies and value the community. If you require any clarification, I am willing to provide an answer.Lkomdis (talk) 07:13, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whatever the reason for your break, you only had 83 edits before your recent edits; that plus the long gap suggests a high level of inexperience, yet you seem to possess advanced knowledge not common amongst inexperienced users. I see no reason here to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 15:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lkomdis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Now i understand the reason, it's about my four years break and my reporting and putting my point in discussion seems to possess advanced knowledge to others, and i agree this is valid reason. Reason for my break Oky first yes i made only had 83 edits before, i believe having thousands of non constructive edits doesn't make good to anyone, and i am an old fellow for three years I was on Mount Abu to find some peace in this Era of chaos, and was away from all digital devices to save my soul. As far as I know we are not bound to regularly making edits to prov our sanity, with respect we are all here Volunteers and free to go vacations as long as they want to. If you want see tickets and other things I ready to share. I believe blocks should not be punitive Wikipedia:NOPUNISH for that.

How I heard about Saqib stubs? @Star Mississippi: While checking a cryptocurrency enthusiast Waqar Zaka I came to know about User:Saqib edits then his Masscreation stubs and his defense style here gave me impression that he may have COI.

From where I got advanced knowledge Four years ago I was well aware about Wikipedia guidelines but had no experience about reporting COI incident so first I discussed with Admin Bbb23 here but he suggested "Enough years to know that I have no interest in these issues. I suppose you could take it to WP:COIN" so reported it there and made my self well aware about COI guidelines then to inform Masscreation incident I went to Oshwah here and he replied "Wow, that is... concerning. If you haven't started a discussion at ANI, I would gather some more evidence and examples of poorly-sourced articles that the user created, and start a new discussion there about this." This is why i reported the incident to ANI, and this is how I learned through suggestions, that helped me to gaind some experience, about reporting an incident. And how should we discuss something with respect as human, it came from my life experience, as I have aged enough!

This is the secret, about how I learned in bits and pieces, and still learning. I came back here to do constructive contributions, and "Yes" I do Assume good faith towards others. ( @Jimbo Wales: , @Liz: This may need your attention) Lkomdis (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not sure whether this is trolling or just an astonishing lack of competence, but either way it's clear this is a waste of everyone's time. Talkpage access revoked. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Writing this long of an unblock request and pinging many different editors goes against your unblock request, and does not help it. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just explained my unblock reason in details, to make it easy for an admin.Lkomdis (talk) 01:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And why are you pinging Jimbo? He's the founder of Wikipedia, he has more important things to do. But based on what I see here, it seems that we have a WP:CIR case, and I'm sure the reviewing admin (if there will be one) will agree with me. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 17:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie: Because Jimbo is an experienced editor, he was here even before your and me, even before most of our policies were not formed. And may I know from where you got to know about this unblock request?, because it looks like you may have conflicts of interest with cryptocurrency enthusiast Waqar Zaka self promoting article, because your comments are indicating that I shouldn't be unblocked until his article is safe,

Are you in team with editors who just voted at his AFD here to Keep the article as per norms like comments, and just to win the discussion, meanwhile I got blocked here?. Please let an admin review my unblock reason.

@Jimbo Wales: Need your attention, this user acting like your secretary to get his desired result, to keep me permanently blocked and save Waqar Zaka.Lkomdis (talk) 01:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not acting like his secretary. Do not ping me. I found out through WP:ANI, I go there a lot for fun to read about what trolls have been doing recently. Stop pinging Jimbo, this is your last warning, or I will get an admin to remove your talk page access, making an unblock nearly impossible. It is clear that you are being disruptive and do not want to change. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And stop alleging me of a conflict of interest when you are an inexperienced, blocked editor, with sub-200 edits to your name, alleging an experienced editor who has sub-4000 edits to their name. I never edit those articles, and the edit history will prove it. Courtesy ping: Star Mississippi so you know what the hell is brewing here. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I learned here, that i should be more careful before reporting COI and Masscreation incidents because a group of people will Wikipedia:NOPUNISH or aggressively try to shutdown me with his block threats. Please assume good faith if you are not aware about the incident. Lkomdis (talk) 02:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AGF goes to you, not me (I was not the one being disruptive), and I am 100% certain your TPA will be removed soon and that you are a sock. Frolic all you want, it will all be gone soon (and I will not care about further replies). thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 02:35, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, It's already clear by your first two comments that you don't care about me, maybe you are here to make sure i shouldn't be Unblock, but that is ok because it is not about me and you, this is about community, and while explaining me to others and using language like User replays are nonsense is not a right way of talking (here), please respect others even if you don't aggre with them. And let an admin review my request please don't hurry, I am already blocked. Lkomdis (talk) 04:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA revoked by The Blade of Northern Lights. Finally, it's over. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]