User talk:Macrobreed2

You can type your message here regarding any issue with my edits or any requests for article creation. I will try to reply here.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yagyavalkya Institute of Technology, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yagyavalkya Institute of Technology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

"..offers a range of services" seems a prime example of promotion. There is also a a money laundering controversy involving the company. Shouldn't this be included to give readers a more balanced view?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Razorpay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheBirdsShedTears, thank you for taking the time to review this draft and providing the valuable input. Now that I know about the money laundering controversy, I would definitely include it to and make it more balanced. I would also try to incorporate more neutral view and remove the peacock terms. Macrobreed2 (talk) 16:17, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Macrobreed2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I have sample check a significant number of the references. Each of these was a regurgitated press release, a PR piece , or general churnalism.

You appear to have made the error that more references create an environment for acceptance. Instead they create a borderline WP:BOMBARD and suspicion of advertising.

I believe that, in this state, it woudl not stand a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion process, so am asking you for more wrk.

Specifically, please remove all PR style references. Consider that a fact, once cited with a good reference, one which passes WP:42 is cited, and discard duplicate references. If you cannot find a reference then discard the fact.

How do you know a reference is PR? Anything said by the org, or by its staff is PR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Razorpay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 05:52, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jaswant Singh Gill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 17:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne, Thanks for taking the time to review the draft. Sorry for leaving you with quite a bit of clean-up. I appreciate your help. Macrobreed2 (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No probs :) qcne (talk) 17:28, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jaswant Singh Gill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]