User talk:Magicpiano

Archives

Aug-Dec 2008 Jan 2009-September 2012 September 2012-September 2016 September 16-? Quebec (Dec 2008-?) Music (Dec 2008-?) Revolution (Dec 2008-?)

Howdy, I noticed that a request to split the Valdez-Cordova NRHP list was made last year, but was never completed. I have created the lists for Chugach and Copper River Census Areas, which are ready to be deployed. I thought I would let you know beforehand, to be ready to update any bots that would be affected. I'll watch here for a reply. 25or6to4 (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and make the changes. I'll do what's needed after you've finished. Thanks for the heads up! Magic♪piano 15:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I'm working through the pages that link to the old page currently, but have not set up a redirect page yet. 25or6to4 (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to semisystematically correct the geographic coordinates of NRHP sites (concentrating on Massachusetts, perhaps more on that later). This is largely an armchair task, requiring merely to find the site in Google Street View and compare it to the Wikipedia picture. Almost without exception the pictures were taken by you, and almost without exception the picture is good enough (no trees in the way, etc.) to make a positive identification. That was an impressive amount of footwork you must have done, visiting all those sites and taking good pictures. Much appreciated. —scs (talk) 15:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You'll find that Faolin42 has also taken a great many pictures in and near Massachusetts. I've been all over New England -- thanks for the good words! Magic♪piano 01:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to run User:Magicpiano/NRBot/UpdateNRHPProgress.js for the first time in a while, and it doesn't seem to work for me anymore; aside from logging a console message that I ran the script, the button doesn't do anything. Looking at the code, I think there's an error in the CheckPermission function; if the user who runs the script isn't an authorized user and the script isn't disabled, the function doesn't return anything, so the return value defaults to undefined and is evaluated as false. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are absolutely correct. I believe it is fixed now, if you want to try it again. Magic♪piano 14:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it works for me now. Thanks for fixing that! TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 03:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were the first one to refer to the address of this house as being at 1 Cary Street (Dec 2014) and the article has remained such to this day. I felt I should put my 2 cents in by changing it to 1 Cary Road. My mom, dad, 3 sisters and I lived in that house from 1978 until 1984 and I received a bunch of mail addressed to 1 Cary Road. It faces the Post Road separated by a guard rail about 40-50 feet away, the driveway in the back of the house is on Fitch Lane. There is a Salt Box addition at the back that serves as the bathroom. A taller person cannot stand up straight in the shower except very close to the faucet. We almost never used the front door, the one leading out of the kitchen was very old though, with double layered diagonal pine boards clench-nailed. The edge of the door had a palm print worn into it over a long time of the same person pushing the door open at the same spot. I wish I had learned more about the house back then, but I can still visualize everything about the interior, especially the ceilings shorter than I was. Cfs0527 (talk) 23:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding all those pictures! Masterhatch (talk) 01:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning:

I'm creating a short promotional video for a high school friend who now lives in Idaho. He mentions during the interview that he used to fish at Abbots Run Valley stream in R.I. when he was s small boy. Your photograph came up during Google search and I'd like to use it in my piece. Please allow me this courtesy and tell me whAT attribution you'd like me to provide in the credits.

Thank you for you consideration.

Nick Nicholson nick@viavideo.tv 2603:6081:8106:FEDE:A48D:7F11:2515:8F34 (talk) 14:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using the image is no problem. Just credit Magicpiano at Wikimedia Commons. Thanks! Magic♪piano 15:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought I should let you know the house pictured in the article “G.W. Reed Travelers Home” is not the correct building. It is actually a few houses over from that one, at 148 Falls Road and can be seen at Historic New England’s site, listed as the “David Reed House, Benton Falls Maine”. https://www.historicnewengland.org/explore/collections-access/gusn/166962/

Thank you. Sebasticookmaine (talk) 03:51, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Humph. How could I have missed that? (My identification of the house was based on that picture. I assumed it had undergone some significant alteration in intervening years.) Perhaps you could upload a picture of the correct house (I don't live anywhere near there). Magic♪piano 12:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I’ll see if I can get a photo and upload it. (I’m new to Wikipedia editing, but I’ll see what I can do) Thank you for working on these articles about historic houses! Sebasticookmaine (talk) 00:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I did manage to get a photo of the house and uploaded it. I think it worked! Sebasticookmaine (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very nice, thanks! Magic♪piano 12:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have had success in making edits in Wikipedia, and I have not been successful. There is an entry for a mound of dirt in Saylor park created during a school construction protect that got listed as an Indian Mound named Story Mound, which is actually in Chillicothe OH. In the edit history of the page I see attempts to make corrects going back a dozen years. I would be happy to send you the documentation that I have and the chain of messages trying to get it corrected if you think you might be able to help correct the entry. Bob Coil bobcoiltrb@gmail.com Bobcoiltrb (talk) 14:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly recommend you work with your state historic preservation office (which your local historical society should be familiar with) to get the mound delisted from the National Register, if what you claim is true. As a rule, what gets placed in Wikipedia needs to be confirmable through "public" sources; for example, if the historical society has a regular publication, it could run a story about this location, describing its history. Wikipedia editors could then use that (and/or the information surround a National Register delisting) to update the article. (I note that there is a separate location in Chillicothe that is also called "Story Mound", but I'm assuming it is unrelated to the one you describe in Sayler Park, Cincinnati.) Magic♪piano 15:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you look at User:Vchimpanzee/Pilot Life Insurance Company Home Office and see if it's ready for article space? There are certain details I need for the infobox that I don't know how to find, and perhaps you do. Thanks.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magicpiano,

a citation like <ref>{{NRHPweekly}}</ref>, which you added in e.g. [1] [2] [3], is quite unhelpful - the linked page lists hundreds of list pages, changing over time; expecting Wikipedia readers and your fellow editors to spend their time searching through these to find out where you had read the information is neither polite nor consistent with WP:CS. Next time please link directly to a page that contains the information. Regards, HaeB (talk) 09:45, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working to expand Skinner Building (Seattle). Hoping you can take another look or at least keep an eye on the page, since I'm trying to change your vote at AfD :) ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Magicpiano,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any source for the Weyerhaeuser Office Building being delisted from the NRHP? - Jmabel | Talk 17:08, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added to article. I'm guessing the building was delisted because it was moved. Magic♪piano 21:59, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help to block user "Old houses" from editing articles on historic homes in New England.Tomticker5 (talk) 01:58, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1735 in Austria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was working on cleaning up the untagged articles on WP:NRHPPROGRESS, since it looks like they've been building up for a while. It looks like Pershing House, a properly tagged featured list, shows up in the statistics as untagged. I assume this is intentional behavior - probably to catch articles that redirect back to the county lists - but I feel like we should have a way to handle sites whose articles are actually written in a list format. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to actually be an oversight in the code. Dudeman made a list of talk-page categories to check for, but omitted "FL-Class National Register of Historic Places articles" as a parent class to check for. It is arguable that that category should be a subcategory of "List-Class National Register of Historic Places articles" (which is in the list of cats to check), but it currently is not. (Doing that would imply also properly categorizing the subcategories of the FL-Class cat into the subcategories of List-Class.) Thanks for noticing this. Magic♪piano 13:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've made all of the needed changes to various bits of Javascript to deal with this.

Speaking of bugs with untagged artices, I think I caught another one; the NRHPStats script and the progress table sometimes produce different results, and I think it has something to do with the UpdateNRHPProgress script not catching articles without a talk page. For example, the entry in NRHPPROGRESS for Boundary County, Idaho shows one untagged article, but National Register of Historic Places listings in Boundary County, Idaho shows two, one of which doesn't have a talk page. (I'll hold off on tagging the articles until you have a chance to look at it.) TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 15:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. The actual problem had to do with how UpdateNRHPProgress batched and rolled up statistics. Some needed tallying into the rollup was not taking place when the talk page was not found. Magic♪piano 00:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I think the bug got worse. Right now NRHPPROGRESS shows 24,362 untagged articles, which can't possibly be right. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think I see the problem. It looks like the script is now counting sites with no article as untagged. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that probably shouldn't be happening. I know what's going wrong, need to figure out how to fix it. Magic♪piano 14:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that took care of it. Please let me know if you see inconsistencies. Magic♪piano 00:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Looks like things are in better shape now. TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 01:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Do you have a reliable source for this and this? All I can find is an entry on a application/pending list from March this year, and the reference number you entered leads to a blank page. Thanks _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 14:37, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the most recent weekly update published by the Park Service. NPGallery I don't believe has been updated since c. 2016, so new listings don't show up there. Magic♪piano 18:56, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

Dropping this in your talk page, because I don't know if this is listed somewhere, or if its a stray that never got posted. I had this on my to-do list, but I was never sure which part of Delaware this is for, and I don't seem to find it listed. If it's listed in the NHRP for Delaware, please tell me where. If not, maybe you can figure out on which NRHP list it belongs. — Maile (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• • St. Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Church (Wilmington, Delaware) New Castle County, Delaware
  • January 25, 2021, NRHP https://npgallery.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/100006071
  • Currently named New Calvary Baptist Church
  • "St. Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Church (U.S. National Park Service)". National Park Service. U.S. Dept of the Interior. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  • "Nomination Synopsis: St. Nicholas Ukrainian Catholic Church" (PDF). Delaware Historical and Cultural Affairs. September 22, 2020.

It's #68 on the National Register of Historic Places listings in Wilmington, Delaware. Magic♪piano 13:14, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up. It really helps. That, and the fact that I finally found on the NRHP narrative clarification on why there is now a Baptist church there: "p. section 7, pg 10 "Interior - The interior of the church, while retaining its overall arrangement of space and some original architectural details from the Ukrainian Catholic era, in many ways reflects its denominational shift to a Baptist church in 1969." — Maile (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed this edit, but have only been able to locate the property on the "pending list". I noticed this while doing research for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Rock, Yavapai County, Arizona, because the property is located there. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found it!. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Register of Historic Places listings in Sheboygan County, Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Holland, Wisconsin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esso Station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esso Station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ormewood (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you updated the NRHP SVG output today, but the svg image itself didn't update on commons. Is this something created separately, or should the image have updated with the script? 25or6to4 (talk) 21:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Map creation is a separate step after the SVG is updated. I'll be doing the maps in the next few days. Magic♪piano 02:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Magicpiano, you reverted my contribution to Evergreen Congregational Church and School. The problem is that the article now is very crude again, with phrases ending as, e.g. "The sanctuary, which represents most of the ch". I've added a corresponding template and will now leave the article as it currently is. However, please consider if my contribution wasn't an improvement of the article although I dropped one source. --Cyfal (talk) 19:07, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

Hi, I've noticed you seem to have taken on the responsibility of maintaining "National Register of Historic Places" lists. Thanks for all your work. I just wanted to make sure of the Manual of Style guidelines on lead sections, specifically on first sentences. MOS:THISISALIST says:

Similarly, if the page is a list, do not introduce the list as "This is a list of X" or "This list of Xs...". A clearer and more informative introduction to the list is better than verbatim repetition of the title. A good example of this is the List of Benet Academy alumni.(See also Format of the first sentence below.)

Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 23:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Today I was doing some research for an edit at Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, and this source described the "Wolastoq-St. John watershed". I started poking around and found these two Wikipedia articles, Wolastoq and Saint John River (Bay of Fundy). After reading both articles, I realized both articles were about exactly the same river. You recognized this way back in 2018, but your redirect was removed. There has been discussion on both articles about fixing this, but no consensus. After reading both articles, I think Wikipedia's readers would benefit from merging both articles. I'd appreciate your opinion. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 11:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The KLM on the Alabama National Historic Landmarks page appears to have the wrong coordinates for the Moundville Archaeological Park. When I imported the KLM into Google Maps, it shows the park south and east of Montgomery, AL (near Glenville, AL) when in fact it is located north and west of Montgomery, near Tuscaloosa, AL. I have no idea to whom, or how, to report the issue, but hope this will attract someone's attention. 24.206.70.68 (talk) 14:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Register of Historic Places listings in Iowa County, Wisconsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wyoming, Wisconsin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

I'm pretty sure Benedict Arnold had one of these... at some point... Anyway, thank you for your awesome contributions on Benedict Arnold related stuff and just general American Revolution articles! ‍ Relativity 00:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you added a listing to the Perry County Ohio page for National Register of Historical Places for this, supposedly with reference number 100006136, but as far as I can tell that listing doesn't exist. I've researched the company's history extensively (see Ludowici Roof Tile page for this) and was very interested in seeing what prompted you to add this listing. WereItNotSoSimple (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I update the NRHP lists from the weekly listing updates published by the National Park Service. In the case of the listing you mention, the listing appears in the update published February 12, 2021, which you can find in this PDF. More information about the listing's nomination may be available from the National Archives (although a listing from 2021 is recent enough that it may not appear there yet), or from the state's historic preservation office. Magic♪piano 17:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Register of Historic Places listings in San Bernardino County, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Essex, California.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at a diverse range of works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the "center of gravity"

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Tokyo war crimes trials

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Register of Historic Places listings in Rockbridge County, Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairfield, Virginia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]