View text source at Wikipedia
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mary Mark Ockerbloom. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
...on a short biography of contemporary chemist Yvonne Connolly Martin, one of the first woman chemistry PhD's from Northwestern University, and a pioneer in cheminformatics? I could take care of much of the technical side. Have to google the name. Reply here? Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Women in Music | |
---|---|
![]() |
![]()
|
--Ipigott (talk) 10:30, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Hello, Mary Mark Ockerbloom. Mary Magdalena Lewis Tate, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know![]() |
You've worked on articles about Philadelphia, so I'd like you to see a discussion at WikiProject Philadelphia: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Philadelphia#IP_editors_are_erasing_neighborhoods.
It's about a spate of recent changes, largely by anonymous users, to articles about Center City Philadelphia. The changes seem misguided to me, and I'd like to hear what other people think. TypoBoy (talk) 00:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Request to revisit the discussion. North America1000 07:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Heather C. Allen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, while studying interfacial phenomena, Heather C. Allen discovered that halides such as bromide are located close to the surface of water? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Heather C. Allen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
|
What happens in January in GLAM?--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 16 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Naziha Mestaoui, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that artist Naziha Mestaoui's One Heart, One Tree installation at COP21 will support the planting of 52,677 trees? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Naziha Mestaoui. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 17 January 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Magdalena Lewis Tate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that at least seven denominations trace their history to a Pentecostal church founded by Mary Magdalena Lewis Tate, the first American woman to serve as bishop in a nationally-recognized denomination? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Magdalena Lewis Tate. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Invitation | |
---|---|
Black Women's History online edit-a-thon ![]()
|
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Women in Red events by removing your name from this list.)--Ipigott (talk) 12:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
With appreciation for your continuous work to improve coverage of chemistry and chemists generally, and specifically for your collaboration on and improvements to various ACS-related articles in recent days! KLindblom (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2016 (UTC) |
Does Chem Heritage have any info on this guy?
Thx
Smallbones(smalltalk) 22:13, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Any chance you could locate this and provide coords or a street address? The post office would have been completed about 1939.
Also, I'm still writing this up but you might be interested in User:Smallbones/1000 random results, especially near the bottom.
All the best,
Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
|
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
as a part of a revscore trial, we were wondering who it was who did the unassessed / GA article William Johnson (artist). should have known. pst ready for GA process. (there is a NARA work photo on commons, don't know if better than self portrait). cheers Duckduckstop (talk) 20:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Cure Award |
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further. |
Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
I'll likely make it this time. I might want to take 5 minute to talk about this. Hope to see you there. Smallbones(smalltalk) 16:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Hoping you enjoyed the recently-held in-person Art+Feminism meetup, |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mary, Thanks for your email. Yes! I would like very much to work with you on finishing the page started for Betty Cooke. I also would appreciate your help adding to a few others. But still very confused by the Wiki way. . . Not sure if this is even how to respond to you. . . . How would we do that? YagerEtc (talk) 08:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Jan Yager
|
You claimed during your check (tick) of the DYK nom that both parts of the hook were "supported and directly cited". We've since had to pull this hook from the main page after a further review was conducted at WP:ERRORS. Did you just not look close enough here, or are we missing something? — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:46, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 11 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Annot (artist), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Annot and her husband were ordered by the Nazis to close their art school after refusing to dismiss Jewish pupils? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Annot (artist). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
—♦♦ AMBER(ЯʘCK) 00:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC) 12:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
yes, GA just a little, half way to FA ores.wmflabs.org/scores/enwiki/wp10/710594564/. given your good work, should start with WP:DYK. i don't normally try the promotional channels here to get on mainpage, since there are gatekeepers to contend with, but we do need to accurately reflect the quality status of your work, even if there will be a backlog keeping up with you. Duckduckstop (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The section "Impact" is seriously wrong. The real advantages of using a spectrometer is that it enables easier analysis of mixtures of chemicals. This requires measurements at more than one wavelength, which is possible, if a little time-consuming, with a colorimeter, such as the Lovibond comparator. Simple colorimeters had been in use for half a century before the DU-type onstruments was produced. There is a detailed description of old colorimeters in A. I. Vogel "Quantitative Inorganic Analysis", Second edition (1951), pp. 611-624 (note the old date). Colorimeters are still used today - see Vogel, 5th. edition, (1989), p. 638. An even simpler type of colorimetric analysis is used, for example, to check the quality of water in swimming pools: the colour of a sample treated with a specific reagent is compared to a the colours printed in the user-manual. Petergans (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
…for the very hard work that went into writing the TC Martin article. I did a bit today, but will look to do a bit more as time permits. Have you run it by the title subject, to check for suggestions, or errors? We need't worry about puffery creeping in, and she might be able to direct us toward some other sources. My work was a bit of touch up to the lede, but I'll do no more without sources in hand. I do not want to spoil the fine, source-based job you have done. Cheers, Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi, @Mary Mark Ockerbloom:, Although I can tap into some of the background thinking to an extent, I am having some difficulty relating to the vigor of the deletion input at the Barbara Meneley AfD. I have brought up the Horowitz academic editorial repeatedly. I have evenhandedly acknowledged that the editorial could possibly be construed as touching on Meneley somewhat briefly but I see no response whatsoever, other than repetition of the opinion that the sources are "all local". Maybe this is a systematic blind spot. (I am not going to repeat the comment yet again at AfD because I hope the closer will see that there has been no proper counterpoint.)
Interestingly, Horowitz explains in the editorial, "...I am relieved and happy that the editorial team of RACAR agreed with me that it is both impossible and undesirable to attempt to conduct a blind or double blind review process for artists' research appearing in the journal, since documentation for our works can so readily be found online on artist and gallery websites." I think Horowitz is saying something like, "Let people decide for themselves, based on the readily available documentation." Clearly, the deletion input either has not read or has not understood the editorial at all.
The latest AfD input takes umbrage to the "Exhibition catalogues" section. The concern being raised seems to be that the section is somewhat atypical as a header, and may be of undue prominence and is thus "promotional". In my opinion, this is utter amphigory, that is being used to sexily dress up a non-issue in brightly-coloured tiger stripes, making it seem muscular. The general strategy is to criticize things into a conceptual vaccuum of non-existence.
I think it would put closure to any wispy spider web tendrils of legitimacy regarding the "Exhibition catalogues" section if the sources were restyled by being less visually prominent, by attaching them to the relevant works. I plan to make this change to the content you added and I came here to let you know why. If you feel otherwise, I would offer the consolation that I have no objection to the present format myself, but would like the undress the Big Muscular Tiger. FeatherPluma (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | |
celebration of women | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 801 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I am a friend of Dr Lopes. I note you were the last to edit her Wikipedia entry and would like to co-operate with you on her entry update. The key issue to be addressed is that she has reverted to and prefers to be called by her maiden name, Rosaly Lopes, rather than Lopes-Gautier. What I suggest is that her primary entry is under Lopes, but with a link to the primary entry from Lopes-Gautier, who come to her from her work when known by that name. I would be happy to do this, but I have had little experience in Wiki editing. Could you kindly advise me? Simon A Marshall (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | On 21 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Phebe Hemphill, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Phebe Hemphill's sculptures, including the one of Gettysburg, appear on several United States Mint state quarters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Phebe Hemphill. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
hi, i know vital articles area a degree of difficulty harder, but i would encourage you to look at Wikipedia:Vital_articles#Chemistry (33 articles). 4 featured and 3 good out of 33. i fear if you don't do it, no one will. i will help if i can. cheers. Duckduckstop (talk) 19:28, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the Cynthia Larive article. Just wanted to let you know that I've nominated it for DYK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KLindblom (talk • contribs) 19:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women Writers worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Sent by Rosiestep (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC) via WP:MassMessage
![]() | On 30 March 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article DU spectrophotometer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the DU spectrophotometer was used for secret World War II research on the development of penicillin? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/DU spectrophotometer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Join us! | |
---|---|
Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon - ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hi, MMO. I did not want to bring this up over on the DYK template for Planned Parenthood. It is getting to be tedious for me over there, and I do not want to clutter up your fine suggestion.
I liked including Brooklyn because it is a quirky part of New York and a lot of people live in that area so they would be intrigued by seeing their area in a hook. Thank you for wikilinking birth control. So obvious now. D'oh!
Sanger, her sister, and colleague starting out distributing birth control and advice. Right off the bat.
There were arrested for the advice part, at least that is my takeaway from reading the article and as many of the references as I can that support the article.
I cannot find the point of reference that documents that it was for "obscene" even though we tried using that word in one of the many hooks (more than 10).
I am starting to feel like we are flogging this. With that said, I am very happy to see you trying to breath fresh air into it and get us out of a ditch, if we are in one. I am trying to step aside unless called upon.
The QPQ seems to be a non-issue now as this is only my 2nd nomination, although I have gone along on the ride for 5 DYKs, one of which was pulled from the queue at the witching hour for being negative about a living person. That was sad. It also seems that once pulled, and DYK cannot be fixed and re-upped as the 7-day clock has run out. Cheers! {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
17:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
20:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
21:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC){{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}
07:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)![]() | On 4 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kurt Gottfried, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that physicist Kurt Gottfried worked on behalf of Russian dissident Yuri Orlov to obtain his release from Siberia and employment at Cornell University? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kurt Gottfried. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:52, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() Over 800 new articles were created in connection with Art and Feminism | |
---|---|
Women's History Month worldwide online edit-a-thon
(check out our next event Women writers worldwide online edit-a-thon) |
--Ipigott (talk) 13:51, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Johnson (artist) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mary Mark Ockerbloom. I'm an editor (not very active till now) of the Italian Wikipedia, where the gender gap is a real issue. I'm trying to participate to an IEG with the project "Women are everywhere". You will find the draft at this link https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Women_are_everywhere It would be great if you could have a look at it. I need any kind of suggestion or advice to improve it. Support or endorsement would be fantastic. Many thanks, --Kenzia (talk) 17:07, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Espionage worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
|
A tag has been placed on Neal J. Cohen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
I've been gnome-editing the list of articles (unnecessarily linked to "artist") that have been recently created. Thanks for your work! Tony (talk) 05:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Photography
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 12:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
On 27 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marion Boulton Stroud, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Marion Boulton Stroud created The Fabric Workshop as a place for artists "to explore, to take liberties, to be a studio and laboratory of new design"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marion Boulton Stroud. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Marion Boulton Stroud), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:38, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | |
---|---|
Women artists of Middle East / North Africa
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:16, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
On 30 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Louisa Willard, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that forensic chemist Mary Louisa Willard was referred to as "Lady Sherlock" for assisting law enforcement officials? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Louisa Willard. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Louisa Willard), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The article William Johnson (artist) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:William Johnson (artist) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: Wikipedia:GLAM/Boot Camp. -Pete (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
|
The article William Johnson (artist) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Johnson (artist) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Entertainment worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
As a past contributor, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.
This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
LGBTQ worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage. (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
|
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Halls of Fame worldwide online edit-a-thon
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Greetings Mary Mark Ockerbloom:
It appears you have participated in an editathon in the past. We are doing a mini research study involving past editathon participants to transform and improve Wikipedia.
If this sounds like something quick you would want to do this summer, please sign up to our mini summer research program.
You can read more about our project here.
Together we can revolutionize Wikipedia!
Thanks & Cheers
Wiki crowdresearch (talk) 15:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment, 55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ
Our next event: Women in Halls of Fame'' |
--Ipigott (talk) 16:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
GLAM tonight! LTNS!--DThomsen8 (talk) 21:36, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
|
On 21 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jeanne Burbank, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Jeanne Burbank designed batteries for the first nuclear submarine, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jeanne Burbank. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jeanne Burbank), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Wikipedia and United Nations Women Project |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) Delivered by Rosiestep (talk) via MassMessage 04:27, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Indigenous women editathon & Polar women editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hi
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. We welcome you to have a look. Feel free to participate.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.
-from Diptanshu.D (talk · contribs · count) and others of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.
DiptanshuTalk 10:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article DU spectrophotometer you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 18:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
|
Mary,
What do you want me to do?
How do I get in?
David 215-236-9314
![]() ![]() ![]() | |
---|---|
Women in Nursing editathon & Women Labor Activists editathon |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage
Hello!
I'd seen some of your great work for the residency at the CHF when I first started as WiR in May, but it was a time of serious information overload, so sorry I've only just got around to getting in touch! I got a nudge from John last night when he helped me out by adding the Wellcome Library to the Forward to Libraries list.
I've just been talking with the British Society for the History of Science about running some editathons to improve histsci content - would be lovely to do something collaborative, let me know if there's anything you're working on that we could get behind and help out with! Zeromonk (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
|
The article DU spectrophotometer you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:DU spectrophotometer for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 07:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
External videos | |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() Eleanor Roosevelt, chair of the Commission on the Status of Women, interviews President John F. Kennedy, Secretary of Labor Arthur Goldberg and others, Open Vault from WGBH |
It's hilariously outdated sometimes, absolutely modern at other points. It's Eleanor Roosevelt interviewing John F. Kennedy.
Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
The page for the WHYY Edit-a-thon says both
and
This has misled a brand-new Wikipedian, User:stantonbk, into simply typing their name into the list, which I do not think will have registered them. See Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Philadelphia/Fresh Air Archive 2016#Not registered.
I have updated the older signup directions to
Please {{Ping}} me to discuss. --Thnidu (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Women in Architecture & Women in Archaeology editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
on how to insert those Terry Gross interviews. I made a total mess at Dave Davies (reporter). What's needed is a number and a title. Where do I get these? Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
Please look at the end of my talk page, where Jim Henderson has left a note for me about the Fixed Nitrogen Research Laboratory, and sats that CHF has more information on it. Can you help him? --Dthomsen8 (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi Mary; Alex Madva has pointed me towards your excellent work on Ursula Klein. I'm just leaving you a quick message to thank you for that article, to note that I am listing it as part of the editathon's output, and invite you to join the 2016 Women in Philosophy Drive. Alex and I are hoping that we can put a little more energy into it and related projects from hereon, and we'd love for you to be a part of that if you have the time. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge (ongoing) and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon (starting October 15th are two contests where I am providing some prizes. Take a look!-
|
Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:48, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, can you move the article to the list on Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, we're aiming for 500 women bios. The list will join the main one in a few weeks anyway!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:13, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() ![]()
| |
---|---|
Announcing two exciting online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 18:07, 23 October 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
On 27 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Claudine Picardet, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 18th-century chemist Claudine Picardet translated scientific articles from Swedish, English, German, and Italian into French? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Claudine Picardet. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Claudine Picardet), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 01:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
Missing article. See http://www.wnyc.org/story/rare-call-womens-suffrage-new-york-preserved-shellac and User:Smallbones/Public broadcasting I'm sure I'll get a round tuit sooner or later. Google gives several resources. Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi, if you want something to run on a particular date, after it's approved by an uninvolved editor, you can move the template to the Special Occasions holding area and put it under that date. I don't understand why you want this hook to run before U.S. Election Day; why not on it? We already have another non-2016 election hook scheduled for that day as well. Best, Yoninah (talk) 18:33, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Gertrude Foster Brown at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:31, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
On 8 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gertrude Foster Brown, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gertrude Foster Brown encouraged New York women to exercise their new right to vote in her 1918 book Your Vote and How to Use It? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gertrude Foster Brown. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Gertrude Foster Brown), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Homelessness&oldid=prev&diff=749472893
I changed the third WikiProject line to class=B, (by hand, not AWB) and someone changed it back. Why?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
Not sure this is sufficient[1] as a ref. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
Any chance you could rate this article Becca Pizzi? Smallbones(smalltalk) 18:48, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Mary Mark Ockerbloom. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
![]()
| |
---|---|
Two new topics for our online editathons ![]() |
(To subscribe: Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging
![]() |
WikiConference North America Barnstar |
Thank you for the role you played at WikiConference North America 2016. This year's conference could not have been a success without your contributions and we hope you will continue to be involved in 2017. On behalf of WikiConference North America - Gamaliel (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC) |
On 30 November 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arthur Good, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in La Science Amusante, Arthur Good constructed imaginative scientific apparatus such as the "soap-bubble chandelier" (illustrated) using common items like bottles, candles, and soap? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Arthur Good. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arthur Good), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
|
On 13 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mary Chase Walker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that schoolteacher Mary Chase Walker (pictured) was boycotted in 1866 in San Diego, California, after lunching in public with a black woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Chase Walker. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mary Chase Walker), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Smallbones(smalltalk) 05:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar of deep recognition for all your efforts on Women in Red throughout the year. Enjoy the end of year festivities and prepare to put more women on the world map in 2017. --Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your additions in building up this article and Wikipedia by adding the names of deans!Parkwells (talk) 14:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Wishing you a Charlie Russell Christmas, Mary Mark Ockerbloom! |
"Here's hoping that the worst end of your trail is behind you That Dad Time be your friend from here to the end And sickness nor sorrow don't find you." —C.M. Russell, Christmas greeting 1926. Montanabw(talk) 23 December 2016 (UTC) |