User talk:Mcb133aco

I have nominated History of Minnesota for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Mcb133aco. I saw your sandbox work and wonder if you could find time to correct two things: History_of_Minnesota#Civil_War_era_and_Dakota_War_of_1862 and Minneapolis#Dakota_natives,_city_founded. Both are very tight summaries (and we have a word count restriction on History of Minnesota). Thanks if you can look. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Mcb133aco. I found your sandbox from your contributions link in the History of Minnesota. Sorry no worries, I just haven't run into you before, and looked at your most recent edits. I agree the Civil War section could be expanded and will try to do that keeping our word count restriction in mind. Your help with History of Minnesota would be great, but I guess you already got notification on that. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Civil War expanded but it could use your help. Sources were easy to find for the First Minnesota Regiment. -SusanLesch (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, not an administrator. I've been editing Minnesota articles since about 2006, and learned how much work a featured article star represents. Of late there's not been as much cooperation but say 10 or 15 years ago, WP:WikiProject Minnesota was strong, and brought several articles to FA. Nowadays the few of us left can choose to help maintain those stars or else lose them. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a moment would you go to my sandbox and give me your POV of the Minnesota War Crimes Article. Thank youMcb133aco (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, my time on this topic is done. Work on the History of Minnesota article wasn't enough. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 19:22, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have made the request. Yours came with time limitations that did not work.Mcb133aco (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you've done quite a bit of important work on 38+2 in your Draft space. What do you think of compiling and publishing a List page first, with a table? Then publish the article content later. What I had in mind was like what @Myotus has done in many areas such as List of artwork at the Minnesota State Capitol. (Personally I've been surprised at how easy it is to create tables using visual editor.) Anyway I have lots of books to use as sources, etc., and am happy to help as needed. Cielquiparle (talk) 22:27, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply, To be honest I am unclear of what purpose a List page serves for the topic as well as the visual appearance as there are not that many images. How do you think it improves the readability of the article in general? I am guessing that your suggestion about a table is in reference to the bullet lists I have compiled. Thank you for the comment that I had done important work. My opinion is all I have done is state facts that are obvious and should have been stated by authorities on the war previous to now. It is interesting what other editors focus on. Another editor has said that the 38+2 should be rolled into the War Article and is not a stand alone article. An issue with nearly all the sources is that the editors seem to have no military background of understanding, yet the topic is military history. If you have not read John Haymond's The Infamous Dakota War Trials it is four years of research that is stellar for NPOV. Mcb133aco (talk) 01:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 01:12, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've reverted your new version of the Dakota War page for now. Thanks for posting your list of concerns on the article Talk page; that is definitely a good first step, so we can get more input other editors before moving forward, as it was a lot of huge changes in one go. You should probably go back and sign your comments on the Talk page, though. Cielquiparle (talk) 21:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion there is a great deal to be changed due to the poor quality of what is posted. It is suppose to be an Encyclopedic article. Expecting self correction from the editors that created that mess is an unreasonable expectation. What I posted was footnoted. Your revert should have been for vandalism, inaccuracy, COI, pov, or poor references. You stated none of those. "Too much" is not listed anywhere as a valid reason for a revert, which makes your action questionable across the board.Mcb133aco (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 18:52, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like many other editors, I've been working on fixing the page in good faith, slowly, one carefully considered edit at a time, with sources. If you have further edits, I would expect you to do the same. For highly controversial topics like wars, I don't think it's a good idea to a complete rewrite of the page unilaterally and then overwrite the page without building consensus for the draft first.

That said, I was going to suggest we start addressing your concerns point-by-point in sequence on the article Talk page, but I'm having a hard time understanding whether you're willing to listen and collaborate or not. To be honest, I'm a little worried that you've been working by yourself in a silo in your User space for too long. It's good to see you back out in the open again. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022 Greater Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thons

Saturday, July 16 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. West-Central Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Kandiyohi County Museum, Kandiyohi County Historical Society, 610 Hwy 71 Service Rd, Willmar, MN Saturday, July 23 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. South-Central Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Blue Earth County History Center and Museum, Blue Earth County Historical Society, 424 Warren St, Mankato, MN Saturday, August 6 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Central Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Weyerhaeuser Museum, Morrison County Historical Society, 2151 Lindbergh Dr. S, Little Falls, MN Saturday, August 20 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Northwest Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Clearwater County History Center, Clearwater County Historical Society, 264 1st Street, Shevlin, MN Sunday, August 21 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Northland/Northeast Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Minnesota Discovery Center, 1005 Discovery Drive, Chisholm, MN Saturday, October 8 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Southwest Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Nobles County Historical Museum, Nobles County Historical Society, 225 9th St, Worthington, MN Saturday, October 29 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Southeast Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Winona County History Center, Winona County Historical Society, 160 Johnson St, Winona, MN Saturday, November 12 - 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Park Region Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Location: Otter Tail County Historical Museum, Otter Tail County Historical Society, 1110 W Lincoln Avenue, Fergus Falls, Minnesota, MN Hello Mcb133aco, You are invited to attend a Greater Minnesota History Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon at a Local History Museum. Help increase and improve the depth of information on Greater Minnesota history topics. Find your own topics to edit or work from a list of suggested topics. Please bring a laptop. Lunch will be provided. For more information view the information page at the Minnesota Historical Society. If you are not attending the event in person you do not need to register but only need to sign up on the Event Dashboard. Myotus (talk) 16:10, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mdewakanton-Wahpekute 38 +2. Thanks! Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 16:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Dakota War of 1862 instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please discuss at the talk page of that article whether a separate article needs to be made for the execution event itself. The rest of the background and major war events are covered there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mdewakanton-Wahpekute 38 +2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mdewakanton-Wahpekute 38 +2, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good day to you. Following your instructions has gotten me nowhere. There are two active editors on the Dakota War. That article is poorly done. I did a rewrite including the content you rejected. It was reverted nearly immediately for being "too large". It was not rejected for vandalism, inaccuracy, or COI. My opinion is the editor that did the revert has taken ownership of the article and does not have a npov. The other editor is indigenous and also does not have a npov. I have written two articles, one on the war the other on the hangings. Both are vast improvements on what is currently posted and I can't do anything with them. When I posted the Dakota War rewrite I posted a bullet list of reasons. The "Owner" is now using that list to improve the article. That list is incomplete and using it to repost content that was deleted is a form of plagiarism in my opinion. They are using it with no collaboration from me. I would very much be interested in your thoughts as I have some considerable work in the owner's revert and your rejection.Mcb133aco (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 16:28, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fond du Lac Indian Reservation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Falklands War artillery and Nick-D on the Battle of the Ruhr

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Falklands War

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi River Band of Chippewa Indians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surrender.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on Australian military leadership and Nick-D on the First Crusade's Byzantine connection

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Meet some of the project coordinators

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the 1991 Gulf War air campaign Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at British Territorials in India Interview: On turning 200 (issues of the Bugle!) Review essay: Coordinators' 2022 reading list Op-ed: Meet some more of the coordinators

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Traverse Indian Reservation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flatiron.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II Review essay: Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on translation and Eisenhower's armies Review essay: Catlemur on military museums in Athens

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seabee, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polar and UDT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seabee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pontoon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mississippi River Band of Chippewa Indians

added links pointing to African and Capture

Hatch's Minnesota Cavalry Battalion

added a link pointing to John Pope

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mississippi River Band of Chippewa Indians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confederacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hole in the Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alcohol.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White Earth Indian Reservation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intoxication.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Western Allied invasion of Germany Op-ed: Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

Hello, Mcb133aco. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mdewakanton-Wahpekute 38 +2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:26, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Algonquian language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D review three recent works

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Adam Cuerden on finding and using images

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the Oppenheimer biopic

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on how WP:SIZE matters

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Lake Indian Reservation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oxcart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Nick-D looks at the Russian invasion of Ukraine Op-ed: Nick-D on writing Rhodesian military articles

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alexander Ramsey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bounty.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fort Ripley (Minnesota fort)

added a link pointing to Renegade

White Earth Indian Reservation

added a link pointing to Surplus

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Treaty of Old Crossing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mules.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treaty of Old Crossing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secretary of the Interior.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:38, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Slaughter Slough

added links pointing to German, Homestead, Fort Pierre and Cornfield

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

I think the Pipestone Indian Training School can be its own article. There's one for the Morris Industrial School for Indians in Minnesota that is a good example of the content. Then it can be wikilinked on the list for Minnesota at American Indian boarding schools.  oncamera  _{(talk page)} 04:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Morris if not PipestoneMcb133aco (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 04:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at a diverse range of works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the "center of gravity"

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at the Tokyo war crimes trials

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Recent external reviews

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hog Farm looks at the bayou battles for Vicksburg

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on US Army divisions in the Pacific War, Nick-D on the First Indochina War

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]