User talk:Misterpither

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Misterpither.

Reverting back infobox photo - consensus / discussion is needed to change infobox photo; personal opinion is not necessarily a justification for this

I have already started a discussion on the talk page, which you have not participated in. The fact of the matter is, personal opinion is most certainly a justification for a vast majority of our edits, and consensus isn’t needed to make changes of any kind. I think what I take offense at is this idea that you are upholding some kind of consensus that doesn’t factually exist as a kind of cover for your own opinion. Since you clearly believe a goofy image of Ryder showing her in a weird way is somehow superior (I can’t imagine how) to the portrait I replaced it with, it is incumbent on you to explain it on the talk page. Viriditas (talk) 03:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your discussion titled Free Winona on the talk page for the Winona Ryder article. Hopefully, it can open ways to reconciling this issue, now that I express my justifications for it. Misterpither (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AphroditesChildPromoPic1960s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Angelic 2 the Core, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 15:51, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help on the Al Di Meola article. I'll probably be working soon on other fusion-related articles - did some editing already on Larry Coryell's page. Might need some help on that one too. CalmonTellechea (talk) 21:44, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]