View text source at Wikipedia
I know I should be teaching my English class right now, but a counselor is here talking to them about their senior year class choices. Thanks for all the help on catagorizing and linking! s7rugg1e 11:25, 1 Feb. 2006
Thanks for your help. I've posted a response. I think that you are mistaken about the validity of the form which I suggested, which only establishes a likely truth.Leon... 22:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Thank you nickelshoe. I'm very new to this and appreciate the help!
Well first of all, I laugh at you. Have you even read the memorandum article? Theres hardly any information about what a memorandum is or what its like, and you could have at least tried to combine the two articles before just taking the easy road and redirecting the business memo. Other than that, i don't really care, because i set that up for a teacher to read to show him how wikipedia could be used for his classes. But i still think that you could have at least warned me first, and explained to me why wikipedia doesn't have "how to's" because that is for wikibooks, and then given me a set deadline to try and combine relevant information under the memorandum article, and then redirected it. or, like i have already said, you could have taken that duty upon your self, and done a service to others who are constantly searching for more information on the internet. in summary, i don't really care, but you could have gone about it a little differently is all. Leo Collin 04:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Nice to have someone welcome me. I have started several articles. Check out Superbrands and Lillian Too if you have some time. Comments appreciated. -- S Masters 15:06, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome. I haven't contributed a lot yet (one completely new page with some interesting information, and then some copying and pasting from that into related articles, basically), but I will continue to write about things that I can contribute on. Thanks again. Josh1billion 01:05, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello nickel, do you mind if i pull the "context" tag you added to Rhizome Navigation now? cheers mathew 23:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
You use {{afdx|2nd}} and proceed as usual. I've now done this to the article, you just need to call by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viable Vision (2nd nomination). It is nearly a speedy as a recreation of a deleted article, but it's not quite a substantially identical recreation, so I held off on that. -Splashtalk 17:54, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
I saw that the article is being proposed for deletion, which would be contrary to all the other countless articles on Wikipedia that have all contestants for some shows. Should we delete all articles for every person who was on Big Brother, Survivor, Dancing with Celebrities, etc., etc. who didn't win? That would take a ton of work to put those all up for deletion, especially if you consider European and other versions of every reality show. Model Citizen 22:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
This article is proposed for deletion. I did not create this article and it is essentially a stub. The part about Cindy Jackson having repeated cosmetic surgery in order to look like Barbie is verifiable, and the graphic by me is quite nice (though I say so myself). I therefore propose to move both of these to the Barbie page and will do this unless anyone objects strongly.
I saw that, and thought about it. But several factors were in play.
1) It's not up for AFD. I wish you all luck with this alternate deletion system, but I've seen several other alternate deletion systems come and go. So while this may work and end up with it deleted, please excese me not putting a huge amount of faith in alternate deletion systems.
2) I check the category Fictional Characters regularly and try to, as much as possible, keep actual specific articles shoved down the subcats. If there is a better home around, I prefer to get it out of Fic Char, even if it may be deleted soon. - TexasAndroid 20:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
Every time I go to a user's talk page to add a comment about an AfD I find you have already been there. :D James084 02:59, 22 February 2006 (UTC)