User talk:Nickm57

Welcome!

Hello, Nickm57, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --Astrokey44 13:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry, I should have put something on the talk page. I will do so now. Hesperian 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You've been making lots of good edits on theory of Portuguese discovery of Australia. I don't suppose you have your own copy of Richardson's Was Australia Charted Before 1610? Hesperian 01:10, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment. Yes its been a hobby of mine for the last 30 years. I do indeed have a copy of Richardson 2006. Its still available - saw it at Melb Uni bookroom in Jan at full price also at a second hand bookshop last year - almost full price! Lavishly illustrated, easy to read, a very good review of the whole debate. --Nickm57 (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not prepared to fork out for a copy for my very limited need. My public library has a copy, which is on loan to someone else, and I have it on reserve. It was due back on 27 December, which makes it exactly seven weeks overdue today. It is very frustrating.

Perhaps you might be willing to help me. I've been working on the Houtman Abrolhos, and have gotten a bit obsessive about the etymology of the name. There is now a full "Discovery and naming" section there, and it still isn't finished, because (a) I've been waiting to hear what Richardson has to say about the McIntyre's claim that the Portuguese name "Abrolhos" meant the Portuguese found it first; and (b) just yesterday I read yet another theory behind the name, which I'll include when I have the time. Would you be willing and able to let me know what, if anything, Richardson has to say about it?

Yes, I realise I am being very cheeky asking you for help when I've just stubbed an article you were working on. I promise I'll get back to Carronade Island and attempt a less clumsy de-copyvio-ing when I have the time to do so. :-( Hesperian 01:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magnificent. Thanks. Hesperian 04:43, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So whts the problem with java le grande being linked? no reason given -0 most would revert your edit - whats up? SatuSuro 10:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Hey thanks for the explanation - i think the dieppe maps seems ok - its interesting when i was in the nat library map room in january looking for some old maps of java got talking wiht a guy who reckns th whole issue has bee buggered up by reading some of the important maps - upside down - i dunno if hes ever gonna publish or not :( SatuSuro 11:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC) we gave each other our emails and ive lost his havent heard from him - he was a retired public servant looked young hasnt published ( i dont think) - canberra based - maybe he was trying to tell me over coffee that either bearings or maps were opposite in some way - there might be other things that my addled brain (i was travelling with my wow addicted teenager) didnt keep properly from the conversations i had with him - not much better now - cheers SatuSuro 11:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick, please do as you wish for the Dieppe maps. I don't have a better resolution however for the map at the beginning.PHG ^{Per Honor et Gloria} 18:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work with the referencing and the expansion of the topic. -Regancy42 (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Ta! Actually, at some point, it will need an edit down by someone other than me... I notice it now prints out at 21 pages! Cheers --Nickm57 (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We need to talk. I saw you have made many revisions to my page. Lady Elizabeth (1879). You have changed my flags from Australia to Great Britain when the ships owner was based out of Australia. You have also made other adjustments to the characteristics of the ships. Is it possible we can discuss your findings or objectives against mine to see what flaws have taken place please. Thank you. LukeDuke1980 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:14, 27 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Surely there is a need for a breakup into smaller parts by now? its getting a bit heavy - surely 19th and 20th centuries would be a good point for the cleaver/axe to separate - I'd even be tempted to look at end of 2 ww as another possible point of separation - watcha think? (happy new years anyways) SatuSuro 06:06, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

or the other way is to reduce the sections by hiving off into separate sub articles - i realise that is a way to do it as well SatuSuro 06:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hahah ghost australian wiki has so few noses left we could do it today - what I would suggest for those sensitve noses still taking the air around wp - would be a talk page item - suggesting sub pages for x sections to reduce the tarmac required for a B52 style article - and the chronology on the right hand columns is a gift - easy to break into that stuff - however after a struggle to get off today (hot in Perth) I am about to jump off the computer - I say just do it if you wish - and leave an explanation on the talk - easy stuff - cheers - i am outta here SatuSuro 06:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nickm57. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Gun Powder Ma (talk) 12:29, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nickm57, We believe we finally got how user & talk pages work instead of emails. We commented here: Meetexplorers (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin boy's find could rewrite history Xavier La Canna, AAP Updated January 10, 2012, 11:35 am AAP © Enlarge photo A Darwin boy may help re-write Australia's history after unearthing what he believes is a 500-year-old Portuguese swivel gun on a Northern Territory beach.

Christopher Doukas made the discovery at Dundee Beach, about two hours' drive from Darwin, when tides dipped to exceptional lows in January 2010, and he could walk out a long way from shore. The boy, now aged 13, saw the item poking out of mud, dug it out with his father and took it back to his home. "As soon as we got it back into Darwin my dad got an angle grinder and nicked a little bit of it. We saw it was bronze, so we knew it was old," Christopher told AAP. Research on the internet showed the item, about the size of a rifle, bore a striking resemblance to Portuguese swivel guns, used as anti-personnel weapons on ships in the 16th Century. In July last year Christopher's mother, Barbara, alerted staff at the Darwin Museum to the find, and sent in photos that she was told seemed to indicate it was the genuine article. But it has only been in the past few weeks, after speaking to her local MP, that she has been asked to bring it in for further examination. 120.144.11.108 (talk) 08:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher said a similar item had sold in Britain for STG8000 (about $A12,000), and he would be interested in selling the gun to a museum. Portugal occupied Timor from 1515 until 1975, although it is hotly debated whether Portuguese explorers made it to Australia, about 700km away. Early maps from France in the 1500s appear to show part of Northern Australia, which some have cited as evidence Portuguese explorers arrived during that period, although that interpretation is controversial. Local historian Peter Forrest was sceptical Portuguese explorers reached Northern Australia in the 1500s, but if the find was a genuine swivel gun from that period it would be grist for the mill for people that believed the theory, he said. It still needed to be demonstrated that the location of the find had some connection with Portuguese contact and the item hadn't washed up or been left there by antique dealers in the 1800s. Mr Forrest said there was no independent evidence of any Portuguese contact with that part of Australia during the 1500s and quite a lot of evidence that there was no such contact. "I think it is jumping to a very premature conclusion to link that object with a Portuguese presence in the top end of the territory of any great antiquity," he said. "Even if it happened, so what? What were the consequences?" he said. The earliest authenticated European contact with Australia was in 1606 by a Dutch vessel Duyfken. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.144.11.108 (talk) 08:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Like the man said, so what! Thanks for alerting me anyway. Nickm57 (talk) 08:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually - the person who thinks its Portuguese is the finder! It doesn't seem to have been professionally assessed at all to date! It might be Portuguese. Or Spanish. Or Indonesian! Or... English!!! Nickm57 (talk) 09:13, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

whats the bet it is english - also viral face - otherwise fb - it is caught up by mainstream media - whats the bet it will take on a life of its own ... SatuSuro 22:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So here is the sober analysis.[1]. As this is not the first time a SE Asian cannon find has been incorrectly attributed to a Portuguese presence, its probably noteworthy. I may try to build it into the page in the next few days. Nickm57 (talk) 04:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your comments. Like all of us here, we can bet a bit obsessive. I'm quite a newbie and quite liable to make mistakes, so I take on any comment. I have an unfortunate affliction, in that I don't believe anything at first, especially when it comes to wikipedia articles. It all started when I was looking for free gold maps, I came across a brilliant book titled "A Lady's Visit to the Gold Diggings of Australia in 1852-53" by Ellen Clacy. In it she refers to the river 'Yarra Yarra'. So I wanted to see what wikipedia had on the name 'Yarra Yarra'. To my surprise, I found out that someone in Turkey, had changed the name Yarra, to Yarrak which translates to penis. So after extensive research and verification I changed the page and have been changing articles ever since. David.moreno72 (talk) 07:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's an extremely funny anecdote!Nickm57 (talk) 08:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If you think that was funny, what's even funnier is that the edit stayed up for about a year and was copied and pasted in all sorts of things!David.moreno72 (talk) 11:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.S The guy has hit the Portland page. He copied text that said that Henty let the dogs onto an Aboriginal. I then located a scan of his diary and could not find the text. I also found a copy in the old scanned newspapers and there is no mention of it there either. So I replaced it with the actual quotes from his diary. It's unfortunately not so dramatic.David.moreno72 (talk) 11:35, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Press Barnstar
		For rating a mention in the mainstream media (and annoying Eddie Everywhere while you were at it) you are hereby awarded the Press Barnstar Hawkeye7 (talk) 09:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Nick-D (talk) 10:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thirded. Orderinchaos 23:10, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello, I don't know if I can write here like this but I now take over the account and hope answered your questions. I have a few i asked on my page. Please comment. I will reply if needed in June or later as on expedition on Saturday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meetexplorers (talk • contribs) 22:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've never attended anything about this, but I'm sure I've discussed it on Usenet in the past, maybe some websites. I've just revised the lead to remove some 2005 stuff badly sourced and added by - well, you might be able to guess (have you seen his talk page? weird stuff). Dougweller (talk) 09:35, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite to have a look at what you have done on the Mahogany Ship. Great work! I can't find anything worth changing at this time. I'll keep an eye on the page for the vandals! Best wishes, Gillyweed (talk) 01:38, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Melbourne Meetup Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus Previous: 25 November 2012 This box: view talk edit

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 07:33, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I am awarding you this Barnstar of Diligence for your scrutiny, precision and community service on issues relating to the Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard‎ Thanks! Guy Macon (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, understood. My comments were more for him too. Keep up the good work. Stalwart111 10:18, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

John Wood (Australian Actor, b.1909), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 13:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Deanlaw. Its great you found an image of Jocelyn Howarth (Constance Worth). I have a better image of her from the courtroom scene in The Wages of Sin, but am not confident about the copyright. As I understand it from your note on the photo - this film is no longer copyrighted so I could upload it? NB: Jocelyn Howarth's sister Gwendolyn lived in Hagerstown, Maryland for many years. She had provided Australian newspaper readers with the only sensible accounts of the Brent divorce. Cheers Nickm57 (talk) 23:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I assume you mean a copy of this image. The Wages of Sin itself does not appear to be available on-line, although a copy of its film trailer is posted on YouTube (posted by Something Weird) but that does not include a courtroom scene. I did a preliminary check on films in a U.S. copyright record through 1969 which should list The Wages of Sin, since as a 1938 work it should have had its U.S. copyright renewed in 1966, but found no entry. The lack of an entry of the renewal of the copyright would be consistent with other films from Willis Kent Productions, which failed to renew nearly all of its film catalog. As such, I think you could post your copy of the courtroom scene with the "not renewed" license. Deanlaw (talk) 13:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its here [2]. Do you mind looking at the licence attribution? Only ever put my own photos on Commons. ThanksNickm57 (talk) 00:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License looks good, though I revised the category so the film title matches the IMBD record + added year since other films use same title. I assume you will revise her article to use this as her infobox image. Thanks for the work. Deanlaw (talk) 12:22, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are needlessly provoking and escalating the situation on ANI. Stop - the point was made long ago ES&L 11:58, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll leave it aloneNickm57 (talk) 20:27, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nickm57. You have new messages at Nonsenseferret's talk page.
Message added 23:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

_nonsense ferret 23:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Australian films before 1910

added a link pointing to Joseph Perry

The Story of the Kelly Gang

added a link pointing to Millard Johnson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited! → World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture sponsored by the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum ← Come and join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Architecture Dates: 15 to 25 October 2015 The Virtual Edit-a-thon, hosted by Women in Red in parallel with a series of "physical" Guggenheim edit-a-thons, will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in Architecture to participate. As it stretches over a week and a half, inexperienced participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in architecture. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. RSVP and find more details →here←--Ipigott (talk) 11:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cobb and Co, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Castlemaine and Casterton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Can you kindly reinstate the religion to: Islam

Citation Source: http://www.muslimheritage.com/article/zheng-he-chinese-muslim-admiral

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.72.174.171 (talk) 23:17, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Nickm57 (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which isn't a reliable source. The IP added this again, also using an Britannica article which only said his family was Muslim, which of course is true. Doug Weller talk 15:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Doug. Wish I had more time to follow things up on WPNickm57 (talk) 20:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nickm57. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Y I added a tick to your comment to help distinguish it from the chatter on the page. If you disagree, you can remove it. Thanks. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 18:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Nickm57 (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Daphne Pollard

added a link pointing to Universal

Rose Quong

added a link pointing to University High School

Violet Hopson

added a link pointing to The Case of Lady Camber

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daphne Pollard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kid Dynamite. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI: I saw that you reverted an IP edit at Lake Mungo remains. Just so you know, that reversion only worked on the last of the three vandalizing edits that IP user had made in a row (something I've personally labeled "layering edits"). It seems to me that experienced vandals like to layer multiple edits in a row in hopes that not all of them will be reverted. Maybe that's what rollback rights are for—being able to revert multiple revisions at once? I don't know because I'm unable to be reliable and regular about learning WP policies; I only know what I've randomly absorbed over time. But if so, rollback rights might be useful for you. Hope this helps anyway! Thanks! —Geekdiva (talk) 05:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for picking this up!Nickm57 (talk) 06:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was a typical map from the Golden Age of Netherlandish cartography. French Melchisédech Thévenot copied it from the Dutch original. Are you a Hollandophobe? —Zingvin (talk) 08:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, just a stickler for agreed processes and historical accuracy!Nickm57 (talk) 01:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

interested - or already fed back, so to speak? - the last days of the cycle are here and I am curious if you are the slightest interested... JarrahTree 11:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - am not sure what you mean! Nickm57 (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My sincerest apology - my tyops would not have helped

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2017/Participate - whether any aspect of the strategy discusssion is of the slightest interest to you or whether you know of fellow editors or even non editors who might have interest in the issue JarrahTree 01:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Got it - thanks Nickm57 (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the cryptic part - you are welcome to contibute to the general on wiki part of it all - or preferably to me on or off wiki - so that I can incorporate into the australian response - no problem either way JarrahTree 10:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nickm57. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elsie Mackay (actress), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pygmalion and Western Mail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nickm57. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rangle River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you for adding a great photo from 1991 to Jim Bowler. That was a great year! Viriditas (talk) 08:36, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nick, you reversed my changes today. I am new to the proceedings. I added a Talk:Gympie Pyramid. Will there be someone listening or even interested in what I would like to change? The two web links I deleted were dead. That would have been a good change, but I am happy to discuss :) Chris Wikigetsme123 (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for putting a reference to my article about the Dauphin Map under the Dieppe maps banner and also on the notice board. I do appreciate the courtesy you have shown me by not dismissing it out of hand. Shutehaven — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:7D47:4A00:110F:E2:7A9:42F3 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your help on the article. I have been very fascinated by Buckley. I have a couple of disabilities that makes me kind of confused and I have a hard time focusing (that's why I generally just look at one source at a time). Anyway, thanks for catching some edits. I will do a good read-through and editing when I get done (and catch what jumps out at me in the meantime). In the meantime, I really appreciate the help and keeping me on the straight-and-narrow.01:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC) –CaroleHenson (talk) 01:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes he's a really interesting character and his rare cross-cultural story is so valuable.Nickm57 (talk) 01:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Nickm57 I can see you've done a lot for the Australia-China relations article and wanted your perspective on something. When you look at the political relations section someone has made the comment that it's heavily weighted to events of the last few years. My belief is that's because the dynamic of the last three or four years is featuring a high level of conflict that we just haven't seen before. As per the note I've left on the talk page, there are many reliable sources that are describing this phenomena as a coercion campaign; and I think there's enough of them to create a separate article on the topic. Would be very happy to get your thoughts. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 09:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Matthew, I have answered on the article's talk page. RegardsNickm57 (talk) 23:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Pickersgill-Cunliffe and Nick-D look at Germans in the Flanders Campaign and 50 years of Australian military history Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three aspects of World War II Op-ed: Matarisvan on ways to improve A-class reviewing numbers