User talk:Ningalonnichpovuka

Talk/Archive 1

Hello, Ningalonnichpovuka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 07:05, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:40, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ningalonnichpovuka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been editing the articles and the user sneha keeps reverting the edits, i have provided reliable citations. I feel that there is noting disruption from my side , and i promise to edit Wikipedia productively. I request to waive the block

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. Since you don't think you did anything wrong, there are no grounds to remove the block. 331dot (talk) 17:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ningalonnichpovuka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm aware that i have been involved in an edit war in the movie page Brahmāstra: Part One – Shiva .It was my bad. Also i reverted the edits done by user Sneha996 even after getting a warning from the admin.It was also my Mistake.I plead for guilty and I won't repeat these mistakes anymore, I will abide with the Wikipedia policies , and request for an unblock. Ningalonnichpovuka (talk) 2:01 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. You have not adequately addressed the reason for your block.

Please see our policy on edit warring. In the event of a content dispute, editors are required to stop reverting, discuss, and seek consensus among editors on the relevant talk page. If discussions reach an impasse, editors can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.

Points to ponder:

Edit warring is wrong even if one is right.

Any arguments in favor of one's preferred version should be made on the relevant talk page and not in an unblock appeal.

Calling attention to the faults of others is never a successful strategy; one must address one's own behavior.

To be unblocked, you must affirm an understanding of all of this, and what not to do, and what to do when in a content dispute. Please tell us, in your own words, what it all means. Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't just revert Sneha996 multiple times, but also recently twice attacked the user by accusing them in your edit summaries of "Muslim Vandalism". In addition, your language skills are insuffiicent for you to edit here. Many of your contributions, if retained, have to be heavily edited for language, grammar, spelling, etc. You apparently tried to create an AfD; yet, you had no clue how to do it and so added it to the log with nothing to back it up.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes i called her 'Muslim vandal', she removed my edits calling vandalims,and also she was removing all the edits related to islam which i did. So i read she is a 'Muslim vandal'. I'm now aware that i cannot accuse anyone here as vandal, and i also report vandalism and incidents in the pages always.I was about to report this incident. I'm also new to proposing articles for deletion and creating a archive for talk page. I admit those mistake, but i promise i will use the parliamentary language and abide all the rules and policy of wikipedia Ningalonnichpovuka (talk)

It is partly true that I reverted edits from muslim related articles as the vandal has been constantly vandalising muslim related articles or edits that degrade muslim community. They were clearly violating WP:UNDUE, WP:WEIGHT, WP:RECENT, WP:EDITORIALIZING etc. An example of their edit behaviour can be seen here: [1]. Also look at their talk page which is flooded by warnings from other editors and administrators. This user should be blocked indefinitely from Wikipedia, including account creation. Sneha996 (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 18:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ningalonnichpovuka. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arif Hussain Theruvath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ningalonnichpovuka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Arif Hussain Theruvath".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ningalonnichpovuka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arif Hussain Theruvath".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]