User talk:RBBB9911/Archive (Original)

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, RedBulbBlueBlood9911, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Vistara have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove any thread in a talk or project page without a valid reason. Thank you. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 13:30, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called How to get a news headline semi protected at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called Garbled infobox at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make the assumption that because I am an IP I am a vandal, as you apparently did at Janet Leach (appropriate adult). I made a small edit to improve the article, i.e. fixed a red link. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:448B:FB03:FDF2:5AE6 (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called Somehow my IP Address has been vandalising Wikipedia at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On 29 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Citizenship Amendment Act protests, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  —  --Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 15:33, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RBBB9911/Archive (Original). Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 15:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Please use past tense for past events. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:15, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, DBigXray but there are certain sites that specify to use present tense for timelines (https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/353742/what-is-the-proper-verb-tense-in-a-timeline and Historical present on Wikipedia to be specific), hence I’m merely following these pages the way I understand them... RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 16:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia rules here. WP:TENSE--DBigXrayᗙ 16:35, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted some lines back to past tense and also removed some content, as I feel we need to discuss on the talk to get a consensus version for that. I see Dey and you have been editing back and forth, lets continue the discussion on the article talk. Also please follow WP:INDENT regards. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:41, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dey subrata FYI. --DBigXrayᗙ 16:45, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the changes I made on the CAA protest, discussion thread following WP:INDENT. I would request you to follow the same. It makes the talk page easier to read. --DBigXrayᗙ 15:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Citizenship Amendment Act protests, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBSE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called Visual editor is blanking content at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called Source Editor issues (by the same person having the visual editor issues above) at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called Does “smartphone price” count as information that deserves to be on Wikipedia? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:RedBulbBlueBlood9911/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:RedBulbBlueBlood9911/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Nokia 1.3, from its old location at User:RedBulbBlueBlood9911/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 8.3 5G, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 21:06, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nokia 1.3 instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

An article on Nokia 1.3 is in article space, but is supported primarily by corporate and other non-independent sources and may not satisfy product notability. Any information that is in this draft and is not in the article can be copied into the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nokia 1.3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nokia 1.3, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 5.3, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to integrate the content of the other models into the article also, and find a suitable title for the group. . They are not appropriate for separate articles. DGG ( talk ) 03:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, User:DGG, and thanks for your advice. However, I don’t think that it would be appropriate to create a single Wikipedia page due to the following reasons:

1. Nokia has released only part of the third generation on its Android smartphones
2. These models are distinct in many aspects (even more distinct than Apple products) including design, specifications and marketing
3. Nokia (and most reputable sources) haven’t created an official name for any generation of its smartphones

Regards, RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RBBB9911/Archive (Original). Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by MrClog (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called How to deal with editors messing up my edits (probably accidentally)? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 09:23, Tuesday, April 7, 2020 (UTC)

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! You created a thread called Is there a way to find when an article was assessed by a WikiProject? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering why you reverted back to the edit that is repetitive and unnecessary, other Wiki pages such as antisemitism does not list any violence of jews neither does anti indian sentiment repeat when Sri Lankan troops massacred Tamil Indians.

Biskebriade, it’s okay. I guess I should’ve explained why I reverted you at the beginning itself.RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 12:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there a way to copy-paste large blocks of Wiki source code without using my device’s clipboard?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talking Tom and Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pearling (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Episode table colours issue, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Where to report unreliable sources so that they can be blacklisted?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, RBBB9911/Archive (Original)! Thanks for ensuring that articles are supported by reliable sources. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit WikiProject Reliability for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Participants". Thanks! — Newslinger talk 16:17, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

stop undoing my work to prevent american isp marketing material :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:184:497F:87C9:4029:E1BF:E07:728C (talk) 06:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Username that is promotional in nature, along with at least one promotional edits falls into AIV. This has been debated ad nauseam in the past.--Cahk (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be too hard on yourself about this one. Placename articles, even in the US, are often problematic, and a lot of them shouldn't have been created. As a rule, if there is a history which can be cited to something, the article is likely to be kept unless there is something dubious about the source. If the article just says "X is a populated place" and gives nothing more than coordinates and elevation, cited to one of the US federal gazetteers (GNIS is the domestic one, GEONames is for spots outside the US), it needs to be checked over, because the collection of the data for those databases was sloppy. A US/GNIS issue is typically that the place is there, but it's just a house or an intersection or a railroad siding; with foreign/GEONames it's often the case that there just isn't anything at the spot given. So some of the other Ghana locations may be a problem. I went through the various villages in Somalia, and there were several dozen that needed to be deleted or which had substantial errors (two places conflated, the coordinates way off, etc.). Be advised that there is a strong "every spot is sacred" faction which will push the viewpoint that simply being listed in one of these gazetteers is proof of notability, which isn't so: the guideline specifically states that more than just a gazetteer listing is needed. Mangoe (talk) 17:09, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to invite you to Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events as you have done work on the Portal:Current events. Hopefully you will consider joining. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Elijahandskip:, and thanks for the invitation. However, since I am actually interested in a wide variety of topics (I edit the Portal only if I see any scope for improvement in grammar), I’ll be unable to join any WikiProject. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem and I understand. Have a good day and keep doing good edits. Elijahandskip (talk) 13:50, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Notability of election promise related articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kpgjhpjm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Covid-19 Sounds Apps and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Covid-19 Sounds Apps, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kpgjhpjm 08:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kpgjhpjm:, the article was created by a user named Cam-boffin, who had incorrectly added the submission template. I fixed it for him/her. This message should go to the aforementioned user. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RedBulbBlueBlood9911:  Done Kpgjhpjm 15:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your edits on Aurangabad railway accident. The Template INRConvert can convert to multiple currencies simultaneously. To do this, replace 'USD' with 'USD EUR' or as required. Also, since the exact conversion rate fluctuates daily, it might be a good idea to set the rounding off to -2 or -3 (hundreds or thousands place respectively). Thank you! --Jose Mathew (talk) 17:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Talking Tom and Friends (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parallel universe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have declined a couple of your speedy deletion nominations, as they were for reasons that are not valid. Speedy deletion is only for the specific reasons described at WP:CSD, so please only nominate a page for speedy deletion if it clearly matches one of those reasons. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

123 RedBulbBlueBlood9911|Talk 08:08, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

123 RedBulbBlueBlood9911|Talk 08:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, {{|DannyS712}}. I was informed at WP:CfD that I could leave a message here requesting that a bot tag categories for the CfD process. I would like to nominate the following categories, relating to mobile devices, for rearrangement (for the sake of consistency) (subcategories are indented). Please note that some categories may be duplicated, so you may have to check for duplicates

Okay, here’s the list. I need all subcategories (and those categories’ subcategories and so on) to be tagged:

Categories

1. Category:Nokia mobile phones and all subcategories within it
2. Category:Samsung excluding subcategories of Category:Samsung Sports, Category:Everland Resort, Category:Former Samsung subsidiaries, Category:Samsung C&T Corporation and Category:Cheil Worldwide
3. Category:Samsung computers and all subcategories within it
4. Category:Samsung mobile phones
5. Category:Apple Inc. mobile phones
6. Category:Huawei
7. Category:HTC Corporation
8. Category:Vivo
9. Category:OnePlus
10. Category:Lenovo
11. Category:Motorola mobile phones

• Propose Article rearrangement Category:Current category (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

Nominator's rationale: For consistency. SIGNATURE

1. Category:Nokia mobile phones and all subcategories within it —> Category:Nokia Android devices (self explanatory)
2. Category:Samsung mobile phones and all subcategories within it —> Category:Samsung Android devices
3. Category:Apple Inc. mobile phones —> Category:iPhone (to match Category:iPad and Category:iPod
4. Category:Huawei
5. Category:HTC Corporation
6. Category:Vivo
7. Category:OnePlus
8. Category:Lenovo
9. Category:Motorola mobile phones
10. Category:BlackBerry Limited mobile phones

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is there a way to propose a particular format for a type of articles?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Opindia that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 10:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, Doug Weller. I guess I wasn't being careful with what to press (I don’t remember marking it as minor, but I’ll be more careful). RedBulbBlueBlood9911Talk 10:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I didn't look at it carefully but there were certainly some edits that changed the meaning of the text. Doug Weller talk 10:34, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Proper tagging, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you recently changed "died" to "was martyred" at Saurabh Kalia. Please do not do that anywhere - martyrdom is in the eye of the beholder & thus not neutral language. The article was recently protected because of similar actions by other people who were drawn to it from a mention at the right-wing "fake news" website called OpIndia. I am reverting your change. - Sitush (talk) 13:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, Sitush. Actually, I was also drawn to the article by that same far-right cesspool. I’ll remember to use neutral language even in these cases. RedBulbBlueBlood9911Talk 13:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was deleted months ago but since then the company has been covered multiple times.. cheddar, fox news and Shibakali Gupta book Big Data Security are some of the new sources. This page should not be speedily deleted without at least having AfC review like any new page. Thanks Kriptocurrency (talk) 14:43, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedBulbBlueBlood9911! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wording, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Fake news in India has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

In this edit, you copy-pasted content from here. Please see Wikipedia's policies on copyright violations. SerChevalerie (talk) 06:46, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SerChevalerie. Could you please point out where exactly in the book the copied text is? The book mentions India only on 2 pages, and both don’t have the offending text. I had actually created the text by building on top of what other people had added on another article (the India section of Fake news website and Fake news) so if this is really a copyvio, you can delete the problematic revisions on those articles. If I have really done a copyvio, I’m sorry, though it is unintentional. RedBulbBlueBlood9911Talk 07:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wait a minute, is the copyvio here only in the paragraph starting with fake news about the 2016 demonetisation? If yes, then I just copied the paragraph from where it was originally written (I’ve forgotten where it originally was, but it’s currently in both of the aforementioned articles) so the copyvio was committed by whoever wrote it. I just copy-pasted it without knowing that it was a copyvio. RedBulbBlueBlood9911Talk 07:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedBulbBlueBlood9911, thanks for clarifying. Right, will have to mark the copyvios in those articles, too. The copied text can be found in the book here, on page 236. SerChevalerie (talk) 07:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out, SerChevalerie. RedBulbBlueBlood9911Talk 07:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedBulbBlueBlood9911, just wanted to apologise for being a bit trigger-happy, the consulting administrator has stated that there are no significant copyvios. SerChevalerie (talk) 15:10, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’s okay, SerChevalerie. After all, even I have been trigger-happy at times in some other places (warning vandals and CSD tagging, if you’re curious). It happens to most of us. RedBulbBlueBlood9911Talk 07:02, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, happy editing, and stay safe! SerChevalerie (talk) 07:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]