User talk:Rashidpour Rezanejad

PM Counting

Hi, it is regarding this edit. According to this consensus at WP:INB, we should not include "ordinal on Indian PMs". Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 25

You you are now wp:editwarring. And per WP:ONUS its down to you to make a case at talk. Slatersteven (talk) 14:19, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mate how am I edit warring when you're reverting all of my edits without explanation? I explained each and every single bit of my edits and you just revert them for no reason? Rashidpour Rezanejad 14:22, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I did explain, "tHis is about all your edits, not just the description." and "THis was better", more detailed explanations are for the talkpage, which you are supposed to have stated once you were reverted. Slatersteven (talk) 14:24, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, now I have started a discussion at Talk:Violence against Muslims in independent India. Please do discuss if you wish too! Rashidpour Rezanejad 14:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please also do not tinker with the lead of 1947 Amritsar train massacre as the title is merely a description, not a name. By a longstanding consensus nothing is boldfaced. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 11:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright my bad! Rashidpour Rezanejad 11:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PS Thank you very much. I've been editing that page from the get go Fowler&fowler «Talk» 11:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Kautilya3 (talk) 22:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khurshid Anwar (Major). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]