User talk:Royalguard11/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I was not aware that Mujeerkhan had put up a parallel one. Can we discuss the dispute in one place?Hkelkar 12:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly assume good faith of users. There is no need to take a simple, honest, and immediately reverted mistake on an AMA page and charge me with possibly being a Sock Puppet. Your entry to my user talk page User_talk:CyberAnth#.3F.3F makes me wonder if I have enocountered what User:Captain_Jackson did. I hope not. Peace. CyberAnth 05:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for quickly and fully resolving this with me. CyberAnth 03:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's really helpfull. --Marwatt 11:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Being vague has it's time and place, but an encyclopedia isn't that time or place. If you read the article you could see that only one feature of OS X is being criticized; saying 'some' isn't being vague, it's a distortion of the truth. Big difference. Duke53 | Talk 22:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

If and when other criticisms come to light then the article can be changed; as for now, it simply is not factual. Wikipedia should strive to be better than that. Duke53 | Talk 23:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While the vandal appears to have grown bored with his game, and the spurious reference to "Requiem for a Martian" has not reappeared, I'm not quite ready to close the case. Maybe in a week.

I noticed that the "Columbus Day" article has a lock against modification by anonymous or new users. If the problem with the Kiley article reappears, that might be the solution, as it would force the vandal out of hiding. Whom would I contact about that? -- JHHL "Hbquikcomjamesl"

At the end of the day, I think it's been a good thing. It's much less confusing to people who stumble across it. It's also more expressive of what the "solution" actually is focused on. And it made some disgruntled people happy at a very low cost. The discussion from this point forward can be more narrowly focused on the "what to migrate" and "how to migrate" questions, rather than on whether migration makes sense. At the same time, I do support efforts to come up with an official policy, but am not hopeful that there can be consensus because the spectrum in the essay is almost fully populated, so you get something like the Knesset trying to agree on what to do with/for/about the Arabs. --NThurston 13:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Royalguard11. I see we are both giving warnings to this vandal. Shall we give him a free run of trashing this little article, or is it important enough to notify WP:AIV? The IP has only been used to mess up this one article. Thirteen edits in about an hour. EdJohnston 05:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the quick response. I read the WP:3O page that you linked but it says that it is for disputes between only two editors. This is why I did not believe this was the proper route to take. If it's alright with you i'd like to send you some Email to discuss this at greater length so that I do not have to log into Wikipedia everytime. Thanks again for the quick response!Bagginator 07:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry bur that information is not valid now. Because it is from 2004 and we are now in 2006. --201.244.247.9 05:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I was trying to align my userboxes on my userpage (I'm using your page as a template) and I can't get the boxes to be all the way on the right side. Instead, they end up staggered in the middle of the page (sort of). Check out my userpage so you may understand. What am I doing wrong? (I've gotta go get some sleep now, so you won't know if I understand or see a change till tomorrow night most likely) -Cooter285 05:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welp I figured it out on my own...thanks for the help earlier! -Cooter285 20:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I love coming to Wikipedia and knowing I can get help from knowledgeable people. Thanks again! State Alchemist 16:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I followed your advice, and I just wanted to ask you to visit my User page, and click on the sub page that says My created userboxes, so that you can check if I did them right, if you have the time that is..... Y muchas gracias for all your help! You rock dude! Leave a message for me on my talk page when you see it. ¡Adios! Kyo cat 03:29, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 18:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! Thank you for helping me out -- I'm a needy newbie ;-) I have one very basic question: Do I have to to represent my 'client's' side of the argument only, or can I find a happy medium to make both parties agree? I'm just wondering, because the case I'm working on now might actually be better of with the the solution my client doesn't want. I can argue his case, but should my personal opinion come into this? Or would finding a mutual solution be more the job of the Mediation Committee? Thanks in advance!— Editor at Large^(speak) 16:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you for the info. It seems the user in my case has had a change of heart: he appears to have decided to let it go! And yes, I understand why you don't use 'client': I just wasn't sure what term you use instead.
Thanks again for the help!— Editor at Large^(speak) 02:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! That really helped with the subtitles. And the Roman Catholic box is fine where it is. In fact, it's actually in a better place right now!--Ed^{I'm lonely, talk to me} _contribs 23:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Stealth7 05:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about the double message. I was looking through who had edited the members page to look for new members. Since you hadn't had any proper welcome, I thought I'd give you one (even though how late we are). The talk page is, well, not well monitered and almost never used by advocates. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 23:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks for the welcome note, even if it's a bit late. Best, Firsfron of Ronchester 03:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for suggesting the right keyword for removing the duplicate image. – Kempton "Ideas are the currency of the future." - Kevin Roberts 23:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I knew that Radiant! added the tag, I was only indicating that it was a partial revert (that I was not changing your subsequent edit). Sorry for not making my summary unclear! Themindset 07:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for giving me the link to the discussion. I have contacted the user to add to the comments he has already received. Wikiwoohoo 20:07, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--ScotchGuy 13:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC) Like so many Self-promoters who take offense to removing vanity links, this guy finally gave up and disappeared. Thanks. The process for getting someone to stop this through "official" channels is WAY too confusing.[reply]

I didn't quite get your message. Sr13 03:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was out of town and then i was sick over the last few weeks, so I was unable to respond to the case I opened for undeleting the EMR wikipedia. I would still like to do that, but I'm not clear at all who to go about doing it. We feel that it's appropriate for Wikipedia, just like Marathon is, because it has it's own unique world and storyline, complete with characters, weapons, and more. We would really like to see it brought back. What do I need to do?

Thanks, Bill —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Donmerlin (talk • contribs).

Thank you for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully yesterday with a result of (18/16/8). I'd like to let you know that I won't be running for adminship again, until I am nominated, rather than nominating myself again. Thanks for your support, Deon. — Deon555talkReview 22:49, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well the name of the image is MSflower.jpg but what I don't understand is how that image is supposed to get from the website it's hosted on to the wikipedia site unless I put in the address somewhere. Can you help me with that? Sorry for the trouble; I'm a complete newbie. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ElentariAchaea (talk • contribs).

Yes, I have taken the case regarding User:Caligvla and have now changed the case status to open. Sorry I forgot to do this before. Walton monarchist89 17.33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for helping me with Userboxes!

That greatly helped!

Zouavman Le Zouave 18:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didnt make any vandalism on the natural selection article. All I did was add the weasel word template. I forgot how to add it so it took me a few times to get it right. Please think before you warn. My first try was weaselwords, then wesael words, but the correct tempelate was weasel. Seing the word weasel should have been a signal to this. 69.22.216.252 02:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you thought that I had asked you not to edit the article, then I guess I wasn't clear. It's okay if your editing the article, heck we probably could use someone who doesn't live in Canada to copyedit the thing. It's sometimes hard to separate one's self from what's POV and what's not when you live there. If there's more editorials, keep removing! As a Canadian, I find it harder to separate editorials/facts/opinions/beliefs. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, no, I didn't take anything negative from what you said. I just didn't want to seem pushy about editing a Canadian article considering that I am American. I've spent hours on the Anti-Americanism article and I guess I have my guard up. haha

I will say that I think the Canadian article would be much more professional and celebratory of Canadians if it just focused on Canada and all its glory and just pretend for the moment the US is not there! ;o)

Are you really a RoyalGuard? (I hope I posted this in the right place, I am a newbie)

Thanks for letting me know. I don't want to step on any toes Sugplumxx 04:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Royalguard11, yes it was me, I must have accidentally logged out or something. Not sure. But the AMA offers some fnatasic offortunities and is a worth cause to dedicate time to. So, will you have me? 203.10.76.44 06:17, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, again. Ok, I'm back in now. Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . 3} 06:23, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your warm welcome, I'll strive to do my best and I will help as much as I can. I must apologize first, about the lateness of my response, my talk page is a little bit flooded of late. Thanks, Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . 3} 05:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I tried to get a case, by going to WP:AMARQ, but I was asked to provide the answers to the dispute and users involved, to maintain a neutral POV, I would like to just join and ongoing case, do I need to "find" a dispute or is there a list, or can I get some one to assign me one? Thanks, Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . 3}

Thanks, for your response. Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . 3} 22:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We've got a number of topics to discuss at Wikipedia:AMA Meeting (suggested topics). Maybe it's time for another meeting? It's been a few months. Maybe a bump to all advocates will energize us again. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 01:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, we are long overdue for a meeting. We should first go over meeting topics to see what we need to focus on, prep the meeting page by posting introductory blurbs like last time, and then start gathering together everyone's attention. :-) אמר Steve Caruso _(desk/AMA) 17:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Royalguard, and thanks for your participation at the recent RfA, which did not succeed. For those of you who expressed their support, your kind words and your trust are sincerely appreciated. For those who were opposed --especially those who offered their constructive criticism-- please accept this message as assurance that equally sincere efforts, aimed at enhancing the quality and accuracy of representations within the Wikipedia, will continue. Striving for improved collaboration and consensus will also continue, with all of your insights in mind, while applying NPOV ideals as fairly and reasonably as possible. Ombudsman 05:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings . Kindly disucss Talk:Al-Hasa why shouldn't that article be moved instead of just removing the moving request . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brokenlove (talk • contribs).

I have deleted the request from the article page, thanksBrokenlove 00:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you participated in pages related to radio. I just wanted a little bit of help to correct an article I've tried to translate from French. It's about a French independent Internet radio called Radio Blagon. If you have a bit of time to have a look at the grammar, the spelling and the general style of this article, that would be great. Thanks, Ajor 18:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever been to the southern hemisphere, click here to reply.AstroBoy 01:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC) Deadline for entries is December 15th[reply]

Thanks for your help. :) Mike423 23:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking part in my RfA. The RfA was not successful, mostly because I did a pretty bad job of presenting myself. I'll run again sometime in the next few months, in the hopes that some will reconsider.

In the meantime, one of the projects I'm working on is A Wikimedia Administrator's Handbook. This is a wikibook how-to guide intended to help new administrators learn the ropes, as well as to simply "demystify" what adminship entails. If you are an administrator, please help out with writing it, particularly on the technical aspects of the tools. Both administrators and non-administrators are welcome to help link in and sort all of the various policies regarding the use of these tools on wikipedia in particular (as well as other projects: for example, I have almost no experience with how things work on wiktionary or wikinews). Users who are neither familiar with policy or the sysop tools could be of great help by asking questions about anything that's unclear. The goal is to get everything together in one place, with a narrative form designed to anticipate the reader's next question.

A second project, related but not entailed, is a book on wikimedia in general, with a history of how various policies evolved over time, interesting trivia (e.g., what the heck was "wikimoney" about?), and a history of how the wikimedia foundation itself came about and the larger issues that occurred during its history (such as the infamous "Spanish Fork").

Again, thanks for your input on the RfA, and thanks in advance for any help you might be able to provide for the handbook. --SB_Johnny|^talk|_books 14:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You told me to leave you a tag or something so you know when to respnd, what is this and how do I do this?--Witeandnerdy 22:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does that have to do with my question or tagging?--Witeandnerdy 23:20, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...since the PowerPC version gave me errors under Rosetta. [1] Do what you will with it. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 01:23, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it doesn't seem to give errors all the time. Nonetheless, it's ridiculously slow under Rosetta, so a Universal version would be nice. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 05:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. So, how do I use the Wikipedia code to make an article look more Wikipedia-ish? (like the headings, etc) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.183.79.16 (talk • contribs).

Hi Royalguard11 - just posting here for posterity (after our conversation on IRC) - I'll be happy to take the Hkelkar case later in the week or next week, but as you suggested, I think it would be nice to have another advocate working on it - it may need a fresh pair of eyes! Also, I like the nav bar! Martinp23 07:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You left a message on my talk page today about posting "unconstructive edits". From my edit history, I only made one edit today, which was to revert Quebec to the previous version, as it was entirely blank, and just a stub notice when I visited it earlier today. If I violated the three-revert rule, I apologize for that, but can't see what other rule I may have violated by doing this. Please help me out here.

Thanks! (usually logged in as lostchicken) 134.173.56.219 08:16, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Support I'd like to express my huge thanks to you, Royalguard11, for your support in my recent RfA, which closed with 100% support at 71/0/1. Needless to say, I am very suprised at the huge levels of support I've seen on my RfA, and at the fact that I only had give three answers, unlike many other nominees who have had many, many more questions! I'll be careful with my use of the tools, and invite you to tell me off if I do something wrong! Thanks, Martinp23 14:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome :) I've read the background to the case, and would be willing to take it on so long as the user knows what he wants from advocacy, so am awaiting his reply. Should I change it to "open" at this point, or wait until I get a response. Thanks. Trebor 21:39, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks, I've set it to open. Trebor 21:43, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A week ago I nominated myself, hoping to be able to help Wikipedia as an administrator as much as a WikiGnome. I am very glad many others shared my thoughts, including you. Thank you for your trust! Be sure I will use these tools to protect and prevent and not to harass or punish. Should you feel I am overreacting, pat me so that I can correct myself. Thanks again, I will try hard not to disappoint you! ReyBrujo 23:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reverting vandalism on my userpage a few times. That vandal was, ironically, angry because I warned him about vandalism. -- FaerieInGrey 01:13, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about vandal User:68.7.67.96 - he has been placing many false vandalism notices on Wikipedians who disagree with him (including myself). If he continues this uncivil behaviour, I'm going to report him to WP:AN - I'd appreciate your help if this occurs. =) –- kungming·2 | ^{(Talk·Contact)} 19:28, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can I use the code for your userbox...

|

Julia 20:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)SriMeshSriMesh

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has re-created User talk:Cool Cat/Archive/2005/02/. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 01:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Keep up the good work ! :) --Cat out 11:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that was quick! Johnbod 03:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to drop by to say thanks for all you're help Ô 00:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, hope you have a great Thanksgiving! Turkey sure is tasty isn't it? Well, that turkey up there isn't too happy, but whether you eat Turkey or not, have a great day! ¡Adios amigo!Kyo cat^meow! 22:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you like this? leave any comments at my talk page! It's the meowm on my signature! Kyo cat^meow! 22:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia page.To put new info on.

P.S. What did you mean by pesonal page?

Alchemistjikan 13:26, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help.I know who to turn to if I need anything else.

Alchemistjikan 15:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note Royalguard11. The dispute does revolve around the interpretation of the policy on verifiability. I will comment in detail shortly. --Ian Pitchford 18:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for actually stating in TfD#Template:MySpace what the exact problem is. Though we're on opposing sides of the discussion, I really appreciate it that you didn't just spew out policy shortcuts at me; there are times that I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall in this TfD (or, at best, people who vote "delete" and don't monitor the discussion), and the fact that you actually spelled out your position (again, though we disagree) is very appreciated. :-) EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's her official myspace site, and promoted as such from her company site and fan club. Appropriate as official page per WP:EL: "Except for a link to a page that is the subject of the article or is an official page of the subject of the article, one should avoid:..." AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 22:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice abuse of the rollback tool for non-vandalism edits. I wouldn't count myspace as the official page unless there is no other official page to goto. We can't link to everyone's 12 different official pages. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 22:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are requesting to be reviewed in your signature. I read this excellent and recent statement from you at that editor review:

It really is a good statement, and I would happily encourage others to follow it.

You will see the quote from the policy that you claimed to be following explicitly contradicts you, using "an", not "the", meaning that yes, we can link to multiple official pages. I agree with you that 12 would be excessive, but there aren't 12. It is a sufficiently long and comprehensive article that it is not close to becoming a link farm. It has a total of 6 External links, while today's Wikipedia:Featured Article, Jaws (film) has 10.

Whether removal of an official site link in clear contradiction to policy that you explicitly refer to in your removal comment is vandalism or not is at least debatable. I did believe myself to be sufficiently justified in using the rollback tool for it, but didn't explicitly call your action vandalism in the note above.

But I will say that your response does read as a bit of a contradiction to your truly admirable editor review statement. I don't see a single question in your response, while I do see "I wouldn't ... we can't ..." which does seem to be two assertions that you are right, and I am wrong. And the word "abuse", of course, which - right or wrong - seems to be an escalation of conflict that could be avoided. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geez, that was stupid of me. I was in a bit of a rush, and was a little annoyed at people who think that IAR is a reasonable keep reason. I have finally went and took a look at the mailing list also from yesterday (which I didn't do before), and saw a discussion on WP:RS, among other things. But, I stupidly jumped to "I'm right and your wrong" like I said I wouldn't. I should have stepped away for a couple minutes, and it's good someone actually asked me what I was doing. Although, while looking through transclusions of {{myspace}} (how I found that), I did find some links to myspace that were blatent advertisments. So, I guess the right thing now is to ask for consensus of people, and not single-handidly do something like deleting all transclusions (unless of course it's a link to "the unofficial myspace fansite for _insertartisthere_" or "Bob's page" or a full page ad). -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whew. Thank you, that's nice of you. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 13:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't going to send thank-you cards, but the emotional impact of hitting WP:100 (and doing so unanimously!) changed my mind. So I appreciate your confidence in me at RFA, and hope you'll let me know if I can do anything for you in the future. Cheers! -- nae'blis 23:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to give you a copy of ShadowTool! I'm not entirely sure of the situation with Perl on Macs, but if you'd like to give it a go, you're more than welcome to. The only thing that I'm worried about is Firefox, since that's what ShadowTool uses to load edits, but, other than that, I think it should work fairly well. If you could, put your name under User:Shadow1/ShadowTool in 'Beta Testers,' and I'd be more than happy to answer any questions you have in #shadowtool on freenode. Thanks! Shadow1 (talk) 02:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. I'll be releasing ShadowTool 1.00pre within the next day or so, keep an eye on the project page for the download. Shadow1 (talk) 02:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mean to be defensive, but I was wondering about the comment here: [2]

I think all I had done on Saskatoon was change "couldn't be colder then our bedroom" to "couldn't be colder than our bedroom".

Still new to this editing business, but I thought I was just taking care of a little typo--not "experimenting"....

Let me know if I did something wrong! (Or if I misunderstood the comment!) I'll keep this IP address for awhile....

Thanks,

mmori

PS: All cleared up! Thanks!

PS: Newbie Question for Royalguard11: Since you're the first person to welcome me to Wikipedia, can you tell me how to link to a version of an article in another language? I've tried the "language:Article Title" tag, but that only shows up in the "in other languages" sidebar. I've been using external links, but I was wondering if there was a better way...?

PS: BTW, I do have a login--I'll try not to be so lazy in the future...! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.244.2.91 (talk • contribs) 22:41, December 3, 2006.

Thank you so much for dropping by and providing me with the assistance I needed. I normally sort of guess what language the code would be, but with Croatian, i didnt have a clue. Once again, Thanks and if you ever need any help, point yourself at my talk page and I will be glad to reciprocate. Thor Malmjursson 19:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tips on IRC. I'll probably have some more time to tinker around with it after my school projects and exams. :) --CyclePat 05:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:YFA?What is that supposed to mean.

Alchemistjikan 16:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me I changed it back. Watersoftheoasis

I'm surprised someone from Canada was interested enough in CHS to pick that up so fast. Honestly, 'tis just fun and games, I wanted to changed it and then revert it for the screenshot :D

-E-EoP —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.173.91.49 (talk) 23:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The dispute has been resolved! Thanks. Reginhild 23:18, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was never able to get it to work. I had more success with Vandal Fighter, but also ultimately I had trouble with various OSX requirements. Mkdw^talk 02:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martinp23 21:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:In-the-dark.jpg

Thank you for voting in my RfA which at 51/20/6 unfortunately did not achieve consensus. In closing the nomination, Essjay remarked that it was one of the better discussed RfAs seen recently and I would like to thank you and all others who chose to vote for making it as such. It was extremely humbling to see the large number of support votes, and the number of oppose votes and comments will help me to become stronger. I hope to run again for adminship soon. Thank you all once more. Wikiwoohoo 19:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many images on Wikipedia are mistagged. Only the copyright holder can authorize a derivative work of a copyrighted work, so if you copy and paste a picture out of someone else's document, edit someone else's photo, etc, that doesn't give you rights to it and the resulting work is not available to Wikipedia under a free license. That is why I changed the tag on Image:Worlds-Smallest-Political-Quiz.PNG to a "fair use" tag - it is not free. The original uploader reverted it back, asserting permission. I have left a message on his/her talk page explaining derivative works and asking if, in fact, the original copyright holder has authorized this derivative work and released it under the license that was selected. The new image is not quite as straight forward. Facts are public domain, so I would be inclined to think that this image is ok to use. (I'd strongly suggest getting the parody tag off of there, though.) Others may disagree, though, and consider this to be a derivative work of the original image. BigDT 00:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out to me. I voted on a couple of the polls but I don't think I can really catch up to all that has been said this late in the game without my brain exploding! Will watch for the next one. - Jord 22:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Royalguard11,

what does Wikipedia's guidelines say about the chauvinistic comments (Grosse Deutschland and 1942) by user Johnbod? Regards Gun Powder Ma 23:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Spread of printing#Grosse Deutscheland

Okay, that's two edit conflicts over GE and we're both trying to fix it. Sorry about that. :( You do it. --Elaragirl^Talk|Count 02:32, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on your successful RfA - 97% percent support is a fantastic achievement, don't you agree? I'm sure that a Bureaucrat will be along shortly to issue you with a shiny new set of admin tools and a reading list of admin-related tasks. Let me know if you need any advice about using them. I think that I'm getting the hang of it now, especially that big old 'delete' button! Regards and happy mopping, (aeropagitica) 22:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I can join you as an administrator in a few months! Just H 02:26, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. You delisted my request for intervention against 72.82.212.127 (Talk), saying in your edit summary, "rm the 3 IP's, none had more than 2 warnings/haven't vandalized again...".

Please look again at the talk page of this anonymous user. He/she has indeed gotten all four official warnings (from two different editors) and even an unofficial warning from a newbie user. He/she vandalizes the article several times a day pretty much every day. In fact he/she is vandalizing the article as I write this!

For your convenience, I have copied the listing I had put up on the request for intervention page here again. Thank you. --Elipongo ^{(Talk|contribs)} 18:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• 72.82.212.127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Repeated and persistent sneaky vandalism to Lord & Taylor and other Department store articles using this and another IP (141.150.233.178 (Talk)). Hard to spot if unfamiliar with subject, but check fake citations he/she has inserted versus the actual citations. --Elipongo ^{(Talk|contribs)} 17:43, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt reply over on my user talk page. As far as I can tell this is a static IP since the same edits have been coming for weeks from the same two IPs. I didn't give him/her any more warnings after the level four I applied today even though he/she's been reverted three or four times already by myself and another user this morning. If it's what you want, I'll keep on slapping level four warnings on the IP page, but personally I think it makes us look silly to have more than one "final warning" posted before something's done.--Elipongo ^{(Talk|contribs)} 19:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not remove external link Osijek Online because tis is very imortant portal. It is independent city portal created by volonteers of Osijek and exist for a 6 years. Meny people from outside of Croatia visit that portal and in my opinion it deserved to bee a as external link, rahter then still cammera of Jware company. City portal osijek031.com is also listed in external links!. I am NOT SPAMMER Thank`s a lot. Darac os 01:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Royalguard, My name is Barbara Biggs. I appear to hve been blocked from Wikipedia in a process I find confronting. I innocently wrote my own entry, only to find it contravened WP guidelines. I emailed what I had written to the friend who suggested I make an entry, saying that it was too difficult and that I had lived without a WP entry for this long and could continue to survive without it now! He then posted a version to the site without telling me. This version has since been the subject of what I consider to be a strange process. All but one person has suggested the article should be kept, since notability is clear. I and the one person who has voted for a speedy delete, Alan, have had coridal discussions about teaching me how to edit articles and source them. There are many about child sexual abuse which I, as a person who volunteers much of my time to this field, read as rubbish and highjacked by a particular extremist group. Then I discovered, just today, a discussion on Alan's page (being unable to access my own, since my username appears, as a result of this? to have been removed or made inaccessible, I went in to Alan's page to ask why). He and another guy, who, btw, has a keep recommendation on my article, saying I've been disobedient in continuing to edit my own article. I haven't edited my own article except to change typos and add sources. I may have done this a lot, since I didn't know about the show preview function, so each time I made a minor change, people may have thought it was a major one. Once it was putting in an apostrophe, another time changing a typo. As I pointed out to Alan and the other user, many of the sources I have found don't come up on a google search because they're too old (even only a couple of years old can be too old in this environment). I am the only person who knows who has interviewd me and where, therefore I was able to find sources that others would have had no hope finding because they wouldn't know where to look. I have added these sources. Now I read that doing this is a violation of WP policy. I have lived my life not waiting for others to fix problems. Had I waited for others to source the material, I would still be waiting. Another user with a strong keep tag on the discussion page, sent me a recent article in the Washington Post about WP's inexplicable handling of notability and it's delete policy. This was not positive for WP media profile, especially having been published in such a well respected publication. This seems to me like an enormous amount of time and effort I have put into this, about a fairly innocuous article, that, as one user has pointed out, when read could have been written by anyone. Are people having control issues here? This has put me off WP, helping out with changing some of the outright rubbish I have read on it (See unsourced opinions and claims on Recovered Memory Therapy, The Courage to Heal, Satanic Ritual Abuse and many more - all, in my opinion, highjacked by the recovered memory movement which most professionals in the field believe is fuelled by people who have either been accused of child sexual abuse or have a loved one who has been). If you want people like me to have a positive experience with WP and continue to be involved to help clean up such articles, as Alan has suggested, it does not serve the purpose to make such heavy work of what should have been a fairly straight forward process. Finally, I have asked if someone can rewrite my article if it's a problem. No-one has taken up the offer. At this stage, it seems like far more trouble than it's worth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.36.217.79 (talk • contribs).

And one more thing. The edit in which I named the barrister who abused me, Robert Roy Vernon, with a weblink source to an article which talks about his death, was deleted http://www.melbournecrime.bizhosting.com/rvernon.htm. Barbara Biggs —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.36.217.79 (talk • contribs) 18:53, December 14, 2006.

If you have questions, feel free to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! Essjay (Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Seems your opinion on who would close your RfA on IRC was right :D Martinp23 23:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and congratulations on your adminship :D Martinp23 23:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Have fun with the admin tools, and please protect me from those mean, mean lawsuit-threatening vandals. Lol, if you ever need any admin-related help, feel free to contact me! =) Nishkid64 23:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Wikiwoohoo 00:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from me too, mate! CharonX/talk 00:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, congrats - another good entry into the cabal the list of administrators :) Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 00:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations not just on your RfA, but also on the hard work and edits that took you there! s d 3 1 4 1 5 final exams! 00:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. To the best of my knowledge, you're the first person I've welcomed to make it to adminship. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 00:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff Royalguard11, I'll be sure to add you to my list of "Admins to pester when I need my pages speedied, OP's blocked, or attack pages trashed" :D Have a good 'un — Deon555^talk_desk 01:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry really didnt see that it was closed. Again sorry. Culverin? ^Talk 01:50, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Royalguard, and good luck with the mop! ← ANAS ^Talk? 11:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Maybe The System works after all! Rfrisbie^talk 16:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And from me too, you'll make a fine admin. Congratulation's again! Dfrg.msc ^{1 . 2 . Editor Review} 21:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Congrats on making admin. You're a great contributor, and were a big help when I first joined the AMA. All the best to you in your adminship :) -- Editor at Large • talk 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm curious what tools you use to fight vandals. I'm a beginner who just started using WP:POP. Thanks. Xiner 03:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I'll check them out. Thanks. Xiner 03:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you a happy and safe Christmas season, and a blessed new year. Enjoy where you are, and who your with. Merry Christmas! From, Defrag and Jilly.

Please check now. Thanks --Justanother 23:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Royalguard11. I fixed that bug on Sunday (I think), but perhaps my server gave you the wrong version. I'll upload it again when you're on IRC so you've got a working version. Thanks, Martinp23 17:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an e-mail explaining the problem to you. Please respond to it as soon as you can. Made of people 01:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're saying. Talk pages of articles that don't exist can be speedied, but not archives of talk pages of articles that don't exist? -- Dragonfiend 21:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it as the "talk page of a page which does not exist." You said it was "an archive of a talk page." Can you explain why we would not speedy delete the archives of talk pages of articles that don't exist? Go ahead and reply here, I'm watching your talk page. -- Dragonfiend 22:08, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 2 is a talk archive of the talk page Talk:Sean Howard, which belongs to the real article Sean Howard. Sean Howard/Archive 2 doesn't have to exits. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 22:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 2 is an archive of talk related to the topic of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Howard (American webcomic artist). The current Sean Howard article is a completely differnet and unrelated Sean Howard. In other words, Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 2 is the archive of talk related to the Sean Howard (American webcomic artist) article which does not exist. -- Dragonfiend 22:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How did it end up as a subpage of a different page about a different person then? -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 22:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you read through the histories, you'll see that after the article on the webcomics artist was deleted, the article on the Australian IT entrepreneur was moved into its former place. Anyway, I've listed it at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Sean Howard/Archive 2 where you can discuss the reasons for keeping it if you want. -- Dragonfiend 22:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you unblocked Dasnedius (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) as autoblock #344922. I had caused that autoblock by blocking Lardenvonzalaszizler (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Now Dasnedius appears to be engaging in the same trolling behavior that Lardenvonzalaszizler was engaging in, including editing Talk:Dragon Ball Z. Do you have information about this sock that I should be aware of? Thanks!  :) —Wknight94 (talk) 05:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On IRC, try Geo.plrd Geo. 20:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Something that was pointed out to me early on at RFPP is Template talk:RFPP using these templates enables the bot to archive decisions providing you indent at least one :. I agree with your decision on the 110th congress just note that only the FA's linked from main page shouldn't be protected if vandalism occurs, with this article I was going to say "that since its a current event and it would be reasonable to expect a lot of edits during the week to 10 days protection would be more a hinderance than a benefit." Anyhow if I can help just ask Gnangarra 03:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you blocked user:131.104.218.46 for disruptive editing. I would just like to point out that this is also the same person who is user:Serafin and has started editing before the 72 hour block expired. On the German wikipedia this person is known as Aserafin and has been blocked there numerous times for the same thing, he has also been extensively warned for attacking myself and others.

--Jadger 00:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I have placed the template on my talk page. I have read and made comments on the December newsletter. And I have opened discussion on what may be my first case if dacy69 accepts me as Advocate. We'll see what happens next! Cheers! SilkTork 11:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing like supposition about history of the “Recovered territories”. If you prefer you can check it in other encyclopaedia like “Britannica” or some other – neutral of course :) Good lack with studies.

The Piast Dynasty Mieszko converted the Poles to Christianity in order to compete better with the crusading and marauding Germans. During the reign (992-1025) of his son, Boleslaw I, the Christian church was firmly established in Poland. Boleslaw also conducted successful wars against Holy Roman Emperor Henry II and considerably expanded the Polish domain. He was crowned king by the pope in 1025. At his death, Poland extended beyond the Karpaty Mountains (Carpathian Mountains) and the Odra and Dniester rivers. --131.104.218.46 23:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there,

Can you block this user? It is the primary vandal of Cabinda (province) as well as adder of misleading edit summaries to his contributions. He also adds uncited, seriously POV material to Jose Educardo Dos Santos.--Thomas.macmillan 19:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be sorry, there were so many discussions getting nowhere on talk:moan page that I decided to not decide which ones to archive. Instead I left it up to those truely interested to resurect them as needed. --Monotonehell 21:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you check Eraye1 Edits? He is editing Japanese articles with out of context links to Unit 731. Some times just changing one or two words, sometimes hadding whole phrases that are our of context and are obviously personal coments (stuff like "However, the Japanese desesrved it by their deeds in World War 2. Unit 731" in the North Korean abducting Japanese people article), and some times, jsut simply dropping links out of place to the Unit 731 article. He is obviously in some sort of anti-Japanese agenda, and I'd have edited all his comments (I only edited 2) but he seems to have been a little active this last couple of days, and I lack the wikipedia edit knowledge to skillfully revert what he did. I was looking arround for some sort of form to report his actions to some sort of mod, but they all seem too severe, with complicated proceedings (is he considered a vandal??). (sorry to dump this on you)--CyberClaw 00:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having trouble using WikiGuard. Whenever I try to open it, it just quits right away. Any ideas? -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's odd. Are you running on OSX 10.4.8? Are you running WikiGuard Beta 3c? --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and yes. I get the "application has unexpectedly quit" message. The Beta2 opens and reports, but I can't even get the other one to open. Is there anything I need extra for the new one to work? -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 02:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well that is odd. Hrm. You shouldn't need anything special to run the app. The only thing I can think of is maybe the older version's preferences are bugging the new version. Try deleting ~/Library/Application Support/WikiGuard and then running the app again. That should clear out whatever the previous versions set. *shrugs* If that doesn't work, then I'm not really sure what would be causing the issue. --Brad Beattie (talk) 02:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, that actually worked. Looks good too. Great job. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 02:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rock. Glad we could get that solved. --Brad Beattie (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure you are the right person to inform about this, but I shall nonetheless. While surfing wikipedia, I stumbled upon strange information on Egypt's article, at the end of the first paragraph, it read "Egypt is loated on the eastern coast of Canada and the main language is english. Many people walk around naked.", this doesn't seem to be right (yes, "located" is mis-spelled). Here 's a screenshot I took, regarding the malicous edit.

I decided to post this here since you are listed on the Edits history of that article as someone who was already dealing with vandalism going on in there. Please check it out, Thanks. --Afz 21:01, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your speedy unprotection of User talk:165.234.100.1. --MatthewUND^(talk) 23:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would ask that if anyone requests to unprotect the Gerald Ford article, you would please leave the semi-protection in place at least for a few weeks after his final funeral. It has been protected and unprotected numerous times, and the vandals keep coming out of the woodwork. Thanks. Veracious Rey talk ↔ contribs 00:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the pointer

Why did you delete all these articles as there is no concensus reached at all, in fact most opinions were in favour of keeping the articles. I don't see any reason why you were in the position to delete these all, at least not yet. SportsAddicted | discuss 02:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's not a vote and tha the required 5 days for an AFD to run have passed, but as the discussion is still very active and no consensus is reached at all I don't think you should push your own opinion and delete them all and ignore the opinions of most people who gave their saying in this subject. You have put reasons at the top of the AFD to delete them, I have put reasons in the discussion to keep them. That doesn't mean you already have to delete them. Why did you delete them per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FA Premier League 2006-07 goalscorers like said in the deletion summary given with the deleted articles. I can't see that the result of the discussion was to delete the articles. SportsAddicted | discuss 02:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to comment that the contributors to the AfD debate seemed to reach a clear consensus of keeping the article, outweighing the demand and argument for deleting. Whilding87 07:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quote "In this case, wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor a sports reporting center, nor a complete collection of all of history so we can look at wikipedia in the future for everything that has happened in the past. I like it and "we've worked really hard" are also not reasons for keeping an article." Reading that you are right and I agree that Wikipedia is indeed not all that you described aboven. But to me (I can't talk for others) this kind of information is there to describe an event, to inform others what has happened in a certain event that they are interested in. It's not an overkill of information, but just a split-off from the original competition articles to reduce the size of these pages. The information like this can be found nowhere else on the internet, at least not in this form. There was not just the "it's useful and I like it" arguments to keep this up and running. I'm definately considering a deletion review, but prefer to discuss with the person in question first. Cheers, SportsAddicted | discuss 12:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me with Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Beckjord so easily and painlessly. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 05:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where and when was the "delete all" consensus reached, huh? Simply because it is a list it doesn't mean that it should be deleted. There are hundreds of lists in Wikipedia that are not deleted. Those articles were not an indiscriminate colelction of information. Simply because some admins that don't care about how it helps some people and for some reason find it "unnnecessary" want to delete them. I want to know where it was decided and who decided it, because I can't see a place where it was decided, at least not in the article's entry for deletition. This case clearly shows that Wikipedia is solely run by admins and if you're not an admin you don't get your point across and in the end of any discussion, if you're an admin, you win.190.40.185.235 14:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for inadvertently violating the 3 revert rule... (I only reverted User6895 three times and forgot I had reverted some random ip weirdo vandalism/edit once already.)

The text in question has been present for several monthes... I reverted the removal, reverted the removal again and gave discussion on talk page (and requested a discussion before more reverts) Without waiting for another response by other people, User6985 reverted again. Out of curiosity, what is the proper forum to deal with these semi-minor disputes in wikipedia policy? Leave a note on discussion of an editor? Let the incorrect change stand and wait for more talk page discussion? (Leaving a note on protection page or opening an moderation request seems excessively major...) Anyway, thanks for glancing at this. Mgunn 01:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick semi-protection on the University of Alabama athletics page. Those fans are rabid down here, maybe even worse than Montreal Canadiens vs. Toronto Maple Leafs rivalry fans. BTW, I'm the P.A. announcer for a high school basketball team down here in Birmingham, Alabama, and I freaked out a referee the other night when I played a certain bit of music. "Is that what I think it is?" he asked. "It depends. Where are you from?" I replied. "I lived in Windsor, Ontario for a number of years," he said. I grinned and said, "Yep, it's what you think it is." The song: the theme from HNIC. I'm working on my "Grapes" impersonation. :-) Realkyhick 03:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]