User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao

To leave me a new message you may click here.

This user is the most active Wikipedian of all time.

• Archive the first (January–November 2006)
• Archive the second (November 2006–January 2008)
• Archive the third (January–March 2008)
• Archive the fourth (March–April 2008)
• Archive the fifth (April–June 2008)
• Archive the sixth (June–October 2008)
• Archive the seventh (October–November 2008)
• Archive the eighth (November–December 2008)
• Archive the ninth (January–February 2009)
• Archive the tenth (February–March 2009)
• Archive the eleventh (March–May 2009)
• Archive the twelfth (May–July 2009)
• Archive the thirteenth (July 2009)
• Archive the fourteenth (July–September 2009)
• Archive the fifteenth (October–December 2009)
• Archive the sixteenth (January–February 2010)
• Archive the seventeenth (March–May 2010)
• Archive the eighteenth (May–August 2010)
• Archive the nineteenth (September–October 2010)
• Archive the twentieth (November–December 2010)
• Archive the twenty-first (January–June 2011)
• Archive the twenty-second (July–December 2011)
• Archive the twenty-third (January–June 2012)
• Archive the twenty-fourth (July–December 2012)
• Archive the twenty-fifth (January–June 2013)
• Archive the twenty-sixth (July–December 2013)
• Archive the twenty-seventh (January–June 2014)
• Archive the twenty-eighth (July–December 2014)
• Archive the twenty-ninth (January–June 2015)
• Archive the thirtieth (July–December 2015)
• Archive the thirty-first (January–June 2016)
• Archive the thirty-second (July–December 2016)
• Archive the thirty-third (January–June 2017)
• Archive the thirty-fourth (July–December 2017)
• Archive the thirty-fifth (January–June 2018)
• Archive the thirty-sixth (June–December 2018)
• Archive the thirty-seventh (January–June 2019)
• Archive the thirty-eighth (June–December 2019)
• Archive the thirty-ninth (January–June 2020)
• Archive the fortieth (June–December 2020)
• Archive the forty-first (January-June 2021)
• Archive the forty-second (July-December 2021)
• Archive the forty-third (January-June 2022)
• Archive the forty-fourth (July-December 2022)
• Archive the forty-fifth (January-June 2023)
• Archive the forty-sixth (July-December 2023)
• Archive the forty-seventh (January-June 2024)

Hi, dearest Ser Amantio di Nicolao, how are you? Me so and so, cause spinal hernia, but I go on!!!

Please, do you have 4 minutes to visit this new page I opened? Thank you very much for your great work, see you soon. Rei Momo (talk) 06:35, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Mougal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Mougal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C679 15:41, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw you removed Amy Tyron from Olympic Medalists in Equestrian-- she did receive a Bronze medal in the team competition in Athens in 2004 so I'm not sure why that category was removed. Nayyn (talk) 09:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nayyn:: She is now in Category:Olympic bronze medalists for the United States in equestrian. She does not need to be in the parent as well. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 08:37, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Today's story is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11, yesterday's was a great mezzo, and on Thursday we watched a sublime ballerina. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Main Page history/2024 July 30b will have a baritone, a violinist, a composer and a Bach cantata, - almost too much, and the composer's article, Wolfgang Rihm, should be better, help wanted. - Plenty of music on my parents anniversary day ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315 Online events: New: | Women in film and stage | Indigenous women Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (July, August, September) | Women in Sports (July, August) Announcements from other communities TBD Tip of the month: Check your athlete's notability before researching and creating her bio. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Costa Rican naturalists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao,

Yesterday I tried to update Aimée de Jongh's Wikipedia page with her latest comprehensive career and bio information. And also with a more recent, professional press photo. Unfortunately, due to a conflict of interest, the update was rejected.

If I send the text to you, would you be willing to review it and update your version of the page? The information I gathered came from a reliable source, the artist's own website https://www.aimeedejongh.com.

Thank you. BBruyn (talk) 12:50, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of my story, watch and listen, - I like today's especially because you see him at work, hear him talk about his work and the result of his work - rare! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

... and a third, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:41, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August, Bach's cantata was 300 years old, and the image one. The cantata is an extrordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in the cycle. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help? My story today is about a woman, nominated for RD but needing support as I write this. A composer died whose article is long and mostly unreferenced. And some articles open for review, always. - How are you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:03, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- what’s the rationale for believing Tamanend was not a native American leader?

 R/ the JMOprof ©¿©¬ 01:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JMOprof: He is categorized in Category:17th-century Native American leaders; no need to be in the parent. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:05, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah so! Thanks.  R/ the JMOprof ©¿©¬ 19:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:I-Kiribati women writers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bordes d'Envalira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'Bordes d'Envalira' is not a village in Andorra. This is supported by local knowledge and the website of the Government of Andorra. Bordes d'Envalira is an unofficial collection of buildings which are part of the Grandvalira ski resort and thus does not suit Wikipedia's notability guidelines (as even Grandvalira does not have an English article). Furthermore, the only reference in this article, positioned as if to support the idea of Bordes d'Envalira being a village, actually contradicts the article. The reference is from an autobiography which describes the area as solely being a mountain pass on the border of France, rather than a village in Central Andorra as suggested by this article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Canòlic
• L'Armiana

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

==

{{You've got mail}} Ilovethehistory9 (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An unjustly forgotten Baltimore soprano, could use your expertise to improve it if I missed anything. Thanks! Gamaliel (talk) 15:07, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gamaliel: Looked good when I looked at it earlier today. I'll check a couple of our books and see if there's anything else that might be of use. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for help you've provided maintaining my wikipedia page. It has some troll-like errors at the moment.

"Her magnum opus in the public eye was her solo song, "4 Her D", appearing in the world-renowned K-Pop group, B1llUSTRATION's debut album as a Target-exclusive bonus track."

I was wondering if you'd be able to clear those up for me.

Many thanks in advance! -- Marisa Williamson 98.124.203.2 (talk) 15:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao Hi! I created a draft Draft:Hosenul Islam . I request you to check this draft and please inform me the weaknesses of the draft or edit it . Please !মোঃ আহসান হাবিব রিফাত (talk) 05:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I need help at In the Light of Truth: The Grail Message. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:15, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tgeorgescu: Sorry, this isn't a realm in which I have much expertise. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Blake Hinson, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you pause the automated addition of the 21st-century English sportswomen category until you can do so accurately, I have reverted over 50 of your additions within the cricket Wikiproject only as they had been misplaced. JP (Talk) 08:23, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpeeling: I've found where the problem lies, so it can be eliminated when I redo the set. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Could you help have a look on this persistent deletion of content case? It is unbecoming with the repeated pattern of deletions by associated IP addresses. Appreciate your assist on this . Thanks hundenvonPG (talk) 16:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Ser Amantio di Nicolao I was recently browsing your page, and I was wondering if you could possibly point me in the right direction for joining the Red Women project. In conjunction, I was also interested in learning if Celibacy is required for joining? Thank you! 47.6.36.61 (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

story · music · places

Three stories related to today in memory, 11 September, 20 July and 20 June, the latter piece of art also pictured on the Main page. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My story today features a pic I took from my position in the choir, I can also offer varied delightful music, some from Venice, also with pics I took, - note the rose in the clarinet ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Moldovan writers by century indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For many years, I've wanted to thank you for your careful vigilance of my Wikipedia page (Dawn Eden Goldstein). I'm honored that you took an interest in it. All your edits have been first-rate.

If I might be so bold as to request your intervention on a page about someone dear to my heart, I'd love to see someone update the page for Father Edward Dowling, S.J., using information from my biography of him, Father Ed: The Story of Bill W.'s Spiritual Sponsor (Orbis Books, 2022). David Crumm, writing about Father Ed for Read the Spirit, noted several errors on Dowling's Wikipedia page, which I believe have yet to be corrected--see https://readthespirit.com/explore/dawn-eden-goldsteins-father-ed-lifts-up-the-saint-who-befriended-bill-w-and-helped-to-spread-the-good-news-about-alcoholics-anonymous/. As Crumm notes, my book also contains information that would be of interest for the Wikipedia page on Edwin A. Lahey.

I don't know what Wikipedia's rules are with regard to whether you are permitted to receive promotional materials from subjects of pages, but if it's permitted, I'd be delighted to have a copy of Father Ed sent to you or to someone who can pass it on to you. My email address can be found on my Dawn Patrol blog. In any case, you have my continued gratitude. Dedengoldstein (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed some semi-automated category edits from this account. I guess some categories were changed or something and they were being updated on articles. The problem I'm seeing is that the old/obsolete categories shouldn't have been on the article in the first place. Any chance that you can check that the categories actually apply to the article while updating them? – Reidgreg (talk) 05:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reidgreg: Can you please give me a couple of specific examples of what you're seeing? Once I can see for myself I can better answer your question. Also: I'm about to head to bed, so I probably won't be answering until tomorrow evening. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, this isn't your fault; the articles had category problems before your edits. At worst you added a tiny amount of clutter to a trash heap. For my perspective, categories should be for defining characteristics of the subject which are commonly and consistently referred to by the article's sources. Very often I see categories which are trivial or contradictory to the article content, but it's generally a low priority for me to address them. Some examples:

• The Hunt (2020 film) is a tricky one as the sources disagree to the genre of the film, to the point of a 45-word 20-source explanatory footnote. Of the 20 sources, only one called it an 'action-comedy' so that category is weakly supported. Other weak or unsupported categories are 'Films based on Animal Farm', 'American splatter films', 'Films about death games', and 'Obscenity controversies in film'.
• The Happytime Murders is another one where the edit history is full of unsupported genre and category changes. It had been categorized as an action film and you added English-language to that, but I don't think any source calls it an action film. I removed those and a score of other categories.
• Johnny & Clyde had an unsupported 'drama' category to which you added English-language.

Reidgreg (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reidgreg: (Apologies for the delay - I thought I would have more time for an in-depth response these past few days, but evidently I misjudged my time management skills and level of exhaustion.)

I take your point...and I will see if anything jumps out at me as I continue filling out the categories. Though it's going to be a fairly large task yet, so I suspect some things will fall through the cracks no matter how careful I am. Still, I'll keep my eye out for anything I can. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320 Online events: New: Women in STEM | Geofocus: Islands I-P | Women in archaeology Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities October is Women in Green's "Around the World in 31 Days" Good Article Edit-a-thon Tip of the month: Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

story · music · places

You may remember Maryvonne Le Dizès, my story today as on 28 August. Some September music was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with Ligeti mentioned in story and music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations on your milesone!! - Today brought a timely promotion of Helmut Bauer to the Main page on the day when pieces from Mozart's Requiem were performed for him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thanks very much. I spent today in southern Maryland with a friend, visiting Thomas Stone National Historic Site and scratching another one of my itches. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 07:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That sound lovely! - Did you see the pics of two musical events and the cat (in places)? The enthusiasm of that keyboard player seemed unlimited. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Not as unlimited as that of the cats, surely? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 07:26, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is it about Gordon Bowker's contributions to British journalism that caused you to remove him from the category "British Journalists"?Geneus01 (talk) 06:32, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Geneus01: He is in the category Category:20th-century British journalists. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:10, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - my mistake; there are so many sub categories of journalist, it must surely take one to eliminate overlap and retain the integrity of granularity - well beyond my understanding - observation well made! Geneus01 (talk) 05:48, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 October 7 § Local politicians by nationality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH ^talk! 01:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This unsigned pirate 2a02:c7e:5e7d:e00:a921:9096:3c65:7de8 has been putting dead information on the page Arthur and the Minimoys. He/she thinks that the Weinstein cut is "still available on DVD" just because a copy of it was found in a charity shop. Look, the Weinstein cut has not been renewed on any format due to the closure of The Weinstein Company following the arrest of Harvey Weinstein in 2018. They’re all out of print as they were dated in 2007, 11 years prior as American distributors bought rights to the original uncut version in 2023. A month ago, an another unsigned pirate, could have been the same one, inserted the link to its former version that’s not even accessible anymore, which he/she thinks it is. Could you please find an admin and put an end to this fairytale editing? Thank you. Retrosunshine2006 talk 03:28, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Retrosunshine2006: I would post this question over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film for more assistance; it's not a field in which I have much interest or knowledge, to be honest. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:26, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao Thanks. Retrosunshine2006 talk 05:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, just letting you know I generally haven't been paying too much attention to the surge of category changes you've been making, but it raised my eyebrows when I saw that you'd categorized Jaws 2 as an adventure film. It's not described as such in the lead, nor do I think most if any sources would categorize it as such. I've reverted that and a handful of other changes. I'm not sure whether that was intentional on your part or not, but you might want to slow down a little. DonIago (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: The problem is, often, that I'm picking up on categories that have already been added to the article. Jaws 2, for instance: it was categorized under Category:Sea adventure films and Category:1970s adventure films, both of which I've since removed. So that kind of thing is getting amplified. I catch it when I can (the other day I ran into a Spanish-language film that had been categorized as "English", for some reason), but sometimes things do slip through. Otherwise I try to take a good look at the category tree before proceeding, because sometimes oddities do occur. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:30, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be better to look at the genres used in the lead and possibly look for references to genres within the article than to go by categories that are currently applied to articles, though I realize that might create more work. While I think your changes are probably fine in the majority of cases, I saw a few more where the category changes didn't appear to be substantiated by the article text. I'm not trying to admonish you at all; I'm just concerned that what's ultimately happening is the addition of improper categories rather than removal of categories that shouldn't have been there in the first place. DonIago (talk) 05:29, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another recent one, Point Break as a comedy film? DonIago (talk) 13:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: Ah, yeah - that was a category mistake. It's categorized under Category:Buddy cop films, which are categorized under both Category:Action thriller films and Category:Buddy comedy films. I removed a couple from my list when I generated it, but that one appears to have slipped through. Sorry. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:59, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, but please consider slowing down a bit on this. I'm uncomfortable with the number of reverts I've had to make to your changes, especially since I'm obviously not seeing all of them (I'm not going through your contributions list; these are articles I was already watching). DonIago (talk) 14:02, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: I'm likely coming to a slowdown point soon anyway - this is a huge project, and I'm trying to get what I can done to get it out of the way. But I think most of the major categories are done.

But I have a question for you: I noted that in both Teen Wolf and Teen Wolf Too you've removed the sports-comedy-related categories, but left the category Category:American basketball films. Do you think it's enough to categorize it as a sports film, rather than a sports comedy? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, I haven't seen Teen Wolf Too, so I can't really say how much sports is a primary aspect of that film, but I definitely remember basketball being a significant component of the first film. That said, I would question whether it's a "sports film". Aren't those typically films where the sport is a primary driver of the plot? The basketball in the first film is somewhat incidental, IIRC. If Marty Scott is a swimmer or a baseball or soccer player instead, does it change anything in terms of the overall plot?

More to the point though, as always: what do reliable sources say? Do they categorize either of these films as being sports films?

If "basketball films" is a sub-cat of "sports film", but nobody really calls either film a "sports film", then it may be best to remove that as well.

I dunno, is this a reasonable analysis? I feel like I'm rambling. DonIago (talk) 14:22, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: You're not rambling, no - you've hit upon exactly the problem that creeps into these category trees; at what point does a subject (such as sports) become a "primary" driver of the film? And of course, because one cannot see all films in one's life, it can become more difficult to judge if one has not seen the film in question. I'll leave it for now, as untangling it requires more research than I can provide...but there are a couple of other categories I might throw in there, then. (I'm a completist: if it fits under the "sports film" rubric then it should receive the requisite categories.)

Similarly...returning to Category:Buddy cop films: I'm not wild about the idea of putting them as a subcategory of either Category:Action thriller films or Category:Buddy comedy films, because I don't think a category tree should be an either/or proposition; it should be a "both" proposition. I tend to leave it as it is because I trust that there are editors that know film better than I. Even so...I would prefer a more elegant solution. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:40, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Buddy cop is a subgenre of Buddy film, which explicitly states that it's a subgenre of romantic comedy (not necessarily more than affection between people though). So I guess one shouldn't be using "buddy cop" unless they're referring to a comedic film. That said, I think most BC films but possibly not all of them could also be considered action thriller films? However, if there are exceptions, then that complicates matters. I'm not quite sure whether I'm responding to the kernel of your concern though. DonIago (talk) 16:05, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: You are, though, because that's how Point Break breaks down (no pun intended) into a comedy film. I don't necessarily disagree - "buddy cop" implies comedy to me, as well. In which case the category tree is correct, but perhaps the film is misfiled.

Really, though, I mean it more as an illustrative point than anything else. Which is usually a sign that I've been thinking about things too long. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:19, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Point Break was categorized as a buddy cop film with no mention of such a dynamic within the body of the article, so I've removed those categories. I'd be okay with it being called a "buddy film" given that the article does discuss the nature of the relationship between the two main characters in those terms. However, "buddy" is kind of a hybrid genre of which comedy is a component, and the "buddy film" category is not a subcat of any comedy genre, so I'd be fine with "buddy" categories being applied. Hope that helps! DonIago (talk) 16:47, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paulina Bates, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Congratulations on your six millionth edit! ϢereSpielChequers 09:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WereSpielChequers: Thank you kindly. It's been a long pull to get there, as Gershwin says, but I finally made it. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:22, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, that's incredible, congrats, I remember I once had twice your edits! We should start a pool on guessing when you surpass the number of articles we have! Hope you're having a good year Ser. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:18, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that's a lot! Congrats, and thanks! --Rosiestep (talk) 13:13, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Any time. :-) Gotta say, it feels good to bang out an article for the first time in...over a year, I think? It's been too long. (See below comment about last year.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:25, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Oooh, can I get in on that? I could use the money. :-) I'm having...well, a better year than last year. But given the stinking cesspool that was last year, that's not difficult. Hopefully it continues to improve...we shall see. (Not going to lie - hitting this milestone helps me feel a little more optimistic, silly as that may seem.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]