User talk:Stephan Leeds

Welcome!

Hello, Stephan Leeds, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Flockmeal 05:05, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

Please stop converting spaces into   escape codes. It isn't necessary and just makes things harder for others to edit. AlistairMcMillan 05:09, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

However, spaces between a number & a symbol of a unit of measure are recommended c.f. aforementioned WP:MOS (goto "dates & numbers" or whatnot) this is b'cause " " stops the whatever-it-is from seperating the two. & they ought not be seperated. Jimp 15:23, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beechcraft Starship, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup. If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page. You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Mion 21:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - a good set of edits. I never knew there was a difference between acronyms and initialisms! Cheers for your input Owain.davies 18:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This page has been deleted so you can carry out your move. Thanks, Mallanox 17:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

I saw that you tagged this article with a {{globalize}} template. I've looked through, and it seems pretty balanced to me. Are you referring to the "controversy" section? Can you describe your concerns specifically? Thanks. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 21:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting my convoluted text "the iPad supports a screen rotation of any angle (in increments of 90°)" with something much better. As a non natively English speaking person I wasn't too happy about what I wrote here, but I could not think of anything better, i'm glad you came up with something much better! thanks! Mahjongg (talk) 01:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regard to the proposed speedy deletion of Shaved ice so that Shave ice can be moved there, I recommend that you get a consensus for the move at Talk:Shave ice first. While "shaved ice" is more proper English grammar, the term "shave ice" is also in common use. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephan Leeds. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephan Leeds. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephan Leeds. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I proposed some changes to the Electronic Paper page per WP:COI but didn’t get a response. I saw that you have edited the page previously and was wondering if you would be willing to take a look. The suggested changes are shown here. They primarily have to do with mis-use of our trademark and some criticisms cited to a vendor blog. CDaignault1 (talk) 19:35, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note about the Theodolite article to explain why I used numeral '6' rather than the word 'six' in the photo caption. There are two reasons. Theodolites have always been sold around the world, initially from Britain then Switzerland/Germany then latterly Japan. So a comprehensibilty reason. Numerals are more international than words. Also theodolites are specified and described by a deluge of numbers (circle direct reading to 0.2" / level sensitivity 10" per 2mm etc etc) with the circle diameter, in this case 6 inches, being the headline indication of accuracy and therefore potential usage. So the 6/six question here is about whether one prioritises normal usage in the world of theodolites over normal usage in the world of Wikipedia editing. I can't say I am greatly distressed by your edit but I would prefer the numeral 6 in this case as being more in keeping with the subject. Colgill (talk) 13:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the photo title to 'A theodolite of the transit type with six-inch circles, manufactured in Britain ca. 1910 by Troughton & Simms'. This removes the reference to 'glass'. The glass is the top of the compass casing. While the compass glass is visible, the compass itself is an obsolescent feature of this theodolite and was dropped from theodolite design soon afterwards. The all-important circles, of which the vertical circle is the more prominent, are made of brass with silver scales. The change to glass circles did not occur till a bit later with the advent of the Wild T2 in about 1920. Colgill (talk) 11:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stephan Leeds (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The block 172.224.0.0/16 is blocked for editing, even for authenticated users. Traffic from users of Apple’s Private Relay service comes from this block (and presumably many others). Should this really block Wikimedia-authenticated users, or should it only block unauthenticated? I don’t know if such subnets are used exclusively by Apple and exclusively for Private Relay traffic, but I hope Apple would be willing to provide such information. When this service starts for Apple users in general, there will be a great loss if they are blocked from editing. I’m not asserting a certain answer here, but just hoping to ensure this is all reasoned out well before the issue affects most editors using Apple equipment, and hoping that we don’t have to choose between this major boon to privacy and the ability to edit. Stephan Leeds (talk) 05:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This range is blocked the same as all other open proxies, webhosts, and VPN's.

This is documented in our local policies:

• Wikipedia:Open proxies
• Wikipedia: Blocking policy § Open or anonymous proxies
• Wikipedia:Blocking IP addresses § Open proxies

This is also documented in the global policy at meta: meta:No open proxies.

These sort of services are often heavily abused to harass, / threaten editors, for sockpuppetry, and for undisclosed paid editing.

If you have a real, demonstrable need to edit via open proxies, there is a process described at WP:IPECPROXY that you can follow to request a userright called "IP Block Exemption" (documented at WP:IPBE).

I am closing this request, as it is more of a question than it is an unblock request. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 11:15, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Lilis (View From the Mirror) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Lilis (View From the Mirror) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Tensor (The View From The Mirror) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Tensor (The View From The Mirror) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC⁶⁷⁸ 01:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWgLYEmpJ_g     Enjoy! – .Raven  .talk 08:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s adorable! Thank you. Stephan Leeds (talk) 09:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stephan Leeds!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MediaWiki message delivery hello as well Heatherladue25 (talk) 11:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MediaWiki message delivery

your welcome Heatherladue25 (talk) 11:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that a recent edit to the G.711 page seems to have duplicated the Intro and Features sections, plus both the tight-hand info boxes. is this a work in progress of a miss-paste? Thanks, LurkingKiwi (talk) 02:02, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Sorry, and thank you for catching it! Definitely a miss-paste or some such and a quick form submission without adequate checking. Stephan Leeds (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Stephan Leeds (talk) 04:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

I like the fact that you put in the caveat about the erroneous term in the USB 3.0 article (back on 2023 October 28 at 19:46), but couldn't we fix the problem by just replacing the picture? I think I figured out how to upload a picture, and this may be the link to it:

. Let me know if you think this would be a good idea.

Thanks!

WesT (talk) 01:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, of course! Please do replace it. No need for my permission for that. Stephan Leeds (talk) 23:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me why an article that has been at the same title since 2005 and is currently a good article is somehow "misspelled" and required you to unilaterally make a page move? Did you stop to think about how this might break or otherwise impact other links, including the links from the good article list? These are the sort of edits that only serve to annoy people who expand and create articles. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:29, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve made many such page moves over nearly twenty years without any such complaint, because the Wikipedia Manual of Style (and simple typographic convention) call for an en dash—and no other character—in that usage. Also the page on page moves literally says, under “Reasons for moving a page”, “The title has been misspelled, does not contain standard capitalization or punctuation, or is misleading or inaccurate.”, which includes “The title [...] does not contain standard [...] punctuation.”. Yes, I know how it affects other links: They link to the new title because of the automatically-created redirect page that exists for exactly that reason. If you think there should be a carve-out for articles on railway topics to not follow the more general typographic convention and instead use a hyphen, there is an established process for changing the Manual of Style to add that exception. Stephan Leeds (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]