User talk:Tiny Particle

Hi Tiny Particle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mario Zippermayr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cover story. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 1910–11 Aston Villa F.C. season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 21:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi mate, I hope you're actually planning on expanding the articles you created at 1923–24 Aston Villa F.C. season and 1956–57 Aston Villa F.C. season. As things stand, those articles don't really add anything beyond the content we already have at 1924 FA Cup Final and 1957 FA Cup Final, so they're not really much use. Feel free to add the club's league record from those seasons in order to make them worthwhile. – PeeJay 16:46, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at my edits you will see that I have been expanding several other AVFC season articles. The above two have {{construction}} Why would you think I was not planning on expanding the above? Tiny Particle (talk)

Please also stop adding the {{Aston Villa F.C. matches}} template to season articles. That template does not (and should not) contain any links to Aston Villa season articles, and thus should not be used on such articles. – PeeJay 17:34, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ffs. Show me one were the addition was not an obvious error Tiny Particle (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No need to get so defensive. I'm sorry if my tone came across as aggressive, rather than as matter-of-fact as intended. I've been on Wikipedia for a very long time, and I've seen people use the {{under construction}} template without ever actually coming back to their work. I don't see any examples that were obvious errors, all I saw was someone copying content from one article to another. You would have been better off drafting your articles in a sandbox before publishing them, and perhaps even writing some of your own content rather than just copying. I appreciate you added the attribution directions to your edit summary, but the tone of 1957 FA Cup Final is (by definition) different to the content that should exist at 1956–57 Aston Villa F.C. season. Hope that helps. – PeeJay 18:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PeeJay:, Yeah sorry for being so tetchy, especially as you did not 'sabotage'/apply the letter of Wiki policy without thought to spirit as per message headings above and below this. I would dearly love to set up a barebones page for each season for every football league club season especially Aston Villa (All Villa fans are historians}. This would allow us to copy snippets details from say a players Wiki article to the particular season it refers to thus building a comphrehensive article by using the linking power of wikipedia to make the continually incremental improvements to encyclopedia we are building. This is not efficient with articles in draftspace as it fucks up the smooth transition between relevant articles and prelinking to non existing articles in the mainspace are always reversed. This is so easy with the mediawiki software and so impossible with the Byzantine rules that have developed. Is there anyway I could get a dispensation for this project? Tiny Particle (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the desire to build up a comprehensive history of your favourite team; I myself did so (with help) for Manchester United over the course of a few months. But please don't cut corners. Content written for one article may not have the same context if you just copy and paste it to a different article. Also, there's no need to pre-link articles, but if the topic is notable, links should be left in place per WP:REDLINK. You can link to that next time someone reverts you for linking to notable topics. – PeeJay 16:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating 1956–57 Aston Villa F.C. season. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 05:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, [[Draft:]]1923–24 Aston Villa F.C. season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:35, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tiny Particle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that [[Draft:]]1923–24 Aston Villa F.C. season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tiny Particle. Thank you for your work on 1923–24 Aston Villa F.C. season. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey y'all! I sure hope y'all are havin' a mighty fine day today. I just wanted to say a heartfelt thank you for takin' the time to contribute to Wikipedia by creatin' that there article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Now y'all can rest easy and enjoy the rest of your day, along with your kinfolk! Y'all take care now, ya hear?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:19, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 1924 FA Cup final into 1923–24 Aston Villa F.C. season. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to 1957–58 Aston Villa F.C. season. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

1919–20 Aston Villa F.C. season

added a link pointing to George Ramsay

1922–23 Aston Villa F.C. season

added a link pointing to George Ramsay

1923–24 Aston Villa F.C. season

added a link pointing to George Ramsay

1924–25 Aston Villa F.C. season

added a link pointing to George Ramsay

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aston Villa Academy Graduates has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:58, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Herbert Chapman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Chapman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Zakariya(New Testament figure) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 20 § Zakariya(New Testament figure) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you sending me my first thanks on Wikipedia :) Juvanet (talk) 04:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tiny Particle. Thank you for your work on Charles Barde. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not surprise change the titles of tons of Wikipedia articles in short succession. We have a process for that, WP:RM, if you'd like to propose a move - although as a heads-up, I think your proposed forms have basically 0% chance of being agreed with. If you do move, you need a more substantial reason than "English language" - that would be a cause to move Al-Baqara to The Cow or the like, but not to change the disambiguator. SnowFire (talk) 18:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your moves. If you still think they're worthwhile, follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves to propose them and there'll be a community discussion. Per above, though, Wikipedia doesn't really do parentheses as alternate titles in other languages very often, nor does it use it as a numbering, hence my skepticism of the community agreeing. SnowFire (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Attacks on the MV Maersk Hangzhou—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to move a big section in an article, please try to do that by moving it within one edit. Deleting and recreating it like this screws up the version history and makes it more difficult to track changes. Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:32, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted for future. -Tiny Particle (talk) 20:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited The Archers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Woolley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1966 in Cuba. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Qahhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanquisher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you created some unusual redirects (monkey masturbating, suicide hostess, etc.) to use as link targets on this article. Generally, if you want to link to another article, but you want the link text to be different from the article title, the right answer is to use a piped link. That way, you don't create an unnecessary extra page that someone could later mess up. Redirects should be reserved for reasonably common alternate or erroneous names for the target or an aspect of it; see WP:R#DELETE #8. The phrase "suicide hostess", for example, is probably unique to the Vonnegut story. —swpb^{T • beyond • mutual} 18:56, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carrie Nation

added a link pointing to Kelly Affair

Monkey

added a link pointing to Monkey House

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maersk Hangzhou has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black nationalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black activism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tiny Particle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1966 in Cuba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shaw (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Shaw.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:57, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:West of the Arabian Peninsula, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rusty 🐈 20:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tiny Particle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carel Joseph van Kempen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Correlated color temperature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KK.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]