User talk:ToadetteEdit

This is ToadetteEdit's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 7 days

Welcome to my user talk page. Here, you can post to me anything, reminding that Wikipedia is not like Messenger or WhatsApp. Sign your post using four tlides (~~~~) after each message. If I post something to you, comment there, making sure that you ping me there with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. After leaving the message, consider watching this page or subscribing the thread to stay updated. Inappropriate messages will be removed without notice. Stale discussions older than 7 days will be archived by a bot. When leaving messages, please do not ping me here (see this page for more info), as I will continue to be alerted by the system.
You are new? Consider using Wikipedia's introduction to start your editing journey. All questions are welcome here, or at the Teahouse. For editors with drafts, I am happy to review your drafts by just asking me.
A note to editors: Please do not use the rollback feature except reverting vandalism. All reverts must specify why the revert was made. Please leave discussions intact unless it is a personal attack.
Threads starts below. Also note that these threads may be newsletters, especially from The Signpost

Hi Toadette,

Please could we discuss the reliable sources I need for my article?

Perhaps if I explain the history, you would understand my issues.

Thanks! AMumFriend. AMumFriend (talk) 12:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AMumFriend, which article are you referring to? ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:27, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

I don't get how the ones I used aren't reliable:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gas_Emergency_Service_(UK)#cite_note-1

Thanks AMumFriend (talk) 18:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AMumFriend, all the sources don't mention the subject or only have brief mentions. I suggest finding sources that are reliable and independent to fulfill the general notability guidelines. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I simply added a more exact fact about Ida's teaching career as I worked with her for several years. --Regraab (talk) 01:25, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Regraab, I recommend declaring a conflict of interest on your user page. ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

You reviewed my Draft:Olaf Deutschmann. Could you guide me on how to improve it. I have discussed it with members on the Live Help channel, and they suggested it was best to contact you directly. Thank you for your time !

@Trialpedian

~~~~ Trialpedian (talk) 16:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Trialpedian! You can improve by searching for sources that are reliable, and independent (the subject should not be the author of a cited reference). I hope that helps! ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:56, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The previous rejections of the draft were for a similar reason. Before submitting this draft I tried to include all quality references, and after some discussions with other members, I believed the current references were acceptable. All are from official websites of reputed organisations. Is there any specific references which are not up to the mark ? I could try to find alternatives or maybe remove that portion from the article. Thanks ! Trialpedian (talk) 14:51, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know , but if you think that the draft is up to par, you can resubmit it again. ToadetteEdit (talk) 08:40, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

• Asilvering
• Significa liberdade

• Good Olfactory
• Hesperian
• I JethroBT
• TommyBoy
• Woody

CheckUser changes

• Barkeep49
• Izno

• Doug Weller
• Spicy

Guideline and policy news

• Administrator elections are a proposed new process for selecting administrators, offering an alternative to requests for adminship (RfA). The first trial election will take place in October 2024, with candidate sign-up from October 8 to 14, a discussion phase from October 22 to 24, and SecurePoll voting from October 25 to 31. For questions or to help out, please visit the talk page at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections.
• Following a discussion, the speedy deletion reason "File pages without a corresponding file" has been moved from criterion G8 to F2. This does not change what can be speedily deleted.
• A request for comment is open to discuss whether there is a consensus to have an administrator recall process.

Arbitration

• The arbitration case Historical elections has been closed.
• An arbitration case regarding Backlash to diversity and inclusion has been opened.
• Editors are invited to nominate themselves to serve on the 2024 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission until 23:59 October 8, 2024 (UTC).

Miscellaneous

• If you are interested in stopping spammers, please put MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist and MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist on your watchlist, and help out when you can.

---

	Greetings, ToadetteEdit. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Vanderwaalforces
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]