User talk:Vituzzu

Heyla, sono sempre io. Ciò che mi ero dimenticato di dirti ieri è che la mia connessione è condivisa da un'altra persona che conosco e che si dedica ad altre attività su Wikipedia. Ecco perchè, probabilmente, sulla Wikipedia italiana mi sono comparsi oggi due avvisi di blocco infinito, sebbene io non abbia avuto accesso a Wikipedia in queste ore. Tutto questo per precisare. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CuoreAlVanadio (talk • contribs) 18:15, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non ti preoccupare, grazie lo stesso per il supporto morale. --Angelo 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per avermi avvisato, ho già beccato due immagini uploadate da Green Owl con licenza libera, ma nettamente copyrighted (una foto di Mosconi e un fumetto di Paperino, in particolare). Andrò col tempo a ricontrollare i contributi delle utenze che mi hai comunicato per vedere se vi sono comportamenti non adeguati alle policy di Wikipedia. Grazie ancora. --Angelo 21:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orceana Calcio è la squadra di calcio di Orzinuovi, e l'articolo è stato creato da Green Owl (tanto per cambiare), con Brixia come altro contributore; se te mi dici che il puppetmaster ha legami wikipediani o reali con Orzinuovi, allora a questo punto è altamente probabile che egli e Green Owl siano la stessa persona. In ogni caso, io posso bloccarli solo in caso violno qualche policy di Wikipedia. Finché i sock fanno interventi su articoli di topic distinti e separati non c'è violazione di policy da queste parti, e due upload sbagliati e disturbi da personalità multipla non ritengo siano ragioni sufficienti per prendere provvedimenti. In ogni caso, le utenze sono sotto osservazione da parte del sottoscritto d'ora in avanti. --Angelo 21:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Si sono LpL! Sono anche Green Owl! Muahahah! --Zan Biedro 15:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, questo Zan Biedro (alias Green Owl, alias...) mi scrive, ma mi sembra un troll, mi potresti dire cosa ne sai? Grazie Mauro Cicognini 10:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per la risposta ed il puntatore Mauro Cicognini 15:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie per gli auguri, per quanto riguarda il soggetto di cui mi dici richiedi un checkuser anche perché io sto andando fuori città proprio adesso (tra Siena e Milano) e mancherò per almeno 24 ore. Ciao e grazie ancora. --Angelo 14:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Come vedi l'ho subito usata (Rocco Jemma), potevi farlo direttamente tu, non c'era problema. Tornando alla questione italiana: allora me lo fai questo regalo di Pasqua? ;-) --Kasper2006 (talk) 05:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Segnalo che la wiki italiana necessiterebbe l'unione di queste due voci Engraulis encrasicolus e Engraulidae o meglio il cancellamento della seconda che sembra meno completa della prima. --Kasper2006 (talk) 18:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Saud (talk) 20:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vituzzu, volevo contattarti su wiki italia ma non ci riesco: come posso fare ad modificare una pagina? mi dice che non posso!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.75.50 (talk) 15:04, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perché condividi la classe di indirizzi di un noto vandalo, sei registrato? --Vituzzu (talk) 11:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Egregio Vituzzu. Sono moglie di "Brunodam" e la prego di chiarire dove, come e quando mio marito le ha fatto "minaccia di morte". Qui ([1]) lei dichiara cose non vere. Suo cugino Luigi mi ha detto che le ha scritto riguardo a "vedersi faccia a faccia" con lei in una prossima riunione di wikipedia in Italia, allo scopo di chiarire unas situazione di blocco che ricorda molto l'ingiustizia-sbaglio fatta con Crisarco e Presbite nella wikipedia inglese. Io, per esempio, uso lo stesso computer di mio marito e sono stata recentemente bloccata ed accusata di essere un suo sockpuppet. Purtroppo wikipedia ha "alcune" falle, come dice ora lo stesso Crisarco rispondendo a Presbite nella wikipedia italiana. Le stesse falle che hanno fatto bandire nella wikipedia italiana mio marito anni fa, solo per avere ospitato per alcuni mesi il cugino Luigi e la moglie Maria Rubino (che scrisse allora un blog di denuncia) che usarono lo stesso modem di casa nostra sugli stessi argomenti. Mio marito disse solo che pensava di inoltrare denuncia (che poi non fece) e subito fu bandito. Questo bando fu il pretesto usato da un gruppo croato per farlo bandire anche dalla wikipedia inglese. Come vede, una vicenda ingarbugliata che parlando "faccia a faccia" (come vuole fare Luigi) si potrebbe risolvere. Cordialmente. Maria

Senti qua, non credo manco ad una delle tue bugie sulla presenza di un folto gruppo di persone (putacaso scrivono tutti allo stesso modo e sanno tutto di tutti allo stesso momento, casualmente si spostano nel mondo tutti allo stesso momento, esistono più tizi che vengono qui a rompere le proverbiali scatole, probabilmente in coordinazione fra di loro attraverso i vari canali che il web offre ma per cortesia, finge l'onnipotenza è un gioco abbastanza infantile così come lo è provare ad imbarcare tutti gli italofoni nel proprio pastone di trolling, fascismo, nazionalismo e menzogna), francamente ho seri dubbi sull'esistenza stessa di una Maria Rubino e di un Luigi28 distinto dal buon Brunodam, non sciorinare link a presunti profili o roba simile, non vale la pena. Il presunto Luigi mi ha detto che vuole incontrare coi classici ammiccamenti che solo uno che, alla luce di una cultura decisamente scarsa, pensa siano propri di tutto il Meridione, ora 'sta roba mi fa semplicemente ridere, "faccia a faccia" penso che il buon Mr. Salvezza del Pianeta avrebbe buon gioco a mettersi la coda fra le gambe, a dimostrazione di ciò ho provveduto ad una semplice informativa alle autorità e nulla più: a me 'sto genere di giochi non fa batter ciglio, ma c'è gente che ci potrebbe credere ed è bene che sia a conoscenza e delle conseguenze che la minaccia generalizzata ha e quanto poi, in sostanza, questa poggi sul vuoto, l'accesso della famosa biblioteca barese è tutto sommato abbastanza facilmente riconducibile, grazie a quel "provvidenziale" DL del 2002, a chi ne abusa.

Se stessi facendo (anche se è un'ipotesi abbastanza remota) di tutta l'erba un fascio la colpa non è di certo mia, ma di chi in questo si è legato di sua volontà a tale fascio.

L'aver letto quanto scritto da un gran signore della masnada poi mi impedisce di essere ulteriormente cordiale

--Vituzzu (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vedo che con lei non si riesce ad intavolare un discorso. Putroppo wikipedia ha "falle" enormi: io addirittura sono stata bandita dalla wikipedia italiana senza mai avervi scritto o postato una parola (credo sia un record!). Mi meraviglia che una persona del suo livello non riesca a porsi il dubbio che tanti anni (e scritti) di mio marito e Luigi su wikipedia possano essere motivati da una palese ingiustizia (direi sbaglio). Nessuno al mondo risulta infallibile, neanche alcuni amministratori della wikipedia (ed il caso Crisarco docet). Insomma, Presbite e Barba Nane vengono banditi e li si riconosce innocenti, ma mio marito e Luigi no: strano, anzi curioso. Viene da pensare che tutto sia riconducibile alle accuse fatte da Maria Rubino sul suo Blog contro una certa "Cricca" della wikipedia italiana (criccawikipediaitaliana.blogspot.com/). Comunque, le tolgo il disturbo per sempre (come penso anche Luigi, che mi ha detto di non volerle piu parlare "faccia a faccia" in futuro). Per educazione la saluto cordialmente. Maria

Quando la presunta sig.ra Rubino fece quel blog io non ero manco attivo, è anche abbastanza infantile a rileggerlo e direi pure che ha fatto rumore solo fra i wikipediani con scarso senso della realtà.

Circa quanto succede qui i deliri del gruppuscolo di salvatori (i vari Brunodam e soci) impediscono loro di vedere che sono essi stessi i migliori alleati dei propri "nemici" (posto che umanamente mi fa davvero sorridere vedere 'ste guerre virtuali).

Dicono che Luigi28 sia il simpaticone che mi scrisse Non ce l'avevo con te....ma adesso ci vedremo faccia a faccia e ci scambieremo presto quattro chiacchiere alla prossima riunione di wikipediani. Lì non potrai colpire dietro ad un computer in forma indisturbata (e, scusami, un poco vigliacca). Ciao :) :) ora l'ammiccamento, come dicevo, è il sigillo di chi, un po' per ignoranza, un po' per ottusità, avendo visto troppi film di De Niro e pensa che fare il maffioso, insomma bambinate che possono risultare pericolose solo per chi le scrive e non per chi le legge ma che oltre a farmi ridere mi fanno fare una sola domanda: con quale faccia tosta mi si scrive ancora? Con quale faccia tosta ogni quanto arriva qualche amico "dei croati" (perché con le sue bravate li aiuta) a chiedermi aiuto? Con quale faccia tosta ci si guarda allo specchio la mattina sapendo che si fa il teppistello per il web? Come si vive a 30, 40 o più anni sapendo che si ragiona come un bimbo di 5 anni? Riguardo l'incontro solitamente ho una specie di allergia alla gentaglia o i mocciosi, ma alle volte sono tentato di are un'eccezione. --Vituzzu (talk) 16:24, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maria, ti sto seguendo dal mio computer. Confermo che con Vituzzu non si intavola alcun discorso. Avevi ragioni quando mi dicevi che non era il caso di parlargli personalmente faccia a faccia. Riconosco che ha un livello un poco troppo basso intellettualmente. Comunque siamo riusciti a fare bloccare 6 volte il Direktor, mentre alcuni "cretinetti" della wiki italiana come lui continuano a fare il gioco degli slavi. Luigi

Non hai idea piccolo di quanto rida a vedere le balle che ti racconti da solo ed anzi, il fatto che parli da solo! --Vituzzu (talk) 19:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SEI PROPRIO UN PICCIOTTO CRETINETTO, VITUZZU BEDDU....questa volta non puoi VIGLIACCAMENTE cancellare e bloccare tutto (LOL), vero? Luigi.

Sei fortissimo XD --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caro Vito, ti prego di prendere debita nota del fatto che il sottoscritto è il sig. Luigi28. Non sono sock di nessuno e nella wiki italiana scrivo col nome di Presbite. Purtroppo lo stesso meccanismo che ha portato qui dentro al blocco di Crisarco (fortunatamente rientrato) è quello che mi ha fatto bloccare a suo tempo, come sock di un certo Pio. Il meccanismo è sempre lo stesso: nella wiki inglese ruota attorno alle tematiche istriano/dalmate un gruppo di esagitati, che con le loro azioni hanno fatto ritenere tutti quanti dei pericoli per il progetto, conseguentemente il ban scatta praticamente "in automatico". Oramai la situazione si è incancrenita alquanto, anche perché gli esagitati di cui sopra mescolano nomi, fatti e dati. Lo stesso nome "Luigi" del presunto parente di Bruno, fa ritenere che questo "Luigi" sia in realtà "Luigi28", e così una volta in più vengo inserito in questo inestricabile vortice d'accuse. Qui nelle voci della Wiki inglese non ho più scritto nulla, limitandomi a singole frasi in qualche talk-page. In tal caso, faccio praticamente sempre capire chi sono, in modo da evitare d'essere confuso con qualcun altro. La cosa però non mi evita lo stesso d'essere confuso per questo o quel vandalo, e quindi non esiste nemmeno la lontana ipotesi che io ritorni a contribuire a questo progetto, anche se a suo tempo avevo sperato che qualcuno si accorgesse dell'errore fatto nei miei confronti. La cosa "simpatica" è che poi chi mi trascinò al ban ha successivamente riconosciuto che in realtà io non ero sock di nessuno, ma di fronte alla mia richiesta di dirlo ad un amministratore mi ha ribattuto che era meglio comunque che io fossi bannato. Ribadisco per l'ennesima volta: io qui ho scritto sempre e solo come "Luigi28" o col mio IP, che pur avendo io l'ADSL vedo che differisce spesso negli ultimi numeri. Ad ogni modo, inizia sempre con "151". E questo è tutto. Presbite/Luigi28--151.21.253.187 (talk) 18:57, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Secondo te confondo 'sto fesso con te? --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you're concerned about an IP's edits as you appear to be at Elia Pirone, you need to issue the appropriate warnings to the IP, either by hand on their talk page or using a script such as Twinkle. In addition, I notice most of your communication on this page is in Spanish Italian. Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elia Pirone in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elia Pirone, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 19:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E grazie per i tuoi contributi nella Wikipedia in Inglese. Fammi sapere se vuoi che ti aiuti con DYK sugli articoli da tradurre dall'Italiano in Inglese. Tempo fa stavo vedendo per esempio che l'Accademia delle Belle Arti di Napoli aveva un bellissimo articolo in Italiano, ma nessun articolo in inglese. E' un peccato che l'Italia sia cosi poco presentata nel progetto inglese, ed in effetti avrebbe mille volte piu' contenuto da far vedere al mondo. Ti saluto come le persone anziane come me sogliono fare: "Tante belle cose", :-). --Sulmues ^(talk) 01:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Io, sarei un sockpuppet di Tikary? Ma fammi il piaciere, toglimi il blocco!

C'è semplicemente stato un equivoco. NON sono io che cercate!! Per Favore, sbloccami! E Per Favore indicami anche i "motivi" del mio blocco. Ti do l'autorizzazione a copiare questo in dirizzo e-mail, paolo.caliego@alice.it per dirmi cosa è succeso e per elencarmi i tuoi "motivi" per cui mi hai bloccato. Hai fatto un errore! E NON TE LO PERDONO FINCHE NON MI SBLOCCHI!!!

Sonkir Blue--Sonkir Blue (talk) 10:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sbloccami sono Onesto! E non farei mai del male! paolo.caliego@alice.it

Sonkir Blue--Sonkir Blue (talk) 10:44, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Aitna deletion. Thank you. —Tikiwont (talk) 12:24, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's now yet another thread related to this mess, at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Two politician pages,.....in WP? Its out.. Any comments you would like to make are welcome. — Gavia immer (talk) 22:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abbandono wikipedia, la mia ribellione l'ho fatta, se vedi qualche nome strambo in giro sappi che non sono io, se non c'è una "K" o "W", "Y", "V" non è un SP mio. Mi sono sempre comportato bene, sempre, nella mia vita reale. Non ho intenzioni di far del male a wikipedia, ma siete voi che mi avete costretto. Ho intenzione di chiedere un bel SCUSA grande grande, sia per il mio comportamento sciocco, sia perché ho intenzione di non avere nemici. Sembrerebbe l'ENNESIMA PRESA PER IL CULO, ma non è così. --Dr Claudio --87.7.81.244 (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:Uishaki with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:41, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no it´s not true. He just asked me how to contact other members on here and i told him that it can be done on their specific talkpages, did not asked why. Just later i knew he had that forum and was just here for spaming, didn´t know that before. Via mail? I never heard that he does that and never ever suggested something like that, WP is not a place for spam. I reported him the last time as a sockpuppet and reverted some of his edits. Why are you asking? Kante4 (talk) 22:36, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i read that and used google translator to understand it a bit. ;) But like i said i never said that and reported his spam and said on his talk page of one of his accounts that he needs to stop it because he was blocked several times and it is just annoying. Hope that it´s cleared up now. :) Kante4 (talk) 22:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I hope you are fine. You reverted my edits there, no reason was given. May I know the reason?

--Illahnou (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is the matter with that edit? --Illahnou (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The same with me also. How did you revert my edits without explanation? AnjaliWasim (talk) 10:38, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - Tags removed as not copyvios. They are both copied from pages in en.wikiversity.org, which is allowed. You are quite welcome to raise them at WP:SPI if you wish. I suspect http://www.knowledgerush.com used data from en.wikiversity.org. Please note, we do not blank pages with CSD#G12 tags - we cannot use the "Duplication Detector" report with a blanked page, pages are only blanked when you use the {{copyvio}} template, and it does it automatically for you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:24, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me deal with it by myself. Thanks
--Nitsansh (talk) 17:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For your info... Matteo was declared Persona non grata on my talk page. I hope he won't bother us anymore, though I doubt it... --Nitsansh (talk) 13:06, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vituzzu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:109.117.190.31, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: talk pages should not be deleted. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 17:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:07, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Smartse#Problem_with_an_Administrator. SmartSE (talk) 23:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and by the way - can't the forum name be added to an edit filter to stop anyone entering it? User:Beetstra would be able to fix it up for you pronto. SmartSE (talk) 23:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason you could not have jumped on IRC and requested a local administrator (I know there are some active) perform the RevDelete and then emailed an Oversighter instead of using your Steward tools to do so yourself? Tiptoety ^talk 17:55, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you decided to improve your knowledge of english wikipedia policies, but.. why don't you jump back on it.wiki IRC channel? --Theirrulez (talk) 02:04, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scusa, Vituzzu beddu, ma qui bisogna collaborare a wikipedia imparzialmente, non fare i bloccatutto per ragioni politiche o antipatie personali (o perché ingiustamente "banditi" dalla rinomata cricca alla berlusca con bunga-bunga alla marijuana) Tra parentesi: ho anche creato la voce Donato Seppi nella wiki spagnola ed anche lí non ho avuto problemi....Solo in quella italiana viene cancellata....strano, ma vero (come nella famosa serie televisiva).B.D. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.77.108.169 (talk) 14:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

thanks for posting. I caught an obvious error in AGK's totals. (141, not 241, opposes) Could you do a quick double check that there aren't other small typos? Thanks, Jd2718 (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it for Vituzzu, see here. Regards, Trijnstel (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scusa Vituzzu, perchè sono state cancellate alcune voci su "photorealism" in particolare Roberto Bernardi e Raphaella Spence che riportavano fonti molto molto attendibili?

--82.63.232.202 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry for the radio silence, guys :). I just wanted to let you know that we're planning on starting a new round of hand coding, which you can sign up for here. This will be the final round (honest!), and is basically because we found some really interesting results from the last round that blew our collective mind. It's important to check that they weren't a fluke, though, and so a bit more work is needed.

If you have any questions, drop a note on my talkpage - and if you know anyone who would be interested in participating, please tell them about it! We'll be holding an IRC training session in #wikimedia-office at 18:00 UTC on the 21st of March to run through the tool and answer any questions you may have. Thanks! :) Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:42, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bodindecha (Sing Singhaseni) School Student - 011.jpg

Thank you.

Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 09:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YOUR KILLINGS ARE NOT OVER! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walang ng MegaFon (talk • contribs) 11:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FIGHT FOR ONE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bago Pilipinas ng Laban (talk • contribs) 11:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NOW! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apat ng GABRIELA (talk • contribs) 12:28, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I'm sorry to see that you're Dragon2016. --Ferfrans SOAR (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all. My regular(ish) update on what's been happening with the new Article Feedback Tool.

Hand-coding

As previously mentioned, we're doing a big round of hand-coding to finalise testing :). I've been completedly bowled over by the response: we have 20 editors participating, some old and some new, which is a new record for this activity. Many thanks to everyone who has volunteered so far!

Coding should actively start on Saturday, when I'll be distributing individualised usernames and passwords to everyone. If you haven't spoken to me but would be interested in participating, either drop me a note on my talkpage or email okeyeswikimedia.org. If you have spoken to me, I'm very sorry for the delay :(. There were some toolserver database issues beyond our control (which I think the Signpost discussed) that messed with the tool.

New designs and office hours

Our awesome designers have been making some new logos for the feedback page :) Check out the oversighter view and the monitor view to get complete coverage; all opinions, comments and suggestions are welcome on the talkpage :).

We've also been working on the Abuse Filter plugin for the tool; this will basically be the same as the existing system, only applied to comments. Because of that, we're obviously going to need slightly different filters, because different things will need to be blocked :). We're holding a special office hours session tomorrow at 22:00 UTC to discuss it. If you're a regex nut, existing abuse filter writer, or simply interested in the feedback tool and have suggestions, please do come along :).

I'm pretty sure that's it; if I've missed anything or you have any additional queries, don't hesitate to contact me! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

• Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
  • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
  • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
• If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 21:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I want to email your activation code, but your email is not set up. Please set it and enable it to receive emails at Special:Preferences. Or, contact me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com with your username. Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 23:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Vituzzu; just a quick note to let you know that we'll be holding an Office Hours session at 18:00 UTC (don't worry, I got the time right ;p) on 4th May in #wikimedia-office. This is to show off the almost-finished feedback page and prep it for a more public release; I'm incredibly happy to have got to this point :). Hope to see you there! Regards, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addirittura due blocchi di 1 mese al range in it.wiki solo perché ti ho fatto notare la tua smisurata voglia di protagonismo e la tua difficoltà ad intavolare un discorso costruttivo con i cosiddetti "avversari" virtuali... Certo che o sei una specie di Catone o devo aver colpito nel segno. Delle due l'una. E, guarda un po', ho i miei buoni motivi per optare per la seconda, anche dando un'occhiatina ai tuoi blocchi pregressi. Insomma, non è che tu sia granché collaborativo come admin. Se questo deve valere due blocchi al range per evasione del blocco, mi chiedo in che mani siamo. Contestualmente, mi chiedo per quale ragione tu mi abbia lasciato scorrazzare da IP tempo addietro (Shiva ha confermato) mentre adesso, magicamente, è evasione del blocco. Due pesi e due misure? O, per meglio dire, quando non si disturba il buon Vito passi (quasi) tutto mentre quando gli si rompe le scatole allora no? Dai, su, siamo seri. Rimuovi il blocco ai range che, per inciso, non danneggiano me, che vado di proxy e altri simpatici mezzucci clandestini, ma molti altri potenziali (ed effettivi) utenti che si vedono bloccati a causa della tua infantile permalosità. Rimuovi il blocco e dimostra la tua maturità. Thanks! --151.42.249.190 (talk) 18:07, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non ti sembra che ti/mi prendi troppo sul serio? --Vituzzu (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ho solo espresso una opinione come ne esprimo tante nel corso della mia giornata tipo. Solo che i miei interlocutori in RL non mi prendono mai a sberle, quando gli faccio notare alcune loro pecche. Vedi un po' tu... --151.42.120.108 (talk) 05:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all :)

Just a quick update on what we've been working on:

• The centralised feedback page is now live! Feel free to use it and all other feedback pages; there's no prohibition on playing around, dealing with the comments or letting others know about it, although the full release comes much later. Let me know if you find any bugs; we know it's a bit odd in Monobook, but that should be fixed in our deployment this week.
• On Thursday, 7th June we'll be holding an office hours session at 20:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. We'll be discussing all the latest developments, as well as what's coming up next; hope to see you all there!
• Those of you who hand-coded feedback; I believe I contacted you all about t-shirts. If I didn't, drop me a line and I'll get it sorted out :).

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scusa se ti disturbo Vito, ma tu ne sai qualcosa? Da quando ne io, ne Yiyi, ne Mattew666 partecipiamo più al Progetto Atltecica, il generossissimo Dre Rock fa da solo. Qui chiedo lumi, ma lui non entra spesso su en.wiki. Tu ne sai nulla? E soprattutto condividi? Pare che si sia fatto aiutare da Pil56 per qualche azione da bot, ma di voci come it:Atletica leggera ai Giochi della XXIX Olimpiade - Lancio del giavellotto maschile ce ne sono ad iosa. Cmq, nella sua talk (link a Treccani incluso), io spiego le mie perplesssità, esistessi su it.wiki sarebbe problema da Bar o da admin noticeboard. --Kasper2006 (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mi intrometto nella discussione per una doverosa precisazione, dato che Kasper mi citava. Come si può evincere dalla cronologia di tiro del giavellotto, non sono io l'autore del "cambio epocale" da lancio del giavellotto a tiro del giavellotto ;) --Dre Rock (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come ho già risposto nella tua talk, ne ho preso atto e mi sono rivolto a User_talk:Ysogo. Cmq aggiungo che lo spostamento è privo di fonti e che per gli inglesi discus, hammer e javelin sono throw mentre peso è shot e così era su it.wiki prima della formidabile autonoma decisione di Ysogo. --Kasper2006 (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all :). First-off, thanks to everyone for all their help so far; we're coming up to a much wider deployment :). Starting at the end of this month, and scaling up until 3 July, AFT5 will begin appearing on 10 percent of articles. For this release we plan on sending out a CentralNotice that every editor will see - and for this, we need your help :). We've got plans, we know how long it's going to run for, where it's going to run...but not what it says. If you've got ideas for banners, give this page a read and submit your suggestion! Many thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guarda che io non mi stanco di darti del pessimo sysop, eh. --151.42.120.96 (talk) 16:00, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've declined the WP:PROD proposal on Mario Magnotta because a user objected to the deletion by removing the PROD template. I noticed that you reverted that removal. While you may believe that the article should be deleted, any user is entitled to oppose a PROD and if this happens the PROD fails - the template should not be restored. You can read more about the process at WP:PROD.

If you still believe the subject of the article is not notable enough for Wikipedia, you can propose the article for deletion using the full WP:AfD process. Thanks. Whouk (talk) 21:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing info from my talk page? Even if this person is a long term spammer, it's still my choice to talk or not talk to this person. Besides that it's also my choice to have this information on my talk page or not. LindaSportGirl (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all!

So, big news this week - on Tuesday, we ramped up to 5 percent of articles :). There's been a lot more feedback (pardon the pun) as I'm sure you've noticed, and to try and help we've scheduled a large number of office hours sessions, including one this evening at 22:00 UTC in the #wikimedia-office ^connect channel, and another at 01:00 UTC for the aussies amongst us :). I hope to see some of you there - if any of you can't make it but have any questions, I'm always happy to help.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 20:40, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey again all :). So, some big news, some small news, some good news, some bad news!

On the "big news" front; we've now deployed AFT5 on to 10 percent of articles, This is pretty awesome :). On the "bad news", however, it looks like we're having to stop at 10 percent until around September - there are scaling issues that make it dangerous to deploy wider. Happily, our awesome features engineering team is looking into them as we speak, and I'm optimistic that the issues will be resolved.

For both "small" and "good" news; we've got another office hours session. This one is tomorrow, at 22:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office ^connect - I appreciate it's a bit late for Europeans, but I wanted to juggle it so US east coasters could attend if they wanted :). Hope to see you all there!

Goditi pure la tua vacanza, ma non mettere i bastoncini tra le ruote alle persone che "lavorano"... ^_^

Oggi (ieri, a questo punto) mi sento di buon umore, quindi non farò né "il critico" né il "superiore et contento". Mi limiterò solo a dirti - fiato sprecato - di non bloccarmi. Sperando che stavolta tu recepisca il messaggio. Ma come puoi concentrare la tua attenzione su di me quando in giro ci sono fior fior di vandali e di troll (pure registrati)? Vabbé, buona vita. --151.42.248.93 (talk) 00:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am waiting for your answer for 5 days and no answer... Strange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpvisit (talk • contribs) 13:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC) Hi Vituzzu, I cna see you are an admin and I am not, I am new on wikipedia. But I think that what you were 'correcting' was too fast. Pleas have a closer look at the editing.[reply]

What is your reason to undo my edits? I honestly don't understand the reasons you did. OK, I am glad that you are helping Hungarian articles, so you love Hungary I guess.

The problem is my question is this: why did you put back the szechenyi link of the HotelStart Kft, and why did you put the other link on black list????

question 1

szechenyibath.com is NOT THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF SZECHENYI BATHS!

So please, do not restore it, ever. Szechenyibath.com is just a website, they want to sell hotel room in Budapest.

szechenyibath.com is just one of the many website of a Hungarian hotel company and the sites sell hotel rooms. The official website of all bath in Budapest (not the Racz bath which in shared property) is this: http://budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/ I linked this site!! in English this http://www.budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/en for Szechenyi Bath http://www.budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/en/szechenyi/history

Almost all baths are own by the state. Not by Hotel Start kft.

The official site had an other official url, which they use in email, but the website was dead for maybe a year: spabudapest.hu

For few days spabudapest.hu was redirected to the other official url I wrote (!!! and also said in a comment, which you ignored): budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu

you can see the contact address (only on the Hungarian version): http://budapestgyogyfurdoi.hu/hu/szechenyi/elerhetoseg here you can see spabudapest.hu after the word kukac (the email signal in Hungarian)

szechenyibath.com is not official. Look: another website owned by hotelstart kft is gellertbath.com. Is it the official site? NO. Does it sell hotel rooms. YES. They also own budapest-parliament.com/ Wow. Another good website! What surprise. Is it the official Parliament site? NO. Does it sell hotel room. YES.

these sites are not the official sites. Neither szechenyibath.com nor gellertbath.com

You understand it now, please do not bring back a lame website which is not official. Just because is first place on search it is not the official website. And not even good. So I cannot digest any advantages to include the not official website, it is a fake official website.

question 2:

Is szechenyispabaths.com the official site? I am not sure. It looks good, good info. But on blacklist? Why? Because you like better the hotelstart kft web page? If you think that szechenyispabaths.com is not OK, and doesn't helps people, don't use it. I used it and I suggest it to friends because I believe that it is cool and the best info on web you get about Szechenyi my favorite bath. You dislike it and put it on the blacklist??? Why put it on the blacklist? Did you look into the hole situation or you started to just quickly do something because you are an administrator???

Put back at least the REAL official site on wikipedia.

Have a good day. If you have a question just ask. I am a Hungarian live in Hungary and can help you help better for Hungarian articles and clear away the spam. If I change anything in the Italian section, I would ask the local guys first and then edit things.

Gabor Takacs Bpvisit Bpvisit (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ti sei dimenticato di richiedere l'eliminazione della voce Donato Seppi nella wiki tedesca....(;D)..... B.D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.77.106.232 (talk) 23:04, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You globally locked this user's account for "massive crosswiki edit-warring", but the user immediately re-appeared with their alternate account User:Omar-toons, contining with the same disruptive behaviour. I've raised the issue here, but since I can't find the original discussion that led to the lock it might be helpful if you commented on the discussion. TDL (talk) 02:05, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vituzzu. I am Miha of Croatia. I do not understand your question very well. I am sometimes editing Wikipedia in my school, so it is likely that I use IP address of somebody else. Be well.--Miha (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all :). A couple of quick updates (one small, one large)

First, we're continuing to work on some ways to increase the quality of feedback and make it easier to eliminate and deal with non-useful feedback: hopefully I'll have more news for you on this soon :).

Second, we're looking at ways to increase the actual number of users patrolling and take off some of the workload from you lot. Part of this is increasing the prominence of the feedback page, which we're going to try to do with a link at the top of each article to the relevant page. This should be deployed on Tuesday (touch wood!) and we'll be closely monitoring what happens. Let me know if you have any questions or issues :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 14:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks for explaining such problems in my talk page. Please also help me to respond on the sock. Have a nice day! :) Mediran talk to me! 12:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before this notice,i have only beeen doing my job asa wikipedia editor. Why would i get blocked in my global account? Isn't the reason to put your information in wikipedia to provide useful information? my edits in the article separation of powers seem very resourceful and would like to know what is the reason. I have a PhD and that shows you that my intention is not to vandalize the page. Now i know there is a dissatisfaction and apparently you are one and thank you again for not blocking me but can't we all come into an agreement? If we can discuss this, then i am sure there can be peace and have a discussion with the people in aragonese, italian and spanish wikipedia. By the way, I am a multilingualist, so i know these languages for your concern. please reply.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 01:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Really now, How are my statements meaningless, I even added more detailed information in the italian wikipedia, I added information (the purpose for this website) and I get punished for it. I told you i'm not here to vandalize, if you would clarify a bit more on detail, then I will consider your purpose, in fact, only the aragonese and spanish wikipedias blocked me, but it was from the mistake for not discussing it before i edit like the others articles, which is a mistake that i told you wont happen again, cheers.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I happen to speak and write Italian, i'm multilingual and thank you for pointing out my mistakes. I will point out to the problem immediatly, as you will.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 00:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I wonder and correct me if I'm wrong, but my statements are more longer than the original and you said [(Quote)"your short Italian text"] that my statements are short, then you might want to go over the two texts and see which text is longer and you will see that my text has by far more information, more details and more accuracy. And you know that i am putting the truth in here, and you revert me as i was someone who vandalizes, but i understand why you are concerned and i approve of you intentions, but just read my statement and you will see that it is more beneficial for the article, which is all i am trying to do. Anyways, i thank you for your concerning on how good my Italian grammar is and I appreciate you letting me know so i could fix the mistake, Thanks.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

----->

I understand your concern and yes I will let you know that my time has come to leave wikipedia, but what I don't quite understand is when you say that my sentences are meaningless if they are in perfect italian, and when you say that my statements have no sources at all, how come the original text doesn't have any sources either? I don't know if you are a historian, but i can tell you with great confidence that the original text has some grammar mistakes too and is not historically accurate. And if there is something you don't understand, tell me so i can know where to fix it and like i said, i know how to read and write italian as i did and showed in the text, so i don't see where the problem really lies and if there is a particular reason on what there is wrong with thenthings said in the text, then feel free to express what it is. and Oh, i see you blocked me without even reading my argument. Well i guess i can't stop you. But keep this in mind, you are not doing a very good job, your job is to see if the content in the text is historically accurate and apparently you only chose to block me because i just made a simple change on the article which is an abuse in your position and exaggerate my mistakes. Cheers. --(Slurpy121 (talk) 01:25, 4 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I do agree with you (to an extent), but some of the corrections, i do not agree, because the original text does contain some of the mistakes i have made and you went a bit more picky in my article ""(for example:, I did not say that the kings of Rome were overthrown in 509 ac, I'm saying that that is the traditional date according to Latin texts which say they were overthrown in the year 509. you say that that fact is incorrect, but That is what history says or at least what we know of the Romans. You say that that fact is incorrect, do you have any proof stating that the text is incorrect? If you say it with no background ((like the original text)), then you need to learn more about history, but if you have proof stating me wrong, then I would love to hear it)"", I do not understand why you were a bit picky by the looks of it, But what i can say (for now) is I am sorry, I am not a proud man like you say i am and i should have consulted you before editing and sorry for making you go through all that trouble, and i will be talking to you later, eventually. but cheers for now.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 04:42, 4 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

No, ho capito quello che hai detto. Ho praticamente detto tutto sufficiente per il momento. Ho ancora non capisco perché si è rifiutate di riconoscere il testo fornito, sai che è vero. Il vostro compito è di mantenere wikipedia in buona forma e che comprende la fornitura di una buona informazione. Le informazioni del testo originale è spazzatura più o meno e una cosa mi ricordo dicendo è che la mia informazione non ha una fonte, ma neppure il testo originale. Come e detto, non voglio essere la modifica in wikipedia in qualunque momento presto. Ho riconosciuto quello che hai detto, ma ho ancora si rifiutano di credere che la ragione di mantenere l'eliminazione le mie modifiche, è solo perché per alcuni problemi di grammatica. So che c'è di più ad esso e se solo si sarebbe così gentile da spiegare, grazie :). Y antes que me olvide, crees que me puedas decir como entiendes muy bien el espanol? te lo agradeceria si me dirias en donde lo aprendiste hablar ;) --(Slurpy121 (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I just have one question, If my editing had terrible grammar and bothered to make an effort to fix my comments and edits here, why didn't you bother to correct my edits in the article itself which would had been more simpler than the corrections you did in our discussion?--(Slurpy121 (talk) 04:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

The response you gave doesn't answer my question. You seemed to recover my messages pretty well. And I see you still haven't answered my question. --(Slurpy121 (talk) 02:25, 6 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

I came here to let you know that i will edit the article Separazione dei poteri and just to be clear with you, i am editing this with letting you know that everytime i edit, i will first inform in the talk page of an article, so be aware of my actions and see my latest updates in the talk pages. So i will proceed to edit said page and if you will consider the changes, you will see a more broader explicit information in he article and see that my actions is only to help this page.--(Slurpy121 (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

• it:Flavio Briatore
• Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Flavio Briatore
• Flavio Briatore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Wikipedia:Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents#Legal notice, WMF involvement?
• User talk:Geoffbrigham#Flavio Briatore

As I noted, if you want to improve the Italian Wikipedia's article, you can rescue the 16 sources that it cited before this began but that have been lost along the way, from the article's history. Uncle G (talk) 17:16, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OpenVPN Private Tunnel is a legitimate paid private VPN service. What's the policy/procedure for me, a rather long-term editor, to be able to edit securely out through a hostile firewall? Thanks. I've come to your talk page courtesy the stacked messages:

"You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. Editing from your IP address (50.117.78.137) has been blocked (disabled) on all Wikimedia wikis until 19:24, 11 September 2017 by Vituzzu" and

"You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are now not able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from 50.117.0.0/17 has been blocked (disabled) by DeltaQuad"

I got these messages while logged in normally to enWP, via OpenVPN. Seems like, if I'm logged in, it's me, and I should have my normal editing privileges, without restriction, no matter where I connect from. So, what's the next step? --Lexein (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You want WP:IPBE. T. Canens (talk) 15:43, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but I have no information about OpenVPNs operation details, or exit node IP ranges. Thanks, though, off I go. --Lexein (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update: action moved to User talk:Lexein. --Lexein (talk) 15:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was just checking out by adding some html codes to the common.css. You have my word, that will never happen again. I would suggest using Mv Elaaf Lite.otf.ttf as a suitable font for the dv.wiki. Regards --Glacious (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Scrivo in italiano perché ho visto che, come me, sei italiano e quindi ci capiamo meglio così. Sulla voce Chiara Galiazzo hai inserito il template che indica la necessità di copy editing. Visto che la pagina l'ho creata io e che sarei interessato a migliorarla, mi farebbe piacere se mi indicassi più precisamente cosa c'è da sistemare. Immagino di aver usato qualche costruzione grammaticale in inglesiano, ma non essendo madrelingua inglese non riesco ad individuare esattamente dove siano i problemi. Grazie! --Stee888 (talk) 13:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your note at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aldo Grippaldi. Are the threats from User:Unotretre or a sock-puppet? Others got the same. Thought you should know that the case was at WP:ANI on en.wiki last night. User:Dennis Brown was particularly good (an en.wiki admin). You might like to shoot him a note or raise it again at ANI - it has been there three times now, I don't think they would be surprised. Stalwart111 13:19, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was actually inclined to remove it from the article - the company is clearly not notable so including it serves no encyclopaedic purpose. I will comment at your ANI thread. Stalwart111 14:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commented so there's no need to ANI-template-message me. Consider me notified. Cheers, Stalwart111 14:32, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that was about the previous ANI post, but I've mentioned this one on his talk page just so there's no concerns. Cheers, Stalwart111 23:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu! long time no see. I want to let you know, that our pending situation on the article on the Italian wikipedia, Separazione dei poteri, is still not over. Since I'm having trouble to put the accent marks on the paragraphs, I need your help (at least) to correct the accent marks of my article, and since I use an electronic translator to put the accent marks, it messes up the grammar, and rarely sometimes the spelling of my paragraph. I really do need your help to improve the article. Please be willing to spare a small amount of time on this. Thanks. (Slurpy121 (talk) 22:30, 7 January 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Hey all; another newsletter.

• If you're not already aware, a Request for Comment on the future of the Article Feedback Tool on the English-language Wikipedia is open; any and all comments, regardless of opinion and perspective, are welcome.
• Our final round of hand-coding is complete, and the results can be found here; thanks to everyone who took part!
• We've made test deployments to the German and French-language projects; if you are aware of any other projects that might like to test out or use the tool, please let me know :).
• Developers continue to work on the upgraded version of the feedback page that was discussed during our last office hours session, with a prototype ready for you to play around with in a few weeks.

That's all for now! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 16:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm 24.139.122.193. I've been replacing instances on Wikipedia of my real name (which I foolishly used as a user name 5 years ago) with my current username. I don't see any harm in it. It's just to avoid these links popping up on Google search. Feedback ^☎ 22:55, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you seriously revert all my edits? Not cool. Could you un-revert them please? Feedback ^☎ 22:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all.

As promised, we've built a set of improvements to the Article Feedback Tool, which can be tested through the links here. Please do take the opportunity to play around with it, let me know of any bugs, and see what you think :).

A final reminder that the Request for Comment on whether AFT5 should be turned on on Wikipedia (and how) is soon to close; for those of you who have not submitted an opinion or !voted, it can be found here.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Helo Vituzzu. If you have noticed a similar dispute on another Wikipedia such as the Italian, it would be helpful if you could summarize that in the SPI report. Also, it's easier to persuade admins here that some group is being disruptive if there is a clear statement on the article talk page of what the issues are and giving the evidence. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the sametopic, just thought I'd let you know. Viridae^{DON'T PANIC} 08:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

mi si è appena posato sul davanzale un corvo (sto a un piano alto e come animale fa veram paura, tra poco mi entrava in casa). vi ho pensato ah ah ah chissà come segno se è nefasto o meno :p scopriremo prossimi giorni/gironi infernali :p cobain4 --46.193.175.39 (talk) 12:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ps leggiti come trattano monti sti galletti d me.r.d.a

http://italie.blog.lemonde.fr/2013/03/30/faute-de-gouvernement-giorgio-napolitano-prolonge-le-calvaire-de-mario-monti/ ah ah ah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.193.175.39 (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Adam Kadmon (character) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JetBlast (talk) 16:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JetBlast (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.google.com/#output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=adriano+prosperi&oq=adriano+prosperi

cazzo siamo ancora solo al terzo posto dietro a wiki ma davanti a treccani ihihih corvo rulez --46.193.175.39 (talk) 17:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you may want to take a look at this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Katy_Perry#Don.27t_edit_on_the_Italia_wiki.21.21

VelvetViolet44444444 (talk) 07:33, 4 July 2013 (UTC)VelvetViolet44444444[reply]

I am astonished to see that I am accused of being a sockpuppet. I am even outraged because I feel humiliated with this accusation. An accusation of being "user Brunodam" without proof, even if I offered to submit my personal data. I demand justice. I am going to complain to the "Better Business Bureau of Florida" and to the Police department of Fort Lauderdale, following instructions from my attorney about this clear case of harassment & offense. I will ask for damages. Junior5 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.46.252.98 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu, I would like to address this antagonism that's being displayed, and open the door to the possibility of constructive collaboration. It strikes me that your views regarding my behavior are likely founded on what Sig. D'Ambrosio has to say. Please understand that "excessive nationalism" is hard to perceive objectively. What may seem to you as "nationalist POV-pushing" - may seem to me to be the restoration of neutrality in the face of excessive nationalism of another kind.

I have read much of what Bruno has to say regarding myself and others who opposed against his edits. And while your view on the matter, perhaps influenced by Brunodam's slanderous fabrications, may be different, I myself do not believe it is accurate to describe me as a "Croatian nationalist". In fact, I am more than half Italian by ancestry. My attitude years ago was different, I agree, but I feel it was primarily a reaction against the shocking and brutal slant introduced by the likes of Giovanni Giove and Brunodam. I was also a significantly younger man.

I am now, I dare say, a reasonably "respectable" Wikipedian with well over 45,000 edits, who's primary objective is to expand and improve the project, following sources in the most unbiased and scientific way possible (indeed, I hope to earn a PhD reasonably soon :)).

Case in point, my edit on FTT. I came there to edit the article to fix its erroneous coa and wrong infobox. I switched the language order as a side-edit, and was annoyed to see it reverted apparently for no real reason. I was wrong there and it was rash of me to revert you. I didn't regard you as a serious editor - I most sincerely apologize. Please note I stopped reverting relatively early on and brought the matter to talk. Whether you believe me or not, the reasons why I switched the languages were as follows:

• Historical: Zone B was administered by Yugoslavia in general, not just its Slovene republic. The majority language in Yugoslavia was Serbo-Croatian (which is another name for Croatian). It was also the exclusive language used in all federal government administration, as well as the military. I thought it logical to have the main Yugoslav language listed up front in a territory administered by Yugoslavia as a whole.
• Contemporary: Only a relatively small chunk of the FTT is part of Slovenia in modern times. Whereas its largest part is today in Croatia.
• Finally, I thought that in either case it would be neutral to have an alphabetical order.

Please note these rationales are not mutually exclusive, and all three were more or less on my mind when I off-handedly edited the languages.

In conclusion, however, let me say in case you misinterpret this, that I am not the least bit threatened by your demening insults and repeated threats. Nor am I really that insulted, or I would have reported you on grounds of WP:NPA immediately. I merely understand that my reverts were inappropriate, and that I am at least partially guilty for thusly re-enforcing the slanderous preconceptions Brunodam and/or his cronies may have instilled. I feel bad about that, and would like to see if I can redress the damage. Best regards, -- Director (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will realize I am certainly not like the maniac Brunodam, or at least, not as bad :). That was the comment that most struck me as inappropriate. I knew the guy, and for one thing - sources have an actual impact on my position (plus I keep my sockpuppets to a reasonable 200 or so :)-- Director (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please be aware that a user conduct request for comment has been filed concerning Direktor's conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry is located at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Direktor, where you may want to participate. It is the first time that I file a RFC/U so all my apologies for the improper use of the template and syntax. You are welcome to participate. I hope that with the help of other users both Direktor and I can start working again with proficiency. --Silvio1973 (talk) 13:59, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I recently went to my account in Persian Wikipedia and I saw this message: Your IP had been closed for all wikis by Vituzzu (meta.wikimedia.org). reason: Open proxy: hosting on OVH + spam from 5.135.13.188. I use a proxifier software in my connection to the net because we don't have free access to the useful science sites in Iran which we need for editing the Wikis articles. I ask you to set my account free. I have been in Persian Wiki for more than 5 years. This is my address: http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%B1:Bbadree Bbadree (talk) 05:54, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Buongiorno. Segnalo che la voce "Free Territory of Trieste" nella versione inglese di Wikipedia è stata bloccata nella versione falsificata dagli indipendentisti. Già nelle scorse settimane queste incursioni si sono rimanifestate, anche da parte di un croato ("DIREKTOR") che insisteva nell'includere il serbocroato tra le lingue ufficiali del fu territorio libero (cosa che non è mai stata) e nell'indicare come stati predecessori Jugoslavia e Regno Unito (confondendo evidentemente sovranità e occupazione militare). Poi è arrivato uno che modificava sistematicamente l'intera voce in senso indipendentista con la motivazione che "visto che non c'è nessuna supervisione seria su questa voce tanto vale continuare a scherzare". Ora qualcuno ("Mark Arsten") lo ha preso sul serio e ha bloccato la pagina nella veste indipendentista. Ci sarà un modo per fare finire questo triste e penoso carosello, portato Avanti con zelo degno di miglior causa da Quattro scalmanati patetici che col loro operato offendono la stragrande maggioranza dei triestini? Grazie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tergestinus (talk • contribs) 07:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vituzzu. Thank you for cleaning up there but we don't remove such comments from AfD pages. They are useful for the closing administrator to decide upon the outcome of the discussion. If clearly inappropriate, we strike a post by wrapping<s></s> around it. On the other hand, This SPI may also be of interest to you. De728631 (talk) 00:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, ReaperEternal has now blocked the lot of them and semi-protected the AfD page. I didn't know you're a steward that's why I was a bit surprised that you locked the accounts. De728631 (talk) 01:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Before you reverse this and block me, I would like to know why you globally blocked AcidBurnRose4, and did you have any proof? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B103:ADAB:0:0:0:103 (talk) 11:49, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are edit warring on Alessandro Taverna. Please don't. As you know, edit warring can lead to a block. The king of the sun (talk) 16:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, any user can contest a speedy deletion nomination, not just an administrator. The king of the sun (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You were mentioned here ("You've been denounced to the Florida Police") Yours, Quis separabit? 16:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And here Quis separabit? 19:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

For the purpose of scrutineering the 2013 Arbitration Committee elections, stewards User:Mathonius, User:Vituzzu, User:Matanya, and User:Tegel, appointed as scrutineers, are granted temporary local CheckUser permissions effective from the time of the passage of this motion until the certification of the election results.

For the Arbitration Committee, Bbb23 (talk) 18:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss here

Hi Vituzzu, I've been trying to edit the Compartment syndrome page and each time I do it says that I cannot because you made some kind of block regarding cross-wiki abuse? I have no idea what cross-wiki abuse is, so, if you could explain what is going on and why I am unable to edit this page, I would really appreciate it. As far as I know, I haven't been breaking rules on Wikipedia and no one has said anything to the contrary. If this is some mistake, please let me know and take whatever action you need to in order to fix this. I appreciate it =) TylerDurden8823 (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:50, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GiantSnowman 19:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank you for your time and effort in scrutinizing the 2013 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections. Your attention to detail and expertise were greatly appreciated. v/r - TP 13:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are deleting evidence on your talk page, so see that for yourself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.133.149.188 (talk) 17:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Just noticed that you blocked 176.9.146.244. It is indeed a Hetzner server, but this IP has been under my control for two years. Is it part of a larger netblock ban or was there really spam from that IP? If so, I have a problem. :( Thomas Auge (talk) 18:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...for helping out with the ARBCOM elections.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year.79.31.61.252 (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WikiFM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WikiFM until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd originally speedied this, but there was a request to let it run through a formal AfD, which seems like a fair request. In any case, I thought I should let you know. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• BTW, next time please let the original editor know that the page is up for a speedy deletion. It's not required, but it is a nice gesture to do. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:55, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tra il 25 e il 27 gennaio ho apportato alcune modifiche, in particolare ho tolto la bandiera jugoslava dagli stati predecessori, dal momento che si parla di un territorio che fino al 1947 apparteneva nella sua totalità al Regno d'Italia, e ho poi riformulato alcune frasi nell'introduzione in modo che fosse chiaro che il Territorio libero di Trieste come entità statuale non è in realtà mai nato, poiché la sua nascita era subordinata all'entrata in vigore dello statuto permanente, della quale era precondizione la nomina del governatore, nomina che - come è noto - non ebbe mai luogo. Il Territorio libero di Trieste come stato si trovava insomma in una condizione paragonabile a chi, iscrittosi alla scuola superiore, compie tutto il ciclo di studi fino a essere ammesso alla maturità ma poi non sostiene l'esame, e quindi rimane con il titolo di terza media. La versione da me modificata coincideva del resto - nello spirit se non nella lettera - con quanto si può leggere nella voce italiana. Ora però le mie modifiche sono state cancellate. Come mai? Grazie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tergestinus (talk • contribs) 16:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing all main space linking to Marek Lugowski or outright censoring article content that refers validly to this person. For example, you have removed a sentence describing this person's academic published research as described by a separate chapter in the book of which article you edited to this end. You claim that the edits you are undoing constitute self promo. Whatever evidence you may offer for that opinion, and it is only your opinion, the facts are that a) the content you remove is encyclopedic and not out of tune with the rest of the article content. When the user whom you are suppressing is being described by an entire book chapter, a reprint of a standalone Scientific American column that went into published circulation globally when it was published, and not just in English, as Scientific American is translated into twenty languages, including Chinese and Italian, and read by literally tens of millions of non-English speakers, your edit appears to be off. Furthermore, b) the person in question is notable, and his BLP is being prepared by an experienced Wikipedian. When it goes on line in March 2014, all the red links you are removing (as well as content!) will instantly become blue links/undisputedly encyclopedic. I request you stop your disruptive edits and allow the Wikipedia process to hash out this issue on its own. Just don't edit in this area anymore, as your edits have merely the net effect of censoring and impoverishing valid main space content, without bringing any tangible benefit to Wikipedia, and your censure of User:Mareklug across several WMF projects by now has all the appearances of stalking and unreasonable policing. As you find yourself on record branding in a discussion on meta on the user's talk page him a "spammer", you are in an adversarial relationship with him, not to omit, failing to assume good faith, especially as the user continues to produce good content (just did major housekeeping on Commons in commons:Category:Commesso (art technique), which he created, and just entered a new article on English Wikipedia, a BLP of a Hopi silversmith and jeweler, and uploaded to Commons a rare heretofore unavailable media of the artist's work. You are a steward, and an experienced Wikipedian as well as an administrator on other WMF project, therefore you should not have to have this explained. I hereby request a second opinion in this matter. Cordially, --Mareklug ^talk 07:53, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vituzzu, you left a message on my talk page regarding External Links. I suggest you actually look at the single external link I left. Your remark was inappropriate. EJT (talk) 12:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your last comment on my talk page.EJT (talk) 10:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vituzzu, I've answered to your accusation regarding links to designer profiles being spam. Please let me know your thoughts and you are welcome to suggest me how to do it better. ► robomod 12:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.[reply]

Ciao ancora, sarebbe possibile chiudere l'incidente visto che non abbiamo chiarito le cose prima come visto qua: "Before posting a grievance about a user here, please discuss the issue with them on their user talk page." Mi piacerebbe sapere per quale motivo si dovrebbe punire un intero portale per colpa di una persona singola. Inoltre ti invito a leggere o a vedere i links che avevo messo nella discussione. Grazie e auguri ► robomod 17:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now I found out that User:48Utilisateur is Brunodamm. I appreciate that you clean up after him in particular since I had run-in with that user myself recently and on that note I'd like to point out that User:Cresthaven might be another socket of the same guy. Originally I had an edit conflict/disagreement with Cresthaven at Diana Veteranorum and User:48Utilisateur got created exactly in that time and got immediately involved in the conflict.

With regard to Portmahomack however 48Utilisateur's edit there was already discussed (see article's talk page) and essentially corrected by User:Ben MacDui and your deletion removed Ben MacDui's correction. So unless you do not see any additional problem with the content and its source, the article should be reset ro Ben MacDui's version. The section on the Roman camp however could be deleted.--Kmhkmh (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kmhkmh, as you may know Brunodam has a very very strong Italian nationalistic (with a fascist flavour) POV and all of his edits are meant to pursue it. I also tend to do anything possible to frustrate all its actions. So, this revert won't weaken my effort but let's say I'm not completely sure about re-inserting those contents. Ciao! --Vituzzu (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I hope it is ok that i moved your comment here, simply to keep the conversation in one threat. With regard to Portmahomack I suggest to remove 48Utilisateur's original edit, rather than the part that was corrected User:Ben MacDui. In practice that means reverting your edit and remove the section on the Roman camp. If 48Utilisateur's intent was to push Italian nationalism via exaggerating the extend of the Roman empire, he'll be utterly frustated because the article won't contain any reference to the Romans anymore.

Personally I didn't come across Brunodam before 48Utilisateur and the latter accopunt is only 2 weeks old. My concrete issue 48Utilisateur was not related to the pushing of any nationalist views but rather with insufficient sourcing and falsely summarizing sources---Kmhkmh (talk) 20:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu. An apparent ip sock of Oldsettler/Brunodam has been going around posting personal attacks against you and I on select userspaces. He has accused me of being a terrorist and you of being in the mafia [2] [3]. Could you please have a look? Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It odd that they attempt to show us that they are "fond" of Somalis, but later post things such as this. AcidSnow (talk) 18:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I always assumed Brunodam perhaps had a familial tie of some sort with the Fascist period. He would occasionally brag that Mussolini united the Somali territories, thereby achieving the goal of a Greater Somalia. However, he didn't show nearly as much interest in the Italian administrations during the earlier aristocratic era and the later trusteeship period. It was more chauvinism and braggadocio than anything. This latest rant, though, is something else altogether and indeed quite lamentable. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:39, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure exactly wither or not it was a real policy but Italy did promote La Grande Somalia. It might have just been their desire to appease the Somalis to prevent a revolt. Hence why they unified Ogaden with Italian Somaliland. They did the same thing with missionaries at first. Anyways, he is aware of the dangers of such allegations can cause right? Best of luck Midday. AcidSnow (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Middayexpress: @AcidSnow:Honestly I'm not able (oh I try and I try!) to feel harassed nor even angry, I feel a weird mix of boredom and laugh. His paranoia seems to worsen with sort of "wiki-stress": the more his attempts at pushing propaganda are frustrated -> the more he becomes angry -> the more his attacks turn into paranoia. Btw I feel honored he spent 12kb about us instead of the old "Croats bribe you, I got evidences!" of about 3 or 4 years ago. Dealing with the topic you shouldn't forget Fascism was one of the saddest fronts ever. It also inherited previous fronts from late XIX century colonialism. Lots of Italian people uprightly relocated to colonies (as they did to Americas, Australia and Northern Europe) but colonies were, definitely, strategical and economical mistakes built upon violence. Finally, "all other European nations did the same" cannot justify us. --Vituzzu (talk) 20:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So true guys! lol You know what's even weirder Vituzzu and AcidSnow? I think it may not even be Oldsettler/Brunodam, but rather an associate of his that is mad over his block. The ip's address is geolocated in the United States, whereas Oldsettler/Brunodam resides in Italy. He also has not stopped spamming the personal attacks [4]. I'll contact an admin to take care of this. Cheers, Middayexpress (talk) 15:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Middayexpress:, @AcidSnow: though he mixes up lots of lies he lives "where those IPs geolocate" though he's sometimes back to Italy. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:58, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu. Oldsettler/Brunodam has another sock account and is spamming again the same libelous material on userspaces [5]. Could you please have a look? Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vito, e grazie di avermi scritto! Non ti preoccupare, nel mio caso aveva solo tolto un template di manutenzione, ma l`ho rimesso. L`argomento in questione poi lo conosco abbastanza bene, in quanto un paio di anni fa ho letto un volume molto bello sui levantini, e gliel`ho segnalato. Spero che lo legga, anche se purtroppo e` in tedesco...Un saluto dall`Helvetia Felix, Alex2006 (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vito, non avevo capito niente! :-( Ti riferivi all`editore su Italy. Si, in effetti qualche mese fa l`avevo incontrato su wiki:it, ma la` e` durato molto poco...Stavo per contattare un admin anche qui (all`inizio speravo che avesse messo la testa a partito, ma non c`e` verso, e` rimasto lo stesso), ma sei stato più veloce, grazie! Alex2006 (talk) 17:39, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speriamo di no, pago già` abbastanza tasse all`Italia (IMU, TARI, TASI, ecc.) pur non vivendoci :-) Alex2006 (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

...you may find these threads useful to understand who I think you ran into.

Would you like me to set up archiving for your talk page? I notice that it is getting really long. Cheers,
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 23:13, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Berean Hunter: since his second reply I was pretty sure I was dealing with a known troll. Within the complex world of en.wiki policies and habits I'm still a n00b but out of there I have a certain experience ;) Being sure I was facing a clearly bad-faith user caused me a bit of frustration when I saw patrollers/admins treated us the same way. To be clear: I don't want any kind of "privilege" but I hope it's clear I do my best in respecting local policies.

Anyway I'm pretty fine with the current situation: more competent (than me) neutral users are taking care of that page so I can be back to my laziness ^^

So, thank you (and @Dwpaul:) for your help, ciao! --Vituzzu (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo! ora aspettati la mia reazione.....finora ho lasciato stare con pazienza, ma da ora in poi avrai un nemico dichiarato PER SEMPRE (te lo sei voluto tu!). Schifoso traditore della tua stessa gente, come ti hanno definito. BD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guerraamorte (talk • contribs) 22:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks It seems that there is a persistent IP user vandalizing this article, including its talk page. Probably a block on the IP and maybe page protection look like they will be required. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for blocking the IP. The blog post they wrote is pretty alarming, considering that they're talking about showing up at the LVA to confront me. (They won't, people like that rarely do what they say they will, thankfully, but it's still quite freaky to read. Considering how much they got about me wrong, I don't think that they'd be able to identify me even if they saw me, though.) If they're trying to show that they're a calm, rational person, they're failing miserably. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Corps of Somali Colonial Troops, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ascari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vituzzu, chiedo se è possibile sbloccarmi almeno le e-mail, per poter intervenire in maniera indiretta nella segnalazione di problematicità. Grazie. --Gianni Andrea (talk) 19:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intendo dire: se è possibile sbloccare la mia funzione e-mail, così posso mandare un messaggio che qualcuno riporterà nella segnalazione di problematicità. --Gianni Andrea (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vito, grazie per la risposta e scusami per il ritardo. Ho visto che mi hanno bloccato l'utenza, non fa nulla perché comunque avevo intenzione di lasciare. Tuttavia, per pura curiosità sono andato a leggermi le vicende di entrambi gli utenti con cui sono stato paragonato: "Fleury" e "Giuseppe129": di Fleury ho capìto sùbito che si è comportato molto male soprattutto nei tuoi confronti, dell'altro non ho capito molto, ma ho visto che è stato addirittura bloccato a livello globale, quindi significa che deve averla davvero combinata grossa. Visto che io ho la coscienza pulita, e che tu mi sei sembrato un'ottima persona nel corso di questa mia breve esperienza da registrato, vorrei che tu mi scrivessi qui se pensi che io sia davvero uno di quei due utenti stra-problematici oppure se io mi sia soltanto meritato un ban per i miei comportamenti come "Gianni Andrea". Apprezzerei molto se tu mi rispondessi: perché io ho soltanto rubato una gallina, non sono un rapinatore e non sono un assassino. Se le modalità con cui ho rubato questa gallina mi hanno fatto meritare il ban infinito, molto bene, io lo accetto. Ma non voglio passare per ciò che non sono. Ti ringrazio se mi vorrai rispondere. --Gianni Andrea (talk) 12:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We are unable to advance on this case at the Administrators' Noticeboard because it is not clear if the user is actually blocked . As you enacted the global block for Starship9000, could you please confirm whether or not a global block, a local block, or both, are still in effect. Many thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update. This appears to have been resolved already. Sorry to have troubled you. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vito,
I wanted to tell you that this user resurfaced. Now his name is ‎Julio188red. Otherwise, he has the same interests as before: Nice, Savoy, Corsica, etc. Alex2006 (talk) 10:16, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Vituzzu (also pinging @Berean Hunter:) I came across this thread at ANI. I don't know why, but this really reminds me of Brunodam for some reason. It doesn't entirely fit and I'll admit that I'm not as entirely familiar with his editing style as you guys are, but something about this is just sort of reminiscent. Maybe it's because it's Italy related and the copyvio issues? They're probably not related since it doesn't immediately fit some of the basic styles he uses, but I figured that it'd be worth mentioning just in case since Brunodam does tend to keep turning up like a bad penny. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Tokyogirl79 here whose spidey sense seems spot on. His IPs have tended to either be Florida or Milan. The IP in the current thread is Milan which can be compared by geolocation to one that Brunodam has used. The behavior is very similar, IDHT when it comes to copyright issues or supplying sourcing for verification. Coincidentally, a /24 range is set to expire in a few days which he had persistence at for several years. A three year block would be well-warranted here.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 16:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tokyogirl79: and @Berean Hunter:, IMHO Alec Smithson is definitely a troublemaker but is not related to BDA. If you need a wider background I can ask one of the fellow Italian admins who dealt with him, also we should be able to reach out your checkusers to share some informations. --Vituzzu (talk) 17:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there is a report at ANI you may be able to help with. Omar-Toons has been globally locked since 2012 by yourself but an admin has just blocked his user Omar-toons (note the small 't') here for socking/block evasion. The report at Meta doesnt really give any information, so I thought you might be able to shed some light on it. The lock/block notes indicate you intended to lift it at some point, so was it ongoing disruption or just a temporary measure? Regards Only in death does duty end (talk) 13:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

46.40.74.190 (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 19:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Buona sera, Vituzzu. Regarding the current spi open on your "admirer," I was wondering if the master would be Borcker, or, if not, which master the case (and all foot fetishism cases) should be moved to. I am also wondering if a comprehensive Lta report should be filed on this fellow, providing one doesn't exist already. I'd be happy to work on it. Grazie, GAB^Hello! 02:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a reason for your reversions of the additions made to this article by another editor. You presumably have valid reasons for deleting what appear to be genuine improvements but unless you record these you must expect your changes to be challenged. Buistr (talk) 18:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you forgot to revert the vandal on these pages: [6], [7], [8] I had saved these links a few days ago, so just thought of letting you know as I am currently on a limited internet mobile, can't access a lot. D4iNa4 (talk) 04:27, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should also be careful about reverting an IP to a previous IP, as you did here - that IP and the one before it were also vandalising the article in the same way. --McGeddon (talk) 16:07, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

46.40.74.190 (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Datbubblegumdoe^{[talk – contribs]} 22:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are we looking at another Brunodam sock with Ivana2016 (talk · contribs) + 184.33.53.147 (talk · contribs)? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator! I was unfairly blocked by the administrators of the Bashkir wikipedia.

I am the author of more than 3 thousand there.

However, due to the fact that the administrators of the Bashkir Wikipedia perceive the project as a means of earning his livelihood - they block the people who invest in the development of more than they are.

They represent a danger to them.

They have created 25 thousand Bot articles, cherish and moderate them.

Bashkir Wikipedia can not be analyzed because of the huge amount of Botovskaya contribution.

Administration of Bashkir Wikipedia blocks participants for exhibiting removal Bot articles.

Administrators of Bashkir Wikipedia - have nothing to do with the purpose of Wikipedia is the free encyclopedia!

Best wishes, Ayratayrat.--Ayratayrat (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not feel that my contribution to the Bashkir Wikipedia was used for the benefit of administrators who would then talk about the language of section activity. For them, Wikipedia has become a hobby, they are trying to make money.

See also: http://bashinform.ru/news/658297-glavnyy-bashkirskiy-vikipedist-ne-mozhet-zabrat-svoy-priz/

http://bashinform.ru/news/682147-organizatory-bashkirskogo-viki-sabantuya-prosyat-podderzhat-ikh-pochin/

Hello, I'm Dl2000. An edit that you recently made to Linea dell'Impero seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear learned friend, how did you come to a conclusion that article on Silvano Bortolazzi is a spam? Did you check the sources on the new article at least a single time? AnjaliWasim (talk) 13:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please TELL CORRECTLY which sources are fake. And do non notable persons get knighted in Italy? I am not an Italian. If yes, that must be a new info for me. If you want to delete an article, kindly mention the valid reasons for doing so at least from the next time. Not the kind of rambling. Please. AnjaliWasim (talk) 13:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu,

Something needs to be done about the 92.3.22.140 (talk · contribs) and 92.3.26.121 (talk · contribs) range as well. They're all socks of one another. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noticing this edit and these remarks of yours, I thought you might take an interest in this anonymous IP edit. I don't think I understand the full story here, but I reverted that edit. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't think this should be deleted as its not obvious that the majority of it was by Brunodam Atlantic306 (talk) 22:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. 20:33, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

You might want to observe this user for a couple of days. AcidSnow (talk) 01:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fu cancellata dalla lista potenziali superpotenze solo perche' non aveva le parentesi. 151.40.79.4 (talk) 23:52, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cominci a diventare offensivo.La vita reale viene prima di quella virtuale.151.40.79.4 (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have blocked me for one year saying "intimidating behavior" while I have never threatened anyone in Wikipedia. How did you come to a conclusion like that while I was asking for a fair neutral view in articles related to the LTTE, which has been designated as a terrorist organization in many countries? Regarding articles about them, I was against using words like "embraced a heroic death". I think it is a kind of bias. Instead, I was asking them to use "killed in action". I think asking for neutrality is accepted in Wikipedia. The comment what I made finally was a quote from Tirukkural saying "Mother who gave (me/us) birth and the country of birth are much better than heavenly deeds". Is it something wrong to say that? Did I intimidate using these words? Please explain.--Fahim (talk) 03:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bodoyn (talk) 03:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Salve ! ho appena ricevuto un messaggio da Vituzzu dicendo che il mioo IP è stato bloccato. Non capisco perché. Forse perché mentre ero su wikipedia a modificare un articolo di prova, ho utilizzato un vpn per vedere un link. Non sapeveo che era una cosa da non fare. Quindi prego di sbloccare il mio IP per poter continuare a lavorare sull'articolo che vorrei poi pubblicare. Grazie e cordiali saluti, --Bodoyn (talk) 03:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC) Bodoyin--Bodoyn (talk) 03:38, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked. I think there are some mistakes. Wikipedia said that my recent IP is 139.59.225.82, and my blocked IP is 139.59.0.0/16. So I hope you will check data again and let me donate on Wiki. Thank you so much :) Minhquangdo (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you deleted all the links to MGK? please read here about that project. And you can see comments about MGK at the website (some of them in English). You left links to Mechon-Mamre, which is not scientific and not accurate, and deleted MGK links. I will appreciate if you will reconsider your decision.

I read "Wikipedia:External links", and I didn't brake the rules that written there. Please explain to me why you blocked the site www.mgketer.org ?(Emmanuel678 (talk) 20:24, 26 January 2017 (UTC))[reply]

I'm not sure whether you still keep a look out for Brunodam and friends, but if you do you might be interested to check the following user accounts below. They might be related to User:48Utilisateur who you banned as a brunodam sock puppet sometime ago. In some articles I'm watching (roman stuff in Northern Africa), there seems to be a return of imho often problematic edits that match or mimick, what User:48Utilisateur was involved with before he got blocked.

• User:6Konto
• User:DoctorCriollin

--Kmhkmh (talk) 22:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I deleted the page Utilisateur:Odin Giovanni after your speed delation request (identity theft, locked abuser). Should I also block the user or not ? Cordially, --Gratus (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vanjagenije (talk) 22:29, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Special:CentralAuth/4Kategorier and Special:CentralAuth/6Konto may interest you. Best — MusikAnimal ^talk 14:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cleaning up wikipedia. User:Nemetope's edits were unhelpful, inaccurate and poorly cited. It got to a point that I gave up even trying to reason with him. This block is so satisfying. Thank you ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 05:54, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my (forthcoming) post on the talk page for why I declined A7. It very likely meets criteria for deletion at AfD, in my opinion, but I don't believe it's eligible for speedy deletion. Please note that a search through Italian-language sources should be made, preferably before an AfD nomination. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For dealing with cross-wiki vandalism, in which the vandals tried to invent a town in Italy. (I had thought that the Vandals had been briefly in Italy in 455 AD and then gone to North Africa.) Robert McClenon (talk) 18:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

While I appreciate that you're cleaning up after Brunodamm and his sockets, there needs to be a bit more care with reverting content. While the policy (WP:EVASION) the allows for wholesale reverts of the edits of a blocked user, it does not allow the reverting of valid content over the objections of other users. ReMaps' addition at Hachelbich was perfectly fine and sourced and so was actually the article on the Roman camp.--Kmhkmh (talk) 16:44, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article in es:, as per your request. I tend to patrol Newpages en es: to detect this kind of issues when the come back. Could you make me a summary about the pattern of this hoaxer?--FAR (talk) 10:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu, I was wondering if you could drop me an e-mail. I have someone who wants to ask you some technical questions but cannot access Wikipedia because he's in Turkey and is having some issues with the block. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vituzzu, your input is welcome at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PerlegoEditorBot, however that request has not actually been submitted by the operator (it may still be getting drafted). Please feel free to leave comments directly on Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PerlegoEditorBot, they will be there should it be submitted later. Thank you! — xaosflux ^Talk 13:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, I slapped a community discussion (that I don't envision gaining support) flag on that request should it get submitted. — xaosflux ^Talk 20:30, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vorrei chiederle scusa per i vandalismi che ho fatto da anonimo su it.wiki e poi annullato con il mio profilo, ora ho capito quanto Wikipedia sia seria e ho intenzione di collaborare in modo migliore, dopo il blocco di 8 ore ho capito che non devo più farlo, grazie per l'attenzione. --Itallyano (talk) 20:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vituzzu. I am trying to contact you on behalf of a user in Turkey whose IP range you have blocked. Because the Turkish government is currently not permitting Wikipedia access from that country, he has had to resort to posting articles and edits through a Virtual Private Network called Browsec. Evidently some ill-motivated people have also used this same VPN at some time in the past, which I suppose is the reason for the block. Is it possible that your block could be made more granular in order for him to continue accessing Wikipedia? I've looked at many of his edits, and he seems to be a sincere Wikipedian and not a spammer. His name is Uzanto:Vasilkadifeli, and he mainly posts to the Esperanto Wikipedia project. Vasil Kadifeli is a serious person, a translator between Turkish and Esperanto, but his knowledge of both Italian and English is poor. He received the following message, but unfortunately the technical explanation is beyond his understanding. Can you perhaps help him to regain access to at least the Esperanto version of Wikipedia?

"Your IP address is in a range which has been blocked on all wikis. The block was made by Vituzzu(meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is leaky colo + open proxy at 46.101.78.152. Start of block: 21:17, 30 nov. 2015. Expiration of block: 21:17, 30 nov. 2020. You can contact Vituzzu to discuss the block. You cannot use the "Retpoŝti ĉi tiun uzanton" feature unless a valid email address is specified in your account preferences and you have not been blocked from using it. Your current IP address is 46.101.38.123, and the blocked range is 46.101.0.0/17. Please include all above details in any queries you make."

— Objectivesea (talk) 09:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my name is Vasil Kadifeli, sorry to create the fuss. I live in Turkey where the wikipedia is for some time forbidden. My userid is "vasilkadifeli" and I assume it is global because so far I have done a few changes in the Esperanto, Turkish, Azerbaijani etc wikipedias. A few months ago I changed an article with "Browsec" VPN application, but yesterday I couldn't as the reason is mentioned above. I understand that the Browsec IPs are blocked. I used the personal VPN of my brother which is installed on the new google cloud servers and performed my change. I am not interested in Browsec which can be blocked at anytime by the Turkish censorship. I am thinking of using that personal VPN for wikipedia from Turkey. So do I still have to apply for such an exemption?

Vasilkadifeli (talk) 07:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to edit from a blocked IP you need an exception. If it is a global block (says global block and meta.wikimedia.org in block message) then ask for global IP block exemption. If it is a local block then ask for IP block exemption on wiki. Also if the IP is globally blocked and locally blocked you will need to get exceptions in both places (only local exception lets you bypass local block and global block exemption only lets you bypass global blocks) --Sau226 (talk) 09:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu. I've declined this speedy because the article does contain some claims of importance (particularly the premieres). AfD is probably the best route with this, and other long-standing articles edited by multiple editors -- even where it's possible one or more of the contributors has a significant conflict of interest. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 23:59, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. There doesn't need to be a reliable source to evade A7, merely a claim that isn't patently absurd. However the fact that the article has been deleted on the Italian wiki tends to suggest the subject isn't very notable even taking into account Italian-language sources, so the AfD route shouldn't prove problematic. Socks turning up at AfD usually make their nature very obvious. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vituzzu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Serena Baglione, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: coverage in potentially reliable sources and winning a medal indicate sufficient significance to pass A7. Use WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Thank you. SoWhy 10:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have put a second notice up for deletion of the above article. Firstly, I didn't write any of these articles (in en.wiki, scn.wiki or it.wiki), on scn.,wiki I added a template and made minor edits to the Sicilian and that's it, nor am I a member of the Cademia, or have any role with the Cademia - I have followed their efforts with interest over the last few months, nothing more (and I would think it's unsurprising that an admin on scn.wiki would be following this sort of work). Furthermore, you gave the reason for suggesting deletion because the reference were self-deemed (not sure if that is the correct terminology, but nevertheless...). I went through each of the references, and at least four of them were clearly independent of the Cademia, a fifth, related to the work the Cademia is doing with Firefox to have Sicilian included as one of their languages - which is important work in my view. Anyway, for the life of me, I can't see what the issue is with this article on the Cademia, and the reasoning for the notices just aren't backed up. I double checked the policy, and quite clearly, the references exist, they are independent of the Cademia, and the Cademia clearly exists, the credentials of the board cannot be questioned, and they have already produced some important outputs in support of the Sicilian language (organising the acceptance of Sicilian in Firefox and Facebook is nothing to be sneezed at). Anyway, it seems beyond the pale that you would threaten an admin with being blocked, while you put up deletion notices without any foundation. πιππίνυ δ - (dica) 12:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I wanted to thank you for your comment on my draft. I wanted to write you to clarify that with my Sicilian orthography article I'm not trying to say that the CS proposal is the definitive one, as you can see I also added the CSFSL one, and i'm working on traditional orthographies, and a reference to Accademia di Krivu. The CS/Wiki orthographies are really close as well, and I'd like to make reference to that one. Ultimately I'm trying to build an article that explains the real landscape of the politics, ideologies and perspective regarding Sicilian orthographic conventions. The main sicilian language article is definitely too large for this already, and probably needs to be broken down more.

Here's my question, what do you think is a consensus based term? Is calling it a 'proposal' sufficient, or an 'unofficial' standard? I want to make it clear that the region has not provided support for an orthography. It's AN orthography, not "the" orthography, and I wouldn't want any such confusion. Paolorausch (talk) 22:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday I could not edit and got this message at the top of any page I tried to edit:

Your IP address has been blocked on all wikis.

The block was made by Vituzzu (meta.wikimedia.org). The reason given is m:NOP .

Start of block: 13:23, 18 January 2018

Expiry of block: 13:23, 18 January 2019

If such a block was made on 18th January, why was I able to edit the English Wikipedia for the past six weeks. Please can you explain. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I also found myself blocked by you one day a few months ago on "all WMF projects" (sometime shortly before 22 February 2018), and unable to log in. I think I remember you or someone indicating that it is possible to get a local waiver to IP blocks, but the administrators so far don't know how to do it. I now understand why you blocked me. I never edit with malevolent intentions, nor have I ever spammed or vandalized, but with constantly changing IP's, what else can you do to prevent OTHERS from spamming/vandalizing. So, no hard feelings. I sometimes find it necessary to reach Wikipedia via TOR. Also, my access through my mobile device keeps changing IP addresses, each time I reboot my phone and open a browser, a different IP address is used. That is why I created an account. I did not make a screen shot of your message. Can you once again explain how I might ask for or apply for a waiver of IP-blocking? Thank you for your time and consideration. rags (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appealed to the stewards as was mentioned on a link given and my access was restored within twelve hours. I got no reply from Vituzzu but I understand that my IP number was inadvertently included within a range block. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon, I would like to request the unlock of the page of Israel Lucas Gois, Varios vandals tried to erase and it ended up being blocked, Cidato has great relevance in the Brazilian market and would like to request the unlocking please--Lima Oliveira sá (talk) 19:10, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you have flagged {{COI}} on article Energica Ego. I will like to know what exactly made you think that one of the major contributor(was it me?) had/has a close connection with its subject. I will also like to know how it can be fixed. Since I have taken responsibility of creating and maintaining some articles, including this one, I will like to fix them immediately. Thank you--Navinsingh133 (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you use your steward powers to clean up a mess? See Special:Contributions/Ichabbie396 and meta:Special:Contributions/Ichabbie396; this person's vandalised TenPoundHammer's userspace at Meta as well as doing his best to make a mess here. Nyttend (talk) 03:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vituzzu. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Elena Emanuele, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: winning a notable TV show indicates significance. Thank you. SoWhy 12:24, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

when I tried to edit on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Frauenwahlrecht#Review_vor_%C3%9Cberarbeitung_/_Aktualisierung_im_Hinblick_auf_kommendes_Doppeljubil%C3%A4um

this morning, I couldn't and got this message:

Du bist aus dem folgenden Grund nicht berechtigt, die Seite zu bearbeiten:

Deine IP-Adresse befindet sich in einem Bereich, der auf allen Wikis gesperrt ist.

Die Sperre wurde durchgeführt von Vituzzu (meta.wikimedia.org). Der angegebene Grund ist leaky colo + open proxy at 146.185.147.55.

   Beginn der Sperre: 20:22, 23. Sep. 2015
   Ablauf der Sperre: 20:22, 23. Sep. 2020

Du kannst Vituzzu kontaktieren, um die Sperre zu diskutieren. Du kannst nicht die Funktion „E-Mail an diesen Benutzer“ benutzen, bis du eine gültige E-Mail-Adresse in deinen Benutzerkonteneinstellungen angegeben hast und du nicht daran gehindert wirst, diese Funktion zu verwenden. Deine aktuelle IP-Adresse ist 146.185.155.17 und der gesperrte Bereich ist 146.185.128.0/18. Bitte beziehe alle obigen Einzelheiten in all deinen Anfragen ein.

As this sort of obstacle came up several times since I have got a new laptop some months ago, I'd like to ask you to do something to prevent this for future edits; of course it doesn't take that long until I can get back to editing, but losing a day or so is unnecessary because I haven't done anything bad.

Sorry for not being more familiar with this kind of thing and thanks in advance for your help! --Reisen8 (talk) 10:03, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

It seems that you have "blocked" this user-account for some reason. Could you please unblock this account?

This account is connected to VideoWiki where we are building a tool that allows Wikimedians to collaboratively edit a Video file. VideoWiki is a proposed sister project. You can verify about VideoWiki at:

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Video

Kindly request you to unblock this user account because Wikipedia's OAuth connected to this account gets blocked and consequently VideoWiki stops working. --Videowiki123 (talk) 09:24, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From my talk page, here is the error:

@VideoWiki123 do you have this error when logging on via the WebUI or just the API? Which site are you logging on to when you get this error? (We can only help you here with issues logging on to en.wikipedia.org). — xaosflux ^Talk 11:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From your not above, this looks like an autoblock, possibly on metawiki. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We use OAuth for 2 reasons on VideoWiki (www.videowiki.org) The first to allow a user to log in via their Wikipedia account. This works properly. The second use of OAuth is to directly upload files to Wikimedia Commons. We are getting an error in the second use case i.e. when the user is trying upload content to Commons. The error message is "User is blocked" - Rogueassasin123 (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC) - Pratik from VideoWiki[reply]

Greetings,

I'm a professor at York University in Toronto, Canada. It appears that you've placed a block on the York University IP address 138.197.0.0/16 "on all Wikimedia wikis until 10:20, 14 August 2021". York University is a campus of 50,000 students, many that want to participate in WikiEd programs and other activities. A number of my students that live on campus are unable to participate due to this block. Can it please be removed, at least temporarily? Best, --Jaobar (talk) 16:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC) cc: User:Ragesoss;User:Shalor (Wiki Ed)[reply]

• Hi Jaobar - are they unable to sign up or are they unable to edit? Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi User:Shalor (Wiki Ed), apparently it's with signup. I've had this issue at other institutions. Can the block be lifted temporarily? --Jaobar (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jaobar: I can't, but I can enable account requests on your Dashboard page. I'm also going to tag Elysia (Wiki Ed) on this since she's your Wikipedia Expert. Vituzzu, would you be willing to give Jaobar eventcoordinator rights? Jaobar, this would give you the ability to create accounts for the students in your class and shouldn't be impacted by the block. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:41, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Shalor (Wiki Ed): Vituzzu can't grant eventcoordinator rights since he's not an admin here, but if students still can't create accounts, Jaobar can ping me and I'll grant eventcoordinator. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:46, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Jaobar I've disabled the block here on the English Wikipedia, since there doesn't seem to be much harm doing it temporarily at-least. Though per WHOIS the IPs are supposed to belong to Digital Ocean, not York University. Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Galobtter, Jaobar, Shalor_(Wiki_Ed) I just blocked this range as a part of my usual re-blocking of Digitalocean, and noticed the local exemption for this range just afterwards.

    Let's look at some random segments of the /16...

    • 138.197.0.0/24 - signalmanpublishing.com, mail.breweryartmusic.com, 88978-69325.cloudwaysapps.com, faith4everyone.com and many others
    • 138.197.22.0/24 - mail.rocketees.com, beacon70.com, ftp.integration.shipper.co.nz, talk.makeict.org, and many others
    • 138.197.111.0/24 - canyonstone.com, standardproperty.com, pinku-online.com, uniquemargin.com, and many others
    • 138.197.219.0/24 - timemoney.com, cybernodes.com, platypus-sandbox.com, 242957.cloudwaysapps.com and many others.

    This does not appear to be an edu range, and seems to be extremely consistent with DigitalOcean. A similar scan of random hosts in this range also strongly suggests that this is in fact a digitalocean range.

    Is there any sort of reasonable explanation for these inconsistencies? SQL^{Query me!} 01:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    SQL, yeah it does appear to be a DigitalOcean range, and York Universities range seems Special:Contributions/130.63.0.0/16 so 🤷🏽‍♂️. I suppose the students could put "what is my ip" into google, so we have a more specific IP to check; @Jaobar I can grant eventcoordinator, but that will only work if you yourself are not prevented from creating accounts. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• As far as I know, Jaobar doesn't have any such restrictions. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:57, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks Galobtter! I didn't realize that he wasn't an admin on here! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi all, my sincerest thanks for your quick response. I'll follow up if there are any further issues. We're creating accounts over the next three weeks or so. Best, --Jaobar (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Galobtter, thank you for your notes. I'm not sure how to answer these questions. All I can say is that some of the students were blocked from creating accounts while on campus. I believe that other students, since 2016, were able to create accounts, so this does seem more complicated than originally thought. I will yield to your expertise here, but do want to make sure that all students can participate. --Jaobar (talk) 15:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vituzzu -- Regarding this edit, are you accusing me or User:48coral of being a sockpuppet? You keep reverting 4 of my perfectly valid edits along with his edits and I do not understand why. Do you have a problem with my edits? I am definitely not a sockpuppet. Respectfully -- WikiPedant (talk) 19:32, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have fixed the reversion. Thank you. -- WikiPedant (talk) 19:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask you to slow down and look at the reverts you're carrying out before you make them? In several cases I've seen, you seem to be making the encylopedia worse by removing good edits. From Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion and enforcement: "This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor...". Removing refs, etc. just because they were added by a banned user, does not help anything. Thanks. O Still Small Voice of Clam 21:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ci sono una trentina di persone che usano la mia stessa rete WIND su wikipedia. Ho visto tra i blocchi che certa gente ha i miei stessi IP e sono stati bloccati per per i vandalismi e le bestemmie e tu pensando che fossi io hai bloccato anche a me per l'evasione. Inoltre rinunciare al proprio account non significa dopo vandalizzare dietro alle spalle, ma essere lasciati in pace. E niente caro Vito volevo proseguire come anonimo, ma purtroppo vengo scambiata per un vandalo😭... Io basita --Natt1444 (talk) 23:37, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you said that Ravarelative was a sock of brunodam. There's another user, Airon90 who seems to have a similar pattern of editing: they've created the bizarre article that was later restored by Ravarelative, and they seem to otherwise be editing primarily Italy-related articles. Could they be the same user? – Uanfala (talk) 10:24, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu, was it intended to take out the picture of the University of Asmara? If yes, why? It was your edit March 22, 2019. regards --Grullab (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu. Would you be able to take a look at VRTS ticket # 2018121410006064 when you get a moment? It's about an IP range block that you applied. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Vaticanoide :) La mamma di lukewiller (talk) 05:33, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 95.249.57.74 (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done

Dear Vituzzu, the next contribution contrary to the Wikipedia guidelines will trigger a write block on your user, therefore this is the last invitation to collaborate constructively.

Please respect the work of others: follow the rules and use common sense. --5.169.34.195 (talk) 09:36, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eccolo anche qui. Ciao Vituzzu. Su en.wiki non sono molto avvezzo a trattare i troll. Sta vandalizzando la talk anche a me. L'ho segnalato. Spero correttamente. --Pulciazzo (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Pulciazzo e Vituzzu! Ha fatto lo stesso su fr.wiki dove l'ho bloccato per 3 giorni. --Arcyon^(talk) 13:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since I installed a VPN a month ago my IP addresses have been blocked on WikiData, WikiQuote, etc. I am OK on WP-EN as I was granted an exemption. Can you please help me by exempting me from the blocks incurred by my VPN? Thank you, Seligne (talk) 17:01, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seligne: you can request exemption at meta:SRIPBE. (WP:TPS) – Fayenatic London 21:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilco, thanks. Seligne (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, la pagina è in it:Categoria:Divisioni amministrative con Stato non riconosciuto perché nel parametro "stato" è inserio VIE invece del corretto VNM. Ho provato a sistemarlo ma sono stato bloccato dal filtro antiabusi come "vandalo città 2". Puoi correggerlo tu?--151.36.243.229 (talk) 22:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know the diagnostic signs - citing "Trevisani, Daniele" is one I just added to my watchlist, per the IPs. Any more? Guy (help!) 10:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao e ben tornato! Avrei bisogno di un parere: secondo te, questo è in buona fede o è niniver? Qualora fosse vera la seconda, in che modo si può procedere, considerato che l'utente non è bloccato su en.wiki? Grazie in anticipo per le risposte, saluti e buona serata.-- 3knolls (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie delle precisazioni (like a résumé) sulla pagina Carmine_Zoccali; adesso la ho modificata rendendola identica a quella di Kamyar_Kalantar-Zadeh che data da più' tempo. Mi scuso per i miei errori dovuti a scarsa esperienza (Mauro561)

Dopo la mia correzione è legittimo, da parte mia rimuovere il like a resumé ? --Mauro561 (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

you ban lerdall. lerdall here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/La_Voce_di_New_York

modulato is lie.ㅜㅜ modulato is 다중계정(sockpuppet).

https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%8B%A4%EC%A4%91_%EA%B3%84%EC%A0%95

modulato is ledrall. lerdall,bianbum,adrin10,modulato same.

many same story change. english,italia.

https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Bianbum https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Lerdall https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Adrin10 https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Modulato

look linkedin web at sock page. bianbum is giuseppe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bianbum/Archive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Giuseppe_Macario

ledrall same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lerdall/Archive https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special%3AContributions%2FLerdall

bianbum is adrin10. adrin10 is modulato. bianbum,adrin10,modulato same.

bianbum,adrin10 same story change.

• euro-mediterranean university of slovenia
• fiano romano
• list of unaccredited institutions of higher education
• university of the people
• us with salvini

adrin10,modulato same story change.

• distance education accrediting commission
• ripoff report
• the league (app)
• università popolare degli studi di milano
• yorker international university

bianbum,modulato same story change.

english

• link campus university
• unipolisi

italia

• barbara mannucci
• cesd
• link campus university
• mormonismo

bianbum,adrin10,modulato same story change.

• list of unaccredited institutions of higher education
• supdi
• turnitin
• university of the people

bianbum,adrin10 more same story change.

• fiano romano —italia,adrin10. english,bianbum,italia.
• uefa champions league anthem —italia,bianbum. english,adrin10.
• second life —italia,bianbum. english,adrin10

modulato la voce di new york why delete?

https://www.lavocedinewyork.com/tag/giuseppe-macario/

modulato is giuseppe. modulato is lerdall. please ban.ㅜㅜ

my english bad. 미안합니다! KoreanCharley (talk) 15:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Speciale:IPBloccati&wpTarget=%23709919 Richard A. Rothschild (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i noticed you removed a comment over at Talk:Codogné by a globally banned user, i'm not sure why they were banned, but would it be prudent to strike their comment and my response to it?—blindlynx (talk) 20:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Vituzzu, I was hoping that you might show up at Talk:Codogné. I've been trying to look into the background of this dispute, but it seems that you may know it already. Could you give me – by email if you think it more prudent – the name of the user involved and a quick sketch of the story? There seems to be a good number of these pages, several of them moved after this discussion on it.wp; I'm still trying to get my head round the extent of the problem, any help much appreciated. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A minor suggestion: before starting an AfD like this one, you could try WP:PROD -- in many cases it is simpler. --JBL (talk) 11:15, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vituzzu... I reverted your edit on Castellum Dimmidi and noticed it's a redirect to Messaâd. The pages have different information. How is that related to SPI of Brunodam? Thanks Volten001 ^☎ 09:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at global block log for the IP user adding that content. Vituzzu (talk) 10:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Romanization of Hispania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Publius Cornelius Scipio. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Figlio di Kmer, della tribù d'Isthar, colui il quale ha sconfitto i demoni Sèm e sopravvolato i laghi Rastagarèr osservando le ninfee Pfnjugerals! 95.250.26.57 (talk) 01:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probabilmente mentre la scrivevi pensavi fosse originale e divertente. Vituzzu (talk) 07:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ovvio! Ed attendevo anche la statuetta. E poi ao co' sto dumilasedici, dumilasedici, schizoposting: voi giuovini iniorata codest'arcana arte ed il suo vero nome. Essa è l'Aeternarte e la inventai io nel 1907, ed essa durerà in eterno. Iscriviti anche tu ad un corso d'arte eterna. Pago io ed offro pure un giro di vodka. --79.42.31.136 (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uff, e vabbè: nguèè, dimmi che sono divertente, sennò mi disautostimo e torno in terapia nguèè. --79.42.31.136 (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dipende da cosa intendi per "divertente", se in senso consapevole o inconsapevole, diciamo. Vituzzu (talk) 23:34, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Vito, mi scuso se i commenti che ho fatto da IP su altri progetti (bollati come "perdigiorno") hanno creato disturbo a qualcuno. Ma non riesco ad accettare che - 10 anni fa - abbiate privato quel progetto di un amministratore come Ribbeck, per poi - ma anche prima - spesso infastidirvi in molte altre situazioni che qualcuno contestava azioni di altri che uno o più utenti ritenevano abusi di funzioni. Ed è successo pure di recente. Scusami davvero se sono degenerato, ci tengo che tu sappia che la mia buona fede non è venuta meno ed infatti la stima che ho detto di avere per Ribbeck, Klaudio, Jaqen e Florilegio la ho veramente e la ho sempre avuta. Stammi bene, buon proseguimento.--Potenza2021 (talk) 13:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, smetto qui. Ma sappi che non voglio molestare nessuno (né qui né sul blog), ribadisco la mia totale buona fede.--Potenza2021 (talk) 14:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infatti, che parlassi di tutti i progetti lo sapevo. Ammetto la mia colpa: volevo fare un gioco (con una connessione Internet che non ricordo essere mai stata usata per quest'utenza) parlando a nome mio e di molti lettori pur sapendo le regole dello spam. E proprio perché sapevo dello spam (pur non condividendo totalmente queste considerazioni) e non c'è nessuna attenuante, fare questo "gioco" ha contribuito a fallire il mio obiettivo serio (quello di esprimere educatamente pensieri e proteste, avvisando utenti coinvolti in alcune vicende citate sul sito).--Potenza2021 (talk) 14:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infatti. Errore cattivo che non ripeterò, ma ammesso.--Potenza2021 (talk) 16:57, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Non ho mai pensato di averla una giustificazione per questo. Aggiungo che mi sono pure pentito di quando annullai interventi di un IP relativi alla voce nella nostra lingua su Lucio Battisti. Chiudo parentesi tornando in topic: ora di certo non mi aspetto una maggior fiducia di prima.--Potenza2021 (talk) 17:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User responded. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 16:25, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I faced a problem in Italian Wikipedia. One administrator has blocked me without any reasonable grounds. I tried to write on your discussion page in Italian Wikipedia, but my message was erased by another user. The text of that message is below:

"Voglio sporgere denuncia contro Mastrocom.

Il 3 maggio ho pubblicato articoli su Veniamin Necciaev e Pavel Rudakov. Ella ha cancellato quegli articoli sulla base del fatto che erano tradotti male. Ho dimenticato di fare la concordanza di genere e numero di nomi nell'Infobox e, molto probabilmente, ho anche usato la forma verbale sbagliata del passato, fidandomi del traduttore, quindi la traduzione è stata davvero pessima. Ma non è questo il punto. Ella ha scritto un testo in russo sulla mia pagina di discussione. Il suo russo è terribile, anche se sulla sua pagina personale afferma di avere un livello medio di conoscenza della lingua. Ma ho capito la sostanza. Voleva che non scrivessi proprio niente nella Wikipedia italiana. Allo stesso tempo, il suo tono di espressione era estremamente ostile.

Le ho risposto in italiano, sottolineando l'inaccettabilità di tali richieste. Mi ha scritto di nuovo in russo e il significato della sua affermazione si è nuovamente ridotto al fatto che non sono il benvenuto su Wikipedia italiana.

Il 12 maggio ho nuovamente pubblicato articoli su Veniamin Necciaev e Pavel Rudakov. Questa volta ho completato la concordanza di genere e numero nell'Infobox e ho usato i verbi al passato remoto, quindi la traduzione è risultata migliore della precedente. Ella ha spostato questi articoli dallo spazio principale allo spazio delle bozze poche ore dopo. Poco prima, ho deciso di modificare questi articoli per includere collegamenti a questi film: Ne imej 100 rublej..., Ulica polna neožidannostej, Udar! Eščё udar!; quando ho fatto clic sul pulsante "Pubblica", ella aveva già spostato questi articoli allo spazio delle bozze, per questo motivo le mie correzioni sono stati salvato non come modifiche ma come nuovi articoli. Ella, ovviamente, ha cancellato anche quegli articoli e mi ha anche dato un divieto permanente. Me ne ha scritto sulla mia pagina di discussione e le ho detto che avrei sporto denuncia contro di lei (Sottolineo che si trattava di un ricorso contro le azioni dell'amministratore stesso, e non di una causa contro Wikipedia!). Dopo di che ha bloccato il mio account.

Le sue azioni sono un evidente abuso dei diritti di amministratore. Sì, non parlo italiano a livello madrelingua. Ma questa non è la base per vietare la creazione di nuovi articoli. Quello che mi ha scritto in russo sulla mia pagina di discussione è un'aggressione verbale, e questa aggressione non ha basi razionali. Sto modificando articoli in altre sezioni linguistiche di Wikipedia da un po' di tempo ormai. Ma questa è la prima volta che incontro un simile atteggiamento. Non puoi essere così ostile con gli "estranei"!

Chiedo di:

1) annullare il mio divieto permanente,

2) proibirle di scrivere qualsiasi cosa sulla mia pagina di discussione,

3) privarla Mastrocom diritti di amministratore."

Please reply here because I have possibility to communicate in Italian Wikipedia no more. K8M8S8 (talk) 16:33, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, today appears this alert in the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irko :

"This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view."

This article is created by fans all around the world through some years, in agree with Wikipedia's policy. Can you remove this alert? All the informations and facts described in are true and reliable.

Thanks for your loyalty.

Massimo Mabat ybm (talk) 16:17, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]