User talk:VocalIndia

An article having poor grammar or otherwise being poorly written is no reason to perform a unilateral draftification. Please study the guidelines at WP:DRAFTIFY, and in any case it would be best to refrain from performing such actions unless you are a WP:new page reviewer. --Paul_012 (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paul 012 No I dont agree your suggestion, her created articles are hard to understand. Why do you moved mainspace again? VocalIndia (talk) 08:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is ongoing regarding the notability of the shows aired on Asianet. An Indian editors opinion would be appreciated to shed some clarity on the matter. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Asianet. TheRedDomitor (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I find that you have some questions about FaHai's name. My native language is Chinese, so I think I can help you work it out (maybe can't LMAO). FaHai's born name is 裴文德 (the character"裴" is his surname and "文德" is his first name). Fahai is his religious name. (zh:金山法海) In Chinese culture, the religious name does not have its own surname. By the way, we use blank in some Chinese naming system because we need to distinguish surname from first name. For instance, you can refer to Jianzhen and Xuanzang.--波斯波莉斯 (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

波斯波莉斯, Thank you so much for your answer. Please kindly vote at talk:Fa Hai. VocalIndia (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xu Xian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immortal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello VocalIndia,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Si Thu Moe Min(War Eagle) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 21:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

John B123 This is not my creation. You should go and tell this to the article creator. I'm trying to speedy delete this trash with Db-person but the creator removed tag again again....Pls help me. VocalIndia (talk) 02:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VocalIndia. I think there must have been a conflict between you moving it to draft and my nomination for deletion. I'll keep my eye on it incase the creator moves it back to mainspace. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 08:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability has not been demonstrated. Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yelena Malysheva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yelena Malysheva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VocalIndia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 09:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Jukes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 02:11, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fan Lihua, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jintong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jintong (mythology) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear admin Rosguill, this is not my mistake. That contents (two sentences) was taken from Yunü, see that page's edit history for attribution (WP:CWW). see. I did not know that content was a copyvio. I think this is a copyright violation of Yunu's creator. So you also need to remove that copyvio content in Yunu article. You are accusing me of wrongdoing. I'm understanding the rules of Wikipedia as well. Thanks. Happy New Year! VocalIndia (talk) 02:44, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I cleaned copyvio in the Yunu article for you. VocalIndia (talk) 02:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All good then. In the future, these misunderstandings can be avoided by specifically stating in the edit summary that you're copying internally from another article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 02:59, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi VocalIndia! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Major protect is needed, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Princess Deokhye into Sō Takeyuki. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa, hello dear, I've already explained in the page's edit history , see. Regards VocalIndia (talk) 17:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I put it in the edit history and then put in "Attribution" section in the two relevant articles. I do it like this: Text and references copied from [[Douglas A-4 Skyhawk]] to [[Attack on HMS Invincible]], See former article's history for a list of contributors. Cheers. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I wasn't looking at who did what, simply that the information was uncited. I see you've added a tag. Thanks for doing that. And, btw, didn't see you're note on the talk page (for some reason my little bell at the top of the page didn't inform me of it). Thanks for taking care of this. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Thanks for your kind! you are one of my idols on Wikipedia. see my user page. Take care. Regard VocalIndia (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your little change, entitled "Nonsense" removed an AfD nomination, but you appeared to have changed the article also.

I'm not sure if that's ok or not.

From a newbie, xdude (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VocalIndia,

Thank you for creating Miaozhuang Wang.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please reword section that are identical to text at https://aminoapps.com/c/pagans-witches/page/item/guanyin/G5vd_DJgtVIJjV3MxnvkN6qeQQnBLR8lMqG

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 01:53, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra: Thanks for reviewing my articles. These content taken from Guanyin#Miaoshan, see that page's edit history for attribution (WP:CWW). I already explained in the page's edit summary [1]! This [2] web is WP:MIRROR of Guanyin Wikipedia page. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 03:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok thank you. I’ll remove the tag in that case. If you leave a note on the article talk page about attribution/copyright it will probably be easier to spot. All the best Mccapra (talk) 03:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zhu Rongjun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happy Camp.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Wang Xuanfu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:30, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing Thuzar Wint Lwin's page and you suddenly appeared there, haha. Thank you for your additional contributions. --Whopeehere (talk) 06:12, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whopeehere:, Hi bro! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you so much for your contributions on Thuzar! You look like a Burmese editor, right ? Pls create more Burmese articles because there are very rare Burmese editors on en-Wikipedia due to the coup d'etat in your country. Sorry to hear that. I hope you're safe. Keep up your nice works on Wiki. If you need my help, sure i will help you. VocalIndia (talk) 06:24, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice interacting with you on AFD discussion. Have a good day!! 🌞 Powerful Karma (talk) 02:37, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Powerful Karma: Ha ha Yes!! We are come from same nation and same sexual orientation. I'm really nice to know you. I'm sorry for my misunderstanding on you. Pls be Take care due to the recent Covid-19 outbreak in India. Best regards VocalIndia (talk) 02:59, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is a standalone stub article really necessary? Especially when there is already Xiyue Temple, which describe the same fact in reverse, i.e. temple is built to worship the deity vis-as-vis there is this deity which has this temple. – robertsky (talk) 18:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Robertsky, Hi... Yes really necessary because he is the one of the five great mountain gods. He has own number of stories and legends. I will expand on near future but now I'm busy due to my work in real life. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  VocalIndia, hmmm... i wonder what kind of stories can be included to expand on this article. Even at zh.wp or Baike, it is really bare. – robertsky (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal.....because i'm new in wikipedia.....If you don't mind, may i know how to know the result of Afd? Ningsih ODINN (talk) 23:51, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Ningsih ODINN, the AfD discussion is closed after 7days. VocalIndia (talk) 03:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Owh ok, is that always 1 week? or not? Ningsih ODINN (talk) 03:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

yes true. VocalIndia (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal, i found out about Kim Bo-hyon...so i think, if he was the grandfather of the country/dynasty's founder (ex. Yi Chun who was the grandfather of Taejo of Joseon, the founder of Joseon dynasty, etc.) can be important because they maybe help their grandson to established those new country/dynasty or doing an important jobs for them, so they can be a really important person for those country's formation....that's just my opinion, so sorry before if this is not clear. Ningsih ODINN (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ningsih ODINN, can you give your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Bo-hyon?, Have you found some Korean reliable source for him? Pls show them. VocalIndia (talk) 07:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal, how's Kim Bo-hyon's article? Is Keep? or no?...btw, i recently make Han Derang, the most influence minister during Emperor Jingzong of Liao, Emperor Shengzong of Liao's reign and is portrayed by Shawn Dou in The Legend of Xiao Chuo's series. About his article, if you know and speak in chinese, could you please help me to make it more better? Ningsih ODINN (talk) 03:10, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ningsih ODINN, I hope you are doing well. AfD result of Kim Bo-hyon was no consensus, it is means keep for now but not sure in the future. If you have any source for him, pls add in the article. For Han Derang, I will edit as much as i can. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 05:39, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Btw I saw this historical series on FB a few days ago. I'm in very interesting. I'm going to watch that series today. Have you watched this series? Is this series good or not? VocalIndia (talk) 05:44, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ningsih ODINN I just watching this series. I love this series very much at early. After I watched ep 20, I don't watch anymore. The king is very disgusting. How could he be so unfaithful? VocalIndia (talk) 02:44, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean West Palace?....If this what you mean, i'm already watch until episode 30, but for the next episode, i didn't see it...as a historical period drama, i think it's reasonable...so for me, i didn't problem with this.. Ningsih ODINN (talk) 03:16, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I mean The Legend of Xiao Chuo😭 VocalIndia (talk) 03:19, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi vocal, i've already re-make the articles Wanyang Budaebuin, could you please help to look and check it if maybe there are missing info or wrong references? And for Legend of Xiao Chuo, sorry before cuz i didn't see it clearly and my answer is YES, King Mingyi is very unfaithful but maybe he likes that because has his own reason and just not for his heart. Even so, he didn't mad if Han Derang hate him because he know what's the result if he choose this.....so i think you must seeing that series until the end episode or just until episode 41 it's fine, and then you can know what's his hope to the Liao dynasty around this year in the series😊...thx! Ningsih ODINN (talk) 11:12, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ningsih ODINN the re-make article is Ok but copyedit is needed. So I've tagged for you. Sorry for delay my reply as I am studying this month and don't have time to work in Wikipedia. Now, I'm back. VocalIndia (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thx so much!...sorry for disturb your study time... Ningsih ODINN (talk) 06:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vocal, can you please looking into Han Kuangsi and Sin Don (TV series)?, thx Ningsih ODINN (talk) 05:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ningsih ODINN:, sorry for the late response. Thanks for your creation of Han Kuangsi. It is amazing work! All of his sons were notable. You should create them as stub articles. Cheers VocalIndia (talk) 16:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ratnahastin(t.c) 05:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khet Singh Khangar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 13:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the information is hard to understand because it's badly translated, but a lot of it can be found here: https://en.thatsbooks.com/CNWZS/24130.jhtml

--Menacinghat (talk) 21:39, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also can't read it. VocalIndia (talk) 04:58, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VocalIndia,

Thank you for creating Yelü Zhimo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs more information, with supporting translation, to meet notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Whiteguru He was King of Ning (Ningwang), a major dukedom in Lao. You can see him in The Legend of Xiao Chuo and you will know how important he was.! Clearly passes WP:NPOL. VocalIndia (talk) 11:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  It is courtesy to supply footnotes or translation in notes instead of sending reviewers to Google Translate. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:00, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whiteguru Thank you. Search with 耶律只没(宁王) on Google. VocalIndia (talk) 12:10, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Whiteguru, If you don't mind pls kindly review Hei Fengguai. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for “defending” article I wrote! It’s an article about a Maya ruler. 🙂 P. S. I see you’re a gay from a traditional Indian family. As a someone quite liberal regarding sexuality, living in more liberal part of the world, I fully support your decision to be as free as possible. It’s a personal message, but I believe you‘ll understand. Miha (talk) 23:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mychele Trempetich Thank. You are very kind. VocalIndia (talk) 01:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DrKay. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Royal Consort Gwiin Jo that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. This is a personal attack. There is no bullying there. Your accusation is offensive and insulting. DrKay (talk) 20:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• wait! DrKay Saying “pls don’t bullying other” is personal attack? Oh my god! How? Wikipedia is not sensitive world. I’m shocked really — saying someone to “pls don’t bullying” is attack. LoL. I can die with this word. I’ve never seen. Very joke. I say it you really bullying to Maria with over action. Why so serious? VocalIndia (talk) 03:54, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 18:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VocalIndia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After a long period of self-consideration, I realized I was wrong. I know i need to control my temper. According to previous ban, I said a user to “pls don’t bullying other” and then I was banned from Wikipedia. I was very upset and dissatisfied for banned and left from Wikipedia for a long time (nearly 8 months). My accusation to a user was offensiv, so I want to apologize. Now I'm back and pretty sure I can't left again from Wikipedia community as I'm addict on creating Chinese mythology articles. I just believe that I can down my temper and will communicate to other users carefully. What I can promise is that it won't happen again in the future. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 17:15, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This only addresses part of the reason for your block. You need to address all the concerns that lead to your block. Yamla (talk) 19:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VocalIndia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to appeal my indefinite block from editing on Wikipedia. I understand that my behavior was deemed persistently disruptive, and I take full responsibility for my actions. I would like to sincerely apologize for any harm or disruption that I caused to the community. After a long period of self-reflection, I realize that I was wrong. I should have controlled my temper and refrained from making offensive remarks towards another user. I understand that my behavior was not acceptable and violated Wikipedia's policies. I left Wikipedia for one year because I was upset and dissatisfied with my ban. However, I have since returned and am committed to making positive contributions to the community. I believe that I can control my temper and communicate more effectively with other users. I understand that my previous making disruptive edits only addressed part of the reason for my block. I would like to assure the administrators that I have reflected on all of the concerns that led to my block and am willing to take steps to address them. Specifically, I plan to: *Review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines to ensure that I understand them thoroughly. *Seek out guidance from other experienced editors on how to interact constructively with other users. *Be more mindful of my tone and language when communicating with other users. *Respectfully engage in discussions and debates on articles and their contents. *Refrain from making disruptive edits and maintain neutrality and accuracy in my contributions. I understand that my behavior in the past was not in line with Wikipedia's values, and I am committed to making positive contributions and following all policies and guidelines moving forward. I ask that you consider my appeal and allow me the opportunity to contribute constructively to the Wikipedia community once again. Thank you for your consideration. I miss my articles so much. So pls let me edit these again. VocalIndia (talk) 07:52, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed block evasion as Taung Tan, strengthening block as a result. Yamla (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Instead of planning to review policy and guidelines, I suggest you use your time while blocked to review them now. PhilKnight (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PhilKnight, So how many time i need to wait ? VocalIndia (talk) 16:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you wait 6 months before making an unblock request, and this time do not evade your block by using another account. PhilKnight (talk) 17:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As per User talk:Taung Tan, this account is now considered compromised. WP:COMPROMISED applies and no further unblock requests should be considered. --Yamla (talk) 19:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taung Tan, I wanted to express my sincerest apologies for this problem. I truly didn't intend to cause any harm, and I am deeply sorry for any inconvenience I may have caused you. I appreciate your kind assistance in writing an unblock appeal behalf of me, but I have made the decision not to pursue the reinstatement of my account. Despite this, I will never forget the help you provided me and am grateful for your efforts. You have always been a guiding light and goddess to Wikipedia group. I intend to return with a new account.VocalIndia (talk) 23:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not return with a new account!!!!!! That would be block evasion via sockpuppetry. Curbon7 (talk) 23:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]