User talk:Wikikl

A tag has been placed on SENSE Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:01, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove "afc submssion" and "afc comment" templates from pages that whose names start with "Wikipedia talk:Articles for submission." I have restored the AFC draft template to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cordoba group. When you are ready for it to be reviewed, click the green "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" button. If you do not want to submit the page, don't worry. If the file remains unedited for 6 months, it will be automatically deleted as an "abandoned AFC submission." However, deleted abandoned AFC submissions can be un-deleted at any time on request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikkikl,
We checked all newspaper editions on that day, sadly the film was not there anywhere. They might have planned a release, which didn't happen. We need some valid proof to say that the film really got a release (blogs not accepted as per Wiki policy). So YouTube interview of director, or an official site of director or distributor or the theatre will do. till then we cannot include the film in the release list.
Anish Viswa 06:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A note for you was left here by an automated bot. I'm posting here in case you missed it. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:10, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anishlal may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Anishlal''' is an Indian [[cinematographer]] and [[Short film Director]]. who works in [[Hindi]], [[Malayalam] and Tamil cinema .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on SENSE Group, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 10:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anishlal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:33, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the additional comments I left at Talk:Anishlal. I looked at the other articles you started in the last month or two. They are seriously lacking in demonstrating that the people, films, books, etc. that you write about are notable. That's not to say that they are in fact not notable, only that you have not demonstrated that they notable. To demonstrate notability, you have to show that they have received significant coverage from reliable sources that are independent of the subject being covered. Please read WP:FIRST, WP:42, and the pages they link to and go back and improve these articles. If you do not, they are at risk for being nominated for deletion either through the proposed deletion or articles for deletion process. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the {{Prod blp/dated...}} template without adding any references from reliable sources. This template should not be removed until a reliable source reference is added. Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources for a definition of what is and is not a reliable source. Please read Wikipedia:Proposed deletion of biographies of living people#Objecting for information on what must be done before this template can be removed. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked that the account "Senseltd" be blocked to prevent its accidental use. This would be purely for administrative reasons and it would not be considered a reflection on you as an editor. See User talk:MBisanz#Senseltd. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sankar (film director) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

English-language references that are not dead links do not show significant coverage. Two awards do not have in-line references and are not found in the references I could read, and there is no indication that these awards are major enough to be a strong indicator of notability by themselves. His film's web site seems to be defunct.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If notability can be demonstrated by the non-English-language references that are not written by or on behalf of Sankar himself, please either add partial translations to the reference section of the article or add them to the article's talk page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:11, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Streetlight (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that the film is notable as defined by WP:FILM or WP:GNG, see Talk:Streetlight (film) for discussion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about the first book of an author of questionable notability. No indication that this book is notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:44, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Poopoloral has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only references are the author's blog and a copy of the book cover. No indication that the book is notable. Author's notability is also questionable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:46, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sankar (film director) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (film director) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:50, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poopoloral is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poopoloral until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 05:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ente Cineme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mukesh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 09:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Sankar (film director)#Merge in Sankar's non-notable works into Sankar (film director). davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ente Cineme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ente Cineme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:31, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be an incomplete article. To avoid situations like this, please use either a userspace draft or the new Draft: namespace to create new articles and move them only after they are complete and the draft clearly shows that the subject of the article meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Oru Pennum Parayathathu, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:36, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you plan on re-creating an article that was deleted due to an articles for deletion discussion and the result was "delete" you must either contact the administrator who deleted it and request undeletion or you may request a deletion review. You should NOT simply re-create the article. If this is not done, the re-created article will be "speedy deleted" as a "re-creation of a page that was deleted through a deletion discussion."

In the future, if you plan on re-creating an article that was deleted due to an "expired PROD" through the proposed-deletion process, you may request that it be undeleted by asking at WP:Requests for undeletion. You can use the same page to request the article be un-deleted if the article was deleted as a result of an "articles for deletion discussion" if the result was either "soft delete" or "delete, without prejudice for re-creation," or some similar outcome.

For articles which you have already re-created which would have been eligible for undeletion, there is no need for you to do anything unless you need to merge the content of the older version into the current version. In those cases, use the "requests for undeletion" process but ask that the old version be "history-merged" into the new version. Once the history-merge is complete you can go back and look at older edits and merge their content into the current edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidwr (talk • contribs) 19:43, 30 March 2014‎

Following up to my own remarks: I have requested that 2 of your recent re-creations, Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku and Poopoloral, be compared against the now-deleted versions and that Streetlight (2012) be compared against the deleted article Streetlight (film) to see if a history-merge is legally required for attribution purposes. If you were the only significant editor of the previous versions OR if the new versions were not substantially identical to the old version, the history merge will probably not be done for that particular article unless you make a specific request for it to be done. History-merges will not affect how the article looks, they will only add the older version's edit history to the current article's edit history so everyone can see who made which edit. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:08, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kaappi marangalkkidayile penkutty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:45, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikikl. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "cordoba group".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/cordoba group}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 06:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikikl,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oru valakilukkathinte Oarmakku .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Amortias (T)(C) 22:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aimnet, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:56, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priyappetta mammootty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyappetta mammootty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 19:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sankar (writer & director) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (writer & director). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KH-1 (talk) 04:07, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikikl. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:52, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on VR Sankar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sankar (writer & director). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. iMahesh (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Panachi Books requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. iMahesh (talk) 08:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikikl. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gvt.BHS Kanniakulangara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wikikl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gvt.BHS Kanniakulangara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]